REVIEW 2 cited by
INDIC QA BENCHMARK: A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Question Answering capability of LLMs for Indic Languages
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on unseen tasks in English, but their abilities in non English languages are less explored due to limited benchmarks and training data. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Indic QA Benchmark, a large dataset for context grounded question answering in 11 major Indian languages, covering both extractive and abstractive tasks. Evaluations of multilingual LLMs, including instruction finetuned versions, revealed weak performance in low resource languages due to a strong English language bias in their training data. We also investigated the Translate Test paradigm,where inputs are translated to English for processing and the results are translated back into the source language for output. This approach outperformed multilingual LLMs, particularly in low resource settings. By releasing Indic QA, we aim to promote further research into LLMs question answering capabilities in low resource languages. This benchmark offers a critical resource to address existing limitations and foster multilingual understanding.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FineWeb2: One Pipeline to Scale Them All -- Adapting Pre-Training Data Processing to Every Language
An adaptive, per-language data filtering and deduplication pipeline produces multilingual LLM pre-training corpora that beat prior public datasets on 11 of 14 evaluated languages, and a 20TB, 1,868 language-script dat...
-
PARAM-1 BharatGen 2.9B Model
A technical report on a 2.9B English-Hindi model whose headline evaluation numbers are internally inconsistent and whose promoted tokenizer was not used to train the final model.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.