Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?

As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:1905.13714.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
1905.13714 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.498427Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 6112f007-52cb-4558-b759-a9c2806e13ed · inbound

Efficient Text-Attributed Graph Learning through Selective Annotation and Graph Alignment cites this paper.

Efficient Text-Attributed Graph Learning through Selective Annotation and Graph Alignment Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?

Reference 58

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T05:44:53.283428Z digest=sha256:59c7a33682905ae34a5ea887e1bc666233d00df8f50448a1b00a4ffdcd7eaca0

Observation f7b6eee7-9ae4-4345-8474-de28a295db67 · inbound

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? cites this paper.

Can human clinical rationales improve the performance and explainability of clinical text classification models? Do Human Rationales Improve Machine Explanations?

Reference 11

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T13:00:04.503196Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T13:00:04.191173Z digest=sha256:5d5d726c9e0fdb0f1325a8a1591fab4a7e7c7255268abfa9a7a99cef605f2edf