Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 170 references

Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Standard topological band theory for nanoscale photonic crystals must be extended to include far-field radiation and polarization singularities, whose winding numbers carry topological information that bulk invariants miss.

desk verdict A competent perspective on far-field topology in nanophotonics, but the central claim rests on a non-quantized Berry phase and an unproven projection; send to review as a perspective, not as a research paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20487 v1 pith:DJVQYP53 submitted 2025-08-28 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hall

Grazia Salerno This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topologicalphotonicsnanophotonicsboundstatesinthecontinuumpolarizationsingularitiesnon-HermitiantopologyBerryphasefar-fieldradiationphotoniccrystals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nanoscale photonic crystals radiate light into the surrounding continuum, and this paper argues that the standard topological band theory built on bulk eigenmodes misses the topology carried by that radiation. The author proposes that topological observables should be defined from the far-field polarization state, and shows how polarization singularities—points where the polarization direction is undefined, most notably bound states in the continuum (BICs)—carry quantized winding. In this picture a BIC of winding number $q$ contributes a Berry phase of $-\pi q$, where the Berry phase is the geometric phase a mode accumulates around a closed loop in momentum space. The argument runs through a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian in which the far field is a non-unitary projection of the bulk mode, and through recent evidence that bulk and far-field Berry curvatures can disagree. If the perspective is right, light leaking from a photonic crystal is not merely a loss channel but an independent, measurable carrier of topological information.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-unitary far-field projection $\hat{R}$ in Eq. (16), which maps the bulk eigenmode $|\psi\rangle$ onto a finite set of radiating channels via the polarization directions $\mathbf{p}_G$ of the diffracted orders, giving the observed electric field $E_F \propto \hat{R}|\psi\rangle$. Because $\hat{R}$ is not unitary, the far-field Berry connection built from the projected polarization state is not a gauge-equivalent copy of the bulk one. Writing that state on the Poincaré sphere—the sphere of all polarization states—yields the far-field Berry curvature $B_f = \frac{1}{2}\sin\theta(\partial_{k_x}\theta\,\partial_{k_y}\varphi - \partial_{k_y}\theta\,\partial_{k_x}\varphi)$ and the Berry phase $\varphi_f = -\pi q + \varphi_G$, where $q$ is the winding number of the polarization vector around the singularity. This is the mechanism that lets a measurable radiation pattern carry a topological invariant different from the bulk invariant.

What would settle it

Take a specific dielectric photonic-crystal slab whose bulk Chern number can be computed from the full non-Hermitian eigenmodes, and measure the far-field Stokes parameters across the Brillouin zone; count the winding numbers of all polarization singularities and compare the integrated far-field Berry curvature with the bulk invariant. Systematic agreement across several lattices would undercut the claimed distinction, while a reproducible mismatch in a sample where left-eigenvector corrections are negligible would confirm that far-field topology is independent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that the topology of an open nanophotonic lattice is not exhausted by the bulk band structure. Far-field radiation changes the Berry connection and Berry curvature, and momentum-space polarization singularities—especially bound states in the continuum—behave as topological defects that supply their own quantized phase. In the framework developed here, the far-field Berry phase is $\varphi_f = -\pi q + \varphi_G$, with $q$ the winding number of the linear polarization vector around a polarization vortex and $\varphi_G$ a geometric phase equal to the area enclosed by the polarization path on the Poincaré sphere, the sphere of all polarization states. The paper reads the emerging discrepancy between bulk and far-field topology as evidence that standard topological band theory, which relies on Hermitian generalized eigenvalue problems, must be generalized to cover radiative, non-Hermitian photonic systems.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the light escaping a nanoscale photonic crystal preserves enough of the internal mode's structure that the winding numbers and Berry phases measured in the far field are genuine topological properties, rather than artifacts of the non-unitary projection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A BIC of winding number $q$ contributes $-\pi q$ to the far-field Berry phase, so measuring the polarization vortex around a BIC gives a direct experimental readout of a topological contribution that bulk invariants alone do not fix.
  • Bulk and far-field topological invariants should generally disagree in radiative lattices, which means experiments extracting Berry curvature from emitted light must be interpreted with a separate, far-field topological framework rather than as direct measurements of the bulk Chern number.
  • The non-Hermitian radiative-coupling Hamiltonian provides a concrete tool for computing quality factors, lifetimes, and far-field topology together, replacing Hermitian tight-binding models as the natural description of open nanophotonic lattices.
  • Symmetry-protected BICs with higher rotational symmetry carry larger quantized charges, so lattices with $C_n$ symmetry of higher order—including quasicrystalline structures—extend the range of accessible far-field topological charges.
  • The relation between polarization singularities and topological invariants suggests that the global topology of a band in the far field can be estimated by counting the total number of linearly and circularly polarized singularities over the Brillouin zone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to build a photonic-crystal slab whose bulk Chern number is known, then measure the far-field polarization texture with interferometry; a systematic mismatch would turn the perspective's central claim into a quantitative prediction about where standard bulk-boundary correspondence fails.
  • The non-unitary-projection logic may generalize beyond BICs: in any open wave system where the observable channel is a projection of the internal mode, 'projection topology' could differ from bulk topology, suggesting analogous effects in plasmonic arrays, metasurfaces, and time-modulated systems.
  • The $-\pi q$ Berry-phase contribution could be engineered as a design tool: arrays of BICs with controlled winding numbers might act as momentum-space sources of synthetic gauge fields, enabling spin-Hall-like splitting of light that is robust against fabrication disorder.
  • Because the paper notes that left eigenvectors are needed for the full non-Hermitian topology but are hard to access, a concrete next step would be to reconstruct left states from the response to weak perturbations and test whether the resulting invariants restore agreement with bulk predictions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This perspective paper by Salerno argues that standard topological band theory, developed for Hermitian tight-binding photonic lattices, must be extended when applied to nanoscaled photonic crystals, because far-field radiation and polarization singularities alter the observables used to infer topology. The paper reviews bulk topological band theory (Berry connection/curvature/Chern number, quantum geometric tensor), non-Hermitian formulations including left/right eigenstates and exceptional points, and the guided-mode expansion of photonic crystal slabs. It introduces a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian with radiative coupling (Eq. (15)), defines the far field as a non-unitary projection of the bulk mode (Eq. (16)), and derives a far-field Berry phase (Eq. (20)) expressed as the BIC topological charge q plus a geometric term. The central claim, made in Sec. III, is that bulk and far-field topologies can differ, suggesting a breakdown of the bulk-radiation correspondence and the need for a generalized topological framework. The paper closes with open directions involving Floquet driving, synthetic dimensions, moiré lattices, and topological rainbows.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the manuscript would offer an important reframing of topological photonics at the nanoscale: experimental far-field measurements (Stokes parameters, polarization vortices, BIC charges) would carry topological information that is not captured by bulk invariants, and the BIC winding number would become a practical topological probe in open photonic systems. The paper is competently organized and presents the standard formalism accurately; the derivation leading to Eq. (20) is transparent, and the review of non-Hermitian topology is useful. The BIC topological charge q in Eq. (1) is a well-established, robust quantity, and the paper appropriately credits recent experimental work on far-field Berry curvature [123]. However, the manuscript's central claim is a perspective rather than a demonstrated result: it does not contain a worked example in which a bulk invariant and a far-field observable provably disagree, and several load-bearing assertions are delegated to the author's own concurrent preprints ([124], [143]). For this reason the significance is conditional on the validity of those external results.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (20)] The far-field Berry phase in Eq. (20) is not a quantized topological invariant as written. The term φG = −1/2 ∮ cosθ ∇φ·dk is a continuous geometric phase that depends on the polarization path on the Poincaré sphere; only for paths with θ = π/2 does the expression reduce to −πq. Consequently, the Sec. III statement that the bulk/far-field discrepancy reveals a failure of standard topological band theory overstates the case unless the loops are restricted or φG is shown to be quantized or otherwise protected. The BIC winding number q itself is robust, but q is not the same as the integrated far-field Berry phase, and the difference between a bulk Chern number and this geometric phase is not by itself a difference between topological invariants.
  2. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (16)] The projection R used to define the far field is onto a finite set of observed diffracted orders, and the manuscript gives no argument that the far-field Berry phase or the effective charge q extracted from the projected state is stable when the set of orders is enlarged or the normalization of |E⟩ is changed. If the invariants change under such a truncation, the claimed breakdown of bulk-radiation correspondence would be a projection artifact rather than a physical enrichment. Relatedly, Eq. (16) contains a dimension error: since each pG is a two-component polarization vector, R should be a 2×N matrix, not an N×2 matrix, for the subsequent pseudo-inverse relations to make sense. The text should correct this and explicitly address truncation stability, or state that this is an open problem.
  3. [Sec. III and Refs. [123], [124], [143]] The load-bearing assertion that bulk and far-field topologies can break correspondence (Sec. III) rests on Refs. [123] and [124], of which [124] (and [143]) are the author's own not-yet-published preprints. The present manuscript does not reproduce the calculation or state the parameter regimes, so the central conclusion is not self-contained. To make the perspective convincing, the author should either include a concrete two-band example showing a bulk invariant different from the far-field invariant, or explicitly label the breakdown as a conjecture based on ongoing work.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Author affiliation, first page] The affiliation line contains a stray space in 'P .O. Box'; it should read 'P.O. Box'.
  2. [References [63] and [127]] The arXiv identifiers are formatted inconsistently: Ref. [63] uses 'arXiv:2412.01684' while Ref. [127] uses 'arXiv:2507:20033'; the latter should be 'arXiv:2507.20033'.
  3. [Sec. I, BIC applications] The sentence 'they are particularly suited for low-threshold lasing [56,57], and guiding slow light [58]' is ungrammatical; 'guiding' should be 'for guiding' or the clause should be rephrased.
  4. [Sec. II.C] The sentence 'along which each eigenstate is mapped with a polarization state on the Poincaré sphere' should read 'mapped to a polarization state'.
  5. [Sec. II.C, Eq. (20)] The statement that φG 'is equal to the area between this path and the equator on the Poincaré sphere' is imprecise; the formula is an oriented integral of cosθ dφ, and the wording should reflect that the area carries a sign and depends on the path orientation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the perspective's equations follow from stated definitions and its load-bearing claims carry independent external support.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain in Sec. II. The effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (5), the non-Hermitian loss model in Eqs. (13)-(15), and the far-field projection in Eq. (16) are introduced as definitions or standard reductions rather than as fitted inputs. The far-field Berry connection in Eq. (18), curvature in Eq. (19), and phase in Eq. (20) follow algebraically from the polarization parametrization in Eq. (17); Eq. (20) is explicitly written as -pi*q + phi_G, with q taken from the winding-number definition in Eq. (1) and phi_G labeled a continuous geometric area term, so the paper does not present a new quantized invariant. The statement that a charge-q vortex sources a -pi*q Berry phase is an algebraic consequence of the definition of q, and the broader geometric-phase context is attributed to prior independent literature. The self-cited works are used for supporting statements, but each is paired with or replaceable by independent external references or standard group-theoretic character tables, so the central perspective does not reduce to a self-citation chain. The skeptic's concern that Eq. (20) is not quantized and that R in Eq. (16) is a truncation-dependent projection is a correctness and interpretation question, not a circularity, because the paper presents the bulk/far-field discrepancy as a consequence of the projection rather than as a fitted prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This perspective introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard Bloch/guided-mode theory, a non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian model from prior work, and the projection of bulk modes onto far-field channels. The main load-bearing assumptions are the validity of the non-Hermitian model and the sufficiency of the far-field projection for defining topological invariants.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Bloch's theorem and the guided-mode expansion of the photonic master equation (Eq. (3)-(5)) are valid.
    Invoked in Sec. II to derive the effective Hamiltonian Eq. (5).
  • domain assumption The effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian Eq. (13)-(15), derived from Lindblad master equation, accurately describes radiation losses in photonic crystal slabs.
    Used in Sec. II.B.2 to explain BIC formation and far-field projection.
  • domain assumption The far-field electric field is a projection of the bulk eigenmode onto a finite set of diffracted orders within the light line (Eq. (16)).
    Central to the perspective's argument that far-field observables capture only a partial view of the bulk.
  • standard math The Poincaré sphere parametrization of polarization (Eq. (17)) yields the far-field Berry connection and curvature (Eqs. (18)-(20)).
    Standard result from Bliokh et al. and others, used in Sec. II.C.
  • domain assumption The topological charge q of a BIC, defined as polarization winding (Eq. (1)), enters the far-field Berry phase (Eq. (20)).
    Connects local polarization singularities to global Berry phase; supports the argument that BICs carry far-field topology.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJVQYP53

@misc{pith2026250820487,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological photonics in nanoscaled systems with far field radiation and polarization singularities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJVQYP53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20487}
}
read the original abstract

Topology is a powerful framework for controlling and manipulating light, minimizing detrimental perturbations on the photonic properties. Combining nanophotonics with topological concepts presents opportunities for both fundamental physics and technological applications. Although most topological photonic realizations have been inspired by condensed-matter analogue models, new topological ideas have just begun to be realized at the nanoscale. Nanophotonics is characterized by subtle phenomena that are not usually considered in other topological models' realizations, such as nonlocality, strong field confinement, and light radiating to the far-field continuum. In this perspective, we will discuss how standard topological band theory for photonic crystals needs to be extended by a more comprehensive approach that properly treats such nanophotonic intrinsic effects and, in particular, the interplay of polarization and far-field radiation. We highlight the emerging role that polarization singularities might play in defining the topological invariants in the far field, which are not fully captured by bulk observables alone. We conclude by outlining a set of open questions and promising directions for exploring novel concepts in topological nanophotonics and shaping next-generation photonic devices.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

170 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [123]

    Enabling infinite q factors in absorbing optical systems,

    R. Kolkowski and A. Shevchenko, “Enabling infinite q factors in absorbing optical systems,” Nanophotonics 12, 3443–3454 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [124]

    Non- Hermitian physics and master equations,

    F. Roccati, G. M. Palma, F. Ciccarello, and F. Bagarello, “Non- Hermitian physics and master equations,” Open Systems & In- formation Dynamics 29, 2250004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [143]

    Bulk topological invariants in noninteracting point group symmetric insulators,

    C. Fang, M. J. Gilbert, and B. A. Bernevig, “Bulk topological invariants in noninteracting point group symmetric insulators,” Physical Review B 86, 115112 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [1]

    These eigenvectors |ψR⟩̸ =|ψL⟩ share the same eigenvalue ˆH|ψR⟩ = ε|ψR⟩; ⟨ψL| ˆH =⟨ψL|ε

    Berry curvature in non-Hermitian systems When the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be diagonalized both from the left and the right, it yields left and right eigen- vectors. These eigenvectors |ψR⟩̸ =|ψL⟩ share the same eigenvalue ˆH|ψR⟩ = ε|ψR⟩; ⟨ψL| ˆH =⟨ψL|ε. (11) Although the norm of these states is not conserved due to the losses or gains, leading to in...

  5. [2]

    However, bound states in the contin- uum (BICs) represent special modes within these resonances where such losses are suppressed due to symmetry-driven in- terference mechanisms

    BICs from an effective non-Hermitian model Guided resonances in photonic crystals generally experi- ence radiation losses. However, bound states in the contin- uum (BICs) represent special modes within these resonances where such losses are suppressed due to symmetry-driven in- terference mechanisms. This motivates the development of a non-Hermitian model...

  6. [3]

    Nanophoton- ics: shrinking light-based technology,

    A. F. Koenderink, A. Alù, and A. Polman, “Nanophoton- ics: shrinking light-based technology,” Science 348, 516–521 (2015)

    2015

  7. [4]

    The rich photonic world of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays,

    W. Wang, M. Ramezani, A. I. Väkeväinen, P. Törmä, J. G. Ri- vas, and T. W. Odom, “The rich photonic world of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays,” Materials Today21, 303 (2018)

    2018

  8. [5]

    Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators,

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, B. Stern, M. Lipson, and M. Lon ˇcar, “Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators,” Op- tics express 26, 1547–1555 (2018)

    2018

Show all 170 references
  1. [6]

    Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: a review of properties and applications,

    V . G. Kravets, A. V . Kabashin, W. L. Barnes, and A. N. Grigorenko, “Plasmonic surface lattice resonances: a review of properties and applications,” Chemical Reviews 118, 5912 (2018)

    2018

  2. [7]

    On- chip nanophotonics and future challenges,

    A. Karabchevsky, A. Katiyi, A. S. Ang, and A. Hazan, “On- chip nanophotonics and future challenges,” Nanophotonics 9, 3733–3753 (2020)

    2020

  3. [8]

    Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices,

    A. González-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. García-Ripoll, and F. J. García-Vidal, “Light–matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices,” Nature Reviews Physics 6, 166–179 (2024)

    2024

  4. [9]

    Quantum topological photonics,

    Q. Yan, X. Hu, Y . Fu, C. Lu, C. Fan, Q. Liu, X. Feng, Q. Sun, and Q. Gong, “Quantum topological photonics,” Advanced Optical Materials 9, 2001739 (2021)

    2021

  5. [10]

    Yoshioka, The quantum Hall effect (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    D. Yoshioka, The quantum Hall effect (Springer, Berlin, 2002)

    2002

  6. [11]

    Topological photonics,

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, “Topological photonics,” Review of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  7. [12]

    Roadmap on topological photonics,

    H. Price, Y . Chong, A. Khanikaev, H. Schomerus, L. J. Maczewsky, M. Kremer, M. Heinrich, A. Szameit, O. Zilber- berg, Y . Yang, et al. , “Roadmap on topological photonics,” Journal of Physics: Photonics 4, 032501 (2022)

    2022

  8. [13]

    Exceptional points and non- Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale,

    A. Li, H. Wei, M. Cotrufo, W. Chen, S. Mann, X. Ni, B. Xu, J. Chen, J. Wang, S. Fan, et al., “Exceptional points and non- Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale,” Nature Nanotechnol- ogy 18, 706–720 (2023)

    2023

  9. [14]

    Dirac-like plasmons in honeycomb lattices of metallic nanoparticles,

    G. Weick, C. Woollacott, W. L. Barnes, O. Hess, and E. Mar- iani, “Dirac-like plasmons in honeycomb lattices of metallic nanoparticles,” Physical Review Letters110, 106801 (2013)

    2013

  10. [15]

    Topological pho- tonics,

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, “Topological pho- tonics,” Nature Photonics 8, 821–829 (2014)

    2014

  11. [16]

    Electronic properties of graphene in a strong magnetic field,

    M. Goerbig, “Electronic properties of graphene in a strong magnetic field,” Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1193–1243 (2011)

    2011

  12. [17]

    Direct observation of photonic Landau levels and helical edge states in strained honeycomb lattices,

    O. Jamadi, E. Rozas, G. Salerno, M. Mili ´cevi´c, T. Ozawa, I. Sagnes, A. Lemaître, L. L. Gratiet, A. Harouri, I. Carusotto, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, “Direct observation of photonic Landau levels and helical edge states in strained honeycomb lattices,” Light: Science & Applicatio...

    2020

  13. [18]

    Tunable pseudo- magnetic fields for polaritons in strained metasurfaces,

    C.-R. Mann, S. A. Horsley, and E. Mariani, “Tunable pseudo- magnetic fields for polaritons in strained metasurfaces,” Na- ture Photonics 14, 669–674 (2020)

    2020

  14. [19]

    Observation of Landau levels and chiral edge states in photonic crystals through pseudomagnetic fields induced by synthetic strain,

    R. Barczyk, L. Kuipers, and E. Verhagen, “Observation of Landau levels and chiral edge states in photonic crystals through pseudomagnetic fields induced by synthetic strain,” Nature Photonics 18, 574–579 (2024)

    2024

  15. [20]

    Chirality in photonic sys- tems,

    D. Solnyshkov and G. Malpuech, “Chirality in photonic sys- tems,” Comptes Rendus. Physique 17, 920–933 (2016)

    2016

  16. [21]

    Chi- ral emission from optical metasurfaces and metacavities,

    J. Han, H. Jang, Y . Lim, S. Kim, J. Lee, and Y . C. Jun, “Chi- ral emission from optical metasurfaces and metacavities,” Ad- vanced Photonics Research 5, 2400060 (2024)

    2024

  17. [22]

    Photonic bands, su- perchirality, and inverse design of a chiral minimal metasur- face,

    S. Zanotto, G. Mazzamuto, F. Riboli, G. Biasiol, G. C. La Rocca, A. Tredicucci, and A. Pitanti, “Photonic bands, su- perchirality, and inverse design of a chiral minimal metasur- face,” Nanophotonics 8, 2291–2301 (2019)

    2019

  18. [23]

    Circular dichroism in a plasmonic array of ellipti- cal nanoholes with square lattice,

    H. Ali, E. Petronijevic, G. Pellegrini, C. Sibilia, and L. C. Andreani, “Circular dichroism in a plasmonic array of ellipti- cal nanoholes with square lattice,” Optics Express 31, 14196– 14211 (2023)

    2023

  19. [24]

    Maximum chirality empowered by a bound state in a 8 continuum in a plasmonic metasurface,

    H. Ali, S. Zanotti, G. Pellegrini, E. Petronijevic, and L. C. An- dreani, “Maximum chirality empowered by a bound state in a 8 continuum in a plasmonic metasurface,” ACS Applied Optical Materials 2, 825–833 (2024)

    2024

  20. [25]

    Analogs of quantum-Hall- effect edge states in photonic crystals,

    S. Raghu and F. D. M. Haldane, “Analogs of quantum-Hall- effect edge states in photonic crystals,” Physical Review A78, 033834 (2008)

    2008

  21. [26]

    Possible realization of di- rectional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with bro- ken time-reversal symmetry,

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, “Possible realization of di- rectional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with bro- ken time-reversal symmetry,” Physical Review Letters 100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  22. [27]

    Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic pho- tonic crystal,

    Z. Wang, Y . Chong, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Solja ˇci´c, “Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic pho- tonic crystal,” Physical Review Letters100, 013905 (2008)

    2008

  23. [28]

    Magnetic on–off switching of a plasmonic laser,

    F. Freire-Fernández, J. Cuerda, K. S. Daskalakis, S. Perum- bilavil, J.-P. Martikainen, K. Arjas, P. Törmä, and S. van Di- jken, “Magnetic on–off switching of a plasmonic laser,” Na- ture Photonics 16, 27–32 (2022)

    2022

  24. [29]

    Polariton Z topological insulator,

    A. Nalitov, D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, “Polariton Z topological insulator,” Physical Review Letters 114, 116401 (2015)

    2015

  25. [30]

    Polariton Chern bands in 2d photonic crystals beyond Dirac cones,

    X. Xie, K. Sun, and H. Deng, “Polariton Chern bands in 2d photonic crystals beyond Dirac cones,” Physical Review X15, 021061 (2025)

    2025

  26. [31]

    Topo- logical edge plasmon modes between diatomic chains of plas- monic nanoparticles,

    C. Ling, M. Xiao, C. T. Chan, S. F. Yu, and K. H. Fung, “Topo- logical edge plasmon modes between diatomic chains of plas- monic nanoparticles,” Optics Express 23, 2021–2031 (2015)

    2015

  27. [32]

    Topological plasmonic chain with retardation and radiative effects,

    S. R. Pocock, X. Xiao, P. A. Huidobro, and V . Giannini, “Topological plasmonic chain with retardation and radiative effects,” ACS Photonics5, 2271 (2018)

    2018

  28. [33]

    Radiative topological states in resonant photonic crystals,

    A. Poshakinskiy, A. Poddubny, L. Pilozzi, and E. Ivchenko, “Radiative topological states in resonant photonic crystals,” Physical Review Letters 112, 107403 (2014)

    2014

  29. [34]

    Higher-order topology in plas- monic Kagome lattices,

    M. Proctor, M. Blanco de Paz, D. Bercioux, A. Garcia-Etxarri, and P. Arroyo Huidobro, “Higher-order topology in plas- monic Kagome lattices,” Applied Physics Letters118, 091105 (2021)

    2021

  30. [35]

    Topological pho- tonics: From crystals to particles,

    G. Siroki, P. A. Huidobro, and V . Giannini, “Topological pho- tonics: From crystals to particles,” Physical Review B 96, 041408 (2017)

    2017

  31. [36]

    Far-field probing of leaky topological states in all-dielectric metasurfaces,

    M. A. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. A. Smirnova, D. Korobkin, D. Zhir- ihin, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, P. A. Belov, A. Alù, and A. B. Khanikaev, “Far-field probing of leaky topological states in all-dielectric metasurfaces,” Nature Communications 9, 1–8 (2018)

    2018

  32. [37]

    Topological plasmonic edge states in a planar array of metallic nanoparticles,

    M. Honari-Latifpour and L. Yousefi, “Topological plasmonic edge states in a planar array of metallic nanoparticles,” Nanophotonics 8, 799–806 (2019)

    2019

  33. [38]

    Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material,

    L.-H. Wu and X. Hu, “Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material,” Physical Review Letters 114, 223901 (2015)

    2015

  34. [39]

    Robustness of topological corner modes in photonic crystals,

    M. Proctor, P. A. Huidobro, B. Bradlyn, M. B. de Paz, M. G. Vergniory, D. Bercioux, and A. García-Etxarri, “Robustness of topological corner modes in photonic crystals,” Physical Re- view Research 2, 042038 (2020)

    2020

  35. [40]

    Near-field imaging of synthetic dimensional integrated plasmonic topological harper nanochains,

    Q. Yan, B. Zhao, Q. Lyu, Y . Li, S. Chu, C. Lu, X. Hu, C. Chan, and Q. Gong, “Near-field imaging of synthetic dimensional integrated plasmonic topological harper nanochains,” Nature Communications 16, 2592 (2025)

    2025

  36. [41]

    Ro- bust optical delay lines with topological protection,

    M. Hafezi, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and J. M. Taylor, “Ro- bust optical delay lines with topological protection,” Nature Physics 7, 907 (2011)

    2011

  37. [42]

    Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics,

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Taylor, “Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics,” Nature Photonics 7, 1001 (2013)

    2013

  38. [43]

    Topological phases in ring res- onators: recent progress and future prospects,

    D. Leykam and L. Yuan, “Topological phases in ring res- onators: recent progress and future prospects,” Nanophotonics 9, 4473–4487 (2020)

    2020

  39. [44]

    Synthetic dimension in photonics,

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, “Synthetic dimension in photonics,” Optica 5, 1396–1405 (2018)

    2018

  40. [45]

    Photonic topological insulator in synthetic dimensions,

    E. Lustig, S. Weimann, Y . Plotnik, Y . Lumer, M. A. Bandres, A. Szameit, and M. Segev, “Photonic topological insulator in synthetic dimensions,” Nature 567, 356–360 (2019)

    2019

  41. [46]

    Topological insulator laser: Theory,

    G. Harari, M. A. Bandres, Y . Lumer, M. C. Rechtsman, Y . D. Chong, M. Khajavikhan, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Segev, “Topological insulator laser: Theory,” Science 359, eaar4003 (2018)

    2018

  42. [47]

    Topo- logical insulator laser: Experiments,

    M. A. Bandres, S. Wittek, G. Harari, M. Parto, J. Ren, M. Segev, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Topo- logical insulator laser: Experiments,” Science 359, eaar4005 (2018)

    2018

  43. [48]

    Classifying topol- ogy in photonic crystal slabs with radiative environments,

    S. Wong, T. A. Loring, and A. Cerjan, “Classifying topol- ogy in photonic crystal slabs with radiative environments,” npj Nanophotonics 1, 19 (2024)

    2024

  44. [49]

    A perspective on topological nanophotonics: current status and future challenges,

    M. S. Rider, S. J. Palmer, S. R. Pocock, X. Xiao, P. Ar- royo Huidobro, and V . Giannini, “A perspective on topological nanophotonics: current status and future challenges,” Journal of Applied Physics 125, 120901 (2019)

    2019

  45. [50]

    Roadmap on nonlocality in photonic ma- terials and metamaterials,

    F. Monticone et al., “Roadmap on nonlocality in photonic ma- terials and metamaterials,” Optical Materials Express15, 1544 (2025)

    2025

  46. [51]

    Nanophotonic nonlinear and laser devices exploiting bound states in the continuum,

    M.-S. Hwang, K.-Y . Jeong, J.-P. So, K.-H. Kim, and H.-G. Park, “Nanophotonic nonlinear and laser devices exploiting bound states in the continuum,” Communications Physics 5, 1–12 (2022)

    2022

  47. [52]

    Topological Nature of Optical Bound States in the Contin- uum,

    B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Solja ˇci´c, “Topological Nature of Optical Bound States in the Contin- uum,” Physical Review Letters113, 257401 (2014)

    2014

  48. [53]

    Geometric phases in 2d and 3d polarized fields: geometrical, dynamical, and topological aspects,

    K. Y . Bliokh, M. A. Alonso, and M. R. Dennis, “Geometric phases in 2d and 3d polarized fields: geometrical, dynamical, and topological aspects,” Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 122401 (2019)

    2019

  49. [54]

    Topological Po- larization Singularities in Metaphotonics,

    W. Liu, W. Liu, L. Shi, and Y . Kivshar, “Topological Po- larization Singularities in Metaphotonics,” Nanophotonics 10, 1469–1486 (2021)

    2021

  50. [55]

    Experimental Observation of a Polar- ization V ortex at an Optical Bound State in the Continuum,

    H. M. Doeleman, F. Monticone, W. den Hollander, A. Alù, and A. F. Koenderink, “Experimental Observation of a Polar- ization V ortex at an Optical Bound State in the Continuum,” Nature Photonics 12, 397–401 (2018)

    2018

  51. [56]

    Loss-driven topological transitions in lasing,

    G. Salerno, R. Heilmann, K. Arjas, K. Aronen, J.-P. Mar- tikainen, and P. Törmä, “Loss-driven topological transitions in lasing,” Physical Review Letters129, 173901 (2022)

    2022

  52. [57]

    High topological charge lasing in quasicrystals,

    K. Arjas, J. M. Taskinen, R. Heilmann, G. Salerno, and P. Törmä, “High topological charge lasing in quasicrystals,” Nature Communications 15, 9544 (2024)

    2024

  53. [58]

    Lasing action from photonic bound states in con- tinuum,

    A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y . Fainman, and B. Kanté, “Lasing action from photonic bound states in con- tinuum,” Nature 541, 196–199 (2017)

    2017

  54. [59]

    Quasi-bic mode lasing in a quadrumer plasmonic lattice,

    R. Heilmann, G. Salerno, J. Cuerda, T. K. Hakala, and P. Törmä, “Quasi-bic mode lasing in a quadrumer plasmonic lattice,” ACS Photonics 9, 224–232 (2022)

    2022

  55. [60]

    Slow light waveguides based on bound states in the continuum,

    Y . Tanimura, Y . Ishii, K. Takata, T. Uemura, M. Notomi, S. Iwamoto, and Y . Ota, “Slow light waveguides based on bound states in the continuum,” Optics Letters 50, 2013–2016 (2025)

    2025

  56. [61]

    Giant nonlinear response at the nanoscale driven by bound states in the continuum,

    L. Carletti, K. Koshelev, C. De Angelis, and Y . Kivshar, “Giant nonlinear response at the nanoscale driven by bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters121, 033903 (2018)

    2018

  57. [62]

    Nonlinear bound states in the continuum of a one-dimensional photonic crys- 9 tal slab,

    S. Krasikov, A. Bogdanov, and I. Iorsh, “Nonlinear bound states in the continuum of a one-dimensional photonic crys- 9 tal slab,” Physical Review B97, 224309 (2018)

    2018

  58. [63]

    Realization of polari- tonic topological charge at room temperature using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskite metasurface,

    N. H. M. Dang, S. Zanotti, E. Drouard, C. Chevalier, G. Trippé-Allard, M. Amara, E. Deleporte, V . Ardizzone, D. Sanvitto, L. C. Andreani, et al. , “Realization of polari- tonic topological charge at room temperature using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskit...

    2022

  59. [64]

    Polariton Bose–Einstein condensate from a bound state in the contin- uum,

    V . Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, S. Zanotti, A. Gianfrate, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, D. Suàrez-Forero, F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Gigli, et al., “Polariton Bose–Einstein condensate from a bound state in the contin- uum,” Nature 605, 447–452 (2022)

    2022

  60. [65]

    Condensation dynamics in a two- dimensional photonic crystal waveguide,

    M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, A. Gianfrate, D. Trypogeorgos, C. Leblanc, F. Riminucci, G. Salerno, M. De Giorgi, D. Bal- larini, and D. Sanvitto, “Condensation dynamics in a two- dimensional photonic crystal waveguide,” arXiv:2412.01684 (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2412.01684

    2024 doi arXiv

  61. [66]

    Bound states in the contin- uum in subwavelength emitter arrays,

    M. B. de Paz and P. A. Huidobro, “Bound states in the contin- uum in subwavelength emitter arrays,” Physical Review Re- search 5, 033108 (2023)

    2023

  62. [67]

    Flat-band lasing in silicon waveguide-integrated metasurfaces,

    S. Eyvazi, E. A. Mamonov, R. Heilmann, J. Cuerda, and P. Törmä, “Flat-band lasing in silicon waveguide-integrated metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics 12, 1570–1578 (2025)

    2025

  63. [68]

    Analytical perspective for bound states in the continuum in photonic crys- tal slabs,

    Y . Yang, C. Peng, Y . Liang, Z. Li, and S. Noda, “Analytical perspective for bound states in the continuum in photonic crys- tal slabs,” Physical Review Letters113, 037401 (2014)

    2014

  64. [69]

    Bound states in the continuum in anisotropic photonic crystal slabs,

    R.-L. Chern, J.-C. Chang, and H.-C. Yang, “Bound states in the continuum in anisotropic photonic crystal slabs,” Scientific Reports 13, 14139 (2023)

    2023

  65. [70]

    Multipolar origin of bound states in the continuum,

    Z. Sadrieva, K. Frizyuk, M. Petrov, Y . Kivshar, and A. Bog- danov, “Multipolar origin of bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review B 100, 115303 (2019)

    2019

  66. [71]

    Merging bound states in the continuum at off-high symmetry points,

    M. Kang, S. Zhang, M. Xiao, and H. Xu, “Merging bound states in the continuum at off-high symmetry points,” Physical Review Letters 126, 117402 (2021)

    2021

  67. [72]

    Super bound states in the continuum on a photonic flatband: concept, experimental realization, and optical trapping demonstration,

    N. D. Le, P. Bouteyre, A. Kheir-Aldine, F. Dubois, S. Cu- eff, L. Berguiga, X. Letartre, P. Viktorovitch, T. Benyattou, and H. S. Nguyen, “Super bound states in the continuum on a photonic flatband: concept, experimental realization, and optical trapping demonstration,” Physic...

    2024

  68. [73]

    Generation and annihilation of topo- logically protected bound states in the continuum and circu- larly polarized states by symmetry breaking,

    T. Yoda and M. Notomi, “Generation and annihilation of topo- logically protected bound states in the continuum and circu- larly polarized states by symmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters 125, 053902 (2020)

    2020

  69. [74]

    Circularly polarized states spawning from bound states in the continuum,

    W. Liu, B. Wang, Y . Zhang, J. Wang, M. Zhao, F. Guan, X. Liu, L. Shi, and J. Zi, “Circularly polarized states spawning from bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters 123, 116104 (2019)

    2019

  70. [75]

    Singular points of polarizations in the momentum space of photonic crystal slabs,

    W. Ye, Y . Gao, and J. Liu, “Singular points of polarizations in the momentum space of photonic crystal slabs,” Physical Review Letters 124, 153904 (2020)

    2020

  71. [76]

    Realizing tun- able evolution of bound states in the continuum and circularly polarized points by symmetry breaking,

    X. Wang, J. Wang, X. Zhao, L. Shi, and J. Zi, “Realizing tun- able evolution of bound states in the continuum and circularly polarized points by symmetry breaking,” ACS Photonics 10, 2316–2322 (2022)

    2022

  72. [77]

    Polarization states and far-field optical properties in dielectric photonic crystal slabs,

    L. Zagaglia, S. Zanotti, M. Minkov, M. Liscidini, D. Ger- ace, and L. Claudio Andreani, “Polarization states and far-field optical properties in dielectric photonic crystal slabs,” Optics Letters 48, 5017–5020 (2023)

    2023

  73. [78]

    J. D. Joannopoulos, P. R. Villeneuve, and S. Fan, Photonic crystals: Molding the Flow of Light (Elsevier, 1997)

    1997

  74. [79]

    Scattering-matrix treatment of patterned multilayer photonic structures,

    D. Whittaker and I. Culshaw, “Scattering-matrix treatment of patterned multilayer photonic structures,” Physical Review B 60, 2610 (1999)

    1999

  75. [80]

    A flexible framework for large-scale FDTD simula- tions: open-source inverse design for 3D nanostructures,

    Y . Mahlau, F. Schubert, K. Bethmann, R. Caspary, A. C. Lesina, M. Munderloh, J. Ostermann, and B. Rosen- hahn, “A flexible framework for large-scale FDTD simula- tions: open-source inverse design for 3D nanostructures,” arXiv:2412.12360 (2024), 10.48550/arXiv.2412.12360

    2024 doi arXiv

  76. [81]

    T-matrix representation of optical scattering response: Suggestion for a data format,

    N. Asadova, K. Achouri, K. Arjas, B. Auguié, R. Aydin, A. Baron, D. Beutel, B. Bodermann, K. Boussaoud, S. Burger, et al., “T-matrix representation of optical scattering response: Suggestion for a data format,” Journal of Quantitative Spec- troscopy and Radiative Transfer 333,...

    2025

  77. [82]

    Legume: A free implementation of the guided- mode expansion method for photonic crystal slabs,

    S. Zanotti, M. Minkov, D. Nigro, D. Gerace, S. Fan, and L. C. Andreani, “Legume: A free implementation of the guided- mode expansion method for photonic crystal slabs,” Computer Physics Communications 304, 109286 (2024)

    2024

  78. [83]

    Theory of photonic crystal polaritons in period- ically patterned multilayer waveguides,

    S. Zanotti, H. S. Nguyen, M. Minkov, L. C. Andreani, and D. Gerace, “Theory of photonic crystal polaritons in period- ically patterned multilayer waveguides,” Physical Review B 106, 115424 (2022)

    2022

  79. [84]

    Tutorial: computing topological invariants in 2d pho- tonic crystals,

    M. Blanco de Paz, C. Devescovi, G. Giedke, J. J. Saenz, M. G. Vergniory, B. Bradlyn, D. Bercioux, and A. García- Etxarri, “Tutorial: computing topological invariants in 2d pho- tonic crystals,” Advanced Quantum Technologies 3, 1900117 (2020)

    2020

  80. [85]

    Ge- ometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems,

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, “Ge- ometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems,” Physics Reports 697, 1–87 (2017)

    2017

  81. [86]

    Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift,

    A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V . Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Sanvitto, and G. Malpuech, “Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift,” Nature 578, 381 (2020)

    2020

  82. [87]

    General- ized quantum geometric tensor in a non-Hermitian exciton- polariton system,

    Y .-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, “General- ized quantum geometric tensor in a non-Hermitian exciton- polariton system,” Optical Materials Express 14, 664–686 (2024)

    2024

  83. [88]

    Quan- tum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems,

    Y .-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, “Quan- tum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Review Re- search 7, L012067 (2025)

    2025

  84. [89]

    Quantum metric and wave packets at exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems,

    D. Solnyshkov, C. Leblanc, L. Bessonart, A. Nalitov, J. Ren, Q. Liao, F. Li, and G. Malpuech, “Quantum metric and wave packets at exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Review B 103, 125302 (2021)

    2021

  85. [90]

    Experimental measure- ment of the divergent quantum metric of an exceptional point,

    Q. Liao, C. Leblanc, J. Ren, F. Li, Y . Li, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, J. Yao, and H. Fu, “Experimental measure- ment of the divergent quantum metric of an exceptional point,” Physical Review Letters 127, 107402 (2021)

    2021

  86. [91]

    Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point,

    M. Parto, Y . G. Liu, B. Bahari, M. Khajavikhan, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point,” Nanophotonics 10, 403–423 (2020)

    2020

  87. [92]

    Nonrecip- rocal and topological plasmonics,

    K. Shastri, M. I. Abdelrahman, and F. Monticone, “Nonrecip- rocal and topological plasmonics,” Photonics 8, 133 (2021)

    2021

  88. [93]

    Excep- tional topology of non-Hermitian systems,

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, “Excep- tional topology of non-Hermitian systems,” Review of Modern Physics 93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  89. [94]

    Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries,

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, “Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries,” Nature Reviews Physics4, 745–760 (2022)

    2022

  90. [95]

    Non-Hermitian photonic lattices: tu- torial,

    Q. Wang and Y . Chong, “Non-Hermitian photonic lattices: tu- torial,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B40, 1443– 1466 (2023)

    2023

  91. [96]

    Topological physics of non-Hermitian optics and photonics: a review,

    H. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Hua, D. Lei, M. Lu, and Y . Chen, 10 “Topological physics of non-Hermitian optics and photonics: a review,” Journal of Optics23, 123001 (2021)

    2021

  92. [97]

    Topological band theory for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, “Topological band theory for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,” Physical Review Letters 120, 146402 (2018)

    2018

  93. [98]

    Active topological pho- tonics,

    Y . Ota, K. Takata, T. Ozawa, A. Amo, Z. Jia, B. Kante, M. No- tomi, Y . Arakawa, and S. Iwamoto, “Active topological pho- tonics,” Nanophotonics 9, 547 (2020)

    2020

  94. [99]

    Perspective on topological states of non- Hermitian lattices,

    L. E. Foa Torres, “Perspective on topological states of non- Hermitian lattices,” Journal of Physics: Materials 3, 014002 (2019)

    2019

  95. [100]

    Topologi- cal complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands,

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, “Topologi- cal complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands,” Nature 598, 59–64 (2021)

    2021

  96. [101]

    Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non- Hermitian band,

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, K. Y . Yang, C. C. Wojcik, J. Vuˇckovi´c, and S. Fan, “Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non- Hermitian band,” Science 371, 1240–1245 (2021)

    2021

  97. [102]

    Eigen- value topology of non-Hermitian band structures in two and three dimensions,

    C. C. Wojcik, K. Wang, A. Dutt, J. Zhong, and S. Fan, “Eigen- value topology of non-Hermitian band structures in two and three dimensions,” Physical Review B106, L161401 (2022)

    2022

  98. [103]

    Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,

    ¸ S. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics,” Nature Mate- rials 18, 783–798 (2019)

    2019

  99. [104]

    Exceptional points in optics and pho- tonics,

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alu, “Exceptional points in optics and pho- tonics,” Science 363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  100. [105]

    Exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems: Applications and re- cent developments,

    H. Meng, Y . S. Ang, and C. H. Lee, “Exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems: Applications and re- cent developments,” Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024), 10.1063/5.0183826

    2024 doi

  101. [106]

    Non-Hermitian Chern bands,

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, “Non-Hermitian Chern bands,” Physical Review Letters 121, 136802 (2018)

    2018

  102. [107]

    Non-Hermitian bulk- boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized Brillouin zone theory,

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, “Non-Hermitian bulk- boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized Brillouin zone theory,” Physical Review Letters125, 226402 (2020)

    2020

  103. [108]

    Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems,

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, “Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Review Letters 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  104. [109]

    Non-Bloch bands in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems,

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, “Non-Bloch bands in two- dimensional non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Review B107, 195112 (2023)

    2023

  105. [110]

    Non-Hermitian photonic band winding and skin effects: a tutorial,

    H. Wang, J. Zhong, and S. Fan, “Non-Hermitian photonic band winding and skin effects: a tutorial,” Advances in Op- tics and Photonics 16, 659–748 (2024)

    2024

  106. [111]

    Topo- logical origin of non-Hermitian skin effects,

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, “Topo- logical origin of non-Hermitian skin effects,” Physical Review Letters 124, 086801 (2020)

    2020

  107. [112]

    Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems,

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, “Correspondence between winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Review Letters 125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  108. [113]

    Nontrivial point-gap topology and non- Hermitian skin effect in photonic crystals,

    J. Zhong, K. Wang, Y . Park, V . Asadchy, C. C. Wojcik, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, “Nontrivial point-gap topology and non- Hermitian skin effect in photonic crystals,” Physical Review B 104, 125416 (2021)

    2021

  109. [114]

    Universal non-Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions,

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, “Universal non-Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions,” Nature Communi- cations 13, 2496 (2022)

    2022

  110. [115]

    Geometry-dependent skin effects in reciprocal photonic crystals,

    Z. Fang, M. Hu, L. Zhou, and K. Ding, “Geometry-dependent skin effects in reciprocal photonic crystals,” Nanophotonics 11, 3447–3456 (2022)

    2022

  111. [116]

    Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems,

    Z. Gong, Y . Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, “Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems,” Physical Review X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  112. [117]

    Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries,

    H. Zhou and J. Y . Lee, “Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries,” Physical Review B 99, 235112 (2019)

    2019

  113. [118]

    Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics,

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, “Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics,” Physical Review X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  114. [119]

    Quantum geometric tensor in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,

    D.-J. Zhang, Q.-h. Wang, and J. Gong, “Quantum geometric tensor in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,” Physical Re- view A 99, 042104 (2019)

    2019

  115. [120]

    Complex Berry curva- ture pair and quantum hall admittance in non-Hermitian sys- tems,

    A. Fan, G.-Y . Huang, and S.-D. Liang, “Complex Berry curva- ture pair and quantum hall admittance in non-Hermitian sys- tems,” Journal of Physics Communications 4, 115006 (2020)

    2020

  116. [121]

    Geometric contribution to adi- abatic amplification in non-Hermitian systems,

    T. Ozawa and H. Schomerus, “Geometric contribution to adi- abatic amplification in non-Hermitian systems,” Physical Re- view Research 7, 013173 (2025)

    2025

  117. [122]

    Nonreciprocal response theory of non- Hermitian mechanical metamaterials: Response phase tran- sition from the skin effect of zero modes,

    H. Schomerus, “Nonreciprocal response theory of non- Hermitian mechanical metamaterials: Response phase tran- sition from the skin effect of zero modes,” Physical Review Research 2, 013058 (2020)

    2020

  118. [125]

    Observation of Berry curvature in non-Hermitian system from far-field radiation,

    X. Yin, Y . Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, S. Noda, and C. Peng, “Observation of Berry curvature in non-Hermitian system from far-field radiation,” Nature Communications 16, 2796 (2025)

    2025

  119. [126]

    Breakdown of bulk-radiation correspondence in radiative photonic lattices,

    X. Yuan, L. Malgrey, H. Sigurðsson, H. S. Nguyen, and G. Salerno, “Breakdown of bulk-radiation correspondence in radiative photonic lattices,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05188 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2504.05188

    2025 doi

  120. [127]

    Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasurface: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points,

    L. Lu, Q. Le-Van, L. Ferrier, E. Drouard, C. Seassal, and H. S. Nguyen, “Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasurface: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points,” Photonics Research 8, A91–A100 (2020)

    2020

  121. [128]

    Dirac exciton–polariton condensates in photonic crystal gratings,

    H. Sigurðsson, H. C. Nguyen, and H. S. Nguyen, “Dirac exciton–polariton condensates in photonic crystal gratings,” Nanophotonics 13, 3503 (2024)

    2024

  122. [129]

    Generalized guided mode expansion for non-Hermitian reso- nances in photonic crystal slabs,

    V . A. Nguyen, H. S. Nguyen, Z. Yuan, D. X. Nguyen, C. Dang, S. T. Ha, X. Letartre, Q. Le-Van, and H. S. Nguyen, “Generalized guided mode expansion for non-Hermitian reso- nances in photonic crystal slabs,” arXiv:2507:20033 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2507.20033

    2025 doi

  123. [130]

    Room-temperature lasing at flatband bound states in the continuum,

    T. T. H. Do, Z. Yuan, E. G. Durmusoglu, H. K. Shamkhi, V . Valuckas, C. Zhao, A. I. Kuznetsov, H. V . Demir, C. Dang, H. S. Nguyen, et al. , “Room-temperature lasing at flatband bound states in the continuum,” ACS Nano 19, 19287 (2025)

    2025

  124. [131]

    Taming Friedrich–Wintgen interference in a resonant metasurface: vortex laser emitting at an on-demand tilted angle,

    R. Mermet-Lyaudoz, C. Symonds, F. Berry, E. Drouard, C. Chevalier, G. Trippé-Allard, E. Deleporte, J. Bellessa, C. Seassal, and H. S. Nguyen, “Taming Friedrich–Wintgen interference in a resonant metasurface: vortex laser emitting at an on-demand tilted angle,” Nano Letters 23,...

    2023

  125. [132]

    Measuring the quantum geometric tensor in two-dimensional photonic and exciton-polariton systems,

    O. Bleu, D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, “Measuring the quantum geometric tensor in two-dimensional photonic and exciton-polariton systems,” Physical Review B 97, 195422 (2018)

    2018

  126. [133]

    Tuning of the Berry curvature in 2d per- ovskite polaritons,

    L. Polimeno, G. Lerario, M. De Giorgi, L. De Marco, L. Do- minici, F. Todisco, A. Coriolano, V . Ardizzone, M. Pugliese, C. T. Prontera,et al., “Tuning of the Berry curvature in 2d per- ovskite polaritons,” Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1349–1354 (2021)

    2021

  127. [134]

    Electrically tunable Berry curva- ture and strong light-matter coupling in liquid crystal micro- cavities with 2D perovskite,

    K. Łempicka-Mirek, M. Król, H. Sigurdsson, A. Win- 11 cukiewicz, P. Morawiak, R. Mazur, M. Muszy´nski, W. Piecek, P. Kula, T. Stefaniuk,et al., “Electrically tunable Berry curva- ture and strong light-matter coupling in liquid crystal micro- cavities with 2D perovskite,” Scien...

    2022

  128. [135]

    Pseudospin-orbit coupling and non-Hermitian ef- fects in the quantum geometric tensor of a plasmonic lattice,

    J. Cuerda, J. M. Taskinen, N. Källman, L. Grabitz, and P. Törmä, “Pseudospin-orbit coupling and non-Hermitian ef- fects in the quantum geometric tensor of a plasmonic lattice,” Physical Review B 109, 165439 (2024)

    2024

  129. [136]

    Observation of quantum metric and non-Hermitian Berry curvature in a plasmonic lattice,

    J. Cuerda, J. M. Taskinen, N. Källman, L. Grabitz, and P. Törmä, “Observation of quantum metric and non-Hermitian Berry curvature in a plasmonic lattice,” Physical Review Re- search 6, L022020 (2024)

    2024

  130. [137]

    Spin Hall effect of light via momentum-space topological vortices around bound states in the continuum,

    J. Wang, L. Shi, and J. Zi, “Spin Hall effect of light via momentum-space topological vortices around bound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters129, 236101 (2022)

    2022

  131. [138]

    Photonic spin Hall effect at an optical bound state in the con- tinuum,

    G. Wan, Z. Ma, Y . Xue, C. Zhang, Y . Chen, and X. Zhou, “Photonic spin Hall effect at an optical bound state in the con- tinuum,” Physical Review B111, 085411 (2025)

    2025

  132. [139]

    Non-Hermitian topological invariant of photonic band structures undergoing inversion,

    P. Bouteyre, D. X. Nguyen, G. Gachon, T. Benyattou, X. Letartre, P. Viktorovitch, S. Callard, L. Ferrier, and H. S. Nguyen, “Non-Hermitian topological invariant of photonic band structures undergoing inversion,” arXiv:2211.09884 (2022), 10.48550/arXiv.2211.09884

    2022 doi arXiv

  133. [140]

    Probing phase transition of band topology via radiation topology,

    C.-Y . Ji, W. Lan, P. Fu, G. Wang, C. Gu, Y . Wang, J. Li, Y . Yao, and B. Liu, “Probing phase transition of band topology via radiation topology,” Photonics Res.12, 1150–1157 (2024)

    2024

  134. [141]

    Topology of far- field signals for photonic crystal slabs,

    J. Zhang, A. Liu, J. Wang, and Z. Dong, “Topology of far- field signals for photonic crystal slabs,” Applied Physics Let- ters 126, 023103 (2025)

    2025

  135. [142]

    Topological phases of photonic crys- tals under crystalline symmetries,

    S. Vaidya, A. Ghorashi, T. Christensen, M. C. Rechtsman, and W. A. Benalcazar, “Topological phases of photonic crys- tals under crystalline symmetries,” Physical Review B 108, 085116 (2023)

    2023

  136. [144]

    L lines, C points and Chern numbers: understanding band structure topology us- ing polarization fields,

    T. Fösel, V . Peano, and F. Marquardt, “L lines, C points and Chern numbers: understanding band structure topology us- ing polarization fields,” New Journal of Physics 19, 115013 (2017)

    2017

  137. [145]

    Topological in- variants and topological charges in photonic systems,

    K. Arjas, G. Salerno, and P. Törmä, “Topological in- variants and topological charges in photonic systems,” arXiv:2508:03302 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2508.03302

    2025 doi

  138. [146]

    Topological pho- tonics of generalized and nonlinear eigenvalue equations,

    T. Isobe, T. Yoshida, and Y . Hatsugai, “Topological pho- tonics of generalized and nonlinear eigenvalue equations,” arXiv:2505.09876 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2505.09876

    2025 doi arXiv

  139. [147]

    Hidden-symmetry-enforced nexus points of nodal lines in layer-stacked dielectric photonic crystals,

    Z. Xiong, R.-Y . Zhang, R. Yu, C. T. Chan, and Y . Chen, “Hidden-symmetry-enforced nexus points of nodal lines in layer-stacked dielectric photonic crystals,” Light: Science & Applications 9, 176 (2020)

    2020

  140. [148]

    Ma- nipulating generalized Dirac cones in subwavelength dipolar arrays,

    M. B. De Paz, A. González-Tudela, and P. A. Huidobro, “Ma- nipulating generalized Dirac cones in subwavelength dipolar arrays,” Physical Review A106, 033505 (2022)

    2022

  141. [149]

    Photonics of time-varying media,

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huido- bro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Alù, and J. B. Pendry, “Photonics of time-varying media,” Advanced Photonics 4, 014002–014002 (2022)

    2022

  142. [150]

    Photonic Floquet topological insulators,

    M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y . Plotnik, Y . Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, “Photonic Floquet topological insulators,” Nature 496, 196 (2013)

    2013

  143. [151]

    Experimen- tal observation of anomalous topological edge modes in a slowly driven photonic lattice,

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, M. Valiente, E. Andersson, P. Öhberg, N. Goldman, and R. R. Thomson, “Experimen- tal observation of anomalous topological edge modes in a slowly driven photonic lattice,” Nature Communications8, 1– 7 (2017), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017

  144. [152]

    Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological in- sulators,

    L. J. Maczewsky, J. M. Zeuner, S. Nolte, and A. Szameit, “Observation of photonic anomalous Floquet topological in- sulators,” Nature Communications 8, 1–7 (2017), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017

  145. [153]

    Plasmonic topological insula- tors for topological nanophotonics,

    W. Zhang, X. Chen, and F. Ye, “Plasmonic topological insula- tors for topological nanophotonics,” Optics Letters 42, 4063– 4066 (2017)

    2017

  146. [154]

    Inducing exceptional points, enhancing plasmon quality and creating correlated plasmon states with modulated Floquet parametric driving,

    E. I. Kiselev, M. S. Rudner, and N. H. Lindner, “Inducing exceptional points, enhancing plasmon quality and creating correlated plasmon states with modulated Floquet parametric driving,” Nature Communications 15, 9914 (2024)

    2024

  147. [155]

    Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions,

    T. Ozawa and H. M. Price, “Topological quantum matter in synthetic dimensions,” Nature Review Physics 1, 349–357 (2019)

    2019

  148. [156]

    Colloquium: Synthetic quantum matter in nonstandard geometries,

    T. Grass, D. Bercioux, U. Bhattacharya, M. Lewenstein, H. S. Nguyen, and C. Weitenberg, “Colloquium: Synthetic quantum matter in nonstandard geometries,” Review of Modern Physics 97, 011001 (2025)

    2025

  149. [157]

    Topo- logical rainbow concentrator based on synthetic dimension,

    C. Lu, C. Wang, M. Xiao, Z. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Topo- logical rainbow concentrator based on synthetic dimension,” Physical Review Letters 126, 113902 (2021)

    2021

  150. [158]

    Perspective on the topological rainbow,

    S. Elshahat, C. Wang, H. Zhang, and C. Lu, “Perspective on the topological rainbow,” Applied Physics Letters119 (2021), 10.1063/5.0074014

    2021 doi

  151. [159]

    On-chip nanophotonic topological rainbow,

    C. Lu, Y .-Z. Sun, C. Wang, H. Zhang, W. Zhao, X. Hu, M. Xiao, W. Ding, Y .-C. Liu, and C. T. Chan, “On-chip nanophotonic topological rainbow,” Nature Communications 13, 2586 (2022)

    2022

  152. [160]

    Quasicrystalline Weyl points and dense Fermi- Bragg arcs,

    A. Grossi e Fonseca, T. Christensen, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, “Quasicrystalline Weyl points and dense Fermi- Bragg arcs,” Physical Review B108, L121109 (2023)

    2023

  153. [161]

    Fermi arc reconstruction in syn- thetic photonic lattice,

    D.-H.-M. Nguyen, C. Devescovi, D. X. Nguyen, H. S. Nguyen, and D. Bercioux, “Fermi arc reconstruction in syn- thetic photonic lattice,” Physical Review Letters 131, 053602 (2023)

    2023

  154. [162]

    Far-field coupling between moiré photonic lattices,

    J. Guan, J. Hu, Y . Wang, M. J. Tan, G. C. Schatz, and T. W. Odom, “Far-field coupling between moiré photonic lattices,” Nature Nanotechnology 18, 514–520 (2023)

    2023

  155. [163]

    Magic configurations in moiré superlattice of bilayer photonic crystals: Almost-perfect flat- bands and unconventional localization,

    D. X. Nguyen, X. Letartre, E. Drouard, P. Viktorovitch, H. C. Nguyen, and H. S. Nguyen, “Magic configurations in moiré superlattice of bilayer photonic crystals: Almost-perfect flat- bands and unconventional localization,” Physical Review Re- search 4, L032031 (2022)

    2022

  156. [164]

    Observation of Bloch flatbands and local- ized states in moiré bilayer grating,

    Q. Jing, Z. Che, S. Chen, T. Xue, J. Wang, W. Liu, Y . Dai, L. Shi, and J. Zi, “Observation of Bloch flatbands and local- ized states in moiré bilayer grating,” Nano Letters (2025), 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c00304

    2025 doi

  157. [165]

    Tailoring flatband dispersion in bilayer moiré photonic crystals,

    C. Saadi, S. Cueff, L. Ferrier, A. Benamrouche, M. Gayrard, X. Letartre, H. S. Nguyen, and S. Callard, “Tailoring flatband dispersion in bilayer moiré photonic crystals,” arXiv:2504.18670 (2025), 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18670

    2025 doi arXiv

  158. [166]

    Magic-angle lasers in nanostructured moiré super- lattice,

    X.-R. Mao, Z.-K. Shao, H.-Y . Luan, S.-L. Wang, and R.- M. Ma, “Magic-angle lasers in nanostructured moiré super- lattice,” Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1099–1105 (2021)

    2021

  159. [167]

    Moiré quasibound states in the continuum,

    L. Huang, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Moiré quasibound states in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters128, 253901 (2022)

    2022

  160. [168]

    Optical moiré bound states in the contin- uum,

    H. Qin, S. Chen, W. Zhang, H. Zhang, R. Pan, J. Li, L. Shi, J. Zi, and X. Zhang, “Optical moiré bound states in the contin- uum,” Nature Communications 15, 9080 (2024)

    2024

  161. [169]

    Skyrmion bags of light in plasmonic moiré superlattices,

    J. Schwab, A. Neuhaus, P. Dreher, S. Tsesses, K. Cohen, 12 F. Mangold, A. Mantha, B. Frank, G. Bartal, F.-J. Meyer zu Heringdorf, et al., “Skyrmion bags of light in plasmonic moiré superlattices,” Nature Physics 21, 988–994 (2025)

    2025

  162. [170]

    Twisted moiré pho- tonic crystal enabled optical vortex generation through bound states in the continuum,

    T. Zhang, K. Dong, J. Li, F. Meng, J. Li, S. Munagavalasa, C. P. Grigoropoulos, J. Wu, and J. Yao, “Twisted moiré pho- tonic crystal enabled optical vortex generation through bound states in the continuum,” Nature Communications 14, 6014 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.