Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Curiosity-driven Exploration in Sparse-reward Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.10825 v1 pith:DHKULPDT submitted 2023-02-21 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords intrinsiclearningreinforcementcuriositydetachmentmethodmodulemotivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sparsity of rewards while applying a deep reinforcement learning method negatively affects its sample-efficiency. A viable solution to deal with the sparsity of rewards is to learn via intrinsic motivation which advocates for adding an intrinsic reward to the reward function to encourage the agent to explore the environment and expand the sample space. Though intrinsic motivation methods are widely used to improve data-efficient learning in the reinforcement learning model, they also suffer from the so-called detachment problem. In this article, we discuss the limitations of intrinsic curiosity module in sparse-reward multi-agent reinforcement learning and propose a method called I-Go-Explore that combines the intrinsic curiosity module with the Go-Explore framework to alleviate the detachment problem.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HMamba: Hyperbolic Mamba for Sequential Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    HMamba is an architecture that runs Mamba's selective state space model in hyperbolic space for sequential recommendation, claiming 3-11% gains over baselines on four benchmarks.

Pith tools