Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What Do We Get from Two-Way Fixed Effects Regressions? Implications from Numerical Equivalence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.12374 v11 pith:D4BRQMZO submitted 2021-03-23 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords twfecoefficienteffectshorizonregressionsassumptionscausalcommon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper develops numerical and causal interpretations of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in settings with nonbinary, nonstaggered treatments and time-varying covariates. Using the equivalence between TWFE and pooled first-difference (FD) regressions, I express the TWFE coefficient as a weighted average of FD coefficients across all horizons, clarifying how short- and long-run changes contribute to the estimate. Causal interpretation of the TWFE coefficient relies on common trends assumptions at all horizons simultaneously, whereas each FD coefficient relies on the assumption only at its own horizon. This structure opens the identifying assumptions to empirical scrutiny: I propose diagnostic procedures that assess common trends horizon by horizon, and illustrate them by reexamining TWFE estimates of minimum-wage effects on employment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed

    econ.EM 2025-01 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A robust DID estimator recovers path-dependent treatment effects with partially missing treatment histories whenever any two of outcome, propensity, and missingness models are correct.

Pith tools