Humans disagree with the IoU for measuring object detector localization error
Reviewed by Pithpith:DIUDS6CMopen to challenge →
classification
cs.CV
cs.HC
keywords
localizationhumanserrorsevaluatemightobjectqualityscore
read the original abstract
The localization quality of automatic object detectors is typically evaluated by the Intersection over Union (IoU) score. In this work, we show that humans have a different view on localization quality. To evaluate this, we conduct a survey with more than 70 participants. Results show that for localization errors with the exact same IoU score, humans might not consider that these errors are equal, and express a preference. Our work is the first to evaluate IoU with humans and makes it clear that relying on IoU scores alone to evaluate localization errors might not be sufficient.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.