Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.09998 v2 pith:DFW567JF submitted 2024-01-18 math.PR

On the anti-concentration functions of some familiar families of distributions

classification math.PR
keywords alphadistributionsanti-concentrationfamiliarfamiliesfunctionmathbfbinomial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Let $\{X_{\alpha}\}$ be a family of random variables following a certain type of distributions with finite expectation $\mathbf{E}[X_{\alpha}]$ and finite variance ${\rm Var}(X_{\alpha})$, where $\alpha$ is a parameter. Motivated by the recent paper of Hollom and Portier (arXiv: 2306.07811v1), we study the anti-concentration function $(0, \infty)\ni y\to \inf_{\alpha}\mathbf{P}\left(|X_{\alpha}-\mathbf{E}[X_{\alpha}]|\geq y \sqrt{{\rm Var}(X_{\alpha})}\right)$ and find its explicit expression. We show that, for certain familiar families of distributions, including uniform distributions, exponential distributions, non-degenerate Gaussian distributions and student's $t$-distribution, the anti-concentration function is not identically zero, while for some other familiar families of distributions, including binomial, Poisson, negative binomial, hypergeometric, Gamma, Pareto, Weibull, log-normal and Beta distributions, the anti-concentration function is identically zero.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.