Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Merging high localization and TE-TM polarization degeneracy of guided waves in dielectric metasurfaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A square-lattice metasurface of dielectric disks can guide waves that are both tightly confined and polarization-degenerate across all in-plane directions.

desk verdict Extends prior single-direction TE-TM degeneracy to a 2D multi-directional dielectric metasurface platform, with a credible microwave proof-of-principle but an over-sold universal design rule and under-resolved experimental DBW. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17872 v1 pith:DJWNGN25 submitted 2024-11-26 physics.optics cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification physics.opticscond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords TE-TMpolarizationdegeneracydielectricmetasurfaceguidedwavesMieresonancesmagneticdipolemodesnear-fieldlocalizedlightmicrowaveverification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a square array of dielectric disk resonators can guide waves that are strongly localized to the surface while preserving the polarization degeneracy normally lost in miniaturized waveguides: transverse-electric (TE) and transverse-magnetic (TM) modes travel with almost the same wavenumber at the same frequency and along every in-plane direction. This matters because compact planar optics typically trades away polarization control, forcing polarization-handling components to rely on anisotropic crystals or one-dimensional waveguides. The authors derive universal design curves for disk diameter, height, and lattice period as functions of the disk permittivity at several localization levels, then support those curves with silicon-nitride designs and a microwave ceramic prototype whose TE and TM dispersion stays close over a broad band.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of orthogonal Mie magnetic-dipole modes of a cylindrical dielectric resonator: HE11ℓ (a horizontal magnetic dipole whose resonance is set by the disk height) and TE01ℓ (a vertical magnetic dipole whose resonance is set by the disk diameter). When the two resonances overlap and the disks are arranged in a square lattice, the TM and TE guided modes of the metasurface follow nearly identical dispersion. The paper's quantitative yardsticks are the wavenumber difference $\Delta k = |k_p - k_s|$, the localization degree $\kappa = k/(n_{\text{sub}} k_0)$, and the normalized decay length $Z_\lambda$; the fitted design curves in Fig. 3 give $d/h$ and $d/a$ versus disk permittivity at fixed $\kappa$, and the designs are optimized with a tolerance of $0.001a$ using a frequency-domain eigenmode solver.

What would settle it

Fabricate a silicon-nitride metasurface with $d/a=0.655$ and a lattice period of 300 nm, designed for $\kappa_{\max}=1.2$, and measure the TE and TM guided dispersion across 500 to 1700 nm; if the wavenumber difference exceeds the predicted $4.1\times10^{-3}\,\pi/a$ by more than the stated fabrication tolerance, the degeneracy claim is falsified. Alternatively, choose a disk material with permittivity between 4 and 49, read $d/a$ and $d/h$ from the fitted curves, build the array at the target $\kappa$, and check whether the predicted $\Delta k$ actually holds, since the experiment tests only the $\varepsilon=25$ point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that near-field TE-TM degeneracy of guided waves is achieved by spectrally overlapping two mutually orthogonal Mie-type magnetic dipole modes of each disk resonator: the horizontal-dipole HE11ℓ mode, tuned by the disk height $h$, and the vertical-dipole TE01ℓ mode, tuned by the disk diameter $d$. Because these orthogonal modes separately control the TM and TE guided polarizations, choosing the geometry so the two resonances coincide makes the array's TE and TM branches nearly identical. The paper states that array interactions (spatial dispersion) prevent the single-resonator Kerker condition from being sufficient, so a parametric optimization over $d/a$, $h/a$, and the lattice period is required. Quantitatively, for silicon nitride at localization $\kappa_{\max}=1.2$ the wavenumber difference stays below $\Delta k_{\max}=4.1\times10^{-3}\,\pi/a$, corresponding to a polarization-preserving length up to $L_{\max}/\lambda=898$; a microwave ceramic ($\varepsilon=25$) disk array confirms $\Delta k<12\times10^{-3}\,\pi/a$ from 8 to 9.6 GHz for all in-plane directions.

Load-bearing premise

The design recipe derived from simulations is assumed to work for any transparent material and wavelength, even though only one experimental confirmation point is provided.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a silicon-nitride metasurface with $\kappa_{\max}=1.2$, the TE and TM guided branches stay within $\Delta k_{\max}=4.1\times10^{-3}\,\pi/a$, so a guided wave preserves its polarization for up to $L_{\max}/\lambda=898$ wavelengths.
  • The same design curves apply to materials from visible/NIR silicon nitride to microwave ceramics, so one geometry recipe serves different spectral ranges by scaling the lattice period.
  • A low-index substrate such as quartz does not destroy the degeneracy; enlarging the disks compensates for its presence.
  • The microwave prototype demonstrates that the degeneracy holds for all in-plane directions over 8 to 9.6 GHz, not just along a single propagation direction.
  • This offers a planar, all-dielectric route to polarization converters, filters, demultiplexers, and sensors that work with tightly localized light.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universality claim could be stress-tested by porting the fitted $d/a$ and $d/h$ curves to a material not used here, such as titanium dioxide in the visible, and measuring the resulting $\Delta k$; the paper's evidence covers only silicon-nitride simulations and one ceramic experimental point.
  • Because the degeneracy is purely geometric, combining it with a tunable disk material (e.g., phase-change or thermo-optic) could switch between degenerate and non-degenerate operation, turning the passive platform into an active polarization controller.
  • The mechanism relies on overlapping two orthogonal magnetic-dipole resonances, so similar degeneracies might be realized with other resonator shapes or lattice symmetries such as hexagonal, but those extensions are not demonstrated.
  • The paper leaves fabrication sensitivity open: designs are optimized to $0.001a$, but the measured impact of random errors in $d/a$ and $h/a$ on $\Delta k$ is not quantified, so a tolerance study would be a direct next experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a design principle for dielectric metasurfaces consisting of disk resonators in a square lattice, aiming to support guided TE and TM modes with nearly identical dispersion (small Δk) over a broad frequency range and all in-plane directions, while maintaining strong vertical localization (large κ). The authors use MPB simulations to optimize d/a and h/a for given disk permittivity and localization, present silicon nitride designs with Δk_max = 4.1×10^-3 π/a at κ_max = 1.2, analyze the effect of a quartz substrate, and report a microwave experiment on a ceramic (ε = 25) metasurface that allegedly confirms Δk < 12×10^-3 π/a between 8 and 9.6 GHz. The paper claims that the design rule is universal across constitutive materials and spectral ranges.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work would provide a practical route to planar polarization-controlling devices based on localized guided modes, a useful complement to existing single-direction or narrowband degeneracy schemes. The paper's strengths include concrete, reproducible numerical designs (MPB, geometric parameters listed), a clear operational principle based on overlapping Mie-type magnetic dipole modes, and an independent microwave experiment. However, the two load-bearing pillars — the universal design curves of Fig. 3 and the experimental Δk resolution — are not quantitatively secured, so the central claims currently outrun the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Fig. 7(b)] The experimental DBW values are not resolvable with the stated acquisition parameters. With a scan length L = 340 mm and lattice constant a = 12.5 mm, the nominal Fourier resolution in the in-plane wave vector is 2π/L ≈ 0.0185 rad/mm, which corresponds to 2a/L × π/a ≈ 0.074π/a. This is more than six times larger than the claimed Δk < 12×10^-3 π/a. Unless a sub-bin extraction procedure with quantified uncertainty is described, the red curve in Fig. 7(b) cannot support the stated DBW values. Please provide the dispersion extraction method (e.g., peak fitting, interpolation, windowing) and error bars.
  2. [§II.C, Fig. 3] The universal design dependencies are presented as fits ("fitting distributions") without the fitting function, residuals, number of fitted points, or a sensitivity analysis. Since these curves are the basis for the claim that the approach extends to arbitrary constitutive materials and spectral ranges, the manuscript needs to provide the fit equation, its residuals, and an analysis of how Δk grows when d/a or h/a deviate from the optimal values, including the stated tolerance of 0.001a. Without this, the universality claim is a descriptive summary of the numerical search rather than a validated design rule.
  3. [§III.A, Fig. 3] The microwave experiment tests only one point (ε = 25, κ_max = 1.25, d/a = 0.426, h/a = 0.4) on the proposed design surface. The paper does not show where this geometry falls relative to the fitted curves of Fig. 3 at ε = 25, nor does it quantify the agreement between the measured DBW and the simulation for that geometry. A single point cannot validate a global design rule; at minimum, the experimental geometry should be overlaid on Fig. 3 and the measured Δk(f) compared with the simulation for that specific geometry with uncertainty bounds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3(a)] The colored regions in Fig. 3(a) are not clearly defined in the main text; specify which materials correspond to which ranges and cite the data sources for the material dispersion.
  2. [Fig. 6(c)] The axis labels "F(Ez)(c)" and "F(Hz)" are confusing; rename them to indicate the Fourier magnitudes, e.g., |F(Ez)| and |F(Hz)|.
  3. [§II.D and Table I] The text states "case #1 (d/a = 0.655, h/a = 0.843)" while Table I lists h/a = 0.823 for case #1; please reconcile the discrepancy.
  4. [Reference [58]] Reference [58] appears incomplete ("The rise of Mie-tronics (2022)"); provide full citation details.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrase "discover the near-field polarization degree of freedom" is repeated in the abstract and conclusions; consider toning down "discover" to "demonstrate" for objectivity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the degeneracy results are computed Maxwell solutions from an explicit parameter sweep, and the microwave experiment is an independent out-of-sample check.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is an inverse-design search, not a self-referential derivation. Section II.C sweeps the disk geometry (d/a, h/a) and computes TE/TM dispersions with the open-source MPB eigensolver; the reported small Delta-k values (e.g., 4.1e-3 pi/a) are outputs of that Maxwell solve for the chosen geometry, not imposed inputs. The fitted 'universal dependencies' in Fig. 3 are descriptive summaries of the optimization landscape; they are not used to force the experimental outcome, because the ceramic sample geometry (d/a = 0.426, h/a = 0.4) is stated to come from a separate constrained optimization for kappa_max = 1.25 with fixed plate thickness. The microwave measurement at epsilon = 25, 8-11 GHz is an independent, parameter-free realization of the design mechanism and provides external grounding. Self-citations [23,24] are contextual (prior demonstrations of single-directional degeneracy and of the insufficiency of the Kerker condition); they are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the paper's own eigenmode calculations independently support the design principle. The absence of a sensitivity analysis and the limited experimental resolution are concerns about generality and measurement uncertainty, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The central design relies on numerically optimized geometry with fitted universal curves and several stated but underived scaling and compensation rules. The main assumptions are the standard Bloch-mode model, the Mie-overlap mechanism, and the finite-aperture Fourier analysis of the experiment.

free parameters (3)
  • Optimized disk geometry d/a and h/a = d/a=0.655, h/a=0.823 (case #1); d/a=0.880, h/a=1.456 (case #2); d/a=0.888, h/a=0.957 (case #3); d/a=0.426, h/a=0.4…
    These geometric ratios are chosen by numerical optimization to minimize the TE-TM wavenumber difference at the target localization; they are the output of the design procedure, not derived from first principles.
  • Target localization kappa_max = 1.2 and 1.5 (optical), 1.25 (microwave)
    The desired localization level is a design input that sets the operating point on the design curves.
  • Fitting parameters of universal design curves = Not specified (d/h vs epsilon is described as increasing from 0.64 to 1.12 then decreasing to 1)
    Figure 3's curves are 'fitting distributions' to the numerically optimized designs; the fitting function and coefficients are not given, so the predictive extrapolation is unquantified.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations and Bloch-periodic eigenmode theory as implemented in MPB provide accurate dispersion of lossless dielectric metasurfaces.
    Used throughout Sec. II to compute TE/TM guided-mode dispersions.
  • domain assumption The TE-TM degeneracy originates from the near-field spectral overlap of the two orthogonal Mie-type magnetic dipole modes of the disk, HE_11-l and TE_01-l.
    Sec. II B states this as the operational principle that explains and guides the design.
  • ad hoc to paper The maximal LD and the average/maximal DBW within a wide wavelength range are directly proportional.
    Sec. II A states this without derivation; it frames the localization-degeneracy trade-off that motivates the metasurface approach.
  • ad hoc to paper Substrate impact can be compensated by slight enlargement of disks and decreasing the LD for low-permittivity substrates.
    Sec. II E states this rule and demonstrates it for one quartz-substrate case only.
  • domain assumption The 2D Fourier transform of near-field maps over a finite sample aperture faithfully recovers the isofrequency contours of the infinite periodic metasurface.
    Sec. III B uses this standard procedure to claim all-direction degeneracy; finite-size and source-spectrum effects are not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Merging high localization and TE-TM polarization degeneracy of guided waves in dielectric metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DJWNGN25

@misc{pith2026241117872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Merging high localization and TE-TM polarization degeneracy of guided waves in dielectric metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DJWNGN25}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17872}
}
read the original abstract

The polarization degree of freedom is an inherent feature of plane waves propagating in an isotropic homogeneous medium. The miniaturization of optical systems leads to the high localization of electromagnetic waves, but also to the loss of polarization control, namely, breaking TE-TM polarization degeneracy. In this work, we discover the near-field polarization degree of freedom for highly localized guided waves propagating along a dielectric metasurface. We demonstrate the opportunity to create a metasurface with the degenerate TE-TM polarization spectrum for the required operating wavelength and different constitutive materials. In particular, we analyze several possible implementations including silicon nitride and ceramic metasurfaces consisting of disk-shaped resonators, and evaluate the impact of substrate. Finally, we experimentally implement one of the metasurface designs and verify its broadband degenerate TE-TM polarization spectrum. The obtained results form a fundamentally new platform for the planar polarization devices utilizing the polarization degree of freedom of localized light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.17872 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic view of the guided TE and TM modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Parametric dependencies of (a) diameter-to-height [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Dependencies of the local maxima of (a) DBW ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic view and photographs of a fragment of the metasurface and individual ceramic resonator referenced to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Experimentally measured and (b) numerically simulated spatial distributions of the real part (normalized on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Dispersion characteristics of the TE (blue) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The maximal LD and the average/maximal DBW within a wide wavelength range are directly proportional

    The normalized decay length Zλ means the distance from the metasurface plane at which the field intensity decreases in e times in the units of the incident wavelength. The maximal LD and the average/maximal DBW within a wide wavelength range are directly proportional. This means it is more difficult to achieve the TE-TM de- generacy (low values of DBW) fo...

  2. [2]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromag- netic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Pergamon Press Ltd., New York, NY, 1959)

  3. [3]

    Q. Mu, F. Fan, S. Chen, S. Xu, C. Xiong, X. Zhang, X. Wang, and S. Chang, Tunable magneto-optical polar- ization device for terahertz waves based on InSb and its plasmonic structure, Photon. Res. 7, 325 (2019)

  4. [4]

    T. Liu, D. Zhang, W. Liu, T. Yu, F. Wu, S. Xiao, L. Huang, and A. E. Miroshnichenko, Phase-change non- local metasurfaces for dynamic wave-front manipulation, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 044004 (2024)

  5. [5]

    Z. Zhu, Y. Li, Z. Qin, L. Jiang, W. Wang, H. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Pang, and S. Qu, Miura origami based reconfigurable polarization converter for multifunctional control of electromagnetic waves, Photon. Res. 12, 581 (2024)

  6. [6]

    Collett, Field Guide to Polarization , edited by J

    E. Collett, Field Guide to Polarization , edited by J. E. Greivenkamp, SPIE Field Guides, Vol. FG05 (SPIE Press, Bellingham, W A, 2005)

  7. [7]

    J. M. Chavez Boggio, D. Bodenm¨ uller, T. Fremberg, R. Haynes, M. M. Roth, R. Eisermann, M. Lisker, L. Zim- mermann, and M. B¨ ohm, Dispersion engineered silicon nitride waveguides by geometrical and refractive-index optimization, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 2846 (2014)

  8. [8]

    W. Zhao, Y. Peng, M. Zhu, R. Liu, X. Hu, Y. Shi, and D. Dai, Ultracompact silicon on-chip polarization con- troller, Photon. Res. 12, 183 (2024)

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    V. I. Fesenko, V. R. Tuz, O. V. Shulika, and I. A. Sukhoivanov, Dispersion properties of Kolakoski- cladding hollow-core nanophotonic Bragg waveguide, Nanophotonics 5, 556 (2016)

  2. [10]

    V. I. Fesenko and V. R. Tuz, Dispersion blue-shift in an aperiodic Bragg reflection waveguide, Opt. Commun. 365, 225 (2016)

  3. [11]

    Benedikovic, M

    D. Benedikovic, M. Berciano, C. Alonso-Ramos, X. Le Roux, E. Cassan, D. Marris-Morini, and L. Vivien, Dispersion control of silicon nanophotonic waveguides us- ing sub-wavelength grating metamaterials in near- and mid-IR wavelengths, Opt. Express 25, 19468 (2017)

  4. [12]

    S. Teng, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Liu, and H. Lv, Conver- sion between polarization states based on a metasurface, Photon. Res. 7, 246 (2019)

  5. [13]

    M. Pu, Y. Guo, X. Ma, X. Li, and X. Luo, Methodologies for on-demand dispersion engineering of waves in meta- surfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801376 (2019)

  6. [14]

    T. Liu, J. Li, and S. Xiao, Single-sized phase-change metasurfaces for dynamic information multiplexing and encryption, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023258 (2024)

  7. [15]

    I. L. Garanovich, S. Longhi, A. A. Sukhorukov, and Y. S. Kivshar, Light propagation and localization in modu- lated photonic lattices and waveguides, Phys. Rep. 518, 1 (2012)

  8. [16]

    Halir, P

    R. Halir, P. J. Bock, P. Cheben, A. Ortega-Mo˜ nux, C. Alonso-Ramos, J. H. Schmid, J. Lapointe, D.-X. Xu, J. G. Wang¨ uemert-P´ erez,´I. Molina-Fern´ andez, and S. Janz, Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: a review of principles and applications, Laser Photonics Rev. 9, 25 (2015)

  9. [17]

    Quaranta, G

    G. Quaranta, G. Basset, O. J. F. Martin, and B. Gallinet, Recent advances in resonant waveguide gratings, Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1800017 (2018)

  10. [18]

    Y. Meng, Y. Chen, L. Lu, Y. Ding, A. Cusano, J. A. Fan, Q. Hu, K. Wang, Z. Xie, Z. Liu, Y. Yang, Q. Liu, M. Gong, Q. Xiao, S. Sun, M. Zhang, X. Yuan, and X. Ni, Optical meta-waveguides for integrated photon- ics and beyond, Light Sci. Appl. 10, 235 (2021)

  11. [19]

    A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory (Chapman and Hall, London, 1983)

  12. [20]

    O. Y. Yermakov, A. I. Ovcharenko, A. A. Bogdanov, I. V. Iorsh, K. Y. Bliokh, and Y. S. Kivshar, Spin control of light with hyperbolic metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075446 (2016)

  13. [21]

    A. B. Evlyukhin, S. M. Novikov, U. Zywietz, R. L. Erik- sen, C. Reinhardt, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, and B. N. Chichkov, Demonstration of magnetic dipole resonances of dielectric nanospheres in the visible region, Nano Lett. 12, 3749 (2012)

  14. [22]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, Y. H. Fu, J. Zhang, and B. Luk’Yanchuk, Magnetic light, Sci. Rep. 2, 492 (2012)

  15. [23]

    Kruk and Y

    S. Kruk and Y. Kivshar, Functional meta-optics and nanophotonics governed by Mie resonances, ACS Pho- tonics 4, 2638 (2017)

  16. [24]

    Yermakov, V

    O. Yermakov, V. Lenets, A. Sayanskiy, J. Baena, E. Mar- tini, S. Glybovski, and S. Maci, Surface waves on self- complementary metasurfaces: All-frequency hyperbolic- ity, extreme canalization, and te-tm polarization degen- eracy, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031038 (2021)

  17. [25]

    Asadulina, A

    S. Asadulina, A. Bogdanov, and O. Yermakov, All- dielectric meta-waveguides for flexible polarization con- trol of guided light, Laser Photon. Rev. n/a, 2300544 (2024)

  18. [26]

    D. G. Baranov, D. A. Zuev, S. I. Lepeshov, O. V. Kotov, A. E. Krasnok, A. B. Evlyukhin, and B. N. Chichkov, All- dielectric nanophotonics: the quest for better materials and fabrication techniques, Optica 4, 814 (2017)

  19. [27]

    Y. Su, Y. Zhang, C. Qiu, X. Guo, and L. Sun, Silicon photonic platform for passive waveguide devices: materi- als, fabrication, and applications, Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 1901153 (2020)

  20. [28]

    Aguilar, S

    O. Aguilar, S. de Castro, M. P. F. Godoy, and M. R. S. Dias, Optoelectronic characterization of Zn1−xCdxO thin films as an alternative to photonic crystals in organic solar cells, Opt. Mater. Express 9, 3638 (2019)

  21. [29]

    L. Y. Beliaev, E. Shkondin, A. V. Lavrinenko, and O. Takayama, Optical, structural and composition prop- erties of silicon nitride films deposited by reactive radio- frequency sputtering, low pressure and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, Thin Solid Films 763, 139568 (2022)

  22. [30]

    Sarkar, V

    S. Sarkar, V. Gupta, M. Kumar, J. Schubert, P. T. Probst, J. Joseph, and T. A. F. K¨ onig, Hybridized guided-mode resonances via colloidal plasmonic self- assembled grating, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 13752 (2019)

  23. [31]

    Schinke, P

    C. Schinke, P. Christian Peest, J. Schmidt, R. Brendel, K. Bothe, M. R. Vogt, I. Kr¨ oger, S. Winter, A. Schirma- cher, S. Lim, H. T. Nguyen, and D. MacDonald, Uncer- tainty analysis for the coefficient of band-to-band absorp- tion of crystalline silicon, AIP Adv. 5, 10.1063/1...

  24. [32]

    Shkondin, O

    E. Shkondin, O. Takayama, M. E. A. Panah, P. Liu, P. V. Larsen, M. D. Mar, F. Jensen, and A. V. Lavrinenko, Large-scale high aspect ratio Al-doped ZnO nanopillars arrays as anisotropic metamaterials, Opt. Mater. Express 7, 1606 (2017)

  25. [33]

    S. G. Johnson and J. D. Joannopoulos, Block-iterative frequency-domain methods for Maxwell’s equations in a planewave basis, Opt. Express 8, 173 (2001)

  26. [34]

    F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, G. Marino, P. Ginzburg, D. O’Connor, A. Mart ´ ınez, G. A. Wurtz, and A. V. Zay- ats, Near-field interference for the unidirectional excita- tion of electromagnetic guided modes, Science 340, 328 (2013)

  27. [35]

    S. V. Li, D. G. Baranov, A. E. Krasnok, and P. A. Belov, All-dielectric nanoantennas for unidirectional excitation of electromagnetic guided modes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 (2015)

  28. [36]

    Decker, I

    M. Decker, I. Staude, M. Falkner, J. Dominguez, D. N. Neshev, I. Brener, T. Pertsch, and Y. S. Kivshar, High- efficiency dielectric Huygens’ surfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 813 (2015)

  29. [37]

    K. E. Chong, L. Wang, I. Staude, A. R. James, J. Dominguez, S. Liu, G. S. Subramania, M. Decker, D. N. Neshev, I. Brener, et al. , Efficient polarization- insensitive complex wavefront control using huygens’ metasurfaces based on dielectric resonant meta-atoms, ACS Photonics 3...

  30. [38]

    A. V. Prokhorov, P. D. Terekhov, M. Y. Gubin, A. V. Shesterikov, X. Ni, V. R. Tuz, and A. B. Evlyukhin, Res- onant light trapping via lattice-induced multipole cou- pling in symmetrical metasurfaces, ACS Photonics 9, 3869 (2022)

  31. [39]

    Allayarov, A

    I. Allayarov, A. B. Evlyukhin, and A. C. Lesina, Mul- tiresonant all-dielectric metasurfaces based on high-order multipole coupling in the visible, Opt. Express 32, 5641 (2024)

  32. [40]

    R. K. Mongia and P. Bhartia, Dielectric resonator anten- nas—a review and general design relations for resonant frequency and bandwidth, Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 4, 230 (1994)

  33. [41]

    V. E. Babicheva and A. B. Evlyukhin, Resonant lattice Kerker effect in metasurfaces with electric and magnetic optical responses, Las. Photon. Rev. 11, 1700132 (2017)

  34. [42]

    H. K. Shamkhi, K. V. Baryshnikova, A. Sayan- skiy, P. Kapitanova, P. D. Terekhov, P. Belov, A. Karabchevsky, A. B. Evlyukhin, Y. Kivshar, and A. S. Shalin, Transverse scattering and generalized Kerker ef- fects in all-dielectric Mie-resonant metaoptics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 1...

  35. [43]

    H. K. Shamkhi, A. Sayanskiy, A. C. Valero, A. S. Kupri- ianov, P. Kapitanova, Y. S. Kivshar, A. S. Shalin, and V. R. Tuz, Transparency and perfect absorption of all- dielectric resonant metasurfaces governed by the trans- verse Kerker effect, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 085201 (2019)

  36. [44]

    Colburn, A

    S. Colburn, A. Zhan, E. Bayati, J. Whitehead, A. Ryou, L. Huang, and A. Majumdar, Broadband transparent and CMOS-compatible flat optics with silicon nitride meta- surfaces, Opt. Mater. Express 8, 2330 (2018)

  37. [45]

    J.-H. Yang, V. E. Babicheva, M.-W. Yu, T.-C. Lu, T.-R. Lin, and K.-P. Chen, Structural colors enabled by lattice resonance on silicon nitride metasurfaces, ACS Nano 14, 5678 (2020)

  38. [46]

    X. Sun, H. Yu, N. Deng, D. Ban, G. Liu, and F. Qiu, Electro-optic polymer and silicon nitride hybrid spatial light modulators based on a metasurface, Opt. Express 29, 25543 (2021)

  39. [47]

    Yermakov, H

    O. Yermakov, H. Schneidewind, U. H¨ ubner, T. Wieduwilt, M. Zeisberger, A. Bogdanov, Y. Kivshar, and M. A. Schmidt, Nanostructure-empowered efficient coupling of light into optical fibers at extraordinarily large angles, ACS Photonics 7, 2834 (2020)

  40. [48]

    A. Z. Subramanian, E. Ryckeboer, A. Dhakal, F. Peyskens, A. Malik, B. Kuyken, H. Zhao, S. Pathak, A. Ruocco, A. De Groote, P. Wuytens, D. Martens, F. Leo, W. Xie, U. D. Dave, M. Muneeb, P. Van Dorpe, J. Van Campenhout, W. Bogaerts, P. Bienstman, N. Le Thomas, D. Van Thourhout,...

  41. [49]

    I. H. Malitson, Interspecimen comparison of the refrac- tive index of fused silica, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1205 (1965)

  42. [50]

    D. S. Filonov, A. E. Krasnok, A. P. Slobozhanyuk, P. V. Kapitanova, E. A. Nenasheva, Y. S. Kivshar, and P. A. Belov, Experimental verification of the concept of all- dielectric nanoantennas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 201113 (2012)

  43. [51]

    S. Xu, A. Sayanskiy, A. S. Kupriianov, V. R. Tuz, P. Kap- itanova, H.-B. Sun, W. Han, and Y. S. Kivshar, Ex- perimental observation of toroidal dipole modes in all- dielectric metasurfaces, Adv. Opt. Mater. 7, 1801166 (2019)

  44. [52]

    A. S. Kupriianov, V. V. Khardikov, K. Domina, S. L. Prosvirnin, W. Han, and V. R. Tuz, Experimental ob- servation of diffractive retroreflection from a dielectric metasurface, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 163101 (2023)

  45. [53]

    R. Ubic, G. Subodh, and M. T. Sebastian, High per- mittivity materials, in Microwave Materials and Appli- cations, Vol. 1, edited by M. T. Sebastian, R. Ubic, and H. Jantunen (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2017) Chap. 4, pp. 149–202

  46. [54]

    Wangling, Data sheet of microwave thermoplastic mate- rial, http://www.wang-ling.com.cn/index-en.html

  47. [55]

    J. A. Dockrey, S. A. R. Horsley, I. R. Hooper, J. R. Sam- bles, and A. P. Hibbins, Direct observation of negative- index microwave surface waves, Sci. Rep.6, 22018 (2016)

  48. [56]

    Y. Yang, L. Jing, L. Shen, Z. Wang, B. Zheng, H. Wang, E. Li, N.-H. Shen, T. Koschny, C. M. Soukoulis, and H. Chen, Hyperbolic spoof plasmonic metasurfaces, NPG Asia Mater. 9, e428 (2017)

  49. [57]

    O. Y. Yermakov, A. A. Hurshkainen, D. A. Dobrykh, P. V. Kapitanova, I. V. Iorsh, S. B. Glybovski, and A. A. Bogdanov, Experimental observation of hybrid TE-TM polarized surface waves supported by a hyperbolic meta- surface, Phys. Rev. B 98, 195404 (2018)

  50. [58]

    Won, Into the ‘Mie-tronic’era, Nat

    R. Won, Into the ‘Mie-tronic’era, Nat. Photon. 13, 585 (2019)

  51. [59]

    Kivshar, The rise of Mie-tronics (2022)

    Y. Kivshar, The rise of Mie-tronics (2022)

  52. [60]

    Koshelev and Y

    K. Koshelev and Y. Kivshar, Dielectric resonant metaphotonics, ACS Photonics 8, 102 (2020)

  53. [61]

    Koshelev, S

    K. Koshelev, S. Kruk, E. Melik-Gaykazyan, J.-H. Choi, A. Bogdanov, H.-G. Park, and Y. Kivshar, Subwave- length dielectric resonators for nonlinear nanophotonics, Science 367, 288 (2020)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.