pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20972 · v1 · pith:D2VYL4VKnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

In-Plane Ferromagnetism and Critical Dynamics in Alkali-Deficient K_(1-x)CrTe₂ (with x approx 0.3) Single Crystals

Catherine Witteveen , Felix Eder , Sara A. L\'opez-Paz , Vladimir Pomjakushin , Jonas A. Krieger , Zurab Guguchia , Harald O. Jeschke , Martin M{\aa}nsson
show 1 more author
Fabian O. von Rohr
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ferromagnetismvan der Waals magnetschromium telluridemagnetic anisotropyneutron diffractionalkali deficiencytwo-dimensional magnetism
0
0 comments X

The pith

Alkali-deficient K1-xCrTe2 crystals exhibit in-plane ferromagnetism with a sharp transition at 117 K and ferromagnetic alignment between layers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the synthesis of K1-xCrTe2 single crystals with x approximately 0.3 that adopt the Cm space group featuring trigonal prismatic coordination around the potassium ions. Magnetization data reveal a ferromagnetic transition at 117 K accompanied by clear in-plane magnetic anisotropy, while neutron diffraction directly confirms that chromium spins align ferromagnetically both within each layer and between adjacent layers. This ordering stands in contrast to the out-of-plane A-type antiferromagnetism reported for the more stoichiometric LiCrTe2 and NaCrTe2 compounds and instead resembles the behavior of CrTe2 itself. A reader would care because the results illustrate how alkali deficiency and the resulting structural changes can switch the preferred spin orientation and interlayer coupling in layered van der Waals magnets.

Core claim

Single crystals of K1-xCrTe2 with x approximately 0.3 crystallize in the Cm space group with trigonal prismatic K+ coordination. Magnetization measurements establish a sharp ferromagnetic transition at Tc equals 117 K together with in-plane anisotropy, corroborated by density functional theory. Neutron diffraction shows that the Cr spins order ferromagnetically within the layers and maintain ferromagnetic alignment between layers. This contrasts with the out-of-plane A-type antiferromagnetism of LiCrTe2 and NaCrTe2 but matches CrTe2, with the differences attributed to altered interlayer spacing, chromium oxidation state, or stacking sequence.

What carries the argument

The Cm space group structure with trigonal prismatic potassium coordination that alters interlayer spacing and stacking relative to the octahedral environments of stoichiometric ACrX2 compounds.

If this is right

  • AC susceptibility and muon spin rotation detect short-range order persisting above the 117 K transition.
  • Dynamic magnetic fluctuations appear below Tc.
  • The compound offers a composition-tunable platform for exploring spin orientation and effective dimensionality in two-dimensional magnets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Systematic variation of the alkali deficiency level x could map how interlayer coupling evolves across the ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic boundary.
  • The in-plane anisotropy may simplify device fabrication in planar geometries compared with out-of-plane systems.
  • Analogous deficiency engineering might be tested in other layered chromium chalcogenides to control magnetic order.

Load-bearing premise

The observed switch to in-plane ferromagnetism is caused by the specific Cm structure and trigonal prismatic coordination rather than by uncontrolled defects or impurities.

What would settle it

Neutron diffraction performed on a similarly deficient crystal that instead shows out-of-plane spin alignment would contradict the reported in-plane ferromagnetic order.

read the original abstract

Layered chromium tellurides are model systems for studying low-dimensional magnetism in van der Waals materials. We report the synthesis and characterization of K$_{1-x}$CrTe$_2$ single crystals ($x \approx 0.3$), which crystallize in the $Cm$ space group with trigonal prismatic K$^+$ coordination, unlike the octahedral environments of more stoichiometric ACrX$_2$ compounds. Magnetization measurements show a sharp ferromagnetic transition at $T_{\rm C}=117$ K and in-plane magnetic anisotropy, supported by density functional theory. Neutron diffraction reveals ferromagnetic alignment of Cr spins within and between layers. This contrasts with the out-of-plane A-type antiferromagnetism in LiCrTe$_2$ and NaCrTe$_2$, but resembles CrTe$_2$. These differences likely arise from changes in interlayer spacing, Cr oxidation state, or stacking. AC susceptibility and $\mu$SR indicate short-range order above $T_{\rm C}$ and dynamic behavior below. Overall, K$_{1-x}$CrTe$_2$ provides a tunable platform for studying spin orientation and dimensionality in two-dimensional magnets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of alkali-deficient K_{1-x}CrTe_2 (x ≈ 0.3) single crystals that crystallize in the Cm space group with trigonal prismatic K^+ coordination. Magnetization measurements establish a sharp ferromagnetic transition at T_C = 117 K with in-plane anisotropy, supported by DFT calculations. Neutron diffraction confirms ferromagnetic alignment of Cr spins both within and between layers. This contrasts with the out-of-plane A-type antiferromagnetism in LiCrTe_2 and NaCrTe_2 but resembles CrTe_2; the differences are attributed to changes in interlayer spacing, Cr oxidation state, or stacking. AC susceptibility and μSR data indicate short-range order above T_C and dynamic behavior below T_C.

Significance. If the central observations hold, the work adds a tunable van der Waals platform for studying in-plane ferromagnetism and spin dynamics in layered chromium tellurides. The combination of bulk magnetization, neutron diffraction, AC susceptibility, and μSR provides multi-probe support for the transition temperature, anisotropy, and spin alignment, which is a strength. The structural distinction from stoichiometric analogs and its correlation with magnetic order could inform design principles for 2D magnets with controlled spin orientation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and magnetization measurements] Abstract and magnetization section: the reported T_C = 117 K is presented without error bars or explicit description of the fitting procedure (e.g., derivative of M(T) or Arrott-plot analysis) used to extract the transition temperature from the raw data. This detail is needed to evaluate the sharpness and precision of the claimed ferromagnetic transition.
  2. [Neutron diffraction] Neutron diffraction section: the claim of ferromagnetic alignment both within and between layers is central, yet the text does not report the refined magnetic moment magnitude, the magnetic propagation vector, or the goodness-of-fit metrics for the magnetic structure model. These quantities are required to substantiate the intra- and inter-layer ferromagnetic order against possible alternative models.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] The attribution of magnetic differences to interlayer spacing or oxidation state is presented as plausible inference; a quantitative comparison of the refined lattice parameters or bond lengths with LiCrTe_2/NaCrTe_2 would make this discussion more concrete.
  2. [Methods and figures] Figure captions and methods should include the precise value of x determined by chemical analysis or refinement, along with any uncertainty, rather than the approximate x ≈ 0.3.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive recommendation of minor revision. We address each of the major comments point by point below and will update the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and quantitative details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and magnetization measurements] Abstract and magnetization section: the reported T_C = 117 K is presented without error bars or explicit description of the fitting procedure (e.g., derivative of M(T) or Arrott-plot analysis) used to extract the transition temperature from the raw data. This detail is needed to evaluate the sharpness and precision of the claimed ferromagnetic transition.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. The reported T_C was determined from the minimum in dM/dT of the field-cooled magnetization curve. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly describe this procedure, report T_C with uncertainty derived from the width of the derivative peak, and include error bars on the quoted value to allow readers to assess the sharpness and precision of the transition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Neutron diffraction] Neutron diffraction section: the claim of ferromagnetic alignment both within and between layers is central, yet the text does not report the refined magnetic moment magnitude, the magnetic propagation vector, or the goodness-of-fit metrics for the magnetic structure model. These quantities are required to substantiate the intra- and inter-layer ferromagnetic order against possible alternative models.

    Authors: We agree that these quantitative metrics are important for rigor. The magnetic structure was refined in the Cm space group with propagation vector (0,0,0). In the revised manuscript we will report the refined Cr magnetic moment, explicitly state the propagation vector, and include the goodness-of-fit indicators (e.g., R_wp or χ²) for the magnetic model so that the intra- and inter-layer ferromagnetic order can be evaluated against alternatives. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on direct experimental measurements including magnetization data establishing a sharp ferromagnetic transition at Tc=117 K with in-plane anisotropy, neutron diffraction confirming ferromagnetic Cr spin alignment within and between layers, and supporting probes such as AC susceptibility and μSR. Standard density functional theory calculations provide corroboration without any reported self-referential fitting or prediction loops. Structural assignment to the Cm space group and inferences about differences versus LiCrTe2/NaCrTe2 are presented as observations and plausible interpretations from interlayer spacing and coordination, not as outputs derived from the target results themselves. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to inputs, self-citations, or ansatzes; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental interpretation and DFT without new free parameters or postulated entities beyond the measured composition.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard interpretation of neutron diffraction data for determining ferromagnetic spin alignment in layered compounds
    Invoked to conclude FM order within and between layers from the diffraction results.
  • domain assumption DFT calculations reliably predict magnetic anisotropy direction in these tellurides
    Used to support the in-plane anisotropy observation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5802 in / 1469 out tokens · 56784 ms · 2026-05-21T04:09:58.852814+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shacklette, T

    L. Shacklette, T. Jow, L. Townsend, Rechargeable electrodes from sodium cobalt bronzes.J. Electrochem. Soc.135, 2669–2674 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    Y. Wang, N. S. Rogado, R. J. Cava, N. P. Ong, Spin entropy as the likely source of enhanced thermopower in NaxCo2O4.Nature423, 425–428 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Terasaki, Y

    I. Terasaki, Y. Sasago, K. Uchinokura, Large thermoelectric power in NaCo2O4 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B56, R12685–R12687 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    M. L. Foo, Y. Wang, S. Watauchi, H. Zandbergen, T. He, R. Cava, N. Ong, Charge ordering, commensurability, and metallicity in the phase diagram of the layered Na xCoO2.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 247001 (2004)

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    Roger, D

    M. Roger, D. Morris, D. Tennant, M. Gutmann, J. Goff, J.-U. Hoffmann, R. Feyerherm, E. Dudzik, D. Prabhakaran, A. Boothroyd,et al., Patterning of sodium ions and the control of electrons in sodium cobaltate.Nature445, 631–634 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Schulze, P

    T. Schulze, P. H ¨afliger, C. Niedermayer, K. Mattenberger, S. Bubenhofer, B. Batlogg, Direct link between low-temperature magnetism and high-temperature sodium order in Na xCoO2. Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 026407 (2008). 17

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Medarde, M

    M. Medarde, M. Mena, J. Gavilano, E. Pomjakushina, J. Sugiyama, K. Kamazawa, V. Y. Pomjakushin, D. Sheptyakov, B. Batlogg, H. Ott,et al., 1D to 2D Na+ ion diffusion inherently linked to structural transitions in Na0.7CoO2.Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 266401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Takada, H

    K. Takada, H. Sakurai, E. Takayama-Muromachi, F. Izumi, R. A. Dilanian, T. Sasaki, Super- conductivity in two-dimensional CoO2 layers.Nature422, 53–55 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Schaak, T

    R. Schaak, T. Klimczuk, M. L. Foo, R. J. Cava, Superconductivity phase diagram of NaxCoO2· 1.3 H2O.Nature424, 527–529 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    T ´oth, B

    S. T ´oth, B. Wehinger, K. Rolfs, T. Birol, U. Stuhr, H. Takatsu, K. Kimura, T. Kimura, H. M. Rønnow, C. R¨ uegg, Electromagnon dispersion probed by inelastic x-ray scattering in LiCrO2. Nat. Commun.7, 13547 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Sugiyama, K

    J. Sugiyama, K. Mukai, Y. Ikedo, H. Nozaki, M. M˚ansson, I. Watanabe, Li diffusion in LixCoO2 probed by muon-spin spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 147601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Nocerino, S

    E. Nocerino, S. Kobayashi, C. Witteveen, O. K. Forslund, N. Matsubara, C. Tang, T. Matsukawa, A. Hoshikawa, A. Koda, K. Yoshimura,et al., Competition between magnetic interactions and structural instabilities leading to itinerant frustration in the triangular lattice antiferromagnet LiCrSe2.Comm. Mater.4, 81 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Kobayashi, N

    S. Kobayashi, N. Katayama, T. Manjo, H. Ueda, C. Michioka, J. Sugiyama, Y. Sassa, O. K. Forslund, M. M˚ansson, K. Yoshimura,et al., Linear trimer formation with antiferromagnetic or- dering in 1T-CrSe2 originating from Peierls-like instabilities and interlayer Se–Se interactions. Inorg. Chem.58, 14304–14315 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [15]

    X. Song, G. Cheng, D. Weber, F. Pielnhofer, S. Lei, S. Klemenz, Y.-W. Yeh, K. A. Filsinger, C. B. Arnold, N. Yao,et al., Soft chemical synthesis of HxCrS2: an antiferromagnetic material with alternating amorphous and crystalline layers.J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 15634–15640 (2019). 18

    work page 2019

  15. [17]

    W. Xu, S. Ali, Y. Jin, X. Wu, H. Xu, Intrinsic ferromagnetic semiconductors in two-dimensional alkali-based chromium chalcogenides.ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.2, 3853–3858 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [18]

    Huang, B

    J. Huang, B. Shi, F. Pan, J. Wang, J. Liu, D. Xu, H. Zhang, T. Xia, P. Cheng, Anisotropic magnetic properties and tunable conductivity in two-dimensional layered NaCrX2 (X= Te, Se, S) single crystals.Phys. Rev. Mater.6, 094013 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [19]

    F. Eder, C. Witteveen, E. Giannini, F. O. von Rohr, Structural modulation and enhanced magnetic ordering in incommensurate K1 –xCrSe2 crystals.J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 4896-4903 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [20]

    F. Eder, C. Witteveen, E. Giannini, F. O. von Rohr, Stoichiometry and phase control in K1 –xCrSe2 via self-flux synthesis.Chem. Mater.37, 9204–9211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [21]

    Lafond, A

    A. Lafond, A. Meerschaut, J. Rouxel, J. L. Tholence, A. Sulpice, Spin-glass-like behavior of the incommensurate composite phase LaCrS3.Phys. Rev. B52, 1112–1119 (1995)

    work page 1995

  20. [22]

    Engelsman, G

    F. Engelsman, G. Wiegers, F. Jellinek, B. Van Laar, Crystal structures and magnetic structures of some metal (I) chromium (III) sulfides and selenides.J. Solid State Chem.6, 574–582 (1973)

    work page 1973

  21. [23]

    Witteveen, E

    C. Witteveen, E. Nocerino, S. A. L ´opez-Paz, H. O. Jeschke, V. Y. Pomjakushin, M. M˚ansson, F. O. von Rohr, Synthesis and anisotropic magnetic properties of LiCrTe2 single crystals with a triangular-lattice antiferromagnetic structure.J. Phys. Mater.6, 035001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [24]

    D. C. Freitas, R. Weht, A. Sulpice, G. Remenyi, P. Strobel, F. Gay, J. Marcus, M. N´ u ˜nez- Regueiro, Ferromagnetism in layered metastable 1T-CrTe 2.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 176002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [25]

    K. D. R ¨oseler, C. Witteveen, C. Besnard, V. Pomjakushin, H. O. Jeschke, F. O. von Rohr, Efficient soft-chemical synthesis of large van-der-Waals crystals of the room-temperature ferromagnet 1T-CrTe2.J. Mater. Chem. A13, 15798-15809 (2025). 19

    work page 2025

  24. [26]

    Prasad, Z

    K. Prasad, Z. Hubble, D. Upreti, P. Karki, J. Hu, K. Ambal, J. Wang, Studies of KCrTe 2 and its conversion to easy-peel 1T-CrTe2.ChemPhysChem27, e202500759 (2026)

    work page 2026

  25. [27]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary material

    work page

  26. [28]

    Nocerino, C

    E. Nocerino, C. Witteveen, S. Kobayashi, O. K. Forslund, N. Matsubara, A. Zubayer, F. Mazza, S. Kawaguchi, A. Hoshikawa, I. Umegaki,et al., Nuclear and magnetic spin structure of the antiferromagnetic triangular lattice compound LiCrTe 2 investigated by𝜇 +SR, neutron and X-ray diffraction.Sci. Rep.12, 21657 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [29]

    Kobayashi, H

    S. Kobayashi, H. Ueda, C. Michioka, K. Yoshimura, Competition between the direct ex- change interaction and superexchange interaction in layered compounds LiCrSe2, LiCrTe2, and NaCrTe2 with a triangular lattice.Inorg. Chem.55, 7407–7413 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [30]

    X. Song, S. N. Schneider, G. Cheng, J. F. Khoury, M. Jovanovic, N. Yao, L. M. Schoop, Kinetics and evolution of magnetism in soft-chemical synthesis of CrSe 2 from KCrSe2.Chem. Mater. 33, 8070–8078 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [31]

    Ushakov, D

    A. Ushakov, D. Kukusta, A. Yaresko, D. Khomskii, Magnetism of layered chromium sulfides MCrS2 (M= Li, Na, K, Ag, and Au): A first-principles study.Phys. Rev. B87, 014418 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [32]

    Y. Ono, R. Ishikawa, Y. Miyazaki, Y. Ishii, Y. Morii, T. Kajitani, Crystal structure, electric and magnetic properties of layered cobaltite𝛽-Na xCoO2.J. Solid State Chem.166, 177–181 (2002)

    work page 2002

  31. [33]

    Miyazaki, N

    Y. Miyazaki, N. Igawa, K. Yubuta, Incommensurately modulated crystal structure of𝛼 ′(O’3)- type sodium cobalt oxide NaxCoO2 (𝑥∼0.78).Acta Cryst. B77, 371–377 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [34]

    Van Bruggen, J

    C. Van Bruggen, J. Bloembergen, A. Bos-Alberink, G. Wiegers, Magnetic and electrical properties related to structural transitions in Na xVS2 and NaxVSe2.J. Less Common Met.60, 259–282 (1978)

    work page 1978

  33. [35]

    Wiegers, Physical properties of first-row transition metal dichalcogenides and their interca- lates.Physica B+C99, 151–165 (1980)

    G. Wiegers, Physical properties of first-row transition metal dichalcogenides and their interca- lates.Physica B+C99, 151–165 (1980). 20

    work page 1980

  34. [36]

    K. G. Nikiforov, Magnetically ordered multinary semiconductors.Prog. Cryst. Growth Char- act. Mater.39, 1–104 (1999)

    work page 1999

  35. [37]

    S. A. L ´opez-Paz, Z. Guguchia, V. Y. Pomjakushin, C. Witteveen, A. Cervellino, H. Luetkens, N. Casati, A. F. Morpurgo, F. O. von Rohr, Dynamic magnetic crossover at the origin of the hidden-order in van der Waals antiferromagnet CrSBr.Nat. Commun.13, 4745 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [38]

    Koepernik, H

    K. Koepernik, H. Eschrig, Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band- structure scheme.Phys. Rev. B59, 1743–1757 (1999)

    work page 1999

  37. [39]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    work page 1996

  38. [40]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators.Phys. Rev. B52, R5467–R5470 (1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [41]

    Nordheim, Zur Elektronentheorie der Metalle

    L. Nordheim, Zur Elektronentheorie der Metalle. I.Annalen der Physik401, 607–640 (1931)

    work page 1931

  40. [42]

    Iqbal, T

    Y. Iqbal, T. M¨ uller, K. Riedl, J. Reuther, S. Rachel, R. Valent´ı, M. J. P. Gingras, R. Thomale, H. O. Jeschke, Signatures of a gearwheel quantum spin liquid in a spin-1 2 pyrochlore molybdate heisenberg antiferromagnet.Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 071201(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [43]

    Hering, F

    M. Hering, F. Ferrari, A. Razpopov, I. I. Mazin, R. Valent ´ı, H. O. Jeschke, J. Reuther, Phase diagram of a distorted kagome antiferromagnet and application to Y-kapellasite.npj Comput. Mater.8, 10 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [44]

    Ghosh, Y

    P. Ghosh, Y. Iqbal, T. M¨ uller, R. T. Ponnaganti, R. Thomale, R. Narayanan, J. Reuther, M. J. P. Gingras, H. O. Jeschke, Breathing chromium spinels: a showcase for a variety of pyrochlore Heisenberg Hamiltonians.npj Quantum Mater.4, 63 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [45]

    X. Guo, W. Liu, J. Schwartz, S. H. Sung, D. Zhang, M. Shimizu, A. L. N. Kondusamy, L. Li, K. Sun, H. Deng, H. O. Jeschke, I. I. Mazin, R. Hovden, B. Lv, L. Zhao, Extraordinary phase transition revealed in a van der Waals antiferromagnet.Nat. Commun.15, 6472 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [46]

    L. D. C. Jaubert, Y. Iqbal, H. O. Jeschke, Spin-peierls transition in the frustrated spinels ZnCr2O4 and MgCr2O4.Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 086702 (2025). 21

    work page 2025

  45. [47]

    G. J. Nilsen, R. Wawrzy´nczak, H. O. Jeschke, H. Mutka, T. Masuda, N. Casati, V. Pomjakushin, Z. Hiroi, Y. Okamoto, Spin waves and magnetic hamiltonian in the low-temperature phase of liincr4o8.Phys. Rev. B112, L020403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [48]

    Mizokawa, A

    T. Mizokawa, A. Fujimori, Electronic structure and orbital ordering in perovskite-type 3d transition-metal oxides studied by Hartree-Fock band-structure calculations.Phys. Rev. B54, 5368–5380 (1996)

    work page 1996

  47. [49]

    Yasuda, S

    C. Yasuda, S. Todo, K. Hukushima, F. Alet, M. Keller, M. Troyer, H. Takayama, N ´eel tem- perature of quasi-low-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnets.Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 217201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  48. [50]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Gu, L. Wang, L.-L. Huang, Y. Fu, C. Liu, S. Wang, H. Su, J.-W. Mei, X. Zou, J.-F. Dai, Pressure-enhanced ferromagnetism in layered CrSiTe3 flakes.Nano Lett.21, 7946-7952 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [51]

    Valenta, M

    J. Valenta, M. Kratochv´ılov´a, M. M´ıˇsek, K. Carva, J. Kaˇstil, P. Doleˇ zal, P. Opletal, P.ˇCerm´ak, P. Proschek, K. Uhl´ıˇrov´a,et al., Pressure-induced large increase of Curie temperature of the van der Waals ferromagnet VI3.Phys. Rev. B103, 054424 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [52]

    Nocerino, J

    E. Nocerino, J. Sugiyama, O. K. Forslund, I. Umegaki, S. Kobayashi, K. Yoshimura, Y. Sassa, M. M˚ansson, Cr-Cr distance and magnetism in the phase diagram of triangular lattice antifer- romagnets: A systematic comparative study.Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 084403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [53]

    P. C. Canfield, T. Kong, U. S. Kaluarachchi, N. H. Jo, Use of frit-disc crucibles for routine and exploratory solution growth of single crystalline samples.Phil. Mag.96, 84–92 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [54]

    Agilent Technologies Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England

    Agilent, CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies Ltd, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England. (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [55]

    Fischer, G

    P. Fischer, G. Frey, M. Koch, M. K¨onnecke, V. Pomjakushin, J. Schefer, R. Thut, N. Schlumpf, R. B¨ urge, U. Greuter,et al., High-resolution powder diffractometer HRPT for thermal neutrons at SINQ.Physica B276, 146–147 (2000)

    work page 2000

  54. [56]

    Rodr´ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction.Physica B: Condensed Matter192, 55–69 (1993)

    J. Rodr´ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction.Physica B: Condensed Matter192, 55–69 (1993). 22

    work page 1993

  55. [57]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, B. J. Campbell, ISODISTORT, ISOTROPY Software Suite

    work page

  56. [58]

    Amato, H

    A. Amato, H. Luetkens, K. Sedlak, A. Stoykov, R. Scheuermann, M. Elender, A. Raselli, D. Graf, The new versatile general purpose surface-muon instrument (GPS) based on silicon photomultipliers for𝜇SR measurements on a continuous-wave beam.Rev. Sci. Instrum.88 (2017). Acknowledgments The authors thank Enrico Giannini for helpful discussions about the magne...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20291736 2017