Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 107 references

Comprehensive characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic properties of arterial tissues using guided-wave optical coherence elastography

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Arterial walls become markedly less viscous and more elastic as they are stretched, and the collagen-rich adventitia overtakes the media in stiffness under load.

desk verdict Strong OCE methodology with a real dataset, but the headline viscosity-with-stretch result needs a control fit before I'd trust the numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20107 v1 pith:DBSHXOJD submitted 2025-07-27 physics.bio-ph physics.optics

Yuxuan Jiang , Guo-Yang Li , Ruizhi Wang , Xu Feng , Yanhang Zhang , Seok-Hyun Yun This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phphysics.optics
keywords arterialbiomechanicsopticalcoherenceelastographyLambwavesnonlinearviscoelasticitylayer-specificmechanicalpropertiesfractionalviscoelasticmodelcollagenandelastincontributionsbiaxialstretch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using broadband guided-wave optical coherence elastography on biaxially stretched porcine aortas, the paper claims that arterial walls become markedly less viscous as they are stretched: elastic shear and tensile moduli rise with prestretch while loss moduli, a fractional viscoelastic order ($\delta$), and wave attenuation all fall. The claim matters because vascular stiffness and energy dissipation are central to diseases like hypertension and aneurysm, yet standard clinical measures such as pulse wave velocity cannot resolve layer-specific or viscoelastic behavior. The paper also argues that the collagen-rich adventitia is softer than the media at zero load but overtakes it in stiffness once stretch engages its collagen fibers, and that chemically removing collagen collapses the elastic moduli while leaving the viscoelastic 'spring-pot' nearly unchanged — evidence that elastin carries most low-strain viscous damping.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) model — a 'spring-pot' with complex modulus $\Omega = \eta(i\omega)^\delta$ coupled in parallel with an elastic spring — embedded in a generalized acousto-viscoelastic theory of small waves superimposed on a finitely pre-stressed solid. This replaces the purely elastic incremental stress tensor with a frequency-dependent one, and the dispersion of the two guided Lamb modes, A0 (quasi-antisymmetric, shear/bending dominated at low frequency) and S0 (quasi-symmetric, tensile/dilatational dominated), is solved through secular equations: 5×5 for a single layer and 9×9 for the two-layer media-adventitia model. The two-layer model gives each layer independent elastic moduli ($\alpha_1, \beta_1, \gamma_1$ for the media; $\alpha_2, \beta_2, \gamma_2$ for the adventitia) while sharing one pair of viscous parameters ($\eta$, $\delta$), and its high-frequency asymptotics divide into four regimes by the modulus ratio of adventitia to media, explaining why at zero stretch the modes asymptote to the adventitia's Scholte and shear velocities but under stretch approach the media's Rayleigh-wave limits. The Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel constitutive model then converts the stretch-dependent moduli into fiber parameters: ground-matrix shear modulus $\mu_0$, fiber stiffness $k_1$, nonlinear exponent $k_2$, fiber angle $\varphi$, and dispersion $\kappa$.

What would settle it

Perform dynamic mechanical analysis or slow stress-relaxation tests on the same porcine aorta tissue at the same equibiaxial stretch levels ($\lambda = 1.0$ to $1.4$) and measure the loss tangent directly; if dissipation does not systematically fall as stretch increases, the OCE-inferred viscosity reduction is a modeling artifact. A cheaper check: refit the two-layer guided-wave model with independent viscosity parameters for media and adventitia and see whether the stretch-dependent decline in $\eta$ and $\delta$ survives the extra degrees of freedom.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that arterial viscoelasticity is strongly deformation-dependent: increasing prestress reduces tissue viscosity. Measuring the dispersion of the A0 (shear-dominated) and S0 (tensile-dominated) guided wave modes over 1-20 kHz under equibiaxial stretch from $\lambda = 1.0$ to $1.4$, and fitting a two-layer viscoelastic guided-wave model, the authors find that shear and tensile moduli of both the media and adventitia rise with stretch, the adventitia stiffening faster than the media once $\lambda$ exceeds about 1.1. Simultaneously, the imaginary (loss) parts of the complex shear and tensile moduli, the fractional order $\delta$ of the Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model, and the directly measured wave attenuation all decrease with stretch, so the wall becomes more elastic and less energy-dissipating under load. Degrading collagen with cyanogen bromide reduces both shear and tensile moduli substantially but leaves the viscous parameters comparable to intact tissue, which the authors read as evidence that collagen governs nonlinear elastic stiffening while the elastin network dominates low-strain viscoelastic dissipation.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that viscosity falls with stretch rests entirely on the assumption that one shared pair of Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative parameters ($\eta$, $\delta$), applied identically to the media and adventitia, faithfully describes the wall's rheology — if the two layers dissipate energy differently, the apparent viscosity loss under stretch could be a modeling artifact rather than a real tissue property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under physiological prestretch, arterial walls dissipate less energy per pulse cycle than at low pressure, so vascular damping is pressure-dependent rather than a fixed tissue constant.
  • Constitutive models of arteries should treat viscosity as a stretch-dependent quantity: the KVFD parameters $\eta$ and $\delta$ and the loss tangent all change with prestress, so a single-valued arterial viscosity is incomplete.
  • The mechanical load shifts between layers: at $\lambda = 1$ the media is slightly stiffer than the adventitia, but by $\lambda = 1.4$ the adventitial tensile modulus is roughly 3.5 times the medial value, so collagen engagement is the dominant nonlinearity.
  • Collagen and elastin play separated roles: collagen drives the nonlinear rise of elastic moduli with stretch, while the elastin network accounts for most low-strain viscoelastic damping, since collagen digestion removes stiffness but not the spring-pot.
  • Guided-wave OCE can non-destructively map layer-specific, anisotropic, nonlinear viscoelasticity at roughly 10 µm resolution over 1-20 kHz, a capability that standard pulse-wave-velocity and ultrasound methods lack.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the viscosity drop holds in vivo under pulsatile pressure, then damping of pulse waves should vary over the cardiac cycle as the wall loads and unloads; this predicts measurable cycle-dependent changes in wave attenuation that pulse-wave imaging could test — a consequence the paper does not state.
  • The paper leaves the KVFD extrapolation from 1-20 kHz to heartbeat frequencies near 1 Hz unvalidated; a direct test would compare OCE-derived loss moduli with slow stress-relaxation or dynamic mechanical analysis on the same samples to see whether a single power law spans both frequency ranges.
  • A testable prediction follows for aged or glycated arteries: if collagen crosslinking raises the nonlinear exponent $k_2$, the same protocol should show sharper adventitial stiffening while low-strain viscous damping stays roughly constant — a dissociation the authors do not draw.
  • Because the two layers share one viscosity pair, an identifiability analysis over the 1-20 kHz band would settle whether the apparent viscosity reduction reflects a tissue property or a constraint imposed by the shared-parameter model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a guided-wave optical coherence elastography (OCE) method for characterizing ex vivo porcine thoracic aorta. Phase velocities of the A0 and S0 guided wave modes were measured over 1-20 kHz in the axial and circumferential directions at equibiaxial stretch ratios from 1.0 to 1.4. The data are fitted sequentially with a single-layer elastic model, a single-layer Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) viscoelastic model, and a two-layer viscoelastic model in which the media and adventitia have distinct elastic moduli but shared viscosity parameters. The authors report stretch-dependent increases in shear and tensile moduli, greater adventitial stiffening under load, and decreases in the fitted fractional-order parameter, loss modulus, and wave attenuation with increasing stretch, which they interpret as a reduction in arterial viscosity under prestress. Collagen removal with CNBr reduces elastic moduli and the GOH stiffening exponent while leaving the fitted viscosity parameters roughly unchanged.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful advance: it demonstrates that a single OCE platform can constrain nonlinear, anisotropic, and layered viscoelastic properties of arteries, and it provides a quantitative data point on stretch-dependent dissipation. The strengths of the paper are the progressive model hierarchy (elastic to viscoelastic to two-layer), the internal consistency check via attenuation prediction, the comparison with literature constitutive parameters, and the detailed analytic derivations in the Supplementary Notes. The main risk is identifiability: the viscosity trend is inferred from a many-parameter fit with acknowledged uncertainties exceeding 50%, and the paper does not currently demonstrate that the trend survives a restricted-model comparison.

major comments (4)
  1. [Viscoelastic two-layer wave model analysis; Table 3] The central claim that arterial viscosity decreases with stretch is supported mainly by the fitted KVFD parameters in Table 3, where the fractional order delta decreases from 0.45 +/- 0.06 to 0.09 +/- 0.02 (axial) and from 0.46 +/- 0.06 to 0.05 +/- 0.03 (circumferential) as lambda goes from 1.0 to 1.4. However, no control fit is reported in which eta and delta are fixed at their lambda = 1 values while only the elastic parameters are allowed to vary with stretch. Because the elastic moduli increase substantially over the same range and the authors state in the Discussion that parameter uncertainties exceeded 50% due to interdependence, the apparent delta decline could reflect parameter trade-off rather than a real reduction in dissipation. Please add such a restricted-model comparison, or an equivalent identifiability analysis such as profile likelihood or bootstrap over the joint parameter distribution, and report the resulting fit quality for the higher-stretch cases.
  2. [Viscoelastic two-layer wave model analysis] The two-layer model assumes identical eta and delta across media and adventitia, stated as a way 'to reduce the number of free parameters.' Yet the abstract and discussion describe layer-specific viscoelastic characterization. If the true layer-specific rheologies differ, the fitted shared viscosity parameters, and hence the stretch-dependent trend, may be biased averages. The assumption should be justified, relaxed in a sensitivity analysis, or the viscosity claim should be explicitly framed as an effective whole-wall property rather than a layer-specific intrinsic property.
  3. [Stretch-dependent viscosity parameters of arterial tissues; Fig. 6c] The attenuation evidence in Fig. 6c is limited to lambda = 1 to 1.2, whereas the largest drop in the fitted delta occurs at lambda = 1.3-1.4. Moreover, the predicted attenuation is computed from the same viscoelastic model and includes radiation losses into the fluid that depend on the elastic parameters. As presented, this validation does not independently confirm the high-stretch viscosity decrease; please extend the attenuation measurements to higher stretch ratios or state this limitation explicitly.
  4. [Table 3] In Table 3, the circumferential adventitia shear modulus alpha is listed as 48 +/- 1 kPa at lambda = 1.4, after values of 32, 110, 220, and 325 kPa at lower stretches. This is inconsistent with the monotonic stiffening described in the text and shown in Fig. 5b. If this is a typographical error (e.g., 480 kPa), it must be corrected; otherwise it undercuts the layer-specific stiffening claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The phrase 'gold clinical gold standard' is a typo; revise to 'gold standard'.
  2. [Equation (3)] The exponential notation in the text accompanying Eq. (3) is inconsistent: the exponent should be sky + i(kx - omega t), not the form currently printed as e^{six} e^{i(kx - omega x)}.
  3. [Methods, Analytic modeling] The sentence 'incompressibility yields lambda_x = (lambda_x lambda_z)^{-1}' should read lambda_y = (lambda_x lambda_z)^{-1}, or equivalently lambda_y = 1/(lambda_x lambda_z).
  4. [Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. S2] The statement that the S0 mode attenuation curves are similar is only demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. S2 at lambda = 1; please clarify whether the comparison was made at all stretch ratios.
  5. [Statistical analysis] The phrase 'A p-values less than 0.05' should be 'A p-value less than 0.05'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the stretch-dependent viscosity trend is a fitted output from measured dispersion data, not an input, and the attenuation comparison is an independent check.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a standard inverse problem: measured A0/S0 phase velocities are fitted with forward guided-wave models (single-layer elastic, single-layer viscoelastic, two-layer viscoelastic), and the fitted parameters are then inspected for trends. The central claim that viscosity decreases with stretch is not an input to the model. The KVFD constitutive assumption Ω = η(iω)^δ (Eq. 4) is taken from standard fractional viscoelasticity references (55,56), and the incremental prestressed viscoelastic stress relation (Eq. 5) is attributed to the authors' prior work (ref 52). However, Supplementary Note 2 re-derives that relation explicitly from the KVFD assumption and the stated incremental-dynamics framework; the derivation does not assume any stretch dependence of η or δ, and the decreasing δ with stretch is a fitted result, not a built-in property. The attenuation comparison in Fig. 6c uses parameters fitted to dispersion to predict the independently measured spatial decay of wave amplitude, so it is a genuine internal validation rather than a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. The two-layer model's assumption that η and δ are identical across layers is a model simplification that affects identifiability and uncertainty, and the paper acknowledges parameter interdependence and uncertainties exceeding 50%; this is a correctness or robustness concern, not circularity. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and the GOH constitutive model is a standard external framework. The derivation is therefore self-contained with respect to the paper's central claim, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a sizable set of fitted parameters (elastic moduli per layer, viscosity parameters, GOH constants) and on assumptions about tissue incompressibility, the GOH and KVFD constitutive models, the authors' own viscoelastic theory, and the flat-plate geometry. No new physical entities are introduced. The parameter counts are high relative to the data, and some parameter uncertainties exceed 50%.

free parameters (9)
  • alpha (shear modulus) per layer per direction per stretch = Table 3: e.g., media axial 40-66 kPa; adventitia axial 32-310 kPa
    Fitted from dispersion curves using the two-layer viscoelastic model; central to the reported stiffening trends.
  • 2*beta+2*gamma (tensile modulus) per layer per direction per stretch = Table 3: media axial 300-1000 kPa; adventitia axial 270-3500 kPa
    Fitted combination; individual beta and gamma are not separately reported.
  • eta (viscosity amplitude, KVFD) = Table 3: axial 10e-3 to 25e-3 s^delta; circumferential 1.3e-3 to 25e-3
    Fitted from dispersion, shared across layers; its stretch dependence is a key finding.
  • delta (fractional order, KVFD) = Table 3: 0.45 down to 0.05
    Fitted; decreases with stretch, indicating a shift toward elastic behavior.
  • mu0 (GOH ground matrix modulus) = Table 5: 20-36 kPa
    Obtained by fitting the GOH model to the measured alpha and 2beta+2gamma values.
  • k1 (GOH fiber stiffness) = Table 5: 71-120 kPa
    Fitted from the measured moduli.
  • k2 (GOH nonlinear exponent) = Table 5: 2.0-10.1
    Fitted from the measured moduli; lower than literature values, which the authors attribute to stretch ratio overestimation.
  • phi (fiber angle) = Table 5: 20-38 degrees
    Fitted from anisotropy data.
  • kappa (fiber dispersion) = Table 5: 0.15-0.19
    Fitted from anisotropy data.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Arterial tissue is incompressible
    Used in deriving the wave equations and boundary conditions (Methods, Eq. 1 and 7).
  • domain assumption Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel (GOH) hyperelastic constitutive model with two symmetric fiber families
    Used to derive acoustoelastic parameters and for GOH fitting (Supplementary Note 5, Eq. S32).
  • domain assumption Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD) viscoelastic model
    Assumed to describe viscoelastic behavior; it is not derived from tissue microstructure (Eq. 4 in main text).
  • ad hoc to paper Incremental dynamics of prestressed viscoelastic solids as per Jiang et al. 2025 (ref 52)
    The generalized acousto-viscoelastic theory is the authors' own prior work, used here without independent validation in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Both layers have identical viscosity parameters eta and delta
    Stated in the two-layer model to reduce free parameters; this assumption may bias the layer-specific viscosity findings.
  • domain assumption The arterial wall is a flat plate with air above and an inviscid water below, ignoring curvature and in-vivo boundary conditions
    Used in the guided wave model; authors acknowledge curvature and boundary condition limitations in the Discussion.
  • domain assumption The measured global stretch ratio equals the local stretch ratio in the wave propagation region
    Used to set lambda in the model; the authors later question this in Supplementary Note 9 to explain the low k2 value.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comprehensive characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic properties of arterial tissues using guided-wave optical coherence elastography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DBSHXOJD

@misc{pith2026250720107,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comprehensive characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic properties of arterial tissues using guided-wave optical coherence elastography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DBSHXOJD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20107}
}
read the original abstract

The mechanical properties of arterial walls are critical for maintaining vascular function under pulsatile pressure and are closely linked to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Despite advances in imaging and elastography, comprehensive characterization of the complex mechanical behavior of arterial tissues remains challenging. Here, we present a broadband guided-wave optical coherence elastography (OCE) technique, grounded in viscoelasto-acoustic theory, for quantifying the nonlinear viscoelastic, anisotropic, and layer-specific properties of arterial walls with high spatial and temporal resolution. Our results reveal a strong stretch dependence of arterial viscoelasticity, with increasing prestress leading to a reduction in tissue viscosity. Under mechanical loading, the adventitia becomes significantly stiffer than the media, attributable to engagement of collagen fibers. Chemical degradation of collagen fibers highlighted their role in nonlinear viscoelasticity. This study demonstrates the potential of OCE as a powerful tool for detailed profiling of vascular biomechanics, with applications in basic research and future clinical diagnosis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20107 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. S0- and A0-waves in the artery. a, Schematic of a flattened artery tissue on a water bath to avoid dehydration. The elastic waves are excited by the contact probe and are measured by an OCT beam. b, Photograph of the setup. c, Typical OCT image of a sample. M: Media. A: Adventitia. d, Representative wave motion profile measured in the artery for two different wave frequencies of 8 and 16 kHz. The displacement map (r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phase velocities in axial and circumferential directions, and their fitting curves using the single-layer elastic model. a. Axial dispersion relations of A0 and S0 modes measured at varying stretch ratios. b. Circumferential dispersion relations of A0 and S0 when stretch ratio 𝜆𝜆 increases from 1 to 1.4. Markers: experiments. Lines: fitting curves using the single-layer elastic model. The parameters are listed in [… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Single-layer viscoelastic model analysis of experimental data. a, Schematic of the KVFD model. b, Axial dispersion relations of A0 and S0 modes. c, Circumferential dispersion relations of A0 and S0 modes. Markers: experiments. Lines: fitting curves using the single-layer viscoelastic model. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-layer viscoelastic analysis of axial and circumferential velocities. a. Axial dispersion relations of A0 and S0 modes. b, Circumferential dispersion relations of A0 and S0 modes. Markers: experiments. Lines: fitting curves using the two-layer viscoelastic model [P…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Viscoelastic properties of arterial tissues after treating with CNBr. a. Representative dispersion relations for an arterial tissue before and after treatment. A 10% strain (𝜆𝜆 = 1.1) was applied in both cases. Curves: fitting with the viscoelastic one-layer model. b-e…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Aging, arterial stiffness, and hypertension

    Sun, Z. Aging, arterial stiffness, and hypertension. Hypertension 65, 252-256 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Weber, T. et al. Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation 109, 184-189 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    Kadoglou, N. P . et al. Arterial stiffness and novel biomarkers in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Regul. Pept. 179, 50-54 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    & Chowienczyk, P

    Cecelja, M. & Chowienczyk, P . Role of arterial stiffness in cardiovascular disease. JRSM Cardiovasc. Dis. 1, 1-10 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Weiss, D. et al. Mechanics -driven mechanobiological mechanisms of arterial tortuosity. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3574 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Effects of material non-symmetry on the mechanical behavior of arterial wall

    Han, H.-C. Effects of material non-symmetry on the mechanical behavior of arterial wall. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 129, 105157 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    & Saccomandi, G

    Gilchrist, M., Murphy, J., Pierrat, B. & Saccomandi, G. Slight asymmetry in the winding angles of reinforcing collagen can cause large shear stresses in arteries and even induce buckling. Meccanica 52, 3417-3429 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    & Rajagopal, K

    Rajagopal, K., Bridges, C. & Rajagopal, K. Towards an understanding of the mechanics underlying aortic dissection. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 6, 345-359 (2007)

    2007

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Witzenburg, C. M. et al. Failure of the porcine ascending aorta: multidirectional experiments and a unifying microstructural model. J. Biomech. Eng. 139, 031005 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    & McGarry, P

    FitzGibbon, B. & McGarry, P . Development of a test method to investigate mode II fracture and dissection of arteries. Acta Biomater. 121, 444-460 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    & Kassab, G

    Lu, X., Yang, J., Zhao, J., Gregersen, H. & Kassab, G. Shear modulus of porcine coronary artery: contributions of media and adventitia. Am. J. Physiol. -Heart Circul. Physiol. 285, H1966-H1975 (2003)

    2003

  4. [12]

    D., Hamid, M

    Stein, P . D., Hamid, M. S., Shivkumar, K., Davis, T. P ., Khaia, F. & Henry, J. W. Effects of cyclic flexion of coronary arteries on progression of atherosclerosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 73, 431-437 (1994)

    1994

  5. [13]

    Van Epps, J. S. & Vorp, D. A. A new three-dimensional exponential material model of the coronary arterial wall to include shear stress due to torsion. J. Biomech. Eng. 130, 051001 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    A., Gasser, T

    Holzapfel, G. A., Gasser, T. C. & Ogden, R. W. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elast. 61, 1-48 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    & Glagov, S

    Wolinsky, H. & Glagov, S. A lamellar unit of aortic medial structure and function in mammals. Circ. Res. 20, 99-111 (1967)

    1967

  8. [16]

    O'Connell, M. K. et al. The three-dimensional micro-and nanostructure of the aortic medial lamellar unit measured using 3D confocal and electron microscopy imaging. Matrix Biol. 27, 171-181 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    & Zhang, Y

    Zou, Y . & Zhang, Y . An experimental and theoretical study on the anisotropy of elastin network. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37, 1572-1583 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Chow, M.-J., Turcotte, R., Lin, C. P . & Zhang, Y . Arterial extracellular matrix: a mechanobiological study of the contributions and interactions of elastin and collagen. Biophys. J. 106, 2684-2692 (2014). 24

    2014

  11. [19]

    R., Duan, X., Gibson, G

    Hill, M. R., Duan, X., Gibson, G. A., Watkins, S. & Robertson, A. M. A theoretical and non- destructive experimental approach for direct inclusion of measured collagen orientation and recruitment into mechanical models of the artery wall. J. Biomech. 45, 762-771 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    & Zhang, Y

    Yu, X., Wang, Y . & Zhang, Y . Transmural variation in elastin fiber orientation distribution in the arterial wall. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 77, 745-753 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Jadidi, M. et al. Mechanical and structural changes in human thoracic aortas with age. Acta Biomater. 103, 172-188 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Wang, R., Mattson, J. M. & Zhang, Y . Effect of aging on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human descending thoracic aorta: Exper iments and constitutive modeling considering collagen crosslinking. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 140, 105705 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Geest, J. P . V., Sacks, M. S. & Vorp, D. A. The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. J. Biomech. 39, 1324-1334 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    D., Franchini, G., Giovanniello, F

    Amabili, M., Asgari, M., Breslavsky, I. D., Franchini, G., Giovanniello, F. & Holzapfel, G. A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of the layers of human descending thoracic aortas. Acta Biomater. 134, 401-421 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Liu, X. et al. Progressive mechanical and structural changes in anterior cerebral arteries with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's Res. Ther. 15, 185 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    D., Wainford, R

    Gkousioudi, A., Razzoli, M., Moreira, J. D., Wainford, R. D. & Zhang, Y . Renal denervation restores biomechanics of carotid arteries in a rat model of hypertension. Sci. Rep. 14, 495 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Sommer, G. et al. Mechanical strength of aneurysmatic and dissected human thoracic aortas at different shear loading modes. J. Biomech. 49, 2374-2382 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    A method for planar biaxial mechanical testing that includes in-plane shear

    Sacks, M. A method for planar biaxial mechanical testing that includes in-plane shear. J. Biomech. Eng. 121, 551-555 (1999)

    1999

  21. [29]

    & Fung, Y

    Deng, S., Tomioka, J., Debes, J. & Fung, Y . New experiments on shear modulus of elasticity of arteries. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circul. Physiol. 266, H1-H10 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    H., Jensen, R

    Peterson, L. H., Jensen, R. E. & Parnell, J. Mechanical properties of arteries in vivo. Circ. Res. 8, 622-639 (1960)

    1960

  23. [31]

    & Arditi, M

    Tardy, Y ., Meister, J., Perret, F., Brunner, H. & Arditi, M. Non-invasive estimate of the mechanical properties of peripheral arteries from ultrasonic and photoplethysmographic measurements. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 12, 39 (1991)

    1991

  24. [32]

    Adji, A., O'rourke, M. F. & Namasivayam, M. Arterial stiffness, its assessment, prognostic value, and implications for treatment. Am. J. Hypertens. 24, 5-17 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors:‘establishing normal and reference values’

    The Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors:‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur. Heart J. 31, 2338-2350 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    & Humphrey, J

    Roccabianca, S., Figueroa, C., Tellides, G. & Humphrey, J. D. Quantification of regional differences in aortic stiffness in the aging human. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 29, 618- 634 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Wilkinson, I. B. et al. Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysis. J. Hypertens. 16, 2079-2084 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    Wilkinson, I. B. et al. Increased central pulse pressure and augmentation index in subjects 25 with hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39, 1005-1011 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Wang, K.-L. et al. Wave reflection and arterial stiffness in the prediction of 15-year all - cause and cardiovascular mortalities: a community -based study. Hypertension 55, 799- 805 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    & Zhang, Y

    Milkovich, N., Gkousioudi, A., Seta, F., Suki, B. & Zhang, Y . Harmonic distortion of blood pressure waveform as a measure of arterial stiffness. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 842754 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Laurent, S. et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur. Heart J. 27, 2588-2605 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    J., Banya, W

    Fantin, F., Mattocks, A., Bulpitt, C. J., Banya, W. & Rajkumar, C. Is augmentation index a good measure of vascular stiffness in the elderly? Age Ageing 36, 43-48 (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    Marais, L. et al. Arterial stiffness assessment by shear wave elastography and ultrafast pulse wave imaging: comparison with reference techniques in normotensives and hypertensives. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 758-772 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Segers, P ., Rietzschel, E. R. & Chirinos, J. A. How to measure arterial stiffness in humans. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 40, 1034-1043 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    & Cao, Y

    Li, G.-Y ., Jiang, Y ., Zheng, Y ., Xu, W., Zhang, Z. & Cao, Y. Arterial stiffness probed by dynamic ultrasound elastography characterizes waveform of blood pressure. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 41, 1510-1519 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Kenyhercz, W. E. et al. Quantification of aortic stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography: Measurement reproducibility, pulse wave velocity comparison, changes over cardiac cycle, and relationship with age. Magn. Reson. Med. 75, 1920-1926 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    & Boppart, S

    Liang, X. & Boppart, S. A. Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 953-959 (2009)

    2009

  38. [46]

    Feng, X., Li, G.-Y ., Ramier, A., Eltony, A. M. & Yun, S.-H. In vivo stiffness measurement of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis using broadband Rayleigh-wave optical coherence elastography. Acta Biomater. 146, 295-305 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    & Yun, S.-H

    Li, G.-Y ., Feng, X. & Yun, S.-H. In vivo Optical Coherence Elastography Unveils Spatial Variation of Human Corneal Stiffness. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    M., Curatolo, A

    Zvietcovich, F., Birkenfeld, J., Varea, A., Gonzalez, A. M., Curatolo, A. & Marcos, S. Multi- meridian wave-based corneal optical coherence elastography in normal and keratoconic patients. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 63, 2380–A0183-2380–A0183 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    & Yun, S.- H

    Vinas-Pena, M., Feng, X., Li, G.- y. & Yun, S.- H. In situ measurement of the stiffness increase in the posterior sclera after UV -riboflavin crosslinking by optical coherence elastography. Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 5434-5446 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Wang, T. et al. Intravascular optical coherence elastography. Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 5418-5433 (2022)

    2022

  43. [52]

    & Yun, S.-H

    Jiang, Y ., Li, G.-Y ., Zhang, Z., Ma, S., Cao, Y . & Yun, S.-H. Incremental dynamics of prestressed viscoelastic solids and its applications in shear wave elastography. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 215, 104310 (2025). 26

    2025

  44. [53]

    Ogden, R. W. Incremental statics and dynamics of pre- stressed elastic materials. In: Waves in nonlinear pre-stressed materials. Springer (2007)

    2007

  45. [54]

    J., Atienza, J

    Craiem, D., Rojo, F. J., Atienza, J. M., Armentano, R. L. & Guinea, G. V. Fractional-order viscoelasticity applied to describe uniaxial stress relaxation of human arteries. Phys. Med. Biol. 53, 4543 (2008)

    2008

  46. [55]

    & Holm, S

    Parker, K., Szabo, T. & Holm, S. Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 215012 (2019)

    2019

  47. [59]

    Holzapfel, G. A. & Ogden, R. W. Modeling the biomechanical properties of soft biological tissues: Constitutive theories. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solids 112, 105634 (2025)

    2025

  48. [60]

    Nordsletten, D. et al. A viscoelastic model for human myocardium. Acta Biomater. 135, 441-457 (2021)

    2021

  49. [61]

    A., Holzapfel, G

    Zhang, W., Jadidi, M., Razian, S. A., Holzapfel, G. A., Kamenskiy, A. & Nordsletten, D. A. A viscoelastic constitutive model for human femoropopliteal arteries. Acta Biomater. 170, 68-85 (2023)

    2023

  50. [62]

    A., Holzapfel, G

    Zhang, W., Jadidi, M., Razian, S. A., Holzapfel, G. A., Kamenskiy, A. & Nordsletten, D. A. A viscoelastic constitutive framework for aging muscular and elastic arteries. Acta Biomater. 188, 223-241 (2024)

    2024

  51. [63]

    Giudici, A. et al. Constituent-based quasi -linear viscoelasticity: a revised quasi -linear modelling framework to capture nonlinear viscoelasticity in arteries. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 22, 1607-1623 (2023)

    2023

  52. [64]

    & Avril, S

    Trabelsi, O., Dumas, V., Breysse, E., Laroche, N. & Avril, S. In vitro histomechanical effects of enzymatic degradation in carotid arteries during inflation tests with pulsatile loading. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 103, 103550 (2020)

    2020

  53. [65]

    M., Ashcroft, B

    Beenakker, J.-W. M., Ashcroft, B. A., Lindeman, J. H. & Oosterkamp, T. H. Mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix of the aorta studied by enzymatic treatments. Biophys. J. 102, 1731-1737 (2012)

    2012

  54. [66]

    H., Fan, Z., Lowe, M

    Quintanilla, F. H., Fan, Z., Lowe, M. & Craster, R. Guided waves' dispersion curves in anisotropic viscoelastic single-and multi-layered media. Proc. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 471, 20150268 (2015)

    2015

  55. [67]

    Couade, M. et al. Quantitative assessment of arterial wall biomechanical properties using shear wave imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 1662-1676 (2010)

    2010

  56. [68]

    L., Niu, Y ., Marlevi, D., Edelman, E

    Olender, M. L., Niu, Y ., Marlevi, D., Edelman, E. R. & Nezami, F. R. Impact and implications of mixed plaque class in automated characterization of complex atherosclerotic lesions. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 97, 102051 (2022)

    2022

  57. [69]

    E., Villiger, M., Otsuka, K

    Bouma, B. E., Villiger, M., Otsuka, K. & Oh, W.-Y . Intravascular optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 2660-2686 (2017). 27

    2017

  58. [70]

    Bouma, B. et al. Evaluation of intracoronary stenting by intravascular optical coherence tomography. Heart 89, 317-320 (2003)

    2003

  59. [71]

    Liu, Y ., Nezami, F. R. & Edelman, E. R. A Transformer-based pyramid network for coronary calcified plaque segmentation in intravascular optical coherence tomography images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 113, 102347 (2024)

    2024

  60. [72]

    & Zhu, J

    Liu, S., Meng, X., Wang, C., Ma, J., Fan, F. & Zhu, J. Handheld optical coherence tomography for tissue imaging: current design and medical applications. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 60, 292-316 (2025)

    2025

  61. [73]

    Li, G.-Y . et al. Guided waves in pre-stressed hyperelastic plates and tubes: Application to the ultrasound elastography of thin-walled soft materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 102, 67- 79 (2017)

    2017

  62. [75]

    Wave propagation in elastic solids

    Achenbach, J. Wave propagation in elastic solids. Elsevier (2012)

    2012

  63. [76]

    Jiang, Y . et al. Simultaneous imaging of bidirectional guided waves probes arterial mechanical anisotropy, blood pressure, and stress synchronously. Sci Adv. (2025) (accepted). arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20288

    2025 arXiv

  64. [77]

    C., Ogden, R

    Gasser, T. C., Ogden, R. W. & Holzapfel, G. A. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 15-35 (2006). 1 Comprehensive characterization of nonlinear viscoelastic properties of arterial tissues using guided -...

    2006

  65. [78]

    exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀42 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  66. [79]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀43 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  67. [80]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀44 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  68. [81]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀45 = 0, 𝑀𝑀51 = 𝑠𝑠1(1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  69. [82]

    exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀52 = −𝑠𝑠1(1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  70. [83]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀53 = 𝑠𝑠2(1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  71. [84]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀54 = −𝑠𝑠2(1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  72. [85]

    (S11) where 𝑖𝑖 in the element 𝑀𝑀15 and 𝑀𝑀35 denotes the imaginary unit

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀55 = 0. (S11) where 𝑖𝑖 in the element 𝑀𝑀15 and 𝑀𝑀35 denotes the imaginary unit. 8 Supplementary Note 2. Derivation of the pre- stressed viscoelastic single- layer model Consider a pre-stressed viscoelastic material subjected to linear elastic wave propagation;...

  73. [86]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀44 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  74. [87]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ) , 𝑀𝑀45 = 0, 𝑀𝑀51 = �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠1 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠1 3 − 𝜌𝜌 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠1� exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀52 = − �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠1 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠1 3 − 𝜌𝜌 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠1� exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀53 = �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠2 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠2 3 − 𝜌𝜌 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠2� exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀54 = − �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠2 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠2 3 − 𝜌𝜌 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠2� exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ), 𝑀𝑀55 = 0. (S19) wh...

  75. [89]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀13 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  76. [90]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀14 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  77. [91]

    (S26) where 𝑖𝑖 in the element 𝑀𝑀39 and 𝑀𝑀59 denotes the imaginary unit

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀15 = 𝑀𝑀16 = 𝑀𝑀17 = 𝑀𝑀18 = 𝑀𝑀19 = 0, 𝑀𝑀21 = �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠1 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠1 3 − 𝜌𝜌1 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠1� exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀22 = �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠2 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠2 3 − 𝜌𝜌1 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠2� exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀23 = − �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠1 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠1 3 − 𝜌𝜌1 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠𝑠1� exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀24 = − �𝐶𝐶1𝑠𝑠2 − 𝐶𝐶2𝑠𝑠2 3 − 𝜌𝜌1 𝜔𝜔2 𝑖𝑖2 𝑠...

  78. [92]

    exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀12 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  79. [93]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀13 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  80. [94]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀14 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  81. [95]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀21 = 𝑠𝑠1(1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  82. [96]

    exp(𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀22 = 𝑠𝑠2(1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  83. [97]

    exp(𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀23 = −𝑠𝑠1(1 + 𝑠𝑠2

  84. [98]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠1𝑘𝑘ℎ1) , 𝑀𝑀24 = −𝑠𝑠2(1 + 𝑠𝑠1

  85. [99]

    exp(−𝑠𝑠2𝑘𝑘ℎ1), 𝑀𝑀35 = exp(−𝑠𝑠1 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2) , 𝑀𝑀36 = exp(−𝑠𝑠2 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2) , 𝑀𝑀37 = exp(𝑠𝑠1 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2) , 𝑀𝑀38 = exp(𝑠𝑠2 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2), 𝑀𝑀39 = −𝑖𝑖𝜉𝜉 exp(−𝜉𝜉𝑘𝑘ℎ2), 𝑀𝑀45 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠1 ∗2) exp(−𝑠𝑠1 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2) , 𝑀𝑀46 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2 ∗2) exp(−𝑠𝑠2 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2), 𝑀𝑀47 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠1 ∗2) exp(𝑠𝑠1 ∗𝑘𝑘ℎ2) , 𝑀𝑀48 = (1 + 𝑠𝑠2 ∗2) exp(𝑠𝑠...

  86. [100]

    𝜉𝜉 is defined in Eq. (S8). 16 Supplementary Note 5. Explicit forms of the acoustoelastic parameters Gasser-Ogden-Holzapfel (GOH) constitutive model has been widely adopted to describe arterial hyperelasticity 7. As shown in Fig. S4, we cut the tube longitudinally and unfold it...

  87. [101]

    The parameter 𝒜𝒜𝑧𝑧𝑦𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑦𝑦0 used in Eqs

    𝐼𝐼4 = 𝐼𝐼6 = 𝜆𝜆𝑐𝑐 2cos2𝜑𝜑 + 𝜆𝜆𝑎𝑎 2sin2𝜑𝜑. The parameter 𝒜𝒜𝑧𝑧𝑦𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑦𝑦0 used in Eqs. (S20) and (S27) is equal to 𝛼𝛼𝑐𝑐 when along the axial direction, while equal to 𝛼𝛼𝑎𝑎 when along the circumferential direction. In the stress-free state (𝜆𝜆𝑐𝑐 = 𝜆𝜆𝑟𝑟 = 𝜆𝜆𝑎𝑎 = 1), Eq. (S33) reduces t...

    1950

  88. [102]

    Ogden, R. W. Incremental statics and dynamics of pre-stressed elastic materials. In: Waves in nonlinear pre-stressed materials. Springer (2007)

    2007

  89. [103]

    Incremental equations for soft fibrous materials

    Destrade, M. Incremental equations for soft fibrous materials. In: Nonlinear mechanics of soft fibrous materials. Springer (2015)

    2015

  90. [104]

    Li, G.-Y . et al. Guided waves in pre-stressed hyperelastic plates and tubes: Application to the ultrasound elastography of thin- walled soft materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 102, 67- 79 (2017)

    2017

  91. [105]

    & Yun, S.-H

    Jiang, Y ., Li, G.-Y ., Zhang, Z., Ma, S., Cao, Y . & Yun, S.-H. Incremental dynamics of prestressed viscoelastic solids and its applications in shear wave elastography. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 215, 104310 (2025)

    2025

  92. [106]

    & Holm, S

    Parker, K., Szabo, T. & Holm, S. Towards a consensus on rheolo gical models for elastography in soft tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 64, 215012 (2019)

    2019

  93. [107]

    L., Charras, G

    Bonfanti, A., Kaplan, J. L., Charras, G. & Kabla, A. Fractional viscoelastic models for power-law materials. Soft Matter 16, 6002-6020 (2020)

    2020

  94. [108]

    C., Ogden, R

    Gasser, T. C., Ogden, R. W. & Holzapfel, G. A. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 15-35 (2006)

    2006

  95. [109]

    & Yun, S.-H

    Li, G.-Y ., Feng, X. & Yun, S.-H. Simultaneous tensile and shear measurement of the human cornea in vivo using S0-and A0-wave optical coherence elastography. Acta Biomater. 175, 114-122 (2024)

    2024

  96. [110]

    & Ogden, R

    Dowaikh, M. & Ogden, R. On surface waves and deformations in a pre-stressed incompressible elastic solid. IMA J. Appl. Math. 44, 261-284 (1990)

    1990

  97. [111]

    & Ogden, R

    Otténio, M., Destrade, M. & Ogden, R. W. Acoustic waves at the interface of a pre-stressed incompressible elastic solid and a viscous fluid. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 42, 310- 320 (2007)

    2007

  98. [112]

    & Spronck, B

    Giudici, A. & Spronck, B. The role of layer-specific residual stresses in arterial mechanics: analysis via a novel modelling framework. Artery Res. 28, 41-54 (2022)

    2022

  99. [113]

    & Holzapfel, G

    Sommer, G. & Holzapfel, G. A. 3D constitutive modeling of the biaxial mechanical response of intact and layer -dissected human carotid arteries. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 5, 116-128 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.