Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Generalized Knot Groups

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv math/0407050 v4 pith:D4ORI4HH submitted 2004-07-04 math.GT math.GR

On Generalized Knot Groups

classification math.GT math.GR
keywords knotgroupsgeneralizedclassicalfirstgrouphomomorphismsisomorphic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generalized knot groups G_n(K) were introduced first by Wada and Kelly independently. The classical knot group is the first one G_1(K) in this series of finitely presented groups. For each natural number n, G_1(K) is a subgroup of G_n(K) so the generalized knot groups can be thought of as extensions of the classical knot group. For the square knot SK and the granny knot GK, we have an isomorphism $G_1(SK)\cong G_1(GK)$. From the presentations of G_n(SK) and G_n(GK), for n>1, it seems unlikely that G_n(SK) and G_n(GK) would be isomorphic to each other. We are able to show that for many finite groups H, the numbers of homomorphisms from G_n(SK) and G_n(GK) to H, respectively, are the same. Moreover, the numbers of conjugacy classes of homomorphisms from G_n(SK) and G_n(GK) to H, respectively, are also the same. It remains a challenge to us to show, as we would like to conjecture, that G_n(SK) and G_n(GK) are not isomorphic to each other for all n>1.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.