pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28623 · v1 · pith:D6SM6EMNnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.quant-gas

Photon correlation microscopy of quantum matter

Elie Vandoolaeghe , I\~nigo Lasheras , Chirag Vaswani , Sampriti Saha , Purbasha Ray , Takashi Taniguchi , Kenji Watanabe , Prasana Sahoo
show 3 more authors
Nicol\`o Defenu Thibault Chervy Puneet A. Murthy
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords photon correlation microscopymany-body blockadedipolar excitonsheterojunctionantibunchingincompressible phaseexciton correlationsquantum optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photon correlations in emitted light evolve from bunching to antibunching with rising exciton density, revealing many-body blockade.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes photon correlation microscopy as a way to read out many-body correlations in quantum matter from the statistics of emitted photons. In gate-confined one-dimensional dipolar excitons at a MoSe2-WSe2 heterojunction, power-dependent measurements show a crossover from compressible to incompressible behavior, marked by saturation of emission intensity and a blueshift in energy. Across this crossover the second-order photon correlation function changes from bunching at low densities to antibunching at high densities. This change signals a many-body blockade of photon emission that arises because collective dipolar repulsion stabilizes the exciton number. A reader would care because the result shows how light correlations can serve as a direct window onto collective matter states without separate matter probes.

Core claim

By confining a one-dimensional ensemble of dipolar excitons to mesoscopic length scales with gate-defined potentials, the authors measure a transition from a compressible to an incompressible phase signaled by simultaneous saturation of emission intensity and energy blueshift. Photon correlation measurements through this crossover show an evolution from bunching at low densities to antibunching at high densities. This constitutes a many-body blockade of photon emission emerging directly from a number-stabilized state driven by collective dipolar repulsion.

What carries the argument

Photon correlation microscopy (PCM) that extracts many-body exciton correlations from the second-order correlation function of the emitted photon field.

If this is right

  • PCM extends to probe a broad class of correlated electronic phases through their emitted light.
  • Many-body correlations in matter can be harnessed to produce non-classical light states.
  • Gate-defined mesoscopic confinement makes matter correlations visible in the photon field.
  • The incompressible phase corresponds to a number-stabilized exciton state that blocks simultaneous photon emission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique could provide an optical, non-contact readout of number stabilization in other confined quantum systems such as quantum dots or cold-atom arrays.
  • Varying the gate-defined confinement length offers a controllable parameter to tune the visibility and strength of the blockade effect.
  • Collective repulsion might be engineered to control photon statistics in integrated photonic devices without external cavities or single-emitter isolation.

Load-bearing premise

The measured second-order photon correlation function directly and quantitatively reflects the underlying many-body correlations of the excitons without dominant contributions from other optical, disorder, or detection effects.

What would settle it

If the photon correlation function remains bunched or shows no clear transition to antibunching precisely at the densities where emission intensity saturates and the blueshift appears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28623 by Chirag Vaswani, Elie Vandoolaeghe, I\~nigo Lasheras, Kenji Watanabe, Nicol\`o Defenu, Prasana Sahoo, Puneet A. Murthy, Purbasha Ray, Sampriti Saha, Takashi Taniguchi, Thibault Chervy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a and b, so that the measurement captures the collective statistics of the ensemble rather than those of any single subband. Figs. 4 a and b show the measured second-order pho￾ton correlation function g (2) ph (τ ) for the 50 nm and 100 nm traps, respectively, across CW excitation powers span￾ning the thermodynamic crossover of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Light and matter share fundamental statistical properties, yet the experimental probes of quantum optics and many-body physics have largely evolved along separate trajectories. While many-body physics explores emergent collective phenomena, quantum optics has refined the measurement of correlations between individual photons. Here, we introduce photon correlation microscopy (PCM) - which bridges the two domains by leveraging correlations of emitted light to probe the correlations in quantum matter at mesoscopic scales. We demonstrate this approach using a one-dimensional (1D) ensemble of dipolar excitons confined at a lateral monolayer MoSe$_2$-WSe$_2$ heterojunction. We use gate-defined potentials to confine the 1D excitons to a mesoscopic lengthscale to enhance the visibility of matter correlations in the emitted photon field. Power-dependent spectroscopy reveals a transition from a compressible to an incompressible phase, signaled by the simultaneous saturation of the emission intensity and energy blueshift, which is supported by numerical simulations. Through this crossover, photon correlation measurements show a striking evolution from bunching at low densities to antibunching at high densities. This constitutes a many-body blockade of photon emission emerging directly from a number-stabilized state, driven by collective dipolar repulsion. Our results establish PCM as a powerful probe of many-body physics through the lens of quantum optics, extensible to a broad class of correlated electronic phases, while pointing toward a route to generating non-classical light through many-body correlations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces photon correlation microscopy (PCM) as a technique to probe many-body correlations in quantum matter by measuring correlations among emitted photons. It demonstrates the method on a one-dimensional ensemble of dipolar excitons confined to mesoscopic length scales in a gate-defined MoSe₂-WSe₂ lateral heterojunction. Power-dependent spectroscopy reveals a crossover from compressible to incompressible phase, marked by simultaneous saturation of emission intensity and blueshift, supported by numerical simulations. Photon correlation measurements show an evolution from bunching (g^{(2)}>1) at low density to antibunching (g^{(2)}<1) at high density, interpreted as a many-body blockade of photon emission arising from a number-stabilized state driven by collective dipolar repulsion.

Significance. If the central mapping from measured photon statistics to many-body exciton correlations holds, the work provides a new experimental bridge between quantum optics and many-body physics at mesoscopic scales, with extensibility to other correlated phases and a potential route to non-classical light sources. The inclusion of numerical simulations to corroborate the compressible-incompressible transition is a methodological strength that grounds the spectroscopic signatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (photon correlation results): The central claim that the measured evolution of g^{(2)}(0) from bunching to antibunching directly encodes the many-body blockade requires that extrinsic contributions (inhomogeneous broadening, finite temporal resolution, collection efficiency, or disorder) do not dominate the photon statistics. The manuscript provides no quantitative bounds, error propagation, or alternative single-particle models to establish this; this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting PCM as a probe of matter correlations.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (numerical simulations): While simulations are invoked to support the density-driven transition, the text does not report how simulation parameters (interaction strength, confinement potential) are constrained by the experimental intensity and blueshift data, nor whether the same parameters quantitatively reproduce the observed g^{(2)} values across the crossover.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 4] Figure 4 and associated text: Axis labels and legends for g^{(2)}(τ) traces should explicitly state the integration time window and any background subtraction procedure to allow direct assessment of the antibunching depth.
  2. [Notation] Notation: Ensure uniform use of g^{(2)}(0) versus g(2) throughout the main text, supplementary material, and figure captions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (photon correlation results): The central claim that the measured evolution of g^{(2)}(0) from bunching to antibunching directly encodes the many-body blockade requires that extrinsic contributions (inhomogeneous broadening, finite temporal resolution, collection efficiency, or disorder) do not dominate the photon statistics. The manuscript provides no quantitative bounds, error propagation, or alternative single-particle models to establish this; this assumption is load-bearing for interpreting PCM as a probe of matter correlations.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification of extrinsic effects is necessary to support the interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in §4 that (i) estimates the contribution of inhomogeneous broadening and finite detector resolution to the measured g^{(2)}(0) using the independently measured linewidth and instrument response function, (ii) provides error propagation for the reported g^{(2)} values, and (iii) shows that a single-particle model with the same parameters cannot reproduce the observed density-dependent crossover from bunching to antibunching. These additions will supply the quantitative bounds requested while preserving the central claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (numerical simulations): While simulations are invoked to support the density-driven transition, the text does not report how simulation parameters (interaction strength, confinement potential) are constrained by the experimental intensity and blueshift data, nor whether the same parameters quantitatively reproduce the observed g^{(2)} values across the crossover.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the fitting procedure and predictive power for g^{(2)} were not fully documented. In the revision we will expand §3.2 to (i) describe the least-squares procedure used to constrain the dipolar interaction strength and gate-defined confinement potential from the measured intensity saturation and blueshift, and (ii) present a direct comparison in which the same parameters are used to compute the expected g^{(2)}(0) across the compressible-incompressible crossover, showing quantitative consistency with the experimental photon-correlation data. This will explicitly link the spectroscopic observables to the correlation measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations with independent support

full rationale

The manuscript reports experimental measurements of photon correlations in a gate-confined 1D exciton system. Power-dependent spectroscopy and g(2) data are presented as direct observations of a compressible-to-incompressible crossover, with numerical simulations cited only as supporting evidence rather than as the source of the central claim. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the reported evolution from bunching to antibunching back to the input data by construction. The mapping of measured g(2) to many-body blockade rests on experimental assumptions about extrinsic contributions, but those assumptions are not enforced by any definitional loop or self-referential derivation within the paper's own chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard domain assumptions of quantum optics and condensed-matter physics but introduces no explicit free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond the claim that photon correlations map to matter correlations.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Photon second-order correlation functions measured in the far field directly encode the spatial and number correlations of the underlying exciton many-body state.
    This mapping is required for the interpretation of the observed antibunching as many-body blockade; it is stated implicitly in the abstract's description of PCM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5827 in / 1375 out tokens · 35726 ms · 2026-06-29T10:42:31.570783+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics — an introduction(Oxford University Press, 2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Mandel and E

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf,Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  3. [3]

    Blanter and M

    Y. Blanter and M. B¨ uttiker, Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors, Physics Reports336, 1 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    F¨ olling, F

    S. F¨ olling, F. Gerbier, A. Widera, O. Mandel, T. Gericke, and I. Bloch, Spatial quantum noise interferometry in ex- panding ultracold atom clouds, Nature434, 481 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    W. S. Bakr, J. I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. F¨ olling, and M. Greiner, A quantum gas microscope for detecting sin- gle atoms in a hubbard-regime optical lattice, Nature 462, 74 (2009)

    2009

  7. [7]

    T. A. Hilker, G. Salomon, F. Grusdt, A. Omran, M. Boll, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Revealing hidden an- tiferromagnetic correlations in doped hubbard chains via string correlators, Science357, 484 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Bergschneider, V

    A. Bergschneider, V. M. Klinkhamer, J. H. Becher, R. Klemt, L. Palm, G. Z¨ urn, S. Jochim, and P. M. Preiss, Experimental characterization of two-particle entangle- ment through position and momentum correlations, Na- ture Physics15, 640 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Holten, L

    M. Holten, L. Bayha, K. Subramanian, S. Brandstetter, C. Heintze, P. Lunt, P. M. Preiss, and S. Jochim, Obser- vation of cooper pairs in a mesoscopic two-dimensional fermi gas, Nature606, 287 (2022)

    2022

  10. [10]

    R. Yao, S. Chi, M. Wang, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwier- lein, Measuring pair correlations in bose and fermi gases via atom-resolved microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183402 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics — photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais, and L. Mandel, Photon anti- bunching in resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 691 (1977)

    1977

  13. [13]

    Hennessy, A

    K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum nature of a strongly coupled sin- gle quantum dot–cavity system, Nature445, 896 (2007)

    2007

  14. [14]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature Photonics10, 631 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Toninelli, I

    C. Toninelli, I. Gerhardt, A. S. Clark, A. Reserbat- Plantey, S. G¨ otzinger, Z. Ristanovi´ c, M. Colautti, P. Lombardi, K. D. Major, I. Deperasi´ nska, W. H. Per- nice, F. H. L. Koppens, B. Kozankiewicz, A. Gourdon, V. Sandoghdar, and M. Orrit, Single organic molecules for photonic quantum technologies, Nature Materials20, 1615 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    Peyronel, O

    T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuleti´ c, Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms, Nature488, 57 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    Weber, M

    T. Weber, M. H¨ oning, T. Niederpr¨ um, T. Manthey, O. Thomas, V. Guarrera, M. Fleischhauer, G. Barontini, and H. Ott, Mesoscopic rydberg-blockaded ensembles in the superatom regime and beyond, Nature Physics11, 9 157 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Delteil, T

    A. Delteil, T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schnei- der, and A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, Towards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons, Nature materials18, 219 (2019)

    2019

  19. [19]

    Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A

    G. Mu˜ noz-Matutano, A. Wood, M. Johnsson, X. Vidal, B. Q. Baragiola, A. Reinhard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, A. Amo, G. Nogues,et al., Emergence of quantum cor- relations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons, Nature materials18, 213 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    M. C. Teich and B. E. A. Saleh, I photon bunching and antibunching, Progress in Optics26, 1 (1988)

    1988

  22. [22]

    X. Duan, C. Wang, J. Shaw, R. Cheng, Y. Chen, H. Li, X. Wu, Y. Tang, Q. Zhang, A. Pan, J. Jiang, R. Yu, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Lateral epitaxial growth of two- dimensional layered semiconductor heterojunctions, Na- ture nanotechnology9(2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    P. K. Sahoo, S. Memaran, Y. Xin, L. Balicas, and H. R. Guti´ errez, One-pot growth of two-dimensional lateral heterostructures via sequential edge-epitaxy, Nature553, 63 (2018)

    2018

  24. [24]

    K. W. Lau, Calvin, Z. Gong, H. Yu, and W. Yao, In- terface excitons at lateral heterojunctions in monolayer semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B98, 115427 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Rosati, I

    R. Rosati, I. Paradisanos, L. Huang, Z. Gan, A. George, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Lombez, P. Renucci, A. Turchanin,et al., Interface engineering of charge- transfer excitons in 2d lateral heterostructures, Nature communications14, 2438 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Vandoolaeghe, F

    E. Vandoolaeghe, F. Fortuna, S. K. Chakraborty, B. Nayak, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, P. K. Sahoo, T. Chervy, and P. A. Murthy, Dipolar excitonic quan- tum wires at atomically sharp lateral interfaces (2026), arXiv:2509.24465

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Citro, S

    R. Citro, S. De Palo, E. Orignac, P. Pedri, and M.- L. Chiofalo, Luttinger hydrodynamics of confined one- dimensional Bose gases with dipolar interactions, New Journal of Physics10, 045011 (2008)

    2008

  28. [28]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed mat- ter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

    2011

  29. [29]

    Deuretzbacher, J

    F. Deuretzbacher, J. C. Cremon, and S. M. Reimann, Ground-state properties of few dipolar bosons in a quasi- one-dimensional harmonic trap, Phys. Rev. A81, 063616 (2010)

    2010

  30. [30]

    Roscilde and M

    T. Roscilde and M. Boninsegni, Off-diagonal correlations in a one-dimensional gas of dipolar bosons, New Journal of Physics12, 033032 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    L. Peng, J. Pan, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Unveiling quantum phases in quasi-one-dimensional dipolar gases using con- tinuous matrix product states, Phys. Rev. A110, 023330 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Citro, E

    R. Citro, E. Orignac, S. De Palo, and M. L. Chiofalo, Evidence of luttinger-liquid behavior in one-dimensional dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A75, 051602(R) (2007)

    2007

  33. [33]

    Sinha and L

    S. Sinha and L. Santos, Cold dipolar gases in quasi- one-dimensional geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140406 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    Lagoin, K

    C. Lagoin, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, and F. m. c. Du- bin, Superlattice quantum solid of dipolar excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176001 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Lagoin, S

    C. Lagoin, S. Suffit, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, and F. Dubin, Mott insulator of strongly interacting two- dimensional semiconductor excitons, Nature Physics18, 149 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    G. J. Schinner, J. Repp, E. Schubert, A. K. Rai, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, A. O. Govorov, A. W. Holleit- ner, and J. P. Kotthaus, Many-body correlations of elec- trostatically trapped dipolar excitons, Phys. Rev. B87, 205302 (2013)

    2013

  37. [37]

    Thureja, A

    D. Thureja, A. Imamoglu, T. Smole´ nski, I. Amelio, A. Popert, T. Chervy, X. Lu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe,et al., Electrically tunable quantum con- finement of neutral excitons, Nature606, 298 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    J. Hu, E. Lorchat, X. Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. F. Heinz, P. A. Murthy, and T. Chervy, Quantum control of exciton wave functions in 2d semiconductors, Science Advances10, eadk6369 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Heithoff, ´A

    M. Heithoff, ´A. Moreno, I. Torre, M. S. G. Feuer, C. M. Purser, G. M. Andolina, G. Calaj` o, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. M. Kara, P. Hays, S. A. Tongay, V. I. Fal’ko, D. Chang, M. Atat¨ ure, A. Reserbat-Plantey, and F. H. Koppens, Valley-hybridized gate-tunable 1d exci- ton confinement in MoSe 2, ACS Nano18, 30283 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Thureja, F

    D. Thureja, F. E. Yazıc ı, T. Smole´ nski, M. Kroner, D. J. Norris, and A. ˙Imamoˇ glu, Electrically defined quan- tum dots for bosonic excitons, Phys. Rev. B110, 245425 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Y. Tang, L. Li, T. Li, Y. Xu, S. Liu, K. Barmak, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Simulation of Hubbard-model physics in WSe2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 353 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Esterlis, E. Demler, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Signatures of Wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature595, 53 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, M. Blei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, M. Crommie, Y. R. Shen, and F. Wang, Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe 2/WS2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    W. Li, C. Wang Beach, C. Hu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, J.-H. Chu, A. Imamo˘ glu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional charges via anyon–trions in twisted MoTe2, Nature651, 48 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Beams, L

    R. Beams, L. G. Can¸ cado, S.-H. Oh, A. Jorio, and L. Novotny, Spatial coherence in near-field raman scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 186101 (2014)

    2014

  46. [46]

    B. Kass, S. Talkington, A. Srivastava, and M. Claassen, Many-body photon blockade and quantum light generation from cavity quantum materials (2024), arXiv:2411.08964

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Nambiar, A

    G. Nambiar, A. Grankin, and M. Hafezi, Diagnosing elec- tronic phases of matter using photonic correlation func- tions, Phys. Rev. X15, 041020 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Cadiz, E

    F. Cadiz, E. Courtade, C. Robert, G. Wang, Y. Shen, H. Cai, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, H. Carrere, D. La- garde, M. Manca, T. Amand, P. Renucci, S. Tongay, X. Marie, and B. Urbaszek, Excitonic linewidth ap- proaching the homogeneous limit in mos 2-based van der 10 waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X7, 021026 (2017)

    2017

  49. [49]

    A. Raja, L. Waldecker, J. Zipfel, Y. Cho, S. Brem, J. D. Ziegler, M. Kulig, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Malic, T. F. Heinz, T. C. Berkelbach, and A. Chernikov, Dielec- tric disorder in two-dimensional materials, Nature Nan- otechnology14, 832 (2019)

    2019

  50. [50]

    Moody, J

    G. Moody, J. Schaibley, and X. Xu, Exciton dynamics in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B33, C39 (2016)

    2016

  51. [51]

    Cai, W.-Y

    C.-S. Cai, W.-Y. Lai, P.-H. Liu, T.-C. Chou, R.-Y. Liu, C.-M. Lin, S. Gwo, and W.-T. Hsu, Ultralow auger- assisted interlayer exciton annihilation in ws2/wse2 moir´ e heterobilayers, Nano Letters24, 2773 (2024)

    2024

  52. [52]

    G. E. Astrakharchik and Y. E. Lozovik, Super-tonks- girardeau regime in trapped one-dimensional dipolar gases, Phys. Rev. A77, 013404 (2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    A. S. Arkhipov, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. V. Belikov, and Y. E. Lozovik, Ground-state properties of a one- dimensional system of dipoles, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters82, 39 (2005)

    2005

  54. [54]

    V. R. Policht, H. Mittenzwey, O. Dogadov, M. Katzer, A. Villa, Q. Li, B. Kaiser, A. M. Ross, F. Scotognella, X. Zhu, A. Knorr, M. Selig, G. Cerullo, and S. Dal Conte, Time-domain observation of interlayer exciton formation and thermalization in a mose2/wse2 heterostructure, Na- ture Communications14, 7273 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    A. J. Leggett, Bose-einstein condensation in the alkali gases: Some fundamental concepts, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 307 (2001)

    2001

  56. [56]

    Haegeman, D

    J. Haegeman, D. Draxler, V. Stojevic, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, Quantum Gross-Pitaevskii Equation, SciPost Phys.3, 006 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, Observation of a one-dimensional tonks-girardeau gas, Science305, 1125 (2004)

    2004

  58. [58]

    O. E. Alon, A. I. Streltsov, and L. S. Cederbaum, Multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree method for bosons: Many-body dynamics of bosonic systems, Phys. Rev. A77, 033613 (2008)

    2008

  59. [59]

    Cudazzo, I

    P. Cudazzo, I. V. Tokatly, and A. Rubio, Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085406 (2011)

    2011

  60. [60]

    T. C. Berkelbach, M. S. Hybertsen, and D. R. Reich- man, Theory of neutral and charged excitons in mono- layer transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B88, 045318 (2013)

    2013

  61. [61]

    Molignini, S

    P. Molignini, S. Dutta, and E. Fasshauer, Many-body quantum dynamics with MCTDH-X, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes94(2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    R. Lin, P. Molignini, L. Papariello, M. C. Tsatsos, C. L´ evˆ eque, S. E. Weiner, E. Fasshauer, R. Chitra, and A. U. J. Lode, MCTDH-X: The multiconfigura- tional time-dependent hartree method for indistinguish- able particles software, Quantum Science and Technology 5, 024004 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Photon correlation microscopy of quantum matter

    A. U. J. Lode, M. Tsatsos, E. Fasshauer, R. Lin, L. Papariello, P. Molignini, C. L´ evˆ eque, S. Weiner, M. B¨ uttner, J. Xiang, S. Dutta, D. Ortu˜ no- Gonzalez, Y. Bilinskaya, M. Eder, and L. Fichte, MCTDH-X: The time-dependent multiconfigurational hartree method for indistinguishable particles (soft- ware),https://gitlab.com/the-mctdh-x-repository/ mctd...

    2025

  64. [64]

    Thermal Bose gas.For a non-degenerate 1D Bose gas (nλ T ≲1), the pair correlator factorizes as g(2) mat(r) = 1 +|g (1)(r)|2 with a Gaussian first-order co- herence|g (1)(r)|2 =e −r2/λ2 T on the scale of the thermal de Broglie wavelengthλ T =ℏ p 2π/(mkBT). Integrating over a trap of lengthL: g(2) ph (0) = 1 + 1 L Z −L L e−r2/λT 2 (1− |r|/L)dr(S15) which in...

  65. [65]

    Quantum-degenerate regime.Asnλ T ≳1, number fluctuations approach the Poissonian value Var(N)→ ⟨N⟩, the spatial pair correlator approaches unity across the trap, andg (2) ph (0)→1

  66. [66]

    As repulsive interactions stiffen the chemical potential, κT →0 and the system develops a correlation hole at short range,g (2) mat(0)→0

    Strongly correlated incompressible regime. As repulsive interactions stiffen the chemical potential, κT →0 and the system develops a correlation hole at short range,g (2) mat(0)→0. The master identity then yields the Poisson floor. g(2) ph (0)→1− 1 ⟨N⟩ ,(S16) attained only in the perfectly number-stabilized limit. For the specific case of contact-interact...

  67. [67]

    Classical chaotic emission.A complemen- tary single-mode result arises classically:Nindepen- dent emitters with random phases produce a fieldE=P j ajeiϕj that follows a complex Gaussian distribution by the central limit theorem, yielding exponentially dis- tributed intensity andg (2) ph (0) = 2. This is the classical chaotic limit, identical in value to t...