Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 87 references

All-optical Implementation of Generalized Quantum Teleportation

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An all-optical feedforward architecture performs generalized quantum teleportation while suppressing hardware noise to fault-tolerant levels.

desk verdict The paper sketches an all-optical feedforward for CV generalized teleportation but the noise analysis cannot be checked from the given material, so the fault-tolerance claim stays unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.22736 v2 pith:DIY4HOYK submitted 2026-06-22 quant-ph

Takaya Hoshi , Akito Kawasaki , Xiruo Yan , Atsushi Sakaguchi , Takumi Suzuki , Tatsuki Sonoyama , Hironari Nagayoshi , Kosuke Fukui
show 2 more authors
Kan Takase Warit Asavanant
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords all-opticalfeedforwardgeneralizedquantumteleportationcontinuous-variablecomputingmeasurement-basedfault-tolerantopticalinformationprocessingnoiseanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a loss-tolerant all-optical feedforward architecture to replace electronic circuits in measurement-based continuous-variable quantum computing. This removes processing latencies that currently limit speed and scale in optical systems. The scheme executes arbitrary linear operations via generalized quantum teleportation. Quantitative noise analysis with realistic device parameters shows the architecture suppresses the hardware-induced noise floor. Eliminating optoelectronic conversions enables continuous high-throughput operations at optical bandwidths.

What carries the argument

The loss-tolerant all-optical feedforward (AOFF) architecture that implements generalized quantum teleportation without classical electronic feedforward circuits.

What would settle it

A laboratory realization of the proposed all-optical feedforward circuit whose measured noise floor exceeds the suppressed level predicted by the analysis would disprove the compatibility claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a loss-tolerant all-optical feedforward architecture for generalized quantum teleportation can execute arbitrary linear operations while suppressing hardware-induced noise below the threshold needed for fault-tolerant quantum computing, as shown by quantitative analysis under realistic device parameters; this removes classical electronic bottlenecks and supports continuous high-throughput optical operations.

Load-bearing premise

The noise model and device parameters in the analysis accurately capture every relevant loss and noise source that would occur in a physical implementation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Circuit runtime decreases because optoelectronic conversions are eliminated.
  • Continuous high-throughput operations become possible at optical speeds and bandwidths.
  • The platform reconciles operational versatility with the intrinsic speed of optical quantum processing.
  • Hardware noise remains low enough to meet fault-tolerant quantum computing requirements.
  • Arbitrary linear operations can be performed without electronic latency bottlenecks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same architecture could be combined with other all-optical components to build larger measurement-based optical processors.
  • Similar feedforward replacement might apply to other continuous-variable protocols that currently rely on electronic control.
  • Scaling studies could test whether the noise suppression holds when multiple AOFF stages operate in sequence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a loss-tolerant all-optical feedforward (AOFF) architecture for generalized quantum teleportation in continuous-variable optical systems. This is intended to overcome processing latencies from classical electronic feedforward in measurement-based quantum computing, enabling arbitrary linear operations. The central claim is that quantitative noise analysis under realistic device parameters shows successful suppression of the hardware-induced noise floor, confirming compatibility with fault-tolerant quantum computing requirements while allowing continuous high-throughput operation.

Significance. If the quantitative noise analysis holds with a complete model, the work would be significant for practical CV quantum computing by eliminating optoelectronic conversion bottlenecks and reconciling versatility with optical speed and bandwidth.

major comments (1)
  1. [Quantitative noise analysis (section detailing the model and parameters)] The central claim of noise suppression and fault-tolerant compatibility rests entirely on the quantitative noise analysis. The manuscript must explicitly enumerate all included loss and noise channels (e.g., propagation loss, imperfect homodyne detection, mode mismatch, nonlinear optical noise) and provide justification that the model captures every relevant physical source that would appear in a physical AOFF implementation; omission of any channel would invalidate the suppression conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The single major comment concerns the completeness of the quantitative noise analysis, which we address directly below by committing to an explicit revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Quantitative noise analysis (section detailing the model and parameters)] The central claim of noise suppression and fault-tolerant compatibility rests entirely on the quantitative noise analysis. The manuscript must explicitly enumerate all included loss and noise channels (e.g., propagation loss, imperfect homodyne detection, mode mismatch, nonlinear optical noise) and provide justification that the model captures every relevant physical source that would appear in a physical AOFF implementation; omission of any channel would invalidate the suppression conclusion.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim requires a transparent and exhaustive accounting of noise sources. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection (immediately preceding the numerical results) that explicitly enumerates every loss and noise channel retained in the model: (i) propagation loss in waveguides and free-space paths, (ii) finite homodyne detection efficiency and electronic noise, (iii) mode mismatch at all beam splitters and couplers, (iv) residual nonlinear optical noise arising from the all-optical feedforward elements, and (v) any additional vacuum noise injected by the teleportation protocol itself. For each channel we will supply a brief physical justification, citing the device parameters used in the simulations and explaining why other potential sources (e.g., thermal noise at room temperature or higher-order nonlinearities) are negligible under the stated operating conditions. This addition will make the completeness of the model verifiable without altering the reported numerical conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; derivation self-contained against external parameters

full rationale

The abstract and description present a proposal for an all-optical feedforward architecture together with a quantitative noise analysis performed under stated realistic device parameters. No equations, fitting procedures, self-citations, or ansatzes are exhibited that would reduce any claimed prediction or suppression result to the inputs by construction. The noise analysis is described as a demonstration under independent device parameters rather than a tautological renaming or self-referential fit, satisfying the default expectation that most papers are not circular. The skeptic concern about model completeness is a correctness issue, not a circularity reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript required for ledger construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of All-optical Implementation of Generalized Quantum Teleportation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DIY4HOYK

@misc{pith2026260622736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: All-optical Implementation of Generalized Quantum Teleportation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DIY4HOYK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.22736}
}
read the original abstract

Measurement-based continuous-variable optical quantum computing inherently offers high-speed, large-scale operations, yet its practical performance remains constrained by the processing latencies and throughput bottlenecks imposed by classical electronic feedforward circuits. To overcome these limitations, we propose a loss-tolerant, all-optical feedforward (AOFF) architecture for generalized quantum teleportation capable of executing arbitrary linear operations. Quantitative noise analysis under realistic device parameters demonstrates that the architecture successfully suppresses hardware-induced noise floor, confirming its compatibility with fault-tolerant quantum computing requirements. By eliminating optoelectronic conversions, this scheme enables continuous high-throughput operations that drastically reduce circuit runtime. Ultimately, this approach delivers a noise-resilient platform that reconciles operational versatility with the intrinsic speed and bandwidth of optical quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22736 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of single-mode measurement-based quantum computing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Circuit diagram of generalized quantum teleportation with conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overall circuit for all-optical generalized quantum teleportation, highlighting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Overall circuit for all-optical generalized quantum teleportation (GQT), highlighting the core all-optical feedforward [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mathematical modeling of the single-stage building block (Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Mathematical modeling of the single-stage building block (Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical analysis of the additional noise covariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical analysis of the additional noise covariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical analysis of the additional noise covariance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Mathematical modeling of the multi-stage building block with gain compensation incorporating experimental imperfec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mathematical modeling of the multi-stage building block with gain compensation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Noise performance and loss dependence of the multi-stage configurations. (a)–(b) Dual-PSA configuration (inter-stage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Noise performance and loss dependence of the multi-stage dual-PSA configura [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Noise performance and loss dependence of the multi-stage PIA configuration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (10) with the ideal feedforward relation in Eq

    = √ G 2 ˆm1eiθ2 + ˆm2eiθ1 .(10) Comparing Eq. (10) with the ideal feedforward relation in Eq. (6), the required parametric gain is determined by: √ G= 2√ 1−T|sin(θ 2 −θ 1)| .(11) 6 This expression assumes an ideal lossless system; in prac- tical implementations,Gacts as an effective gain that must be adjusted to compensate for physical imperfec- tions suc...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Multi-Stage Configuration with Dual PSA To eliminate isotropic excess noise, a dual-PSA con- figuration is analyzed where both stages utilize phase- sensitive amplification. By denoting the intermediate noise covariance matrix accumulated after the first-stage propagation lossL 1 as Vout,k = (1−L 1)Vξ,PSA,k +V ξ,loss1,(16) and noting that the secondary PS...

    work page

  3. [3]

    As detailed in Appendix F, while a PIA provides isotropic gain without requiring pump-phase alignment, it intro- duces a quantum noise penalty

    Multi-Stage Configuration with a PIA Alternatively, a PIA-assisted configuration is analyzed. As detailed in Appendix F, while a PIA provides isotropic gain without requiring pump-phase alignment, it intro- duces a quantum noise penalty. Using the intermediate noise matrixV out,k defined in Eq. (16), the total output noise covariance matrixV PIA out, mult...

    work page

  4. [4]

    As shown in Table I, under realistic hardware parameters, the PSA- based configurations maintain the maximum EIN below −12 dB for target squeezing operations up to 5 dB

    Implications for Fault-Tolerant GKP Quantum Computation We evaluate the applicability of the proposed architec- ture within the context of GKP-based FTQC. As shown in Table I, under realistic hardware parameters, the PSA- based configurations maintain the maximum EIN below −12 dB for target squeezing operations up to 5 dB. Un- der this assumption, assumin...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Physical Grounds of Component Parameters and Candidate Hardware Platforms To evaluate the experimental feasibility of the config- urations summarized in Table I, we justify the physical basis of the adopted hardware parameters by benchmark- ing them against state-of-the-art platforms. The realis- tic baseline—characterized by a 30 dB internal PSA gain and...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Physical Derivation from the Parametric Hamiltonian In a phase-matched single-mode optical parametric amplification process, the interaction Hamiltonian is given by: ˆH= g 2(ˆa† pˆa2 s + ˆapˆa†2 s ),(B1) where ˆap and ˆas are the annihilation operators for the pump (second-harmonic) and signal (fundamental) modes, respectively, andgis the nonlinear coupli...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Algebraic Decomposition and Quadrature Transformation The adjoint transformation of the signal annihilation operator ˆaunder ˆSθ(r) is evaluated as: ˆS† θˆaˆSθ = ˆR†(θ) h ˆS†(r) n ˆR(θ)ˆaˆR†(θ) o ˆS(r) i ˆR(θ) =e −iθ ˆR†(θ) n ˆS†(r)ˆaˆS(r) o ˆR(θ) = ˆR†(θ) e−iθ √ 2 1√ G ˆx+i √ Gˆp ˆR(θ),(B4) whereG=e 2r represents the operational power gain. Transforming ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Optical Loss and Pure Rotation An optical lossLis modeled as a beam splitter coupling the signal mode to a vacuum environment, yielding the transformation matrixW loss(L) and the additive noise covariance matrixV ξ,loss(L): Wloss(L) = √ 1−L·I, V ξ,loss(L) = 1 2 L·I.(D1) A phase shiftϕis represented as a noiseless unitary rotation: WRot(ϕ) = cosϕ−sinϕ sinϕ...

    work page

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    PSA with Insertion Loss A phase-controlled phase-sensitive amplifier (PSA) with operational gainGand internal efficiencyηamplifies along the quadrature ˆp(θ). The transformation is decomposed into a core squeezing operatorW sq sandwiched by rotation matricesW Rot: WPSA(θ, G, η...

  2. [10]

    To preserve the quantum commutation relations, a PIA inevitably introduces excess vacuum noise

    Phase-Insensitive Amplifier (PIA) As an alternative to the dual-PSA setup for multi-stage configurations, a phase-insensitive amplifier (PIA) amplifies both canonical quadratures isotropically. To preserve the quantum commutation relations, a PIA inevitably introduces excess v...

  3. [11]

    This framework models both the balanced beam splitter (T= 1/2) and the asymmetric displacement port (T→1)

    Beam Splitter Operation The interference of two spatial modes at a beam splitter with power transmittanceTtransforms the joint quadrature vector ˆrin = (ˆx1,ˆp1,ˆx2,ˆp2)T via the 4×4 matrix: WBS(T) = √ 1−T·I− √ T·I√ T·I √ 1−T·I , V ξ,BS =0,(D7) whereIdenotes the 2×2 identity m...

  4. [12]

    According to Eq

    General Noise Synthesis and Feedforward Output In both the single-stage and multi-stage configurations, the extracted measurement signals from each path are combined at a balanced beam splitter (Step iii) before driving the displacement on mode ˆa B. According to Eq. (14), 19 ...

  5. [13]

    To maintain notational brevity, explicit functional arguments of the transformation matrices and noise vectors are suppressed here

    Derivation of Path Noise for the Single-Stage Architecture For the single-stage building block, the signal in each pathksequentially undergoes phase-sensitive amplification, a propagation lossL 1, and a phase rotationφ. To maintain notational brevity, explicit functional argum...

  6. [14]

    To maintain consistency, explicit functional arguments are again suppressed throughout this derivation

    Derivation of Path Noise for the Multi-Stage Architecture For the multi-stage configurations, each path incorporates a secondary optical amplifier (OA) and a subsequent propagation lossL 2 prior to the phase rotation. To maintain consistency, explicit functional arguments are ...

  7. [15]

    Geometric Orientation of Squeezed Thermal Noise To clarify the directional behavior of the single-stage total noise, we analyze the geometric orientation of its noise ellipse. The covariance matrix of a non-ideal PSA can be structurally decomposed into a canonical, unrotated s...

  8. [16]

    Babbush, J

    R. Babbush, J. R. McClean, M. Newman, C. Gid- ney, S. Boixo, and H. Neven, Focus beyond quadratic speedups for error-corrected quantum advantage, PRX Quantum2, 010103 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    A. M. Childs, D. W. Leung, and M. A. Nielsen, Unified derivations of measurement-based schemes for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A71, 032318 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Heußen, D

    S. Heußen, D. F. Locher, and M. M¨ uller, Measurement- free fault-tolerant quantum error correction in near-term devices, PRX Quantum5, 010333 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Battistel, C

    F. Battistel, C. Chamberland, K. Johar, R. W. J. Over- water, F. Sebastiano, L. Skoric, Y. Ueno, and M. Usman, Real-time decoding for fault-tolerant quantum comput- ing: progress, challenges and outlook, Nano Futures7, 032003 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Caune, L

    L. Caune, L. Skoric, N. S. Blunt, A. Ruban, J. McDaniel, J. A. Valery, A. D. Patterson, A. V. Gramolin, J. Ma- janiemi, K. M. Barnes, T. Bialas, O. Bu˘ gdaycı, O. Craw- ford, G. P. Geh´ er, H. Krovi, E. Matekole, C. Topal, S. Po- letto, M. Bryant, K. Snyder, N. I. Gillespie, G...

    2026 doi

  13. [21]

    J. R. Scott and K. C. Balram, Timing constraints im- posed by classical digital control systems on photonic implementations of measurement-based quantum com- puting, IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering3, 1 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Raussendorf and H

    R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, A one-way quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Raussendorf, D

    R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states, Phys. Rev. A68, 022312 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    N. C. Menicucci, P. van Loock, M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, T. C. Ralph, and M. A. Nielsen, Universal quantum com- putation with continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 110501 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    M. Gu, C. Weedbrook, N. C. Menicucci, T. C. Ralph, and P. van Loock, Quantum computing with continuous- variable clusters, Phys. Rev. A79, 062318 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    N. C. Menicucci, X. Ma, and T. C. Ralph, Arbitrar- ily large continuous-variable cluster states from a sin- gle quantum nondemolition gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 250503 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    N. C. Menicucci, Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics, Phys. Rev. A83, 062314 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    R. N. Alexander, P. Wang, N. Sridhar, M. Chen, O. Pfis- ter, and N. C. Menicucci, One-way quantum computing with arbitrarily large time-frequency continuous-variable cluster states from a single optical parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. A94, 032327 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Yokoyama, R

    S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S. C. Armstrong, C. Sornphiphat- phong, T. Kaji, S. Suzuki, J.-i. Yoshikawa, H. Yonezawa, N. C. Menicucci, and A. Furusawa, Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain, Nature Photonics7, 982 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Yoshikawa, S

    J.-i. Yoshikawa, S. Yokoyama, T. Kaji, C. Sorn- phiphatphong, Y. Shiozawa, K. Makino, and A. Furu- sawa, Invited article: Generation of one-million-mode continuous-variable cluster state by unlimited time- domain multiplexing, APL Photonics1, 060801 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Asavanant, Y

    W. Asavanant, Y. Shiozawa, S. Yokoyama, B. Charoen- sombutamon, H. Emura, R. N. Alexander, S. Takeda, J. ichi Yoshikawa, N. C. Menicucci, H. Yonezawa, and A. Furusawa, Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state, Science366, 373 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    M. V. Larsen, X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. S. Neergaard- Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state, Science366, 369 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Kashiwazaki, T

    T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, N. Takanashi, A. In- oue, T. Umeki, and A. Furusawa, Fabrication of low-loss quasi-single-mode ppln waveguide and its application to a modularized broadband high-level squeezer, Applied Physics Letters119, 251104 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Kashiwazaki, N

    T. Kashiwazaki, N. Takanashi, T. Yamashima, T. Kazama, K. Enbutsu, R. Kasahara, T. Umeki, and A. Furusawa, Continuous-wave 6-db-squeezed light with 2.5-thz-bandwidth from single-mode ppln waveguide, APL Photonics5, 036104 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Suzuki, S

    T. Suzuki, S. Oki, K. Hirota, T. Hoshi, R. Ide, T. Kashi- wazaki, T. Yamashima, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Broadband high-level squeezed light using waveguide optical parametric amplifiers with ex- ternal dispersion compensation (2026), arXiv:2606.17422 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  28. [36]

    P.-K. Chen, I. Briggs, S. Hou, and L. Fan, Ultra- broadband quadrature squeezing with thin-film lithium niobate nanophotonics, Opt. Lett.47, 1506 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Nehra, R

    R. Nehra, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, Q. Guo, R. M. Gray, A. Roy, and A. Marandi, Few-cycle vacuum squeezing in 22 nanophotonics, Science377, 1333 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    N. C. Menicucci, Fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computing with continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 120504 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    van Loock, C

    P. van Loock, C. Weedbrook, and M. Gu, Building gaus- sian cluster states by linear optics, Phys. Rev. A76, 032321 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    N. C. Menicucci, S. T. Flammia, H. Zaidi, and O. Pfister, Ultracompact generation of continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. A76, 010302(R) (2007)

    2007

  33. [41]

    X. Su, A. Tan, X. Jia, J. Zhang, C. Xie, and K. Peng, Experimental preparation of quadripartite cluster and greenberger-horne-zeilinger entangled states for contin- uous variables, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 070502 (2007)

    2007

  34. [42]

    Yukawa, R

    M. Yukawa, R. Ukai, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Ex- perimental generation of four-mode continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. A78, 012301 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    R. N. Alexander, S. Yokoyama, A. Furusawa, and N. C. Menicucci, Universal quantum computation with temporal-mode bilayer square lattices, Phys. Rev. A97, 032302 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    B.-H. Wu, R. N. Alexander, S. Liu, and Z. Zhang, Quantum computing with multidimensional continuous- variable cluster states in a scalable photonic platform, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023138 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Hoshi, K

    T. Hoshi, K. Ichii, D. Lim, T. Suzuki, A. Kawasaki, R. Ide, A. Sakaguchi, S. Yokoyama, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Generation of one- dimensional cluster states enabling 25-ghz-clock quan- tum computation, inFrontie...

    2025

  38. [46]

    Yokoyama, A

    S. Yokoyama, A. Sakaguchi, W. Asavanant, K. Takase, Y.-R. Chen, H. Nagayoshi, J. ichi Yoshikawa, T. Kashi- wazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, T. Hashimoto, T. Hiraoka, A. Furusawa, and H. Yonezawa, A full-stack analog op- tical quantum computing platform with one hundred in- puts (20...

    2026 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Asavanant, B

    W. Asavanant, B. Charoensombutamon, S. Yokoyama, T. Ebihara, T. Nakamura, R. N. Alexander, M. Endo, J.-i. Yoshikawa, N. C. Menicucci, H. Yonezawa, and A. Furusawa, Time-domain-multiplexed measurement- based quantum operations with 25-mhz clock frequency, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 03...

    2021

  40. [48]

    M. V. Larsen, X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. S. Neergaard- Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic multi-mode gates on a scalable photonic quantum computing plat- form, Nature Physics17, 1018 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Ukai, J.-i

    R. Ukai, J.-i. Yoshikawa, N. Iwata, P. van Loock, and A. Furusawa, Universal linear bogoliubov transforma- tions through one-way quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A81, 032315 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    R. N. Alexander and N. C. Menicucci, Flexible quantum circuits using scalable continuous-variable cluster states, Phys. Rev. A93, 062326 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Shaked, Y

    Y. Shaked, Y. Michael, R. Z. Vered, L. Bello, M. Rosen- bluh, and A. Pe’er, Lifting the bandwidth limit of optical homodyne measurement with broadband parametric am- plification, Nature Communications9, 609 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, N. Huo, L. Cui, C. Feng, Z. Y. Ou, and X. Li, Pulsed entanglement measured by parametric am- plifier assisted homodyne detection, Opt. Express27, 30552 (2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Manceau, G

    M. Manceau, G. Leuchs, F. Khalili, and M. Chekhova, Detection loss tolerant supersensitive phase measurement with an su(1,1) interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 223604 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, N. Huo, L. Cui, S. Feng, X. Li, and Z. Y. Ou, Measuring continuous-variable quantum entangle- ment with parametric-amplifier-assisted homodyne de- tection, Phys. Rev. A101, 053801 (2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    Inoue, T

    A. Inoue, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, N. Takanashi, T. Kazama, K. Enbutsu, K. Watanabe, T. Umeki, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Toward a multi-core ultra- fast optical quantum processor: 43-ghz bandwidth real- time amplitude measurement of 5-db squeezed light using modularized o...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Kawasaki, R

    A. Kawasaki, R. Ide, H. Brunel, T. Suzuki, R. Nehra, K. Nakashima, T. Kashiwazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, F. China, M. Yabuno, S. Miki, H. Terai, T. Yamashima, A. Sakaguchi, K. Takase, M. Endo, W. Asavanant, and A. Furusawa, Broadband generation and tomography of non-gaussian sta...

    2024

  49. [57]

    Kawasaki, H

    A. Kawasaki, H. Brunel, R. Ide, T. Suzuki, T. Kashi- wazaki, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, T. Yamashima, A. Sak- aguchi, K. Takase, M. Endo, W. Asavanant, and A. Furu- sawa, Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale op- tical quantum entanglement towards ultrafast quantum informatio...

    2025

  50. [58]

    Yamashima, T

    T. Yamashima, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Suzuki, R. Nehra, T. Nakamura, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, K. Takase, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, All-optical measurement-device-free feedforward enabling ultra-fast quantum information processing, Opt. Express33, 5769 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Suzuki, T

    T. Suzuki, T. Hoshi, A. Kawasaki, S. Oki, K. Ichii, H. Na- gayoshi, K. Takahashi, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, A. Inoue, T. Umeki, T. Sonoyama, K. Takase, W. Asa- vanant, M. Endo, and A. Furusawa, Ultrafast all-optical quantum teleportation (2026), arXiv:2604.14959 [quant- ph]

    2026 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Williams, E

    J. Williams, E. Sendonaris, R. Nehra, R. M. Gray, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, and A. Marandi, Ultrafast all- optical measurement of squeezed vacuum in a lithium niobate nanophotonic circuit, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043006 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Kalash and M

    M. Kalash and M. V. Chekhova, Wigner function tomog- raphy via optical parametric amplification, Optica10, 1142 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

    2001

  55. [63]

    Fukui, A

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, A. Okamoto, and K. Fujii, High- threshold fault-tolerant quantum computation with ana- log quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. X8, 021054 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Fukui, High-threshold fault-tolerant quantum com- putation with the gottesman-kitaev-preskill qubit under noise in an optical setup, Phys

    K. Fukui, High-threshold fault-tolerant quantum com- putation with the gottesman-kitaev-preskill qubit under noise in an optical setup, Phys. Rev. A107, 052414 (2023)

    2023

  57. [65]

    T. C. Ralph, All-optical quantum teleportation, Opt. Lett.24, 348 (1999)

    1999

  58. [66]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    Kashiwazaki, T

    T. Kashiwazaki, T. Yamashima, K. Enbutsu, T. Kazama, 23 A. Inoue, K. Fukui, M. Endo, T. Umeki, and A. Furu- sawa, Over-8-db squeezed light generation by a broad- band waveguide optical parametric amplifier toward fault-tolerant ultra-fast quantum computers, Applied Physics Let...

    2023

  60. [68]

    Kang, Shallow etched low-loss thin film lithium nio- bate waveguides with bound states in the continuum, AIP Advances13, 035332 (2023)

    Y. Kang, Shallow etched low-loss thin film lithium nio- bate waveguides with bound states in the continuum, AIP Advances13, 035332 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    F. M. Soares, M. Baier, T. Gaertner, N. Grote, M. Moehrle, T. Beckerwerth, P. Runge, and M. Schell, Inp-based foundry pics for optical interconnects, Applied Sciences9, 1588 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    Sobhanan, A

    A. Sobhanan, A. Anthur, S. O’Duill, M. Pelusi, S. Namiki, L. Barry, D. Venkitesh, and G. P. Agrawal, Semiconductor optical amplifiers: recent advances and applications, Adv. Opt. Photon.14, 571 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    G. Ha, K. Hirota, T. Kashiwazaki, T. Suzuki, A. Kawasaki, W. Asavanant, M. Endo, and A. Fu- rusawa, Generation of 12 db squeezed light from a waveguide optical parametric amplifier using a machine- learning-controlled spatial light modulator (2026), arXiv:2603.02744 [quant-ph]

    2026

  64. [72]

    Schmidt and P

    F. Schmidt and P. van Loock, Quantum error correc- tion with higher gottesman-kitaev-preskill codes: Mini- mal measurements and linear optics, Phys. Rev. A105, 042427 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    Conrad, J

    J. Conrad, J. Eisert, and F. Arzani, Gottesman-Kitaev- Preskill codes: A lattice perspective, Quantum6, 648 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Jankowski, N

    M. Jankowski, N. Jornod, C. Langrock, B. Desiatov, A. Marandi, M. Lonˇ car, and M. M. Fejer, Quasi-static optical parametric amplification, Optica9, 273 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Ledezma, R

    L. Ledezma, R. Sekine, Q. Guo, R. Nehra, S. Jahani, and A. Marandi, Intense optical parametric amplifica- tion in dispersion-engineered nanophotonic lithium nio- bate waveguides, Optica9, 303 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, and M. Lonˇ car, Monolithic ultra-high-q lithium niobate mi- croring resonator, Optica4, 1536 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    Shams-Ansari, G

    A. Shams-Ansari, G. Huang, L. He, Z. Li, J. Holzgrafe, M. Jankowski, M. Churaev, P. Kharel, R. Cheng, D. Zhu, N. Sinclair, B. Desiatov, M. Zhang, T. J. Kippenberg, and M. Lonˇ car, Reduced material loss in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides, APL Photonics7, 081301 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    H. Tang, C. Yang, L. Qin, L. Liang, Y. Lei, P. Jia, Y. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Song, C. Qiu, C. Zheng, X. Li, D. Li, and L. Wang, A review of high-power semiconduc- tor optical amplifiers in the 1550 nm band, Sensors23, 7326 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams- Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lonˇ car, In- tegrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operat- ing at cmos-compatible voltages, Nature562, 101 (2018)

    2018

  72. [80]

    F. Yang, X. Fang, X. Chen, L. Zhu, F. Zhang, Z. Chen, and Y. Li, Monolithic thin film lithium niobate electro- optic modulator with over 110 ghz bandwidth, Chin. Opt. Lett.20, 022502 (2022)

    2022

  73. [81]

    Valdez, V

    F. Valdez, V. Mere, X. Wang, N. Boynton, T. A. Fried- mann, S. Arterburn, C. Dallo, A. T. Pomerene, A. L. Starbuck, D. C. Trotter, A. L. Lentine, and S. Mookher- jea, 110 ghz, 110 mw hybrid silicon-lithium niobate mach- zehnder modulator, Scientific Reports12, 18611 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    Kupchak, J

    C. Kupchak, J. Erskine, D. England, and B. Sussman, Terahertz-bandwidth switching of heralded single pho- tons, Opt. Lett.44, 1427 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    K. L. Fenwick, F. Bouchard, A. Sit, T. Lee, A. H. Proppe, G. Thekkadath, D. England, P. J. Bustard, J. S. Lun- deen, and B. J. Sussman, Ultrafast switching of telecom photon-number states, Phys. Rev. A113, 022612 (2026)

    2026

  76. [84]

    Sharping, M

    J. Sharping, M. Fiorentino, P. Kumar, and R. Windeler, All-optical switching based on cross-phase modulation in microstructure fiber, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 14, 77 (2002)

    2002

  77. [85]

    Berti, S

    N. Berti, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, and J. Fatome, Extreme waveform compression with a nonlinear temporal focus- ing mirror, Nature Photonics16, 822 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    R. J. Manning, A. D. Ellis, A. J. Poustie, and K. J. Blow, Semiconductor laser amplifiers for ultrafast all- optical signal processing, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B14, 3204 (1997)

    1997

  79. [87]

    X. Chen, L. Huo, Z. Zhao, L. Zhuang, and C. Lou, Study on 100-gb/s reconfigurable all-optical logic gates using a single semiconductor optical amplifier, Opt. Express24, 30245 (2016)

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.