Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Agentic Feedback Loop Modeling Improves Recommendation and User Simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.20027 v2 pith:D4ND53SQ submitted 2024-10-26 cs.IR cs.AI

classification cs.IRcs.AI
keywords agentuserrecommendationfeedbackloopagenticagentsextensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language model-based agents are increasingly applied in the recommendation field due to their extensive knowledge and strong planning capabilities. While prior research has primarily focused on enhancing either the recommendation agent or the user agent individually, the collaborative interaction between the two has often been overlooked. Towards this research gap, we propose a novel framework that emphasizes the feedback loop process to facilitate the collaboration between the recommendation agent and the user agent. Specifically, the recommendation agent refines its understanding of user preferences by analyzing the feedback from the user agent on the item recommendation. Conversely, the user agent further identifies potential user interests based on the items and recommendation reasons provided by the recommendation agent. This iterative process enhances the ability of both agents to infer user behaviors, enabling more effective item recommendations and more accurate user simulations. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the agentic feedback loop: the agentic feedback loop yields an average improvement of 11.52% over the single recommendation agent and 21.12% over the single user agent. Furthermore, the results show that the agentic feedback loop does not exacerbate popularity or position bias, which are typically amplified by the real-world feedback loop, highlighting its robustness. The source code is available at https://github.com/Lanyu0303/AFL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AgentRecBench: Benchmarking LLM Agent-based Personalized Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AgentRecBench is a public text-based benchmark for LLM recommendation agents, but its headline claim of agent superiority is undercut by its own tables.

  2. A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper categorizes LLM-powered agents for recommender systems into recommender-oriented, interaction-oriented, and simulation-oriented paradigms and describes a common four-module agent architecture.

Pith tools