Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Interaction of the relativistic jet and the narrow-line region of PMN J0948+0022

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.14776 v1 pith:D7LRRRVY submitted 2025-05-20 astro-ph.GA

Interaction of the relativistic jet and the narrow-line region of PMN J0948+0022

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords narrow-linex-shooterj0948museregionbetacomponentcomposite
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We have analyzed publicly available optical spectra of PMN J0948+0022 obtained with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, X-Shooter, and the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE). Initially, PMN J0948+0022 was classified as a jetted narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy, but X-Shooter and MUSE observations, which have better spectral resolution, revealed a different profile for the H$\beta$ line, from Lorentzian to a composite one (a combination of a broad and a narrow Gaussian), more typical of intermediate Seyfert galaxies. According to the unified model, intermediate Seyferts are viewed at larger angles. However, we show that, in this case, the composite line profile results from the interaction of the powerful relativistic jet with the narrow-line region. The jet transfers part of its kinetic energy to the narrow-line region, producing flux changes in the H$\beta$ narrow component (drop by a factor of 3.4 from SDSS to X-Shooter), [O III]$\lambda$5007 core component (which nearly doubled from X-Shooter to MUSE), and its blue wing ($\Delta$v$\sim$200 km s$^{-1}$), which we interpret as evidence of an outflow. We also recalculated the physical parameters of this AGN, obtaining a black hole mass of $10^{7.8}$ M$_{\odot}$ and an Eddington ratio of $\sim$0.21 (weighted mean).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.