Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multinational AGI Consortium (MAGIC): A Proposal for International Coordination on AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09217 v1 pith:DD6REFZB submitted 2023-10-13 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords magicadvancedaddressartificialconsortiumglobalintelligencemoratorium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a Multinational Artificial General Intelligence Consortium (MAGIC) to mitigate existential risks from advanced artificial intelligence (AI). MAGIC would be the only institution in the world permitted to develop advanced AI, enforced through a global moratorium by its signatory members on all other advanced AI development. MAGIC would be exclusive, safety-focused, highly secure, and collectively supported by member states, with benefits distributed equitably among signatories. MAGIC would allow narrow AI models to flourish while significantly reducing the possibility of misaligned, rogue, breakout, or runaway outcomes of general-purpose systems. We do not address the political feasibility of implementing a moratorium or address the specific legislative strategies and rules needed to enforce a ban on high-capacity AGI training runs. Instead, we propose one positive vision of the future, where MAGIC, as a global governance regime, can lay the groundwork for long-term, safe regulation of advanced AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI Governance to Avoid Extinction: The Strategic Landscape and Actionable Research Questions

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A MIRI governance agenda argues for an internationally coordinated halt to dangerous AI development and catalogs around 400 research questions across four strategic scenarios.

  2. The Manhattan Trap: Why a Race to Artificial Superintelligence is Self-Defeating

    cs.CY 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under the same assumptions used to justify an ASI race, racing to superintelligence is strategically self-defeating, and the situation is better modeled as a trust dilemma in which mutual restraint is both preferable ...

Pith tools