Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Electron-Transfer-Induced Thermal and Thermoelectric Rectification

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electron transfer between molecular sites with unequal reorganization energies produces thermal and thermoelectric rectification under a temperature gradient.

desk verdict A genuine new non-phononic thermal rectification mechanism, with an overclaimed universal quantifier that a concrete counterexample refutes; the core result survives. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.00495 v1 pith:DGFNDGYG submitted 2019-08-01 cond-mat.mes-hall

Galen T. Craven , Dahai He , Abraham Nitzan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords molecularrectificationthermalelectronheatthermoelectricdifferenteffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies two molecules, one in a hot bath and one in a cold bath, with an electron that can sit on either. Marcus theory describes how fast the electron hops, and the rate depends on how much each molecule's surrounding solvent reorganizes when the electron arrives. When those reorganization energies differ, the jump rate is not the same after swapping which molecule is hot and which is cold. The heat carried by each hop also depends on the temperatures, so the total heat flow is larger in one direction than the other. This is thermal rectification, a heat diode, produced purely by electron transfer.

The authors then attach the two molecules to metal leads and allow three states: electron on the left, on the right, or on neither. They find the voltage bias that makes the electric current zero at a given temperature difference. In ordinary coherent conductors this bias is an odd function of the temperature difference. Here it is not, and it can even stay nearly unchanged when the temperature bias is reversed, a signature of thermoelectric rectification.

All results come from analytic formulas and illustrative parameter values. No experiment is reported. The main assumptions, negligible direct phonon heat flow between sites and thermal equilibrium of each local environment, are stated in the text and are the conditions under which the predictions hold.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

From the abstract and Eqs. (4)-(5): for an asymmetric electron transfer reaction (ERA differs from ERB) between environments at different temperatures, |J_Q+(Delta T)| differs from |J_Q-(-Delta T)| for all nonzero Delta T, so electron transfer alone generates thermal rectification; and in a junction, the zero-current voltage satisfies Phi(Delta T) not equal to -Phi(-Delta T), giving thermoelectric rectification. If true, the paper establishes a non-phononic molecular thermal rectification mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

Footnote 33 states: 'We furthermore assume that the distance between the sites is large enough such that the contribution from phononic heat transfer between the two sites vanishes in the harmonic approximation.' The entire predicted thermal rectification is computed for electron-transfer heat only; if phononic channels cannot be suppressed or the local vibrational modes do not equilibrate at TA and TB, the effect would be masked or altered.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a new mechanism for thermal rectification in molecular systems, based on electron transfer (ET) between molecular sites in environments at different temperatures. Using a bithermal version of Marcus theory, the authors derive a heat current for ET events and show that when the partial reorganization energies of the two environments differ, the heat current magnitude can be asymmetric with respect to reversal of the temperature bias. They extend the model to a molecular junction with metal leads, showing that the zero-current Seebeck voltage is not odd under bias reversal, i.e., thermoelectric rectification. Numerical examples illustrate the rectification ratios and voltage asymmetries for illustrative parameter choices.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would establish a non-phononic thermal rectification mechanism in purely molecular environments, contrasting with the usual requirement of anharmonicity for phononic thermal diodes. The mechanism is physically transparent and the paper provides falsifiable predictions for rectification ratios and Seebeck asymmetries. The calculations are explicit and the formulas for the rates and currents are taken from prior well-established work; the novelty lies in the rectification application. The paper is well written and the numerical examples clearly illustrate the effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [After Eq. (4)] The statement that for α ≠ 1, |J_Q^±(ΔT)| ≠ |J_Q^±(−ΔT)| for all ΔT ≠ 0 is not implied by Eqs. (2)–(5). For ΔE_ab = 0, the rectification ratio in Eq. (5) can be evaluated analytically. With x = ΔT/T, c = (E_RB − E_RA)/(2E_R), and r = E_R/(k_B T), one obtains ln R = (3/2) ln[(1 − cx)/(1 + cx)] + r c x/[2(1 − c^2x^2)]. This expression crosses zero at a finite positive x for sufficiently small r and large c; for example, with T = 300 K, E_RA = 1 meV, E_RB = 100 meV (α = 100), R = 1 at ΔT ≈ 420 K, with T_A ≈ 90 K and T_B ≈ 510 K, both physically positive. Thus the universal inequality fails, while the mechanism still produces rectification for most parameters. The claim should be replaced by a qualified statement, e.g., 'generically' or 'for the parameter regimes shown.'
  2. [Footnote 33] The assumption that phononic heat transfer between the two sites vanishes because of large inter-site distance is central to isolating the electron-transfer heat current, but no quantitative estimate is provided. In molecular systems, phononic transport is typically the dominant heat channel, and whether it can be suppressed relative to the ET contribution is not obvious. The paper should either provide a quantitative criterion (e.g., inter-site distance or vibrational coupling strength) under which the phononic contribution is negligible, or explicitly state that the predictions apply only to systems engineered to suppress phononic conductance, promoting the footnote to a main-text limitation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'Re ctification' should be 'Rectification'.
  2. [Fig. 5 discussion] The claim that Φ(ΔT) ≠ −Φ(−ΔT) for all ΔT ≠ 0 is stated without proof and may be subject to exceptions analogous to those in the thermal rectification claim; it should be qualified.
  3. [Eq. (4)] The derivation of Eq. (4) is not shown in the text; a brief derivation or an explicit pointer to the supplemental material would improve the manuscript.
  4. [Figures] The axes in Figs. 2, 3, and 5 are not always labeled with units; please add units (e.g., K for ΔT, eV for ΔE_ab and Φ).
  5. [Introduction] The phrase 'in contradiction with the traditional posit' is overly strong; 'in contrast to' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rectification prediction is computed from previously derived bithermal Marcus rates and heat-current expressions, with no parameter fitted to the target result.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain does not reduce to its own conclusion. Equations (2) and (4) are taken from prior work by the same authors (refs. 23, 25, 40), but they are stated as previously derived rate and heat-current results, not as assumptions equivalent to rectification. The new content is the algebraic consequence that for ERA ≠ ERB the steady-state heat current satisfies |J_Q^+(ΔT)| ≠ |J_Q^+(−ΔT)|, and the numerical evaluation of the rectification ratio R defined in Eq. (5). No parameter is fitted to make rectification appear: ERA, ERB, ΔE_ab, V_mn, and T are model inputs, and the figures are illustrative scans over those inputs. The junction thermoelectric rectification is obtained by solving the same bithermal rate equations under the zero-current condition, again with no fitted parameter. The self-citations to refs. 23 and 25 are load-bearing in the sense that the paper builds on the ETIHT formalism, but this is standard scientific building on prior published results, not a derivation that assumes its own target claim; the rectification asymmetry is a new consequence not stated in those earlier papers. The assertion about the universal inequality ∀ΔT≠0 may be open to mathematical counterexample (the skeptical note gives a finite ΔT where R=1), but that is a correctness concern about an overstrong claim, not circularity. Footnote 33's assumption that phononic heat transfer vanishes is an explicit physical modeling assumption, not a self-referential justification. No instance of self-definition, fitted input renamed as prediction, or self-citation used to forbid alternatives is present. The manuscript is therefore self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. It combines established Marcus electron-transfer theory with a bithermal generalization from prior work. The numerical figures use illustrative parameter values rather than fitted constants, and all calculations are analytic apart from final numerical evaluation.

free parameters (6)
  • ERA (partial reorganization energy of environment A) = 0.15 eV
    Illustrative model parameter used in all figures; not fitted to experimental data.
  • alpha = ERA / ERB = 1, 2, 5
    Controls the asymmetry between the two environments; chosen to show the rectification scaling.
  • Delta E_ab (reaction free energy) = 0.5 eV in Fig. 2, varied in Fig. 3
    Energy difference between the charge-localized states; varied to show the dependence of the rectification ratio.
  • Delta E_MA (molecule-metal reaction free energy) = plus or minus 0.25 eV
    Sets the molecular energy level relative to the electrode chemical potential in the junction model.
  • V_ab (electronic coupling between molecular sites) = 0.01 eV in Fig. 5
    Coupling strength that sets the overall rate magnitude; it does not control the rectification asymmetry.
  • Reference temperature T = 300 K
    Ambient temperature around which the temperature difference Delta T is applied.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bithermal Marcus rate formula, Eq. (2), valid in the strong electron-phonon coupling and high temperature limit.
    Taken from Refs. 23, 34-37; nuclear tunneling is neglected. This is the rate law that generates the temperature dependence.
  • domain assumption Each molecular environment's vibrational modes are equilibrated at its local temperature TA or TB during electron transfer.
    Required for the bithermal rate formula to be meaningful; if local equilibrium fails, the simple rate expression does not apply.
  • domain assumption Phononic heat transfer between the two sites is negligible due to large intersite distance and harmonic approximation.
    Stated in footnote 33; ensures that the computed heat current comes from electron transfer only. If phononic channels are present, the predicted rectification could be masked.
  • standard math Steady-state master equation kinetics describe occupation probabilities and fluxes.
    Used to compute p_a, p_b, J_el, and the zero-current condition in both the two-site and junction models.
  • domain assumption Marcus interfacial electron-transfer rates describe molecule-metal charge exchange.
    Used for the junction model in Eq. (6) and Figs. 4-5; standard Marcus theory applied to electrode interfaces.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron-Transfer-Induced Thermal and Thermoelectric Rectification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGFNDGYG

@misc{pith2026190800495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron-Transfer-Induced Thermal and Thermoelectric Rectification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGFNDGYG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.00495}
}
read the original abstract

Controlling the direction and magnitude of both heat and electronic currents using rectifiers has significant implications for the advancement of molecular circuit design. In order to facilitate the implementation of new transport phenomena in such molecular structures, we examine thermal and thermoelectric rectification effects that are induced by an electron transfer process that occurs across a temperature gradient between molecules. Historically, the only known heat conduction mechanism able to generate thermal rectification in purely molecular environments is phononic heat transport. Here, we show that electron transfer between molecular sites with different local temperatures can also generate a thermal rectification effect and that electron hopping through molecular bridges connecting metal leads at different temperatures gives rise to asymmetric Seebeck effects, that is, thermoelectric rectification, in molecular junctions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.00495 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic diagram for electron transfer between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Thermal rectification ratio as a function of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Voltage bias Φ as function of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic diagram for electron and heat trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    temperatures, thermal rectification effects can be induced solely from the transfer of electrons

    15 eV, ERB = αE RA, and T = 300 K. temperatures, thermal rectification effects can be induced solely from the transfer of electrons. It is clear from Eq. (4) that in general J + Q ⁄= J − Q . This asymmetry is analogous to that reported for an anhar- monic vibrational mode, specifically a two-level system, bridging two bosonic reservoirs with different tempera...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Aviram and M

    A. Aviram and M. A. Ratner, Chem. Phys. Lett. 29, 277 (1974), doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85031-1

    doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85031-1 1974

  3. [3]

    B. G. Streetman and S. Banerjee, Solid State Electronic Devices (Prentice Hall, 2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Coropceanu, J

    V. Coropceanu, J. Cornil, D. A. da Silva Filho, Y. Olivier , R. Silbey, and J.-L. Br´ edas, Chem. Rev.107, 926 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Xiang, X

    D. Xiang, X. Wang, C. Jia, T. Lee, and X. Guo, Chem. Rev. 116, 4318 (2016), doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00680

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00680 2016

  6. [6]

    T. S. Plett, W. Cai, M. Le Thai, I. V. Vlassiouk, R. M. Penner, and Z. S. Siwy, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 6170 (2017), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00258

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00258 2017

  7. [7]

    N. Li, J. Ren, L. Wang, G. Zhang, P. H¨ anggi, and B. Li, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1045 (2012), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1045

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1045 2012

  8. [8]

    Narayana and Y

    S. Narayana and Y. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 214303 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.214303

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.214303 2012

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Maldovan, Nature 503, 209 (2013), doi:10.1038/nature12608

    M. Maldovan, Nature 503, 209 (2013), doi:10.1038/nature12608

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Terraneo, M

    M. Terraneo, M. Peyrard, and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 094302 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.094302

    2002 doi

  3. [11]

    B. Li, L. Wang, and G. Casati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 184301 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.184301

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    Segal and A

    D. Segal and A. Nitzan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 034301 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.034301

    2005 doi

  5. [13]

    C. W. Chang, D. Okawa, A. Majumdar, and A. Zettl, Science 314, 1121 (2006), doi:10.1126/science.1132898

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    Segal, Phys

    D. Segal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 105901 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.105901

    2008 doi

  7. [15]

    A. L. Cottrill and M. S. Strano, Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500921 (2015), doi:10.1002/aenm.201500921

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    S. Wang, A. L. Cottrill, Y. Kunai, A. R. Toland, P. Liu, W.-J. Wang, and M. S. Strano, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 13172 (2017), doi:10.1039/C7CP02445B

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    B. Li, L. Wang, and G. Casati, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 143501 (2006), doi:10.1063/1.2191730

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    Ben-Abdallah and S.-A

    P. Ben-Abdallah and S.-A. Biehs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 044301 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.044301

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Joulain, J

    K. Joulain, J. Drevillon, Y. Ezzahri, and J. Ordonez- Miranda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 200601 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.200601

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Wang and B

    L. Wang and B. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 267203 (2008), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.267203

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    Wang and B

    L. Wang and B. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 177208 (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177208

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    D. M.-T. Kuo and Y.-C. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 81, 205321 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.205321

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Z. H. Zhang, Y. S. Gui, L. Fu, X. L. Fan, J. W. Cao, D. S. Xue, P. P. Freitas, D. Houssameddine, S. Hemour, K. Wu, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 037206 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.037206

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    G. T. Craven and A. Nitzan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 9421 (2016), doi:10.1073/pnas.1609141113

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    R. Chen, G. T. Craven, and A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 147, 124101 (2017), doi:10.1063/1.4990410

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    G. T. Craven and A. Nitzan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 207201 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.207201

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 24, 966 (1956), doi:10.1063/1.1742723

    1956 doi

  20. [28]

    R. A. Marcus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 599 (1993), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.599

    1993 doi

  21. [29]

    A. M. Kuznetsov and J. Ulstrup, Electron Transfer in Chemistry and Biology: An Introduction to the Theory (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    N. Hush, J. Chem. Phys. 28, 962 (1958), doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1744305

    1958 doi

  23. [31]

    Hush, Trans

    N. Hush, Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 557 (1961), doi:10.1039/TF9615700557

    1961 doi

  24. [32]

    This model is equivalent to the standard polaron model [34]

  25. [33]

    Galperin, M

    M. Galperin, M. A. Ratner, and A. Nitzan, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 103201 (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    We furthermore assume that the distance between the sites is large enough such that the contribution from phononic heat transfer between the two sites vanishes in the harmonic approximation

  27. [35]

    See the Supplemental Material for a detailed descripti on of the calculations. 6

  28. [36]

    S. H. Lin, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 3759 (1966), doi:10.1063/1.1726531

    1966 doi

  29. [37]

    S. H. Lin, C. H. Chang, K. K. Liang, R. Chang, Y. J. Shiu, J. M. Zhang, T.-S. Yang, M. Hayashi, and F. C. Hsu, Adv. Chem. Phys. 121, 1 (2002), doi:10.1002/0471264318.ch1

    2002 doi

  30. [38]

    Nitzan, Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molec- ular Systems (Oxford University Press, 2006)

    A. Nitzan, Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molec- ular Systems (Oxford University Press, 2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    P. Vath, M. B. Zimmt, D. V. Matyushov, and G. A. Voth, J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 9130 (1999), doi:10.1021/jp990494q

    1999 doi

  32. [40]

    D. L. Derr and C. M. Elliott, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 7888 (1999), doi:10.1021/jp991755z

    1999 doi

  33. [41]

    The heat transferred per electron is ∼ 0

    The typical magnitude of the electron-transfer-induc ed heat current in a single-molecule device is in the range µ eV/ ps to meV/ ps [24]. The heat transferred per electron is ∼ 0. 01 eV

  34. [42]

    Lehmann, G.-L

    J. Lehmann, G.-L. Ingold, and P. H¨ anggi, Chem. Phys. 281, 199 (2002), doi:10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00344-0

    2002 doi

  35. [43]

    N. F. Polizzi, S. S. Skourtis, and D. N. Beratan, Faraday Discuss. 155, 43 (2012), doi:10.1039/C1FD00098E

    2012 doi

  36. [44]

    R. A. Marcus, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 679 (1965), doi:10.1063/1.1696792

    1965 doi

  37. [45]

    M. A. C ¸ ipilo˘ glu, S. Turgut, and M. Tomak, Phys. Status Solidi 241, 2575 (2004), doi:10.1002/pssb.200402058

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    S´ anchez and R

    D. S´ anchez and R. L´ opez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 026804 (2013), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.026804

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    In general, the magnitude of thermal rectification will be large in systems where biasing of the chemical po- tentials significantly alters the molecule-to-molecule el ec- tronic flux, and will be small in the opposite limit

  40. [48]

    This effect arises because constant ∆ EMA implies con- stant E′ a which means that variation of ∆ Eab is synony- mous with variation of E′ b, and thus the energy gaps be- tween the biased chemical potential at each electrode and the corresponding molecular energy level are not ...

  41. [49]

    Kir˘ sanskas, Q

    G. Kir˘ sanskas, Q. Li, K. Flensberg, G. C. Solomon, and M. Leijnse, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 233102 (2014), doi:10.1063/1.4903340

    2014 doi

  42. [50]

    Q. Li, M. Strange, I. Duchemin, D. Donadio, and G. C. Solomon, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 71757182 (2017), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02005

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    Hedstr¨ om, A

    S. Hedstr¨ om, A. J. Matula, and V. S. Batista, J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 19053 (2017), doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05749

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    Sadat, A

    S. Sadat, A. Tan, Y. J. Chua, and P. Reddy, Nano Lett. 10, 2613 (2010), doi:10.1021/nl101354e

    2010 doi

  45. [53]

    Menges, H

    F. Menges, H. Riel, A. Stemmer, and B. Gotsmann, Nano Lett. 12, 596 (2012), doi:10.1021/nl203169t

    2012 doi

  46. [54]

    Menges, P

    F. Menges, P. Mensch, H. Schmid, H. Riel, A. Stem- mer, and B. Gotsmann, Nat. Commun. 7, 10874 (2016), doi:10.1038/ncomms10874

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    Mecklenburg, W

    M. Mecklenburg, W. A. Hubbard, E. R. White, R. Dhall, S. B. Cronin, S. Aloni, and B. C. Regan, Science 347, 629 (2015), doi:10.1126/science.aaa2433

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    Capozzi, J

    B. Capozzi, J. Xia, O. Adak, E. J. Dell, Z.-F. Liu, J. C. Taylor, J. B. Neaton, L. M. Campos, and L. Venkataraman, Nature Nanotech. 10, 522 (2015), doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.97

    2015 doi

  49. [57]

    Reddy, S.-Y

    P. Reddy, S.-Y. Jang, R. A. Segalman, and A. Majumdar, Science 315, 1568 (2007), doi:10.1126/science.1137149

    2007 doi

  50. [58]

    A. Tan, J. Balachandran, S. Sadat, V. Gavini, B. D. Dunietz, S.-Y. Jang, and P. Reddy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 8838 (2011), doi:10.1021/ja202178k

    2011 doi

  51. [59]

    W. Lee, K. Kim, W. Jeong, L. A. Zotti, F. Pauly, J. C. Cuevas, and P. Reddy, Nature 498, 209 (2013), doi:10.1038/nature12183

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    Y. Kim, W. Jeong, K. Kim, W. Lee, and P. Reddy, Nature Nanotech. 9, 881 (2014), doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.209

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    L. Cui, W. Jeong, S. Hur, M. Matt, J. C. Kl¨ ockner, F. Pauly, P. Nielaba, J. C. Cuevas, E. Meyhofer, and P. Reddy, Science (2017), doi:10.1126/science.aam6622

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.