REVIEW 2 cited by
Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Offline preference optimization is a key method for enhancing and controlling the quality of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. Typically, preference optimization is approached as an offline supervised learning task using manually-crafted convex loss functions. While these methods are based on theoretical insights, they are inherently constrained by human creativity, so the large search space of possible loss functions remains under explored. We address this by performing LLM-driven objective discovery to automatically discover new state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms without (expert) human intervention. Specifically, we iteratively prompt an LLM to propose and implement new preference optimization loss functions based on previously-evaluated performance metrics. This process leads to the discovery of previously-unknown and performant preference optimization algorithms. The best performing of these we call Discovered Preference Optimization (DiscoPOP), a novel algorithm that adaptively blends logistic and exponential losses. Experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of DiscoPOP and its successful transfer to held-out tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?
A systematic comparison of black-box evolution, neural and symbolic distillation, and LLM-based proposal for meta-learning RL algorithms yields practical recommendations: warm-started LLM proposal is sample-efficient,...
-
Automated Capability Discovery via Foundation Model Self-Exploration
ACD automatically generates thousands of open-ended tasks and clusters them into dozens of capability and failure categories, with LLM-vs-human scoring agreement (F1 = 0.86).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.