Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 88 references

Hyperfine driven spin relaxation of charge carriers in metal-halide perovskites

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims an exact Kubo–Toyabe relaxation function for localized carrier spins in metal-halide perovskites, and uses it to extract localization radii and correlation times from Faraday-rotation data.

desk verdict A useful adaptation of the muon Kubo–Toyabe model to hyperfine spin relaxation in perovskites, with testable composition predictions, but the experimental section does not yet show the dynamical model is necessary. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15224 v1 pith:DGEE7LJ4 submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Guillaume Lague , Frédérick Bernardot , Mauricio Calvo , Olfa Selmi , Sofia Masi , Christophe Testelin , Hernan Miguez , Ivan Mora-Sero
show 1 more author
Maria Chamarro
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords metal-halideperovskitesspinrelaxationhyperfineinteractionKubo-ToyabemodelcarrierlocalizationFaradayrotationnuclearbathdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Localized electrons and holes in metal-halide perovskites relax their spins through the hyperfine field of lattice nuclei, and this paper claims that the decay can be described exactly, at any correlation time, by a dynamical version of the Kubo–Toyabe model borrowed from muon-spin relaxation. The exact relaxation function G(t) interpolates between the static Merkulov-Rosen-Efros limit and the short-correlation mono-exponential limit, and it is needed because bulk perovskites sit in the intermediate regime where those approximations fail. The model reveals distinct channels: electron spins are governed by halogen nuclei, while hole spins are governed by metal (lead) nuclei, so lighter halogens or lighter metals should give longer spin lifetimes. Fitting time-resolved Faraday rotation on MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 films yields nuclear-field widths, nanosecond hyperfine correlation times, and localization radii around 5 nm. If correct, the model turns spin-relaxation measurements into a quantitative probe of carrier localization in perovskites.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dynamical Kubo–Toyabe strong-collision relaxation function G(t), built by summing over random hops that reset the local hyperfine field: g^(0)(t) = exp(-nu t) g(t) and g^(n)(t) as repeated convolutions (Eqs. 8–10), with hopping rate nu = 1/tau_c. This machinery extends the static Merkulov-Rosen-Efros function g(t) to finite correlation times, and the discrete-time strong-collision numerical scheme makes it computable. The companion identities (Eqs. 19–20) connect the variance DeltaB_N^2 of the Gaussian nuclear-field distribution to the localization radius a0 and the hyperfine coupling constants.

What would settle it

Measure the longitudinal-field Faraday-rotation recovery on MAPbI3, MAPbBr3, and MAPbCl3 films with matched localization volumes at 2 K: the model predicts electron spin lifetimes spanning from a few nanoseconds (iodine) to hundreds of nanoseconds (chlorine), so a flat halogen dependence would falsify the electron-halogen channel; alternatively, a zero-field time-resolved trace at omega_N tau_c ~ 2 should show the non-exponential shape of G(t), which no single-exponential fit can reproduce.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the longitudinal spin relaxation of a localized carrier in a fluctuating nuclear field is governed by the dynamical Kubo–Toyabe relaxation function G(t), defined as the sum over all numbers of strong-collision hops n of the functions g^(n)(t) in Eqs. (8)–(10). Each hop randomly redraws the local hyperfine field from the Gaussian distribution of Eq. (3), so the function interpolates exactly between the static Merkulov-Rosen-Efros limit (long correlation time) and the short-correlation mono-exponential limit, and it differs from both when omega_N tau_c ~ 1. For metal-halide perovskites the model shows that electron spins feel mainly halogen nuclei while hole s

Load-bearing premise

The extracted localization radii and the predicted halide/cation trends rest on hyperfine coupling constants computed from atomic wavefunctions, which the authors chose because no bulk perovskite experimental values exist; if those constants are wrong by a factor of two, the radii shift by roughly 40 percent and the trends could soften.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In bulk lead-halide perovskites, carrier spins sit in the intermediate regime tau_c/T1 ~ 1, so neither the static frozen-bath model nor the short-correlation mono-exponential formula fits the data; the full G(t) is required and recovers both as limits.
  • Electron spin relaxation is controlled by halogen nuclei; replacing iodine with bromine or chlorine lengthens electron spin lifetimes from nanoseconds toward hundreds of nanoseconds in MAPbCl3.
  • Hole spin relaxation is controlled by metal nuclei; replacing lead with tin approximately doubles the hole spin lifetime for the same localization volume.
  • Fitting the field-dependent Faraday-rotation signal at a fixed delay extracts the nuclear-field width DeltaB_N, the hyperfine correlation time tau_c (about 1–5 ns), and localization radii of 4.9–6.2 nm for electrons and holes in MAPbI3 and FAPbI3.
  • The same exact function unifies the two limiting regimes, so parameters extracted from experiments in any correlation-time regime can be compared on equal footing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted halogen trend is directly testable: in MAPbI3, MAPbBr3, and MAPbCl3 films with comparable localization volumes, the electron spin lifetime should scale roughly with the halogen hyperfine constants; observing a weaker trend would point to a different relaxation channel.
  • Because the extracted localization radii inherit the uncertainty of the atomic hyperfine constants, an independent measurement of a0 (for example from temperature dependence of the localization or from the magnetic-field dependence of the spin signal) would calibrate the constants and sharpen the composition predictions.
  • The strong-collision assumption—complete randomization of the nuclear field after each hop—could be relaxed in a future model; comparing the extracted tau_c values with independently estimated hopping rates would show how much of the correlation time is truly hopping versus field memory.
  • The framework is not limited to perovskites; any localized carrier system with a finite hyperfine correlation time (defects, nanocrystals, organic semiconductors) could be analyzed with the same G(t), turning spin-relaxation data into localization radii there too.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper adapts the dynamical Kubo–Toyabe strong-collision model, originally developed for muon spin relaxation, to describe longitudinal hyperfine-driven spin relaxation of localized charge carriers in metal-halide perovskites for arbitrary hyperfine correlation time τc. After presenting the static MER relaxation function and the short-τc (mono-exponential) approximation, the authors derive a general relaxation function G(t) as a Poisson-weighted convolution of static relaxation functions, and compute electron and hole nuclear-field variances ΔBN for perovskite Bloch states. They predict that electron spin relaxation is strongly halogen-dependent while hole relaxation is governed by the metal cation, with lighter halogens and Sn substitution leading to longer spin lifetimes. The model is then applied to photo-induced Faraday rotation data on FAPbI3 and MAPbI3 at 13 ns delay, extracting ΔBN,e, ΔBN,h, τc,e, τc,h and, via Eqs. (19)–(20), localization radii a0. The paper concludes that bulk MHPs lie in the intermediate regime τc/T1 ∼ 1, requiring the exact dynamical treatment.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful theoretical framework: the strong-collision Kubo–Toyabe formalism is a standard and internally consistent way to interpolate between the static MER limit and motional narrowing, and the composition trends (halogen and cation substitution) are concrete, falsifiable predictions. The use of literature hyperfine constants rather than a fit to the model is a strength: the predictions are not circular. The paper also explicitly identifies the uncertainty in the choice of atomic hyperfine constants (Ref. [47] vs. [50]) and the lack of bulk experimental hyperfine values. However, the experimental demonstration—which is the basis for the 'necessity of the exact dynamical solution' and for the extracted parameters in Table 6—is not supported by the analysis shown: no error bars, no comparison with simpler models, and no identifiability check are presented. Since the quantitative reliability of ΔBN, τc, and a0 is load-bearing for the paper's main applied claims, the manuscript needs substantial revision before acceptance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 6(c,d), Eqs. (19)–(20)] The extracted parameters in Table 6 are the central experimental result, but the fitting procedure is not established as unique or even necessary. Each fit is to a single PFR-vs-longitudinal-field curve at a fixed 13 ns delay, with four dynamical parameters (ΔBN,e, τc,e, ΔBN,h, τc,h) plus the relative electron/hole amplitudes, which are not explicitly fixed or reported. No error bars, confidence intervals, residual plots, or parameter-correlation/identifiability analysis are given. The statement that a short-τc approximation gives 'approximately half as long' correlation times is supported only by earlier work [24], not by fits to the present data. Since the paper claims that the exact dynamical model is necessary, the authors should quantitatively compare the dynamical model with mono-exponential, Smirnov, and static-MER fits to the same data (e.g., via residuals or an information crite
  2. [Section III C, Tables 1–2] The hyperfine coupling constants are taken from Roothaan–Hartree–Fock calculations (Ref. [47]) because no bulk perovskite experimental values exist; the authors explicitly acknowledge that Morton–Preston values (Ref. [50]) differ. Since ΔBN^2 is proportional to A^2 (Eqs. 19–20), and a0 ∝ A^(−2/3), a factor-of-2 uncertainty in A would shift a0 by about 40% and could soften or alter the predicted halogen and cation trends in Figs. 4 and 5. The acknowledgment is honest, but the manuscript provides no quantitative sensitivity analysis. Please propagate the [47] vs. [50] difference through the predicted relaxation functions and the extracted localization radii, or give a clear argument for why the chosen set is the more reliable one in this context.
  3. [Section IV and Appendix A, Eqs. (11)–(14)] The fits for FAPI and MAPI use the stable low-temperature phases (tetragonal P4/mbm and orthorhombic Pnma, Table 5) but apply Bloch states and hyperfine coupling matrices derived for a cubic structure. The text says the change will 'slightly modify' the Bloch states, but no estimate of the resulting uncertainty in ΔBN or a0 is provided. Given that the extracted localization radii are close to 5 nm and that a0 depends on ΔBN^−2/3, even a modest phase-induced change in the hyperfine matrix elements may be non-negligible. A quantitative or referenced justification for treating the cubic form as sufficient would strengthen the reliability of Table 6.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] Typographical errors: 'particulaly' (first sentence of the Abstract), 'te dynamical model' (Section II B), 'Ti:Saphirre' (Section IV), 'MaSnI3' in the caption of Fig. 5, and inconsistent use of 'a0, e' vs 'a0,e' in Table 6. These should be corrected before publication.
  2. [Section II B, Eq. (5) and Fig. 2] The list of three regimes in the text should be checked for numerical consistency: the text describes ωN τc = 0.01 as the short-correlation regime and Figure 1 shows curves for 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, but the discussion of Fig. 2(a) states that at ωN τc = 100 the dynamical and MER functions are 'very similar', which is consistent; however, the intermediate-regime comparison at ωN τc = 2.0 in Fig. 2(b) would benefit from specifying the parameter values and definition of reduced time more explicitly in the caption.
  3. [References] Reference [36] duplicates Reference [29] (same Hayano, Uemura, Imazato, Nishida, Yamazaki, Kubo paper) and should be consolidated. Also, the g-factor signs in Table 6 (ge and gh) are given with signs, but the ωN values are all positive; the text should clarify whether |g| is used in the Larmor-frequency conversion.
  4. [Section IV, Table 6] The caption and text do not specify whether the electron and hole contributions in the PFR fits were weighted by their respective spin polarizations or by independent amplitude parameters. Please clarify the amplitude treatment in the fitting procedure and state the number of data points per curve.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dynamic Kubo-Toyabe fits and composition predictions are not re-labeled inputs; the self-citations used are independent measurements, with only a minor motivating self-citation.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. G(t) in Eqs. (8)-(10) is the standard dynamic Kubo-Toyabe strong-collision relaxation function imported from Hayano et al. [29] and Allodi/de Renzi [37]; it is a genuine convolution extension of the static MER/Kubo-Toyabe g(t), not a redefinition of the target spin lifetime or of the fitted parameters. The compositional predictions (Sec. III C, Figs. 4-5) are obtained by inserting literature Roothaan-Hartree-Fock hyperfine constants [47] and stated Bloch-state admixture coefficients into Eqs. (19)-(20); they are not fitted to the PFR data, so they are genuine predictions rather than fitted inputs. In Sec. IV, DeltaB_N and tau_c are fitted to the PFR curves, and DeltaB_N is then converted to localization radii through Eqs. (19)-(20); this is a parameter extraction followed by a physical conversion, not a fit parameter renamed as a prediction. The g-factors and spin-dynamics inputs taken from the authors' earlier work (Refs. [24], [52], [53]) are independent measurements, and hyperfine coupling matrices are standard expressions referenced to external theory. The only self-citation approaching load-bearing status is the statement that the short-tau_c approximation gives correlation times about half as long, supported by Ref. [24]; however, the present paper's own fits place tau_c/T1 ~ 1 independently, so the necessity claim does not reduce to that citation. The absence of a quantitative mono-exponential comparison and identifiability analysis for the four-parameter fits of single 13-ns PFR curves is a correctness/over-claim risk, not a circularity, and the paper itself acknowledges that other spin relaxation models can fit the data and that the FWHM of the curves is not a direct measure of DeltaB_N.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model itself is adapted from prior muon-spin literature, so no new physical entities are introduced. The quantitative predictions and extracted radii rest on several chosen parameters: assumed a0 and tau_c for hypothetical compositions, interpolated orbital admixture coefficients, and a specific choice of atomic hyperfine constants. The strongest assumptions are the strong-collision Markovian dynamics and the transferability of atomic RHF constants to bulk perovskites.

free parameters (5)
  • carrier localization radius a0 = 5 nm = 5 nm
    Assumed equal for all carriers and all three perovskites in the composition predictions (Sec. III C). Predicted spin lifetimes scale strongly with a0, so the quantitative trends are tied to this choice.
  • hyperfine correlation time tau_c = 4.0 ns = 4.0 ns
    Assumed for MAPbI3, MAPbBr3, MAPbCl3, and MASnI3 in the predictions (Sec. III C). Determines which relaxation regime applies.
  • Pb orbital admixture coefficients |C_Pb,6s|^2=0.30, |C_Pb,6p|^2=0.88 = 0.30 and 0.88
    Interpolated within DFT ranges (0.2-0.4 and 0.80-0.95) and used for all computed hyperfine constants in Tables 1-4 and for the experimental localization radii.
  • Choice of atomic hyperfine constants from Koh-Miller [47] over Morton-Preston [50] = Koh-Miller RHF values
    The authors note that no bulk perovskite experimental values exist and choose the RHF constants. Different published constants would shift ΔBN and hence all extracted localization radii.
  • Fitted ΔBN,e, ΔBN,h, tau_c,e, tau_c,h for FAPI and MAPI = FAPI: 0.51 mT, 2.0 mT, 3.3 ns, 1.7 ns; MAPI: 0.98 mT, 5.6 mT, 4.6 ns, 4.0 ns
    Extracted from the PFR-vs-field fits in Figure 6(c,d). No uncertainties are reported, and the values are model-dependent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Strong-collision Markovian randomization of the nuclear field at a rate nu = 1/tau_c
    Introduced in Eqs. (8)-(10); each hop completely replaces the local field with an independent field from P(B_N). If real hopping/trapping dynamics are correlated or non-Markovian, G(t) is not exact.
  • domain assumption Gaussian distribution of local nuclear fields with variance ΔBN^2
    Equation (3), standard in the MER and Kubo-Toyabe models; assumed for all materials.
  • domain assumption Frozen nuclear spin bath during carrier spin precession
    Section II A; nuclear dynamics are assumed much slower than carrier spin dynamics, so P(B_N) is static between hops.
  • domain assumption Cubic Bloch states (Eqs. 11-14) apply to tetragonal FAPI and orthorhombic MAPI
    Section IV explicitly notes the low-temperature phases are not cubic and states that a strong modification is not expected; this affects the hyperfine coupling matrices.
  • ad hoc to paper Substituting Pb with Sn does not significantly modify the Bloch wavefunctions
    Section III C: 'We further assume that substituting lead atoms with tin in the perovskite does not significantly modify the Bloch wavefunctions'; this is stated without first-principles verification.
  • domain assumption Atomic Roothaan-Hartree-Fock hyperfine constants [47] are valid in bulk perovskites
    Section III C: 'In the absence of experimental results for bulk lead halide perovskites, we decided to use the theoretical values given by Ref. [47]'; the constants have a large literature spread.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hyperfine driven spin relaxation of charge carriers in metal-halide perovskites." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGEE7LJ4

@misc{pith2026260715224,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hyperfine driven spin relaxation of charge carriers in metal-halide perovskites},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGEE7LJ4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15224}
}
read the original abstract

Spin relaxation of localized charge carriers in semiconductors is primarily governed by hyperfine interaction with the surrounding nuclear spin bath. While this mechanism is well-established in III-V bulk materials and quantum dots, its critical role in metal halide perovskites (MHPs) has only recently emerged. Their inverted band structure induces an unusual hierarchy of hyperfine couplings, with hole interactions dominating electron interactions, particurlaly in Pb-based perovskites. Here, we adapt a spin relaxation model - originally developed for muon spin spectroscopy - to provide an exact description of longitudinal spin relaxation for localized carriers across arbitrary hyperfine correlation times. This approach is motivated by recent experimental evidence in MAPbI3, which places carrier spins in an intermediate correlation regime, where conventional mono-exponential approximations fail. Our analysis reveals distinct hyperfine relaxation channels: electrons couple primarily to halogen nuclei, whereas holes are governed by metal nuclei. This leads to a key prediction - perovskites with lighter halogens and metal cations exhibit significantly extended spin lifetimes. Applied to time-resolved Faraday rotation data obtained from two perovskite samples, our model extracts key microscopic parameters - including the carrier localization volume and hyperfine correlation time - demonstrating the necessity of the exact dynamical solution over a single-exponential approximation. These findings provide microscopic insight into hyperfine-driven spin relaxation in MHPs and establish a robust framework for characterizing carrier localization and spin dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15224 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Longitudinal spin relaxation function computed using the dynamical Kubo-Toyabe model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between the three longitudinal spin relaxation functions presented in this [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Longitudinal spin relaxation function as a function of reduced time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Longitudinal carrier spin relaxation function in the three perovskites considered: MAPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Longitudinal carrier spin relaxation function for the two perovskites considered: MAPbI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Zeeman splitting of carrier spins in a transverse magnetic field in (a) the FAPI sample [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Dynamics of the nuclear spin polarization by optically oriented electrons in a (In,Ga)As/GaAs quantum dot ensemble , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  2. [50]

    doi:10.1088/0031-8949/89/11/115201 , year =

    Allodi, G and Renzi, R De , title =. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/89/11/115201 , year =

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/89/11/115201

  3. [24]

    Nanomaterials , VOLUME =

    Garcia-Arellano, Guadalupe and Trippé-Allard, Gaëlle and Campos, Thomas and Bernardot, Frédérick and Legrand, Laurent and Garrot, Damien and Deleporte, Emmanuelle and Testelin, Christophe and Chamarro, Maria , TITLE =. Nanomaterials , VOLUME =. 2022 , NUMBER =

    2022

  4. [1]

    and Loss, Daniel and Samarth, Nitin , year =

    Awschalom, D. and Loss, Daniel and Samarth, Nitin , year =. Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation , isbn =

  5. [2]

    Best Research-Cell Efficiency chart , note =

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best Research-Cell Efficiency chart , note =

  6. [3]

    Dong, H and Ran, C.X and Gao, W.Y and Li, M.J and Xia, Y.D and Huang, W , title =

  7. [4]

    and Friend, Richard H

    Quan, Li Na and Rand, Barry P. and Friend, Richard H. and Mhaisalkar, Subodh Gautam and Lee, Tae-Woo and Sargent, Edward H. , title =. Chemical Reviews , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  8. [5]

    2021 , doi =

    Metal Halide Perovskites for X-Ray Detection and Imaging , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

Show all 88 references
  1. [6]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume =

    Even, Jacky and Pedesseau, Laurent and Jancu, Jean-Marc and Katan, Claudine , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  2. [7]

    The Rashba effect in two-dimensional hybrid perovskites: the impacts of halogens and surface ligands

    Liu, Beichen and Gao, Huaxiong and Meng, Chaoying and Ye, Honggang. The Rashba effect in two-dimensional hybrid perovskites: the impacts of halogens and surface ligands. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1039/D2CP03971K

    2022 doi

  3. [8]

    and Materny, Arnulf , title =

    Ghosh, Supriya and Pradhan, Bapi and Bandyopadhyay, Arkamita and Skvortsova, Irina and Zhang, Yiyue and Sternemann, Christian and Paulus, Michael and Bals, Sara and Hofkens, Johan and Karki, Khadga J. and Materny, Arnulf , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , v...

    2024

  4. [9]

    Electronic model for self-assembled hybrid organic/perovskite semiconductors: Reverse band edge electronic states ordering and spin-orbit coupling , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  5. [10]

    and Yakovlev, Dmitri R

    Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Yalcin, Eyüp and Akimov, Ilya A. and Nestoklon, Mikhail O. and Glazov, Mikhail M. and Kotur, Mladen and Kudlacik, Dennis and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Kirstein, Erik and Hordiichuk, Oleh and Dirin, Dmitry N. and Kovalenko, Maksym V....

    doi

  6. [11]

    and Yakovlev, Dmitri R

    Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Yalcin, Eyüp and Kalitukha, Ina V. and Akimov, Ilya A. and Nestoklon, Mikhail O. and Turedi, Bekir and Hordiichuk, Oleh and Dirin, Dmitry N. and Kovalenko, Maksym V. and Bayer, Manfred , title =. Advanced Science , volume =. doi...

    doi

  7. [12]

    Applied Physics Letters , volume =

    Zhu, Laipan and Wang, Zhong Lin , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  8. [13]

    and Li, Y

    Zhu, J. and Li, Y. and Lin, X. et al. , title =. Nat. Mater. , volume =. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  9. [14]

    Nano Letters , volume =

    Giovanni, David and Ma, Hong and Chua, Julianto and Grätzel, Michael and Ramesh, Ramamoorthy and Mhaisalkar, Subodh and Mathews, Nripan and Sum, Tze Chien , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  10. [15]

    J.E, Kirstein , title =

  11. [16]

    Energy Tuning of Electronic Spin Coherent Evolution in Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskites , journal =

    Garcia-Arellano, Guadalupe and Tripp. Energy Tuning of Electronic Spin Coherent Evolution in Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskites , journal =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  12. [17]

    Huynh, U.N., Liu, Y., Chanana, A. et al. , title =. Nat Commun , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  13. [18]

    Spin Coherence and Relaxation Dynamics of Localized Electrons and Holes in FAPbI3 Films , journal =

    Lag. Spin Coherence and Relaxation Dynamics of Localized Electrons and Holes in FAPbI3 Films , journal =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  14. [19]

    Kirstein, E., Yakovlev, D.R., Glazov, M.M. et al. , title =. Nat Commun , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  15. [20]

    and Boujdaria, K

    Garcia-Arellano, G. and Boujdaria, K. and Chamarro, M. and Testelin, C. , journal =. Land\'e g factors in tetragonal halide perovskite: A multiband. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  16. [21]

    and Boujdaria, K

    Saïdi, I. and Boujdaria, K. and Chamarro, M. and Testelin, C. , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  17. [22]

    and Kirstein, Erik and Yakovlev, Dmitri R

    Nestoklon, Mikhail O. and Kirstein, Erik and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Glazov, Mikhail M. and Semina, Marina A. and Ivchenko, Eugeniyus L. and Kolobkova, Elena V. and Kuznetsova, Maria S. and Bayer, Manfred , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  18. [23]

    and Talmadge, W

    Odenthal, P. and Talmadge, W. and Gundlach, N. et al. , title =. Nature Phys , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  19. [25]

    and Zhukov, Evgeny A

    Kirstein, Erik and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Turedi, Bekir and Kovalenko, Maksym V. and Bayer, Manfred , title =. Advanced Science , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202502735 , year =

    doi

  20. [26]

    Spin Noise of a Halide Perovskite , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  21. [27]

    Nat Commun , volume =

    Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr3 perovskite crystals , author =. Nat Commun , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  22. [28]

    and Glazov, Mikhail M

    Kirstein, Erik and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Glazov, Mikhail M. and Evers, Eiko and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Belykh, Vasilii V. and Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Kudlacik, Dennis and Nazarenko, Olga and Dirin, Dmitry N. and Kovalenko, Maksym V. and Bayer, Manfred , title =. Advanced Mat...

    doi

  23. [29]

    and Zhukov, Evgeny A

    Kirstein, Erik and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and H. Spin Dynamics of Electrons and Holes Interacting with Nuclei in MAPbI3 Perovskite Single Crystals , journal =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  24. [30]

    and Kotur, Mladen and Yakovlev, Dmitri R

    Kudlacik, Dennis and Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Kotur, Mladen and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Kavokin, Kirill V. and Harkort, Carolin and Karzel, Marek and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Evers, Eiko and Belykh, Vasilii V. and Bayer, Manfred , title =. ACS Photonics , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  25. [31]

    and Belykh, Vasilii V

    Meliakov, Sergey R. and Belykh, Vasilii V. and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Kolobkova, Elena V. and Kuznetsova, Maria S. and Bayer, Manfred and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. , journal =. Hole spin precession and dephasing induced by nuclear hyperfine fields in. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  26. [32]

    P , title =

    Meier, F and Zakharchenya, B. P , title =

  27. [33]

    Dyakonov, M , title =

  28. [34]

    Nat Commun , volume =

    The squeezed dark nuclear spin state in lead halide perovskites , author =. Nat Commun , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  29. [35]

    Polarization of Nuclei in Metals , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1953 , doi =

    1953

  30. [36]

    Nuclear spin physics in quantum dots: An optical investigation , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  31. [37]

    and Alonso, M

    Francisco-López, Adrián and Charles, Bethan and Weber, Oliver J. and Alonso, M. Isabel and Garriga, Miquel and Campoy-Quiles, Mariano and Weller, Mark T. and Go. Equal Footing of Thermal Expansion and Electron–Phonon Interaction in the Temperature Dependence of Lead Halide Per...

    2019

  32. [38]

    Electron spin relaxation by nuclei in semiconductor quantum dots , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  33. [39]

    1985 , doi =

    Hyperfine coupling constants and atomic parameters for electron paramagnetic resonance data , journal =. 1985 , doi =

    1985

  34. [40]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Electronic structure of organometal halide perovskite CH3NH3BiI3 and optical absorption extending to infrared region , author =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  35. [41]

    doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa71e7 , year =

    Lee, Min-I and Barragán, Ana and Nair, Maya N and Jacques, Vincent L R and Le Bolloc’h, David and Fertey, Pierre and Jemli, Khaoula and Lédée, Ferdinand and Trippé-Allard, Gaëlle and Deleporte, Emmanuelle and Taleb-Ibrahimi, Amina and Tejeda, Antonio , title =. doi:10.1088/136...

    doi

  36. [42]

    Nat Commun , volume =

    Absolute energy level positions in tin- and lead-based halide perovskites , author =. Nat Commun , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  37. [43]

    , year =

    Dyakonov, Michel and Perel, V.I. , year =. Optical orientation in a system of electrons and lattice nuclei in semiconductors. Theory , volume =

  38. [44]

    Optical orientation in a system of electrons and lattice nuclei in semiconductors

    Berkovits, Vladimir and Ekimov, Alexeï and Safarov, V , year =. Optical orientation in a system of electrons and lattice nuclei in semiconductors. Experiment , volume =

  39. [45]

    , year =

    Dyakonov, Michel and Perel, V. , year =. Hyperfine Interaction in Optical Orientation of Electrons in Semiconductors , volume =

  40. [46]

    Dzhioev, R. I. and Korenev, V. L. and Merkulov, I. A. and Zakharchenya, B. P. and Gammon, D. and Efros, Al. L. and Katzer, D. S. , journal =. Manipulation of the Spin Memory of Electrons in. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  41. [48]

    Hole-spin initialization and relaxation times in InAs/GaAs quantum dots , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  42. [49]

    Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1979 , doi =

    1979

  43. [51]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , volume =

    Kubo, Ryogo , title =. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , volume =. 1954 , doi =

    1954

  44. [52]

    , title =

    Schulten, Klaus and Wolynes, Peter G. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1978 , issn =

    1978

  45. [53]

    Cooling and Heating Nuclear Spins by Strongly Localized Electrons , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  46. [54]

    The principles of nuclear magnetism

    Abragam, Anatole. The principles of nuclear magnetism. 1989

    1989

  47. [55]

    Knight-Field-Enabled Nuclear Spin Polarization in Single Quantum Dots , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  48. [56]

    Stabilization of the Electron-Nuclear Spin Orientation in Quantum Dots by the Nuclear Quadrupole Interaction , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  49. [57]

    1990 , doi =

    Calorimetric and IR spectroscopic studies of phase transitions in methylammonium trihalogenoplumbates (II)† , journal =. 1990 , doi =

    1990

  50. [58]

    1992 , doi =

    Dielectric study of CH3NH3PbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) , journal =. 1992 , doi =

    1992

  51. [59]

    Proceedings of the XIVth colloque amp

    Magnetic resonance and relaxation , author=. Proceedings of the XIVth colloque amp. 1967 , organization=

    1967

  52. [60]

    Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1979 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.20.850 , url =

    1979 doi

  53. [61]

    Hole--spin dephasing time associated with hyperfine interaction in quantum dots , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  54. [62]

    Theory of spin inertia in singly charged quantum dots , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  55. [63]

    Nature Phys , volume =

    Breakdown of the nuclear-spin-temperature approach in quantum-dot demagnetization experiments , author =. Nature Phys , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  56. [64]

    Spin noise of localized electrons: Interplay of hopping and hyperfine interaction , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  57. [65]

    and Yakovlev, Dmitri R

    Kirstein, Erik and Zhukov, Evgeny A. and Yakovlev, Dmitri R. and Kopteva, Nataliia E. and Yalcin, Ey. Coherent Carrier Spin Dynamics in FAPbBr3 Perovskite Crystals , journal =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  58. [66]

    Spin polarization recovery and Hanle effect for charge carriers interacting with nuclear spins in semiconductors , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235413 , url =

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    Dynamic polarization of nuclear spins by optically oriented electrons and holes in lead halide perovskite semiconductors , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/w11v-2v4g , url =

    2026 doi

  60. [68]

    and Fang, Yanan and Keenan, Philip J

    Baikie, Tom and Barrow, Nathan S. and Fang, Yanan and Keenan, Philip J. and Slater, Peter R. and Piltz, Ross O. and Gutmann, Matthias and Mhaisalkar, Subodh G. and White, Tim J. A combined single crystal neutron/X-ray diffraction and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance stud...

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    and Malliakas, Christos D

    Stoumpos, Constantinos C. and Malliakas, Christos D. and Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. , title =. Inorganic Chemistry , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  62. [70]

    1977 , volume =

    Gryncharova, E.I and Perel, V.I , title =. 1977 , volume =

    1977

  63. [71]

    and Stoumpos, Constantinos C

    Fabini, Douglas H. and Stoumpos, Constantinos C. and Laurita, Geneva and Kaltzoglou, Andreas and Kontos, Athanassios G. and Falaras, Polycarpos and Kanatzidis, Mercouri G. and Seshadri, Ram , title =. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1...

    doi

  64. [72]

    and Levcenco, Sergej and Unold, Thomas and Taubert, Andreas and Schorr, Susan

    Lehmann, Frederike and Franz, Alexandra and Többens, Daniel M. and Levcenco, Sergej and Unold, Thomas and Taubert, Andreas and Schorr, Susan. The phase diagram of a mixed halide (Br , I) hybrid perovskite obtained by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. RSC Adv. 2019. doi:10.1039/C8RA09398A

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Hyperfine-Induced Asymmetric Overhauser Field in MAPbI3 Thin Films , journal =

    Lag. Hyperfine-Induced Asymmetric Overhauser Field in MAPbI3 Thin Films , journal =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  66. [74]

    Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 , url =

    2004 doi

  67. [75]

    Electron Spin Decoherence in Quantum Dots due to Interaction with Nuclei , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.186802 , url =

    2002 doi

  68. [76]

    Low-temperature spin relaxation in n-type GaAs , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.66.245204 , url =

    2002 doi

  69. [77]

    Spin relaxation time of donor-bound electrons in a CdTe quantum well , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.235301 , url =

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    and Eble, B

    Desfonds, P. and Eble, B. and Fras, F. and Testelin, C. and Bernardot, F. and Chamarro, M. and Urbaszek, B. and Amand, T. and Marie, X. and Gérard, J. M. and Thierry-Mieg, V. and Miard, A. and Lemaître, A. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1...

    2010 doi

  71. [79]

    2022 , month =

    Zaidi, S M Junaid and Khan, M Ijaz and Gillani, S S A and Sahar, M Sana Ullah and Ullah, Sana and Tanveer, Muhammad , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aca645 , url =

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    Structural , electronic , and optical properties of cubic formamidinium lead iodide perovskite: a first-principles investigation

    Wang, Sanjun and Xiao, Wen-bo and Wang, Fei. Structural , electronic , and optical properties of cubic formamidinium lead iodide perovskite: a first-principles investigation. RSC Adv. 2020. doi:10.1039/D0RA06028C

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    ACS Omega , volume =

    Gao, Li-Ke and Tang, Yan-Lin , title =. ACS Omega , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  74. [82]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume =

    Feng, Jing and Xiao, Bing , title =. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  75. [83]

    Kinetic equations for hopping transport and spin relaxation in a random magnetic field , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.014206 , url =

    2015 doi

  76. [84]

    Modification of Hanle and polarization recovery curves under interplay of hopping and quantum measurement back action , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2026 , month =

    2026

  77. [85]

    1974 , issn =

    Roothaan-Hartree-Fock atomic wavefunctions: Basis functions and their coefficients for ground and certain excited states of neutral and ionized atoms, Z 54 , journal =. 1974 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-640X(74)80016-1 , url =

    1974 doi

  78. [86]

    1964 , month =

    Herman, Frank and Skillman, Sherwood and Arents, John , title =. 1964 , month =. doi:10.1149/1.2426131 , url =

    1964 doi

  79. [87]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) , volume =

    Atomic parameters for paramagnetic resonance data , author =. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) , volume =. 1978 , doi =

    1969

  80. [88]

    Hyperfine interaction of electrons and holes with nuclei probed by optical orientation in methylammonium lead iodide perovskite crystals , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2026 , month =. doi:10.1103/3ptm-4tpd , url =

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.