Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Reinforcement Learning and Mean-Variance Strategies for Responsible Portfolio Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.16667 v1 pith:D4SN6NSY submitted 2024-03-25 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords mean-varianceoptimizationportfoliodeeplearningreinforcementobjectivesresponsible
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Portfolio optimization involves determining the optimal allocation of portfolio assets in order to maximize a given investment objective. Traditionally, some form of mean-variance optimization is used with the aim of maximizing returns while minimizing risk, however, more recently, deep reinforcement learning formulations have been explored. Increasingly, investors have demonstrated an interest in incorporating ESG objectives when making investment decisions, and modifications to the classical mean-variance optimization framework have been developed. In this work, we study the use of deep reinforcement learning for responsible portfolio optimization, by incorporating ESG states and objectives, and provide comparisons against modified mean-variance approaches. Our results show that deep reinforcement learning policies can provide competitive performance against mean-variance approaches for responsible portfolio allocation across additive and multiplicative utility functions of financial and ESG responsibility objectives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Simulation-Based Neural Policies for Portfolio Choice: Architecture, Training, and Interpretability

    math.OC 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a controlled lifecycle benchmark, per-date backward neural policies beat single and two-regime networks on welfare and Bellman residuals, and a shape penalty fixes negative MPC violations.

Pith tools