Phase transition in a 1d driven tracer model

Asaf Miron; David Mukamel; Harald A. Posch

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 30 references

Phase transition in a 1d driven tracer model

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A driven tracer in a one-dimensional lattice gas undergoes a continuous phase transition at a finite overtaking rate, separating a phase in which its velocity vanishes as 1/L from one in which it stays finite.

desk verdict A genuinely new continuous transition in a driven tracer model, supported by clean MF and simulations, but Eq. (20) and Eq. (2) contain typos that must be fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09290 v2 pith:DNGALZVG submitted 2019-08-25 cond-mat.stat-mech

Asaf Miron , David Mukamel , Harald A. Posch This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82C2282C2660K35 PACS 05.40.-a05.60.-k05.70.Ln

keywords driventracersingle-filediffusionovertakingnonequilibriumphasetransitionmean-fieldtheoryexclusionprocesslatticegascriticalscaling

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a single driven tracer particle moving through a one-dimensional lattice gas where bath particles cannot pass each other but the tracer can overtake them at prescribed rates. Its central claim is that the steady state changes through a continuous nonequilibrium phase transition at a finite overtaking rate: below a critical bath density the tracer moves with a finite velocity and a localized density cloud surrounds it, while above that density the tracer's velocity vanishes as 1/L and the density excess spreads across the whole system. The authors support this with a mean-field analysis that yields explicit transition lines and with direct simulations on rings of up to 4096 sites. The significance is the contrast with the equilibrium single-file picture, where any finite overtaking rate smoothly restores ordinary diffusion without a sharp transition.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the mean-field rate equations for the bath occupation densities $\rho_\ell$ in the tracer's reference frame, obtained by neglecting correlations between occupations. Their stationary solution has the form $\rho_\ell = A + (\rho_1 - A)((2-c)/(2+c))^{\ell-1}$, where the parameter $c = v/(1+u/2)$ is set by the tracer's hop and exchange rates through the boundary equations and by the total particle number. The two phases correspond to two self-consistent scalings of $c$: $c_E = a/L$ in the extended phase, which leads to a continuum profile $\rho_E(x) = A + (\rho_1 - A)e^{-ax}$ and a transcendental equation for $a$; and a finite $c_L$ in the localized phase, which forces $A = \rho$ and gives an exponential profile. The critical manifolds are obtained by setting $c_L = 0$, and the critical scaling follows from a generalized ansatz $c = b/L^\alpha$, which self-consistently yields $\alpha = 1/2$.

What would settle it

Run the same model at the canonical rates on much larger rings (for example L = $10^{5}$) and measure the tracer velocity as a function of density: if in the purported extended phase v decays more slowly than 1/L, or if the density at which v vanishes drifts systematically away from the mean-field value with increasing L, then the continuous transition at a finite overtaking rate is not the true behavior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's discovery is that allowing a driven tracer to exchange places with bath particles does not simply restore ordinary transport. For fixed hop and exchange biases, the model has two stable steady phases: an extended phase, where the stationary bath density profile in the tracer's frame is a macroscopic function of x = l/L and the tracer velocity scales as v ~ 1/L, and a localized phase, where the profile differs from the mean density only over O(1) sites ahead of the tracer and v approaches a finite constant. Mean-field theory yields two critical densities, $\rho_c^I = q'(p-q)/(pq'-qp')$ and $\rho_c^{II} = p'(p-q)/(pq'-qp')$, at which the tracer velocity vanishes linearly as the localized phase is entered, and predicts that at the transition the density profile becomes a function of $y = \ell/\sqrt{L}$ with the velocity scaling as $L^{-1/2}$. Numerical simulations for the canonical rates $p = q' = 1.75$, $q = p' = 0.25$ reproduce the mean-field phase boundaries and the profile collapse in both phases and at criticality.

Load-bearing premise

The main argument assumes that pairs of bath particles occupy sites independently of each other; if the actual correlations among bath particles matter enough to move the phase boundary or change the order of the transition, the central claim would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For parameters in the extended phase, a tracer on a ring of length L has a mean velocity of order 1/L, so in the thermodynamic limit it does not move.
In the localized phase the tracer reaches a finite mean velocity and drags a cloud of bath particles or holes of size O(1) with it.
The phase transition is continuous: the tracer velocity grows linearly with the deviation of the bath density from its critical value, and the critical profile and velocity obey a scaling form with y = l/sqrt(L).
Particle-hole symmetry implies a second transition at higher density, where the tracer moves in the opposite direction due to the exchange bias.
At the exactly treatable rates p = q' = 1, q = p' = 0, the extended phase persists for all densities, so the transition is not universal in the rates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the transition survives in quasi-1D channels of finite width, the overtaking rate becomes a practical control knob: small changes in channel width or bath density could switch a driven particle between a moving and a stationary state.
The critical scaling v = L^{-1/2} g(sqrt(L) delta_rho) suggests a universality class that may be shared by other driven tracer models with exchange; testing the same scaling in models with different microscopic rules would map out that class.
The authors' observation that multiple tracers attract and form a macroscopic condensate in the extended phase implies that the single-tracer transition may control a collective condensation phenomenon; a systematic study of the N-tracer case could connect this model to condensation transitions in transport.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper gives a clean answer to a good question: does a finite overtaking rate destroy the extended (single-file-like) phase of a driven tracer? The answer is no—there is a continuous transition at finite overtaking rate, and the extended phase persists when hopping and exchange biases oppose. That is new and worth taking seriously.

The MF rate equations are set up carefully, the boundary equations are explicit, and the phase diagram, velocity scaling, and density profiles follow without fitted parameters. Simulations on rings up to L=4096, run with a Gillespie algorithm, match the MF predictions nicely, including the 1/L velocity in the extended phase, O(1) velocity in the localized phase, and the sqrt(L) scaling at criticality. The data collapse in Fig. 5 is convincing.

Two concrete internal problems in the printed formulas need attention. Eq. (20) for the localized-phase contact density rho^L_1 does not follow from their own boundary equation (5); the printed numerator is missing a factor rho multiplying (q-q'). For the canonical rates at rho=0.05 this gives rho^L_1 about 4.65, which violates exclusion; the corrected formula gives about 0.49. Second, Eq. (2) swaps the labels of the two critical manifolds relative to Sec. IV.C and Fig. 6. The low-density transition is the p' form (0.125 for canonical rates), not the q' form. These are typos, not conceptual errors—the derivation in Sec. IV.C and the simulations use the correct assignments—but a reader relying on Eq. (2) or Eq. (20) will hit nonsense. The authors should fix both before publication.

The MF factorization is uncontrolled, and the paper acknowledges the exact critical density may differ from the MF value; simulations support the MF picture, but the transition is not rigorously proven. That is a limitation, not a fatal flaw, for this type of paper.

Who this is for: statistical physicists working on driven tracers, single-file diffusion, and nonequilibrium phase transitions. It deserves serious refereeing; the central result is plausible and supported. I would accept after a revision fixing the two typos and ideally adding a note about the corrected Eq. (2). Send to a competent referee, not a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a one-dimensional lattice gas on a ring with one driven tracer particle and hard-core bath particles, allowing overtaking through tracer-bath exchange processes. Working in the tracer's reference frame, the authors derive mean-field rate equations and predict two stationary phases: an extended phase in which the tracer velocity vanishes as 1/L and the bath density profile is macroscopic, and a localized phase in which the velocity is O(1) and the density profile is localized near the tracer. They obtain two critical manifolds, characterize the velocity and profile in both phases, and propose a continuous transition with a characteristic sqrt(L) crossover scale at criticality. The analytic results are compared with Gillespie simulations for lattices up to L=4096, showing good agreement and data collapses.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a striking nonequilibrium phase transition in a simple exclusion model with overtaking, in contrast to the smooth crossover known for unbiased single-file diffusion. The paper's strengths are that the mean-field critical densities are derived analytically with no fitted parameters, the scaling predictions are explicit and falsifiable, and the simulations provide direct numerical support through velocity data and density-profile collapses. The special parameter choice reproducing an exact matrix-product result adds credibility. The main limitation is that the mean-field factorization of correlations is uncontrolled, and the authors themselves use the mean-field critical density when comparing to simulations; nevertheless, the numerical agreement with the mean-field phase diagram is persuasive.

major comments (2)

[IV.B, Eq. (20)] The printed formula for the localized-phase boundary density rho^L_1 is inconsistent with the stationary boundary equation (5). Setting rho_{L-1}=rho_{L-2}=rho in Eq. (5) gives rho^L_1 = rho[p-(1-rho)(q-q')]/[p*rho + p'*(1-rho)], whereas Eq. (20) omits the factor rho multiplying (q-q'). For the canonical rates at rho=0.05, the printed expression yields rho^L_1 ≈ 4.65, which violates the exclusion constraint, while the corrected expression gives about 0.49. This error affects the derivation of the localized phase and its comparison with Fig. 5B. Please correct Eq. (20) and verify whether Eq. (21) and all localized-phase curves were computed with the corrected expression, and state this explicitly.
[III, Eq. (2) vs. IV.C] The labels of the two critical manifolds are interchanged between Eq. (2) and the subsequent derivation. Eq. (2) assigns rho^I_c = q'(p-q)/(p q' - q p') and rho^II_c = p'(p-q)/(p q' - q p'), but Sec. IV.C and the text accompanying Fig. 6 identify rho^I_c with the p'-form (which equals 0.125 for the canonical rates) and rho^II_c with the q'-form. The discussion in Sec. III of the low-density transition also uses rho^I_c for the p'-value. This inconsistency makes the phase diagram in Fig. 1 ambiguous and must be fixed by making the notation uniform throughout the paper.

minor comments (4)

[V] The simulation section states that each figure results from averaging 100 different realizations but does not specify how many independent runs and how many sweeps were used for each parameter point; please clarify the statistics to allow reproducibility.
[IV.A, Eq. (17)] The text says that rho^E_1 and rho^E_{L-1} are recovered from the boundary equations, but the derivation is not shown; a brief explanation or reference would help the reader verify this step.
[IV.D, Eq. (24)] The scaling c = b/L^alpha is introduced without explicitly stating that c is the quantity defined in Eq. (9); please connect the notation to avoid confusion.
[I] There are minor typographical errors, e.g., 'microrehology' should be 'microrheology' and 'the analysis carries out' should be 'the analysis carried out' in Sec. IV.D.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mean-field predictions are derived analytically from the microscopic rates and checked against independent Gillespie simulations.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Section IV writes the rate equations from the microscopic transition rates with an explicit, stated mean-field closure, namely `⟨τ_k(t)τ_m(t)⟩ ≈ ρ_k(t)ρ_m(t)`. The critical densities are then solved analytically from the stationary boundary equations, not fitted to simulation data: the extended-phase boundary values are `ρ_1^E ≈ q'(p−q)/(pq'−qp')`, `ρ_{L−1}^E ≈ p'(p−q)/(pq'−qp')`, and the localized-phase velocity vanishes at `ρ = p'(p−q)/(pq'−qp')`, giving the transition manifold. The simulations used for comparison are generated independently with the Gillespie algorithm described in Sec. V and contain no adjustable parameters, so Figs. 3–6 are genuine tests of the mean-field picture rather than a restatement of its inputs. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the mean-field value may differ from the exact value (`We take the MF value of ρ_c^I which may slightly differ from its exact value`), which is an honest statement about approximation error, not a fitted input. Self-citations in the introduction and discussion are contextual and not load-bearing for the transition claim. The exact comparison with the matrix-product ansatz [29] is independent external evidence for one special case. The internal MF algebra issues noted in review, such as the apparent typo in Eq. (20) and the labelling of the critical manifolds between Eq. (2) and Sec. IV.C, are correctness concerns rather than circularity: no prediction in the paper reduces by construction to an input of the calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the mean-field factorization and on the assumption that the system reaches a stationary state in the t >> L >> 1 limit. The model rates and density are inputs, not fitted parameters. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption Mean-field factorization of two-point correlations, <tau_k tau_m> approximately rho_k rho_m, closes the rate equations.
Stated in Section IV before Eq. (4). This is uncontrolled in an exclusion process with strong correlations, and the exact critical point could differ from the MF value.
domain assumption The system reaches a unique stationary state in the t >> L >> 1 limit.
Assumed throughout the analysis and used to define stationary velocity and density profiles; no mixing or convergence proof is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase transition in a 1d driven tracer model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DNGALZVG

@misc{pith2026190809290,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase transition in a 1d driven tracer model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DNGALZVG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09290}
}

read the original abstract

The effect of particle overtaking on transport in a narrow channel is studied using a 1d model of a driven tracer in a quiescent bath. In contrast with the well-studied non-driven case, where the tracer's long-time dynamics changes from sub-diffusive to diffusive whenever overtaking is allowed, the driven tracer is shown to exhibit a phase transition at a finite overtaking rate. The transition separates a phase in which the stationary bath density profile, as seen in the tracer's frame, is extended, as in the non-overtaking case, to a phase with a localized bath density profile. In the extended phase the tracer velocity vanishes in the thermodynamic limit while it remains finite in the localized phase. The phase diagram of the model, as well as the tracer velocity and the bath density profile in both phases, are studied, demonstrating their distinct features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09290 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The MF phase diagram in the (δ 0 , ρ) plane for fixed δ = 3/4, indicating the transition lines between the localized (L) and extended (E) phases. III. MAIN RESULTS The following results, obtained by MF calculations and numerical simulations, demonstrate the existence of both a localized phase and a robust extended phase, which persists in the presence of exchange. A nonequilibrium phase transition separates the ext… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The MF phase diagram for average bath density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** The tracer velocity v, as obtained from numerical simulations, is plotted against 1/L for different values of ρ in the localized and extended phases and for the canonical rates. Top Panel: Data in the localized phase, indicating that v approaches a finite constant at large L. Bottom Panel: Data in the extended phase alongside the MF solution (dashed black lines). profile becomes a function of y = `/√ L. IV. MEAN… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Density profile collapse, with respect to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Data collapse of the density profile ρ (y) versus y = `/√ L for different values of L, at the critical density ρ = ρ I c . We take the MF value of ρ I c which may slightly differ from its exact value. For the canonical rates, this corresponds to ρ = 0.125. The density …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

Dynamics of a simple many-body system of hard rods

DW Jepsen. Dynamics of a simple many-body system of hard rods. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6(3):405– 413, 1965

work page 1965
[2]

Anomalous self-diﬀusion for one- dimensional hard cores

Jerome K Percus. Anomalous self-diﬀusion for one- dimensional hard cores. Physical Review A, 9(1):557, 1974

1974
[3]

Diﬀusion of labeled par- ticles on one-dimensional chains

S Alexander and P Pincus. Diﬀusion of labeled par- ticles on one-dimensional chains. Physical Review B, 18(4):2011, 1978

work page 2011
[4]

The crossover from single ﬁle to ﬁckian diﬀusion.Faraday discussions, 144:285–299, 2010

Jimaan Sané, Johan T Padding, and Ard A Louis. The crossover from single ﬁle to ﬁckian diﬀusion.Faraday discussions, 144:285–299, 2010

work page 2010
[5]

Non-monotonic crossover from single-ﬁle to regular diﬀusion in micro-channels.Scientiﬁcreports, 2:1015, 2012

Ullrich Siems, Christian Kreuter, Artur Erbe, Nadine Schwierz, Surajit Sengupta, Paul Leiderer, and Peter Nielaba. Non-monotonic crossover from single-ﬁle to regular diﬀusion in micro-channels.Scientiﬁcreports, 2:1015, 2012

work page 2012
[6]

Crossover from normal diﬀusion to single-ﬁle diﬀusion of particles in a one-dimensional channel: Lj particles in zeolite zsm-22

AV Anil Kumar. Crossover from normal diﬀusion to single-ﬁle diﬀusion of particles in a one-dimensional channel: Lj particles in zeolite zsm-22. Molecular 9 Physics, 113(11):1306–1310, 2015

work page 2015
[7]

Diﬀusion in quasi-one-dimensional channels: A small system n, p, t, transition state theory for hopping times.The Journal of chemical physics, 146(15):154505, 2017

Sheida Ahmadi and Richard K Bowles. Diﬀusion in quasi-one-dimensional channels: A small system n, p, t, transition state theory for hopping times.The Journal of chemical physics, 146(15):154505, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Small- world rheology: an introduction to probe-based active microrheology

Laurence G Wilson and Wilson CK Poon. Small- world rheology: an introduction to probe-based active microrheology. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(22):10617–10630, 2011

work page 2011

Show all 30 references

[9]

Micro-and nanoscale ﬂuidmechanics: transport in microﬂuidicdevices

Brian J Kirby. Micro-and nanoscale ﬂuidmechanics: transport in microﬂuidicdevices. Cambridge university press, 2010

2010
[10]

A revolution in optical manipulation

David G Grier. A revolution in optical manipulation. nature, 424(6950):810, 2003

2003
[11]

Flow guidance of magnetic particles by dipolar particle interaction

F Wittbracht, A Weddemann, A Auge, and A Hütten. Flow guidance of magnetic particles by dipolar particle interaction. In 2010 Fourth International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies, pages 102–

2010
[12]

Colloids dragged through a polymer solution: Experi- ment, theory, and simulation.The Journal of chemical physics, 129(8):084902, 2008

Christof Gutsche, Friedrich Kremer, Matthias Krüger, Markus Rauscher, Rudolf Weeber, and Jens Harting. Colloids dragged through a polymer solution: Experi- ment, theory, and simulation.The Journal of chemical physics, 129(8):084902, 2008

2008
[13]

Diﬀusion of a sphere in a dilute solution of polymer coils.The Journal of chemical physics, 131(9):094902, 2009

Matthias Krüger and Markus Rauscher. Diﬀusion of a sphere in a dilute solution of polymer coils.The Journal of chemical physics, 131(9):094902, 2009

2009
[14]

Holographic characterization of protein aggre- gates

Chen Wang, Xiao Zhong, David B Ruﬀner, Alexandra Stutt, Laura A Philips, Michael D Ward, and David G Grier. Holographic characterization of protein aggre- gates. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 105(3):1074– 1085, 2016

2016
[15]

Au- tocalibratedcolloidalinteractionmeasurementswithex- tended optical traps.Physical Review E, 77(5):051401, 2008

Marco Polin, Yohai Roichman, and David G Grier. Au- tocalibratedcolloidalinteractionmeasurementswithex- tended optical traps.Physical Review E, 77(5):051401, 2008

2008
[16]

Shear thin- ning and local melting of colloidal crystals

Roel PA Dullens and Clemens Bechinger. Shear thin- ning and local melting of colloidal crystals. Physical review letters, 107(13):138301, 2011

2011
[17]

Journey of an intruder through the ﬂuidization and jamming transi- tions of a dense granular media

Raphaël Candelier and Olivier Dauchot. Journey of an intruder through the ﬂuidization and jamming transi- tions of a dense granular media. Physical Review E, 81(1):011304, 2010

2010
[18]

Directed walk in a one-dimensional lattice gas

SF Burlatsky, GS Oshanin, AV Mogutov, and M Moreau. Directed walk in a one-dimensional lattice gas. Physics Letters A, 166(3-4):230–234, 1992

1992
[19]

Motion of a driven tracer particle in a one- dimensional symmetric lattice gas.Physical Review E, 54(4):3165, 1996

SF Burlatsky, G Oshanin, M Moreau, and WP Rein- hardt. Motion of a driven tracer particle in a one- dimensional symmetric lattice gas.Physical Review E, 54(4):3165, 1996

1996
[20]

Dynamics of a driven probe molecule in a liquid monolayer.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 38(7):527, 1997

J De Coninck, G Oshanin, and M Moreau. Dynamics of a driven probe molecule in a liquid monolayer.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 38(7):527, 1997

1997
[21]

Driven tracer par- ticle in one dimensional symmetric simple exclusion

C Landim, S Olla, and SB Volchan. Driven tracer par- ticle in one dimensional symmetric simple exclusion. Communications in mathematical physics, 192(2):287– 307, 1998

1998
[22]

Biased diﬀusion in a one-dimensional adsorbedmonolayer

O Bénichou, AM Cazabat, A Lemarchand, M Moreau, and G Oshanin. Biased diﬀusion in a one-dimensional adsorbedmonolayer. Journalofstatisticalphysics, 97(1- 2):351–371, 1999

1999
[23]

Active transport in dense diﬀusive single-ﬁle systems

P Illien, O Bénichou, C Mejía-Monasterio, G Os- hanin, and R Voituriez. Active transport in dense diﬀusive single-ﬁle systems. Physical review letters, 111(3):038102, 2013

2013
[24]

Exact gap statistics for the random average process on a ring with a tracer

Julien Cividini, Anupam Kundu, Satya N Majum- dar, and David Mukamel. Exact gap statistics for the random average process on a ring with a tracer. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 49(8):085002, 2016

2016
[25]

Correlation and ﬂuctuation in a ran- dom average process on an inﬁnite line with a driven tracer

J Cividini, A Kundu, Satya N Majumdar, and D Mukamel. Correlation and ﬂuctuation in a ran- dom average process on an inﬁnite line with a driven tracer. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(5):053212, 2016

2016
[26]

Exact correlations in a single- ﬁle system with a driven tracer

A Kundu and J Cividini. Exact correlations in a single- ﬁle system with a driven tracer. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 115(5):54003, 2016

2016
[27]

Tracer diﬀusion in crowded narrow channels

O Bénichou, P Illien, G Oshanin, A Sarracino, and R Voituriez. Tracer diﬀusion in crowded narrow channels. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 30(44):443001, 2018

2018
[28]

Biased tracer diﬀusion in hard-core lattice gases: Some notes on the validity of the einstein relation

G Oshanin, O Bénichou, SF Burlatsky, and M Moreau. Biased tracer diﬀusion in hard-core lattice gases: Some notes on the validity of the einstein relation. In Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures IX, pages 33–74. Springer, 2004

2004
[29]

Large devi- ation of the density proﬁle in the steady state of the open symmetric simple exclusion process

B Derrida, JL Lebowitz, and ER Speer. Large devi- ation of the density proﬁle in the steady state of the open symmetric simple exclusion process. Journal of statistical physics, 107(3-4):599–634, 2002

2002
[30]

Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics

Daniel T Gillespie. Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 58:35–55, 2007

2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Dynamics of a simple many-body system of hard rods

DW Jepsen. Dynamics of a simple many-body system of hard rods. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6(3):405– 413, 1965

work page 1965

[2] [2]

Anomalous self-diﬀusion for one- dimensional hard cores

Jerome K Percus. Anomalous self-diﬀusion for one- dimensional hard cores. Physical Review A, 9(1):557, 1974

1974

[3] [3]

Diﬀusion of labeled par- ticles on one-dimensional chains

S Alexander and P Pincus. Diﬀusion of labeled par- ticles on one-dimensional chains. Physical Review B, 18(4):2011, 1978

work page 2011

[4] [4]

The crossover from single ﬁle to ﬁckian diﬀusion.Faraday discussions, 144:285–299, 2010

Jimaan Sané, Johan T Padding, and Ard A Louis. The crossover from single ﬁle to ﬁckian diﬀusion.Faraday discussions, 144:285–299, 2010

work page 2010

[5] [5]

Non-monotonic crossover from single-ﬁle to regular diﬀusion in micro-channels.Scientiﬁcreports, 2:1015, 2012

Ullrich Siems, Christian Kreuter, Artur Erbe, Nadine Schwierz, Surajit Sengupta, Paul Leiderer, and Peter Nielaba. Non-monotonic crossover from single-ﬁle to regular diﬀusion in micro-channels.Scientiﬁcreports, 2:1015, 2012

work page 2012

[6] [6]

Crossover from normal diﬀusion to single-ﬁle diﬀusion of particles in a one-dimensional channel: Lj particles in zeolite zsm-22

AV Anil Kumar. Crossover from normal diﬀusion to single-ﬁle diﬀusion of particles in a one-dimensional channel: Lj particles in zeolite zsm-22. Molecular 9 Physics, 113(11):1306–1310, 2015

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Diﬀusion in quasi-one-dimensional channels: A small system n, p, t, transition state theory for hopping times.The Journal of chemical physics, 146(15):154505, 2017

Sheida Ahmadi and Richard K Bowles. Diﬀusion in quasi-one-dimensional channels: A small system n, p, t, transition state theory for hopping times.The Journal of chemical physics, 146(15):154505, 2017

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Small- world rheology: an introduction to probe-based active microrheology

Laurence G Wilson and Wilson CK Poon. Small- world rheology: an introduction to probe-based active microrheology. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(22):10617–10630, 2011

work page 2011