REVIEW 1 cited by
What Do We Get from Two-Way Fixed Effects Regressions? Implications from Numerical Equivalence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper develops numerical and causal interpretations of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in settings with nonbinary, nonstaggered treatments and time-varying covariates. Using the equivalence between TWFE and pooled first-difference (FD) regressions, I express the TWFE coefficient as a weighted average of FD coefficients across all horizons, clarifying how short- and long-run changes contribute to the estimate. Causal interpretation of the TWFE coefficient relies on common trends assumptions at all horizons simultaneously, whereas each FD coefficient relies on the assumption only at its own horizon. This structure opens the identifying assumptions to empirical scrutiny: I propose diagnostic procedures that assess common trends horizon by horizon, and illustrate them by reexamining TWFE estimates of minimum-wage effects on employment.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed
A robust DID estimator recovers path-dependent treatment effects with partially missing treatment histories whenever any two of outcome, propensity, and missingness models are correct.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.