Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

First-class constraints generate gauge transformations in electromagnetism (reply to Pitts)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.09063 v1 pith:D6IHAOKB submitted 2022-10-17 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords first-classtransformationarbitraryconstraintgaugepittscalculationelectromagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Brian Pitts has recently claimed to show via straightforward calculation that, at least in the case of Hamiltonian electromagnetism, an arbitrary first-class constraint ``generates not a gauge transformation, but a bad physical change'' (Annals of Physics 351 (2014) pp.382-406; arXiv:1310.2756). We show, via a straightforward calculation, that a transformation generated by an arbitrary first-class constraint relates gauge-equivalent phase space points, vindicating orthodoxy. Pitts, however, is primarily concerned with transformations of entire histories, rather than of instantaneous states. We show that, even in this context, a transformation generated by an arbitrary first-class constraint is also a gauge transformation, once the empirically observed electric field is correctly identified via its dynamical interactions with charge, and not simply given stipulatively as a certain combination of the potential and its derivatives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 18 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Gauge and Metaphysics of Spacetime

    physics.hist-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The argument from gauge fails: treating general relativity's diffeomorphism invariance as a gauge symmetry does not justify a radically different interpretation of spacetime.

Pith tools