pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.03619 · v1 · pith:DNRH6AKAnew · submitted 2019-07-08 · ✦ hep-th

Gravity, Superselection Rules and Axions

Cesar Gomez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 01:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords quantum gravityaxiontheta parametersuperselection rulesQCDstrong CP problemcoherent states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Consistent coupling to quantum gravity requires the QCD theta parameter to become the vacuum expectation value of a local axion field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that any low-energy free parameter must, under consistent coupling to quantum gravity, be reinterpreted as the vacuum expectation value of a local quantum field. It takes the theta parameter of QCD, which labels superselection sectors and appears in the strong CP problem, as the central example. The argument proceeds by representing classical geometries via coherent states of quantum gravity and by recasting the theta superselection rule as the absence of a quantum reference frame for topological charge. Together these ingredients force the theta angle to be promoted to the expectation value of a dynamical local axion field. A sympathetic reader would care because the claim supplies a first-principles route from quantum gravity to the dynamical resolution of an otherwise arbitrary constant.

Core claim

The gravitational emergence of the local axion field associated with the superselection theta parameter is worked out using as basic ingredients the quantum representation of classical geometries in terms of coherent states and the interpretation of the theta QCD superselection rule in quantum information terms as the lack of a quantum reference frame for topological charge.

What carries the argument

Coherent-state representation of geometries together with the quantum-information view of the theta superselection rule as absence of a reference frame for topological charge.

If this is right

  • The theta parameter ceases to be an arbitrary constant and is instead the vacuum expectation value of the emergent axion.
  • The strong CP problem acquires a dynamical solution through the local axion without additional assumptions.
  • The same logic applies to any other low-energy free parameter once quantum gravity is consistently included.
  • The resulting axion is local and arises directly from the gravitational coherent-state structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism may supply a quantum-gravity origin for the model-independent axion that appears in string compactifications.
  • Gauge couplings or the cosmological constant could likewise be forced to become expectation values of local fields under the same reasoning.
  • The absence of a reference frame for topological charge suggests analogous effects for other global symmetries when gravity is present.

Load-bearing premise

The theta QCD superselection rule can be interpreted in quantum information terms as the lack of a quantum reference frame for topological charge.

What would settle it

A consistent quantum-gravity theory in which the theta parameter remains a fixed, non-dynamical constant with no associated local field would directly contradict the claim.

read the original abstract

It is generally accepted that consistent coupling to quantum gravity implies that any low energy free parameter is in reality the vacuum expectation value of some local quantum field. In this note we present a modest attempt to prove this general claim using as key example the theta parameter of QCD and the Peccei-Quinn axion solution of the strong CP problem. The gravitational emergence of the local axion field associated with the superselection theta parameter is worked out using as basic ingredients the quantum representation of classical geometries in terms of coherent states and the interpretation of the theta QCD superselection rule in quantum information terms as the lack of a quantum reference frame for topological charge. The formal connection with the model independent axion in string theory is briefly discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that consistent coupling to quantum gravity requires any low-energy free parameter to be the vacuum expectation value of a local quantum field. It presents a modest attempt to establish this using the QCD theta parameter and the Peccei-Quinn axion as the central example, deriving the local axion field from the quantum coherent-state representation of geometries together with a quantum-information reinterpretation of the theta superselection rule as the absence of a reference frame for topological charge; a brief connection to model-independent string axions is noted.

Significance. If the central steps can be made explicit and rigorous, the result would supply a general quantum-gravity mechanism enforcing the dynamical character of parameters such as theta, with direct implications for the strong-CP problem and for the axion sector of string compactifications. The combination of coherent-state geometry and quantum-information superselection is a novel angle that, if substantiated, would strengthen the case that free parameters cannot remain non-dynamical in a consistent quantum-gravitational theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the two listed ingredients 'work out' the gravitational emergence of the local axion field is not supported by any explicit operator construction, effective-action derivation, or calculation of the kinetic term and topological coupling; without this mapping the step from 'no quantum reference frame for topological charge' to a spacetime-dependent scalar remains an analogy rather than a derivation and is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Main argument] Main argument (as summarized in the abstract): the quantum-information reinterpretation of the theta superselection rule is introduced ad hoc for the purpose of producing the axion; no independent justification or consistency check against known results on superselection or coherent-state geometry is supplied, leaving open whether the construction is circular with respect to the target conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The report correctly identifies that the note is conceptual in nature. We respond point-by-point below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the two listed ingredients 'work out' the gravitational emergence of the local axion field is not supported by any explicit operator construction, effective-action derivation, or calculation of the kinetic term and topological coupling; without this mapping the step from 'no quantum reference frame for topological charge' to a spacetime-dependent scalar remains an analogy rather than a derivation and is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript offers a conceptual framework rather than a complete explicit derivation with operator-level constructions or full effective-action calculations. As a short note presenting a modest attempt, the focus is on outlining the connection via coherent states and the quantum-information view of superselection. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph sketching how the kinetic term and topological coupling arise from the coherent-state overlap and the reference-frame absence, while clarifying that a rigorous operator construction lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Main argument] Main argument (as summarized in the abstract): the quantum-information reinterpretation of the theta superselection rule is introduced ad hoc for the purpose of producing the axion; no independent justification or consistency check against known results on superselection or coherent-state geometry is supplied, leaving open whether the construction is circular with respect to the target conclusion.

    Authors: The reinterpretation is motivated by existing literature on quantum reference frames for global charges and the fact that diffeomorphism invariance precludes a fixed reference for topological sectors; it is not introduced solely to obtain the axion. Nevertheless, the manuscript does not supply explicit consistency checks against standard results on superselection or coherent-state geometry. We will insert a short subsection with additional references and a consistency argument in the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Axion emergence follows from interpretive rephrasing of superselection rule rather than explicit derivation

specific steps
  1. other [Abstract]
    "The gravitational emergence of the local axion field associated with the superselection theta parameter is worked out using as basic ingredients the quantum representation of classical geometries in terms of coherent states and the interpretation of the theta QCD superselection rule in quantum information terms as the lack of a quantum reference frame for topological charge."

    The paper presents the 'interpretation ... as the lack of a quantum reference frame' as one of the two basic ingredients that directly produce the local axion. Because this rephrasing is chosen to connect superselection to a spacetime-dependent scalar, the emergence claim reduces to the interpretive premise rather than an independent derivation from gravity or coherent states.

full rationale

The paper's central step equates the theta superselection rule with absence of a quantum reference frame and then asserts that this, together with coherent-state geometry, forces a local dynamical axion. No operator-level mapping or effective-action derivation is supplied; the reference-frame language is introduced precisely to yield the target field. This matches the 'other' pattern of an ad-hoc reinterpretation whose only stated purpose is to produce the claimed result. The remainder of the argument (coherent states, string-theory connection) does not independently derive the kinetic term or coupling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper invokes standard quantum-gravity and quantum-information assumptions plus one paper-specific reinterpretation of superselection; no free parameters or new entities with independent evidence are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quantum representation of classical geometries in terms of coherent states
    Listed as a basic ingredient for the gravitational emergence of the axion field.
  • ad hoc to paper Interpretation of the theta QCD superselection rule in quantum information terms as the lack of a quantum reference frame for topological charge
    Central interpretive step that converts the fixed theta into a local dynamical field.
invented entities (1)
  • Local axion field associated with the superselection theta parameter no independent evidence
    purpose: To realize the theta parameter as the vev of a quantum field forced by gravity
    Emerges from the argument but no independent falsifiable prediction is stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5632 in / 1498 out tokens · 33793 ms · 2026-05-25T01:14:40.354995+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Moreover, changes of reference frame define unitary transformations acting on the Hilbert space. If we define physical states as those invariant under change of refer- ence frame the physical Hilbert space is associated with an irrep of the group of reference frame transformations. The parameters characterizing these irreps play de role of SS charges. In th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In case we have massless fermions chiral trans- formations can be used to transform the θ parameter

    Until now we have ignored in the discussion the rol of fermions. In case we have massless fermions chiral trans- formations can be used to transform the θ parameter. In this case the generator of the chiral transformation of the fermions defines the charge ˆQt and consequently eliminates the role of ˆQ as SS charge. The PQ current is now replaced by the ch...

    work page

  3. [3]

    One is the mass scale fa needed to define the axion field a(x) with appropriated dimensions and secondly the coefficient χ in the anomaly ∆Qt =χ ∫ F ∧ F

    In the previous formal discussion we have omit- ted two crucial parameters. One is the mass scale fa needed to define the axion field a(x) with appropriated dimensions and secondly the coefficient χ in the anomaly ∆Qt =χ ∫ F ∧ F . This second coefficient was set in our construction without fermions equal to one. This changes if we couple the axion field to fermions

    work page

  4. [4]

    This was automatic in our construction where the PQ generator is identified with ˆQt

    The key ingredient of the PQ mechanism is the anomaly of the PQ current. This was automatic in our construction where the PQ generator is identified with ˆQt. Indeed in this case ∆ Qt is equal to the difference n(+) − n(− ) of the topological number n in ±∞ and this difference is given by ∫ F ∧ F by the definition of n. C. The Etiology of Axions In the genera...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This leads to the well known definition of the axion mass m2 = C f 2a (18) that not surprisingly is the analog of Witten Veneziano formula [27] for the η′ mass if we replace fa byfπ

    with what we normally as- sume is the case for pure Yang Mills [23] [24],[25] namely, for small θ, E(θ) = Cθ2 (17) withC given by the topological susceptibility. This leads to the well known definition of the axion mass m2 = C f 2a (18) that not surprisingly is the analog of Witten Veneziano formula [27] for the η′ mass if we replace fa byfπ. In other word...

    work page

  6. [6]

    only one set of creation annihila- tion operators

    Note that in all this construction we have only used the zero mode part i.e. only one set of creation annihila- tion operators

    work page

  7. [7]

    A completely different representation of the θ vacua is as a dilute gas of instantons [26]. This representa- tion leads to a density of energy E(θ) exponentially sup- pressed likeE(θ)inst =Dcos(θ)e − 8π2 g2 (ρ) withD represent- ing the instanton scale measure factor dρ ρ5 ( 8π2 g2(ρ) )2N . This energy density is actually not well defined without adding some...

    work page

  8. [8]

    In case of the de Sitter generated by E(θ) we get N = M 4 P Cθ2 (21) We observe that the amplitude only vanishes if N = ∞

    can be estimated and scales like 1 N forN = R2 H L2 P for RH the corresponding Hubble radius. In case of the de Sitter generated by E(θ) we get N = M 4 P Cθ2 (21) We observe that the amplitude only vanishes if N = ∞ . This happens for θ = 0 meaning that this value repre- sents a stable vacuum in agreement with what we expect from [28]. Thus, any other val...

    work page

  9. [9]

    However this only takes place if (

    a natural mechanism to generate the full fledged local axion field and to evade the SS properties of θ. However this only takes place if (

    work page

  10. [10]

    It could be worth at this point to make very explicit the steps of the deconstruction mechanism of the axion and to highlight the point where gravity enters

    is non van- ishing or equivalently if we treat de Sitter fully quantum mechanically and not semi classically. It could be worth at this point to make very explicit the steps of the deconstruction mechanism of the axion and to highlight the point where gravity enters. The mechanism has three steps. • In the first step we add to the would be SS charge ˆQθ th...

    work page

  11. [11]

    These oper- ators allows us to define the local axion field a(x) and to define transitions between different values of θ

    the algebra of ak,a + k for k non vanishing. These oper- ators allows us to define the local axion field a(x) and to define transitions between different values of θ. Only in this third step we evade locally the SS nature ofθ. Moreover only in this last step we iden- tify the equation of motion of a(x) and the relation of the mass m and the topological suscep...

    work page

  12. [12]

    In this sense the third step above crucially depends on the quan- tum gravity representation of de Sitter

    was computed using the CSG representation of the quantum de Sitter state. In this sense the third step above crucially depends on the quan- tum gravity representation of de Sitter. Indeed in the semiclassical limit where N = ∞ i.e. where de Sitter is treated classically we will be unable to use the same argument to generate the local axion field i.e. the o...

    work page

  13. [13]

    If we think in the de Sitter quantum state as a thermal state what we will get is instead of the coherent state (

    Here we see a key difference between the coherent state approach and the most popular approach based on a thermal state . If we think in the de Sitter quantum state as a thermal state what we will get is instead of the coherent state (

    work page

  14. [14]

    Thus, at least superficially the TSG approach is not enough to generate the local axion field

    the mixed state ∑ eβn (N0e2iφ)n √ n! |n⟩⟨n| (22) for β the corresponding dS temperature. Thus, at least superficially the TSG approach is not enough to generate the local axion field

    work page

  15. [15]

    Once the axion field is generated the anomaly for ˆQt leads to the coupling a(x)F ∧ F and to the equation of motion ∂∂a = ⟨a|F ∧ F |a⟩

    work page

  16. [16]

    The corresponding reference frame, ap- plied to our case, is designed as a finite cavity where a coherent state for the couple of operators ˆQθ, ˆQt is de- fined

    The de Sitter coherent state we use to create locally quantum superpositions of different values of θ recalls the definition of reference frame used by Aharonov and 7 Susskind in [4]. The corresponding reference frame, ap- plied to our case, is designed as a finite cavity where a coherent state for the couple of operators ˆQθ, ˆQt is de- fined. The coherent s...

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    CP Conservation in the Presenc e of Instantons,

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  18. [18]

    A New Light Boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  19. [19]

    Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978)

    work page 1978

  20. [20]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.279

  21. [21]

    Aharonov and L

    Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind ”Charge superselection rule” Phys. Rev. 155, 1428 (1967)

    work page 1967

  22. [22]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens ”Refer- ence frames, superselection rules, and quantum informa- tion” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 555 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Quantum Compositeness of Gravity: Black Holes, AdS and Inflation

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Quantum Compositeness of Gravity: Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,” JCAP 1401 (2014) 023 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/023 [arXiv:1312.4795 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/023 2014

  24. [24]

    Quantum Exclusion of Positive Cosmological Constant?

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Quantum Exclusion of Positive Cosmological Constant?,” Annalen Phys. 528 (2016) 68 doi:10.1002/andp.201500216 [arXiv:1412.8077 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/andp.201500216 2016

  25. [25]

    Quantum Break-Time of de Sitter

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and S. Zell, “Quantum Break-Time of de Sitter,” JCAP 1706 (2017) 028 doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2017/06/028 [arXiv:1701.08776 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475- 2017

  26. [26]

    A Proof of the Axion?

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and S. Zell, “A Proof of the Axion?,” arXiv:1811.03079 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 1977

  28. [28]

    Cosmo- logical Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Par- ticle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmo- logical Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Par- ticle Creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2738 1977

  29. [30]

    Building up spacetime with quan- tum entanglement,

    M. Van Raamsdonk, “Building up spacetime with quan- tum entanglement,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19 (2010) 2429] doi:10.1007/s10714-010- 1034-0, 10.1142/S0218271810018529 [arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-010- 2010

  30. [32]

    J.V.Neumann ”Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics” Princeton University Press 1955

    work page 1955

  31. [33]

    A. S. Wightman Il Nuovo Cimento B Volume 110, Issue 5?6, pp 751?769

    work page

  32. [34]

    G. -C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner ”Super- selection Rule for Charge” Phys. Rev. D 1, 3267 (1970)

    work page 1970

  33. [35]

    A. S. Wightman ”Proof of the charge superselection rule in local relativistic quantum field theory” Journal of Mathematical Physics 15, 2198 (1974)

    work page 1974

  34. [36]

    Quantum nonlocality in the presence of superselection rules and data hiding protocols

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, ”Quantum-nonlocality in the presence of superselection rules and some applica- tions” quant-ph/0302039 (2003)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [37]

    Mayers, J

    A.Kitaev, D. Mayers, J. Preskill ”Superselection rule s and quantum protocols” Phys.Rev. A69 (2004) 052326

    work page 2004

  36. [38]

    The Structure of the Gauge Theory Vacuum,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen and D. J. Gross, “The Structure of the Gauge Theory Vacuum,” Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 334 [Phys. Lett. 63B (1976) 334]. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90277-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90277-x 1976

  37. [39]

    Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang- Mills Quantum Theory,

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang- Mills Quantum Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 172. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.172

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.172 1976

  38. [40]

    Instantons, the Quark Model, and the 1/n Expansion,

    E. Witten, “Instantons, the Quark Model, and the 1/n Expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 149 (1979) 285. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90243-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90243-8 1979

  39. [41]

    Current Algebra Theorems for the U(1) Goldstone Boson,

    E. Witten, “Current Algebra Theorems for the U(1) Goldstone Boson,” Nucl. Phys. B 156 (1979) 269. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90031-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90031-2 1979

  40. [42]

    Theta dependence in the large N limit of four-dimensional gauge theories,

    E. Witten, “Theta dependence in the large N limit of four-dimensional gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2862 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2862 [hep- th/9807109]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2862 1998

  41. [43]

    Toward a Theory of the Strong Interactions,

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen and D. J. Gross, “Toward a Theory of the Strong Interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2717. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.2717

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.17.2717 1978

  42. [44]

    U(1) Without Instantons,

    G. Veneziano, “U(1) Without Instantons,” Nucl. Phys. B 159 (1979) 213. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90332-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90332-8 1979

  43. [45]

    Parity Conserva- tion in QCD,

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, “Parity Conserva- tion in QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 535. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.535 1984

  44. [46]

    Laporta and E

    E. Witten, “Some Properties of O(32) Superstrings,” Phys. Lett. 149B (1984) 351. doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(84)90422-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1984

  45. [47]

    World Sheet Instantons and the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,

    X. G. Wen and E. Witten, “World Sheet Instantons and the Peccei-Quinn Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. 166B (1986)

    work page 1986

  46. [48]

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91587-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91587-x

  47. [49]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, “Axions In String The- ory,” JHEP 0606 (2006) 051 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/06/051 [hep-th/0605206]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126- 2006

  48. [50]

    On the Possibility of Large Axion Decay Constants

    T. Banks, M. Dine, P. J. Fox and E. Gorbatov, “On the possibility of large axion decay constants,” JCAP 0306 (2003) 001 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001 [hep-th/0303252]. 6 In string theory this is done through the exact component dB of H in H = dB − 3ωY + 3ωL (25) for ω’s the gauge and gravity Chern-Simons forms

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/06/001 2003