Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Solving Larger Maximum Clique Problems Using Parallel Quantum Annealing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12165 v2 pith:DILWSBP6 submitted 2022-05-24 quant-ph cs.ETmath.CO

classification quant-phcs.ETmath.CO
keywords quantumproblemsannealinghardwareoptimizationproblemapproachclique
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum annealing has the potential to find low energy solutions of NP-hard problems that can be expressed as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems. However, the hardware of the quantum annealer manufactured by D-Wave Systems, which we consider in this work, is sparsely connected and moderately sized (on the order of thousands of qubits), thus necessitating a minor-embedding of a logical problem onto the physical qubit hardware. The combination of relatively small hardware sizes and the necessity of a minor-embedding can mean that solving large optimization problems is not possible on current quantum annealers. In this research, we show that a hybrid approach combining parallel quantum annealing with graph decomposition allows one to solve larger optimization problem accurately. We apply the approach on the Maximum Clique problem on graphs with up to 120 nodes and 6395 edges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QUBO Refinement: Achieving Superior Precision through Iterative Quantum Formulation with Limited Qubits

    quant-ph 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    An iterative bit-slicing QUBO refinement method claims 16-decimal precision for linear systems but demonstrates only 1e-13 error and lacks a proven convergence guarantee.

Pith tools