Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"

C. Naitza; E. Marinari; F. Ritort; F. Zuliani; G. Parisi; M. Picco

REVIEW

Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv cond-mat/9811304 v3 pith:DCLDMTF4 submitted 1998-11-20 cond-mat.dis-nn

Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"

E. Marinari , C. Naitza , G. Parisi , M. Picco , F. Ritort , F. Zuliani This is my paper

classification cond-mat.dis-nn

keywords commentcond-matanalysisbokilbraybreakingclaimedclaims

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the analysis of reference cond-mat/9808140.

Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"

discussion (0)