Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Distributed inference for quantile regression processes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.06088 v3 pith:D3KPJHNM submitted 2017-01-21 math.ST stat.MEstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords quantilestatisticalcomputationalconditionaldistributedinferenceregressionapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increased availability of massive data sets provides a unique opportunity to discover subtle patterns in their distributions, but also imposes overwhelming computational challenges. To fully utilize the information contained in big data, we propose a two-step procedure: (i) estimate conditional quantile functions at different levels in a parallel computing environment; (ii) construct a conditional quantile regression process through projection based on these estimated quantile curves. Our general quantile regression framework covers both linear models with fixed or growing dimension and series approximation models. We prove that the proposed procedure does not sacrifice any statistical inferential accuracy provided that the number of distributed computing units and quantile levels are chosen properly. In particular, a sharp upper bound for the former and a sharp lower bound for the latter are derived to capture the minimal computational cost from a statistical perspective. As an important application, the statistical inference on conditional distribution functions is considered. Moreover, we propose computationally efficient approaches to conducting inference in the distributed estimation setting described above. Those approaches directly utilize the availability of estimators from sub-samples and can be carried out at almost no additional computational cost. Simulations confirm our statistical inferential theory.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools