REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Task and Architecture-Independent Generalization Gap Predictors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Can we use deep learning to predict when deep learning works? Our results suggest the affirmative. We created a dataset by training 13,500 neural networks with different architectures, on different variations of spiral datasets, and using different optimization parameters. We used this dataset to train task-independent and architecture-independent generalization gap predictors for those neural networks. We extend Jiang et al. (2018) to also use DNNs and RNNs and show that they outperform the linear model, obtaining $R^2=0.965$. We also show results for architecture-independent, task-independent, and out-of-distribution generalization gap prediction tasks. Both DNNs and RNNs consistently and significantly outperform linear models, with RNNs obtaining $R^2=0.584$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DRIFT: Data Reduction via Informative Feature Transformation- Generalization Begins Before Deep Learning starts
DRIFT preprocesses images by projecting them onto fixed sine mode shapes, which lets small networks train with tens of features while showing smoother convergence than PCA or pixel inputs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.