pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03058 · v1 · pith:DAT2J6JZnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Chemical Equilibration and Thermalization of Quark-Gluon Plasma in a Parton Cascade Model with 2-to-3 Quark Interactions

Cendikia Abdi , Chiho Nonaka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords quark-gluon plasmathermalizationchemical equilibrationparton cascade model2-to-3 interactionsheavy ion collisionsKnudsen number
0
0 comments X

The pith

Including 2-to-3 quark processes speeds thermalization of quark-gluon plasma but leaves chemical equilibration incomplete after 5 fm.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses an extended version of the SMASH transport model to simulate partonic interactions in the quark-gluon plasma created in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. It demonstrates that adding 2-to-3 quark interactions accelerates both thermalization and chemical equilibration compared to models with only gluons. In the expanding system the energy spectrum approaches a Boltzmann distribution by about 0.2 fm and momentum becomes isotropic by 2 fm, yet chemical equilibration is not reached even after 5 fm while the Knudsen number indicates the end of hydrodynamics after 4 fm. This matters because the timing of these processes determines how early hydrodynamic models can reliably describe the plasma evolution.

Core claim

The additional inelastic 2-to-3 channels accelerate thermalization and chemical equilibration compared to the gluon-only scheme. In the expanding medium the energy spectrum converges toward the Boltzmann distribution at t ~ 0.2 fm while momentum isotropization is achieved at t ~ 2 fm, but chemical equilibration is not clearly established even after 5 fm. The Knudsen number rises above unity after ~ 4 fm, indicating a breakdown of the hydrodynamic regime at later times.

What carries the argument

The parton cascade model extended with 2-to-3 quark interactions on mini-jet initial conditions, tracking energy spectra, momentum anisotropy and particle yields to measure equilibration.

Load-bearing premise

The mini-jet initial conditions with nuclear PDFs and the particular implementation of 2-to-3 partonic processes produce dynamics that represent real QGP evolution.

What would settle it

If experimental data from heavy-ion collisions show chemical equilibration occurring well before 5 fm or if simulations without the 2-to-3 channels yield the same timelines, the acceleration claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03058 by Cendikia Abdi, Chiho Nonaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Cross section ratio between table interpolation and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Screening mass comparison extracted from energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy density stability test up to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Parton number density evolution up to 50 fm. Quark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Energy spectrum across different times ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Linear regression fit up to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Temperature evolution across the time evolution up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Momentum anisotropy measured across the time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Number density evolution up to 5 fm for quark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows that the log of the energy spectra con￾verges into a linear function, hence we shall apply the linear regression fit to find the slope of the spectra which will define the effective temperature of the medium. We assume a similar energy spectrum’s convergence behavior as in the box simulation and use the same energy region that we have identified to have the best fit with the linear function in the l… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Temperature evolution up to 5 fm. Quarks (dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Comparison of momentum anisotropy between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Fugacity up to 5 fm. Gluon is shown in blue and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Mean cluster radius extracted from the spatial dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Cell size for maximum entropy across the time evolu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Regression analysis from the upper energy limit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the thermalization, chemical equilibration, and hydrodynamization behavior of the far-from-equilibrium, gluon-dominated quark gluon plasma (QGP) produced in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}} = 200$ GeV using the hadronic transport model SMASH extended to simulate partonic interactions. The initial conditions are prepared using the mini-jet model with nuclear parton distribution functions. We first validate the model in a box simulation with the periodic boundary condition to establish indicators for thermalization, chemical equilibration, and hydrodynamization by analyzing energy spectrum and momentum anisotropy. We observe that the additional inelastic channels accelerate thermalization and chemical equilibration compared to the gluon-only scheme. Applying the same framework to the expanding medium, we find that the energy spectrum converges toward the Boltzmann distribution at $t \sim 0.2$ fm while momentum isotropization is achieved at $t \sim 2$ fm, but chemical equilibration is not clearly established even after 5 fm. The Knudsen number rises above unity after $\sim 4$ fm, indicating a breakdown of the hydrodynamic regime at later times consistent with other kinetic theory approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates thermalization, chemical equilibration, and hydrodynamization of far-from-equilibrium gluon-dominated QGP in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN=200 GeV using the SMASH transport model extended to include 2-to-3 partonic interactions. Initial conditions are generated via the mini-jet model with nuclear PDFs. A periodic-box validation establishes indicators based on energy spectra and momentum anisotropy, showing that the inelastic channels accelerate equilibration relative to gluon-only dynamics. In the expanding system the energy spectrum approaches a Boltzmann distribution at t∼0.2 fm, momentum isotropization occurs at t∼2 fm, chemical equilibration is not clearly reached by t=5 fm, and the Knudsen number exceeds unity after ∼4 fm, signaling the end of the hydrodynamic regime.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the work supplies explicit, simulation-derived timescales separating different equilibration processes in a kinetic-theory framework that incorporates quark 2-to-3 processes; the explicit time-stepped evolution and the Knudsen-number diagnostic constitute concrete, falsifiable outputs that can be compared with other transport and hydrodynamic approaches.

major comments (3)
  1. [Validation section (box simulation)] Validation section (box simulation): the statement that inelastic 2-to-3 channels accelerate thermalization and chemical equilibration is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the box test only reports internal consistency; quantitative convergence tests, statistical error bars on the spectra, and the precise definition of the chemical-equilibration metric are not shown, leaving the magnitude of the acceleration uncertain.
  2. [Expanding medium application] Expanding-medium results: the reported timescales (spectrum convergence at t∼0.2 fm, isotropization at t∼2 fm, chemical equilibration not reached by 5 fm) rest on the specific mini-jet initial conditions with nuclear PDFs and the chosen implementation of the 2-to-3 matrix elements; without sensitivity tests to alternate initial-state models (e.g., CGC) or variations in the partonic cross sections, these numbers cannot be regarded as general features of QGP evolution.
  3. [Hydrodynamization and Knudsen number] Hydrodynamization paragraph: the claim that the Knudsen number rises above unity after ∼4 fm indicates breakdown of hydrodynamics is central to the hydrodynamization conclusion, but the explicit definition of the Knudsen number (mean free path versus system size or gradient scale) and its numerical evaluation are not provided, preventing direct comparison with other kinetic-theory studies.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'chemical equilibration is not clearly established' should be accompanied by the concrete observable (e.g., time evolution of quark/gluon number ratios or effective chemical potentials) used to reach that conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses below and will make the indicated revisions in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Validation section (box simulation): the statement that inelastic 2-to-3 channels accelerate thermalization and chemical equilibration is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the box test only reports internal consistency; quantitative convergence tests, statistical error bars on the spectra, and the precise definition of the chemical-equilibration metric are not shown, leaving the magnitude of the acceleration uncertain.

    Authors: We agree that the validation section would be strengthened by these quantitative elements. In the revised manuscript we will add statistical error bars to the energy spectra, present convergence tests with respect to the number of test particles, and give an explicit definition of the chemical-equilibration metric (the evolution of the quark-to-gluon number-density ratio toward its equilibrium value). revision: yes

  2. Referee: Expanding-medium results: the reported timescales (spectrum convergence at t∼0.2 fm, isotropization at t∼2 fm, chemical equilibration not reached by 5 fm) rest on the specific mini-jet initial conditions with nuclear PDFs and the chosen implementation of the 2-to-3 matrix elements; without sensitivity tests to alternate initial-state models (e.g., CGC) or variations in the partonic cross sections, these numbers cannot be regarded as general features of QGP evolution.

    Authors: The reported timescales are obtained for the mini-jet initial conditions with nuclear PDFs and the specific 2-to-3 matrix elements implemented in our SMASH extension; the manuscript does not claim these values are universal. Performing sensitivity studies to CGC initial conditions or varied cross sections would require substantial new simulations beyond the present scope. We will add a paragraph clarifying the model dependence and the limitations of the current setup. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Hydrodynamization paragraph: the claim that the Knudsen number rises above unity after ∼4 fm indicates breakdown of hydrodynamics is central to the hydrodynamization conclusion, but the explicit definition of the Knudsen number (mean free path versus system size or gradient scale) and its numerical evaluation are not provided, preventing direct comparison with other kinetic-theory studies.

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly define the Knudsen number (Kn = λ/L, with λ the mean free path obtained from the local interaction rate and L the system size or inverse gradient length) and describe its numerical evaluation from the simulation output at each time step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of explicit numerical simulation

full rationale

The paper's central results (energy spectrum convergence at t~0.2 fm, momentum isotropization at t~2 fm, chemical equilibration not reached by 5 fm) are obtained by running the extended SMASH parton cascade with mini-jet initial conditions in both box and expanding geometries. These times are simulation outputs, not parameters fitted to reproduce an external target or defined in terms of the quantities being measured. No self-citations are invoked to establish uniqueness theorems or to smuggle in ansatzes for the 2-to-3 matrix elements. The box validation checks internal consistency of the chosen implementation but does not reduce the expanding-medium predictions to the inputs by construction. This is a standard kinetic-theory simulation study whose derivation chain remains independent of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit list of fitted parameters, background lemmas, or new postulated entities; the model extension itself is treated as a modeling choice whose validity is assumed rather than derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5750 in / 1185 out tokens · 26769 ms · 2026-06-28T08:22:27.650034+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Expectation-Maximization Characteristic Length We determine the characteristic length by assuming a single cluster of 3D Gaussian shape at the center point of the 2 colliding nuclei. The width of the gaussian is defined by the expectation-maximisation clustering algo- rithm where we set its gaussian widthσto maximize the expectation value F= NX i −1 2 x2 ...

  2. [2]

    In contrast to the previous approach, we did not make an assumption regarding the number of clusters

    Shannon Entropy Maximization Characteristic Length Another way to define the characteristic length of the medium is by dividing the medium into smaller cells to isolate the smaller hotspots during the time evolu- tion. In contrast to the previous approach, we did not make an assumption regarding the number of clusters. Moreover, the previous method define...

  3. [3]

    At smallt, we see that a smaller cell size maximizes Shannon entropy, this can be interpreted as the al- gorithm capturing the microscopic features of the multiple small hotspots created at the beginning

  4. [4]

    At aroundt= 2 fm, we see a plateau after an in- crease. This is reached when the energy of each small hotspot has spread and amalgamated into a single large cluster with relatively more homoge- neous energy density compared to the early time

  5. [5]

    The optimal cell size de- creases and forms another plateau

    Attlarger than 3 fm. The optimal cell size de- creases and forms another plateau. This might be caused by the non-uniform cooling down of the medium, thus causing the formation of multiple smaller clusters of relatively high energy density inside the main cluster. Regardless of the different behavior compared to the monotonic increase from the previous al...

  6. [6]

    Knudsen Number Result We see from Fig 19 that the Knudsen number starts well below 1 at the early time but then deviates from the hydrodynamic limit at the later time. Since from Fig 17, we see only a small change in the characteristic medium length, hence it implies that this increase is due to the rapidly increasing mean free path length at the later ti...

  7. [7]

    Gyulassy,Structure and Dynamics of Elementary Matter, edited by W

    M. Gyulassy,Structure and Dynamics of Elementary Matter, edited by W. Greiner, M. G. Itkis, J. Rein- hardt, and M. C. G¨ u¸ cl¨ u (Springer Netherlands, Dor- drecht, 2004) pp. 159–182

    2004

  8. [8]

    Cifarelli and F

    L. Cifarelli and F. Bellini, Investigation of the quark- gluon plasma with the alice experiment, inOxford Re- search Encyclopedia of Physics, edited by B. Foster (Ox- ford University Press, 2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Keegan, A

    L. Keegan, A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, and D. Teaney, Initial conditions for hydrodynamics from weakly cou- pled pre-equilibrium evolution, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 171 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibration in weakly coupled qcd, Phys. Rev. D99, 054018 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Geiger, Thermalization in ultrarelativistic nuclear col- lisions

    K. Geiger, Thermalization in ultrarelativistic nuclear col- lisions. ii. entropy production and energy densities at the bnl relativistic heavy ion collider and the cern large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D46, 4986 (1992)

    1992

  12. [12]

    Kurkela, A

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. m. c. Paquet, S. Schlichting, and D. Teaney, Matching the nonequilib- rium initial stage of heavy ion collisions to hydrodynam- ics with qcd kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122302 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    bottom-up

    R. Baier, A. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. Son, “bottom-up” thermalization in heavy ion collisions, Physics Letters B 502, 51 (2001)

    2001

  14. [14]

    Back.et al., The phobos perspective on discoveries at rhic, Nuclear Physics A757, 28 (2005), first Three Years of Operation of RHIC

    B. Back.et al., The phobos perspective on discoveries at rhic, Nuclear Physics A757, 28 (2005), first Three Years of Operation of RHIC

    2005

  15. [15]

    K. Adcox.et al., Formation of dense partonic matter in relativistic nucleus–nucleus collisions at rhic: Exper- imental evaluation by the phenix collaboration, Nuclear Physics A757, 184 (2005), first Three Years of Operation of RHIC

    2005

  16. [16]

    I. Arsene.et al., Quark–gluon plasma and color glass con- densate at rhic? the perspective from the brahms experi- ment, Nuclear Physics A757, 1 (2005), first Three Years of Operation of RHIC

    2005

  17. [17]

    Petersen, G.-Y

    H. Petersen, G.-Y. Qin, S. A. Bass, and B. Muller, Tri- angular flow in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200AGeV, Phys. Rev. C 82, 041901 (2010), arXiv:1008.0625 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [18]

    Z. Qiu, C. Shen, and U. Heinz, Hydrodynamic elliptic and triangular flow in Pb-Pb collisions at √s= 2.76ATeV, Phys. Lett. B707, 151 (2012), arXiv:1110.3033 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Adamet al.(The ALICE Collaboration), Anisotropic flow of charged particles in pb-pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(The ALICE Collaboration), Anisotropic flow of charged particles in pb-pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 132302 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    D. A. Teaney, Viscous Hydrodynamics and the Quark Gluon Plasma, inQuark-gluon plasma 4, edited by R. C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang (2010) pp. 207–266, arXiv:0905.2433 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    W. Zhao, Y. Zhou, H. Xu, W. Deng, and H. Song, Hy- drodynamic collectivity in proton–proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B780, 495 (2018), arXiv:1801.00271 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Pandey and B

    S. Pandey and B. K. Singh, Higher-order anisotropic flow correlations in Xe–Xe collisions at √sN N = 5.44 TeV, The European Physical Journal Plus139, 400 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Giacalone, J

    G. Giacalone, J. Noronha-Hostler, M. Luzum, and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Confronting hydrodynamic predictions with Xe-Xe data, Nucl. Phys. A982, 371 (2019), arXiv:1807.05557 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Bo˙ zek and W

    P. Bo˙ zek and W. Broniowski, Hydrodynamic modeling of 3he–au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV, Physics Letters B747, 135 (2015)

    2015

  25. [25]

    Goldschmidt, Z

    A. Goldschmidt, Z. Qiu, C. Shen, and U. Heinz, Colli- sion geometry and flow in uranium + uranium collisions, Phys. Rev. C92, 044903 (2015), arXiv:1507.03910 [nucl- th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Okamoto and C

    K. Okamoto and C. Nonaka, Temperature dependence of transport coefficients of qcd in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C98, 054906 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Nakamura, T

    K. Nakamura, T. Miyoshi, C. Nonaka, and H. R. Taka- hashi, Directed flow in relativistic resistive magneto- hydrodynamic expansion for symmetric and asymmetric collision systems, Phys. Rev. C107, 014901 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Nakamura, T

    K. Nakamura, T. Miyoshi, C. Nonaka, and H. R. Taka- hashi, Charge-dependent anisotropic flow in high-energy heavy-ion collisions from a relativistic resistive magneto- hydrodynamic expansion, Phys. Rev. C107, 034912 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    J. S. Moreland, J. E. Bernhard, and S. A. Bass, Alter- native ansatz to wounded nucleon and binary collision scaling in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C 92, 011901 (2015), arXiv:1412.4708 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Schenke, P

    B. Schenke, P. Tribedy, and R. Venugopalan, Fluctuating Glasma initial conditions and flow in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 252301 (2012), arXiv:1202.6646 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Schenke and S

    B. Schenke and S. Schlichting, 3D glasma initial state for relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C94, 044907 (2016), arXiv:1605.07158 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Strickland, J

    M. Strickland, J. Noronha, and G. Denicol, Anisotropic nonequilibrium hydrodynamic attractor, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036020 (2018), arXiv:1709.06644 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Kurkela, A

    A. Kurkela, A. Mazeliauskas, J.-F. Paquet, S. Schlicht- ing, and D. Teaney, Matching the Nonequilibrium Ini- tial Stage of Heavy Ion Collisions to Hydrodynamics with QCD Kinetic Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 122302 (2019), arXiv:1805.01604 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Boguslavski, A

    K. Boguslavski, A. Kurkela, T. Lappi, F. Lindenbauer, and J. Peuron, Limiting attractors in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B852, 138623 (2024), arXiv:2312.11252 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    S. K. Das, M. Ruggieri, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, and V. Greco, Effect of pre-equilibrium phase onR AA andv 2 of heavy quarks in heavy ion collisions, J. Phys. G44, 095102 (2017), arXiv:1701.05123 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Pablos, M

    D. Pablos, M. Singh, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Minijet quenching in a concurrent jet+hydro evolution and the nonequilibrium quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. C106, 034901 (2022), arXiv:2202.03414 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Chattopadhyay and U

    C. Chattopadhyay and U. Heinz, Hydrodynamics from free-streaming to thermalization and back again, Physics Letters B801, 135158 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Nijs and W

    G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, A generalized hydrody- namizing initial stage for Heavy Ion Collisions (2023), arXiv:2304.06191 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Behtash, S

    A. Behtash, S. Kamata, M. Martinez, T. Sch¨ afer, and V. Skokov, Transasymptotics and hydrodynamization of the fokker-planck equation for gluons, Phys. Rev. D103, 18 056010 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    T¨ ornkvist and K

    R. T¨ ornkvist and K. Zapp, Thermalization and isotropization in the AMY parton cascade ALPACA (2023), arXiv:2309.04413 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Kanakubo, Y

    Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, and T. Hirano, Interplay between core and corona components in high-energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. C105, 024905 (2022), arXiv:2108.07943 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Chen and S

    S. Chen and S. Shi, Anisotropic hydrodynamics with a boost-noninvariant expansion, Phys. Rev. D111, 014001 (2025), arXiv:2409.19897 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Kaminski, Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in QCD and Holography (2025), arXiv:2512.24909 [nucl-th]

    M. Kaminski, Non-Equilibrium Dynamics in QCD and Holography (2025), arXiv:2512.24909 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Xu and C

    Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Thermalization of gluons in ultra- relativistic heavy ion collisions by including three-body interactions in a parton cascade, Phys. Rev. C71, 064901 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0406278

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  45. [45]

    Barrera Cabodevila, C

    S. Barrera Cabodevila, C. A. Salgado, and B. Wu, Ther- malization and quark production in spatially homoge- neous systems of gluons, EPJ Web Conf.296, 10013 (2024), arXiv:2312.14594 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Du and S

    X. Du and S. Schlichting, Kinetic and Chemical Equilibration of Quark-Gluon Plasma, PoSHard- Probes2020, 119 (2021), arXiv:2010.13488 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical equilibra- tion in hadronic collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 142301 (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    Kurkela and Y

    A. Kurkela and Y. Zhu, Isotropization and hydrody- namization in weakly coupled heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 182301 (2015), arXiv:1506.06647 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Kurkela and A

    A. Kurkela and A. Mazeliauskas, Chemical Equilibra- tion in Hadronic Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 142301 (2019), arXiv:1811.03040 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Weilet al.(SMASH), Particle production and equilib- rium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, Phys

    J. Weilet al.(SMASH), Particle production and equilib- rium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C94, 054905 (2016), arXiv:1606.06642 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, Multiphase transport model for relativistic heavy ion col- lisions, Phys. Rev. C72, 064901 (2005)

    2005

  52. [52]

    Zhang, Zpc 1.0.1: a parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Computer Physics Communications 109, 193 (1998)

    B. Zhang, Zpc 1.0.1: a parton cascade for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, Computer Physics Communications 109, 193 (1998)

    1998

  53. [53]

    Coleman-Smith, B

    C. Coleman-Smith, B. M¨ uller, and S. Bass, Systematic monte-carlo studies of dijets at rhic using the vni/bms parton cascade, Nuclear Physics A904-905, 759c (2013), the Quark Matter 2012

    2013

  54. [54]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, Pythia 6.4 physics and manual, Journal of High Energy Physics 2006, 026 (2006)

    2006

  55. [55]

    Bleicher, E

    M. Bleicher, E. Zabrodin, C. Spieles, S. A. Bass, C. Ernst, S. Soff, L. Bravina, M. Belkacem, H. Weber, H. St¨ ocker, and W. Greiner, Relativistic hadron-hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dy- namics model, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics25, 1859 (1999)

    1999

  56. [56]

    Avramescu, V

    D. Avramescu, V. Greco, T. Lappi, H. M¨ antysaari, and D. M¨ uller, Heavy-flavor angular correlations as a direct probe of the glasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 172301 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Sun and L

    J.-A. Sun and L. Yan, Estimating the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions via direct photon ellip- tic flow, Phys. Rev. C109, 034917 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Yan and X.-G

    L. Yan and X.-G. Huang, Dynamical evolution of a mag- netic field in the preequilibrium quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D107, 094028 (2023), arXiv:2104.00831 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    R. Abir, C. Greiner, M. Martinez, and M. G. Mustafa, Generalisation of Gunion-Bertsch Formula for Soft Gluon Emission, Phys. Rev. D83, 011501 (2011), arXiv:1011.4638 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    J. F. Gunion and G. Bertsch, Hadronization by color bremsstrahlung, Phys. Rev. D25, 746 (1982)

    1982

  61. [61]

    Fochler, J

    O. Fochler, J. Uphoff, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner, Radiative parton processes in perturbative qcd: An improved ver- sion of the gunion and bertsch cross section from com- parisons to the exact result, Phys. Rev. D88, 014018 (2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    Fochler, J

    O. Fochler, J. Uphoff, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner, Radia- tive parton processes in perturbative QCD: An improved version of the gunion and bertsch cross section from comparisons to the exact result, Physical Review D88, 10.1103/physrevd.88.014018 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.014018 2013

  63. [63]

    Staudenmaier, D

    J. Staudenmaier, D. Oliinychenko, J. M. Torres-Rincon, and H. Elfner, Deuteron production in relativistic heavy ion collisions via stochastic multiparticle reactions, Phys. Rev. C104, 034908 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    Seifert and W

    E. Seifert and W. Cassing, Baryon-antibaryon dynam- ics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C97, 044907 (2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    O. Buss, T. Gaitanos, K. Gallmeister, H. van Hees, M. Kaskulov, O. Lalakulich, A. Larionov, T. Leitner, J. Weil, and U. Mosel, Transport-theoretical descrip- tion of nuclear reactions, Physics Reports512, 1 (2012), transport-theoretical Description of Nuclear Reactions

    2012

  66. [66]

    A. Lang, H. Babovsky, W. Cassing, U. Mosel, H.-G. Reusch, and K. Weber, A new treatment of boltzmann- like collision integrals in nuclear kinetic equations, Jour- nal of Computational Physics106, 391 (1993)

    1993

  67. [67]

    Uphoff, O

    J. Uphoff, O. Fochler, Z. Xu, and C. Greiner, Elastic and radiative heavy quark interactions in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics42, 115106 (2015)

    2015

  68. [68]

    S. M. H. Wong, Thermal and chemical equilibration in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C54, 2588 (1996)

    1996

  69. [69]

    M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Stein- berg, Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 205 (2007), arXiv:nucl- ex/0701025

    arXiv 2007

  70. [70]

    van der Schee, P

    W. van der Schee, P. Romatschke, and S. Pratt, Fully dynamical simulation of central nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 222302 (2013)

    2013

  71. [71]

    Abdul Khalek, J

    R. Abdul Khalek, J. J. Ethier, and J. Rojo (NNPDF), Nuclear parton distributions from lepton-nucleus scatter- ing and the impact of an electron-ion collider, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 471 (2019), arXiv:1904.00018 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Bierlich, G

    C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. L¨ onnblad, and H. Shah, The angantyr model for heavy-ion collisions in pythia8, Journal of High Energy Physics2018, 134 (2018)

    2018

  73. [73]

    J. R. Cudell, V. V. Ezhela, P. Gauron, K. Kang, Y. V. Kuyanov, S. B. Lugovsky, E. Martynov, B. Nicolescu, E. A. Razuvaev, and N. P. Tkachenko (COMPETE Col- laboration), Benchmarks for the forward observables at rhic, the tevatron-run ii, and the lhc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 201801 (2002)

    2002

  74. [74]

    Pawlik and W

    B. Pawlik and W. Guryn (STAR), Results on Total and Elastic Cross Sections in Proton-Proton Collisions at √s 19 = 200 GeV Obtained with the STAR Detector at RHIC (2020), arXiv:2005.00776 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Z. Xu, K. Zhou, P. Zhuang, and C. Greiner, Thermal- ization of gluons with bose-einstein condensation, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 182301 (2015)

    2015

  76. [76]

    T. S. Bir´ o, E. van Doorn, B. M¨ uller, M. H. Thoma, and X.-N. Wang, Parton equilibration in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C48, 1275 (1993)

    1993

  77. [77]

    Sengupta, J

    S. Sengupta, J. R. Bhatt, P. K. Kaw, and J. C. Parikh, Collective thermalization in quark gluon plasma, Pra- mana48, 655 (1997)

    1997

  78. [78]

    Berges, K

    J. Berges, K. Boguslavski, S. Schlichting, and R. Venu- gopalan, Turbulent thermalization process in heavy-ion collisions at ultrarelativistic energies, Phys. Rev. D89, 074011 (2014)

    2014

  79. [79]

    Almaalol, M

    D. Almaalol, M. Alqahtani, and M. Strickland, Anisotropic hydrodynamic modeling of 200 gev au-au col- lisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 044902 (2019)

    2019

  80. [80]

    G¨ otz, I

    N. G¨ otz, I. Karpenko, and H. Elfner, Bayesian analysis of a (3+1)D hybrid approach with initial conditions from hadronic transport, Phys. Rev. C112, 014910 (2025), arXiv:2503.10181 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.