Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Log Parsing Evaluation in the Era of Modern Software Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.09003 v1 pith:DNWPUW6I submitted 2023-08-17 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords parsingindustrylogsdataresearchsystemsanalysisavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to the complexity and size of modern software systems, the amount of logs generated is tremendous. Hence, it is infeasible to manually investigate these data in a reasonable time, thereby requiring automating log analysis to derive insights about the functioning of the systems. Motivated by an industry use-case, we zoom-in on one integral part of automated log analysis, log parsing, which is the prerequisite to deriving any insights from logs. Our investigation reveals problematic aspects within the log parsing field, particularly its inefficiency in handling heterogeneous real-world logs. We show this by assessing the 14 most-recognized log parsing approaches in the literature using (i) nine publicly available datasets, (ii) one dataset comprised of combined publicly available data, and (iii) one dataset generated within the infrastructure of a large bank. Subsequently, toward improving log parsing robustness in real-world production scenarios, we propose a tool, Logchimera, that enables estimating log parsing performance in industry contexts through generating synthetic log data that resemble industry logs. Our contributions serve as a foundation to consolidate past research efforts, facilitate future research advancements, and establish a strong link between research and industry log parsing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parser-Free Querying of Security Logs

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sieve uses an LLM to generate executable queries from natural language security questions grounded by auto-extracted log-format context, cutting error rates over 3x on complex temporal and cross-event tasks versus man...

Pith tools