ReXTime: A Benchmark Suite for Reasoning-Across-Time in Videos
Reviewed by Pithpith:D3MO3SCNopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
We introduce ReXTime, a benchmark designed to rigorously test AI models' ability to perform temporal reasoning within video events. Specifically, ReXTime focuses on reasoning across time, i.e. human-like understanding when the question and its corresponding answer occur in different video segments. This form of reasoning, requiring advanced understanding of cause-and-effect relationships across video segments, poses significant challenges to even the frontier multimodal large language models. To facilitate this evaluation, we develop an automated pipeline for generating temporal reasoning question-answer pairs, significantly reducing the need for labor-intensive manual annotations. Our benchmark includes 921 carefully vetted validation samples and 2,143 test samples, each manually curated for accuracy and relevance. Evaluation results show that while frontier large language models outperform academic models, they still lag behind human performance by a significant 14.3% accuracy gap. Additionally, our pipeline creates a training dataset of 9,695 machine generated samples without manual effort, which empirical studies suggest can enhance the across-time reasoning via fine-tuning.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
DynFrame: Adaptive Reasoning-Driven Multimodal Framework with Dynamic Frame Augmentation for Complex Video Understanding
DynFrame introduces tokenized learnable span-density retrieval and Segment-Decoupled GRPO in video MLLMs, achieving competitive or SOTA results on six benchmarks with 4B and 8B models.
-
EgoCoT-Bench: Benchmarking Grounded and Verifiable Operation-Centric Chain of Thought Reasoning for MLLMs
EgoCoT-Bench provides 3,172 verifiable QA pairs across perception, anticipation, and reasoning tasks on egocentric videos, revealing that many MLLMs give answer-correct but evidence-inconsistent explanations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.