Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Simultaneous emission from dust and gas in the planetary debris orbiting a white dwarf

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near-simultaneous observations of the polluted white dwarf WDJ2100+2122 show its circumstellar dust and calcium/magnesium gas brightening together in two flare epochs, evidence for a common collision origin.

desk verdict A valuable new simultaneous dust+gas monitoring dataset, but the claimed correlation doesn't survive a close look at the decline phases, so the collision-origin interpretation is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07647 v1 pith:DO6UJEIT submitted 2024-12-10 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Laura K. Rogers , Christopher J. Manser , Amy Bonsor , Erik Dennihy , Simon Hodgkin , Markus Kissler-Patig , Samuel Lai , Carl Melis
show 6 more authors
Siyi Xu Nicola Gentile Fusillo Boris Gänsicke Andrew Swan Odette Toloza Dimitri Veras
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords whitedwarfscircumstellardebrisdiscspollutedgasemissionlinesinfraredvariabilityplanetesimalcollisionsWDJ2100+2122near-infraredphotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that the circumstellar dust and gas around the polluted white dwarf WDJ2100+2122 are produced together in the same events. The evidence is a four-year campaign in which optical spectra and near-infrared JHKs photometry were taken within hours of one another on the same nights. At two epochs, the calcium infrared triplet and magnesium lines flare while the Ks band brightens by up to 0.2 magnitudes; oxygen and iron lines stay roughly constant. The authors argue that this near-simultaneous brightening rules out dust sublimation during inward migration, which would lag by about 15 days, and instead favours collisions among rocky debris. If right, this is the first observed link between dust and gas production in any white dwarf debris disc, and it means the debris environment is bursty rather than steady.

What carries the argument

The central object is WDJ2100+2122, a white dwarf whose atmosphere is polluted by accreted rocky material and which hosts both a warm dust disc and a Keplerian gas disc. The machinery is the paired time series: X-shooter line fluxes for Ca II, Mg I, O I, and Fe II together with HAWK-I JHKs differential photometry, sampled about every two weeks. The load-bearing comparison is the timing of the two strongest Ca II epochs against the Ks-band light curve, combined with the radial geometry from FWZI measurements, which put the flaring calcium gas farther out than the dust inner edge, and with the estimated Poynting-Robertson drag timescale of about 15 days. Together these make the case that the extra dust and gas appear at the same place and time, so their common origin is likely collisional vaporisation rather than sublimation.

What would settle it

Take nightly X-shooter spectra and HAWK-I photometry of WDJ2100+2122 through the next calcium flare. If a Ks-band brightening ever occurs without a calcium flare, or arrives more than about two weeks after the flare, the common-origin collision claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

WDJ2100+2122 shows two flare events, peaking at MJD 59699 and 60161, in which the Ca II infrared triplet (8498, 8542, 8662 Å) and the Mg I 8806 Å line brighten severalfold while O I and Fe II lines remain nearly stable. On the same nights, HAWK-I photometry shows the Ks band brighter by up to 0.2 mags relative to its median, with weaker changes in J and H. The calcium-line flux and Ks flux are positively correlated (Pearson R = 0.8), and the calcium line flux decays over 64 days after the first event and 13 days after the second. The paper takes this as the first demonstration that circumstellar gas and dust emission are linked for any white dwarf, and argues that the simultaneous appearance is inconsistent with gas produced by sublimation of dust migrating inward under Poynting-Robertson drag, because that process predicts a delay of roughly 15 days. Collisions between planetesimals or between scattered material and the existing disc are presented as the natural common source.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's claim that dust and gas are produced together rests on two flare events chosen because the calcium lines were strongest, and the two-week observing cadence cannot rule out a delay of up to two weeks between the dust brightening and the gas brightening.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each new correlated dust–gas burst around WDJ2100+2122 would confirm the collision origin and provide a direct measure of how often rocky material is delivered close to the white dwarf.
  • The shortest-yet variability timescales, with Ks changes within a day and gas flux decaying within 13 days, imply that models of white dwarf debris discs must include stochastic, burst-like injection rather than steady-state evolution.
  • The element-dependent flaring, with calcium and magnesium but not oxygen or iron, indicates a cooler outer disc region where collisions occur, while a hotter inner disc remains quiescent.
  • Simultaneous optical spectroscopy and near-infrared photometry becomes a diagnostic tool for distinguishing collision vaporisation from sublimation-driven gas production around white dwarfs.
  • For this object, the standard sublimation-based explanation of gas discs is disfavoured, so theoretical work on collisional cascades and impact vaporisation near white dwarfs becomes the relevant framework.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the collision origin generalizes, the rate of such flares around polluted white dwarfs could trace the rate of planetesimal impacts, offering a way to measure late-stage rocky delivery to white dwarfs over time.
  • A testable extension is to search for a short time lag, hours to days, between dust and gas brightening at higher cadence; a zero lag would point to prompt vaporisation at the impact site, while a lag would locate where the debris is ground down.
  • The 0.2-magnitude Ks brightening implies a modest increase in emitting dust area; combining that area change with the observed calcium line flux could quantify the collisional mass required per event.
  • Observing other white dwarfs with both infrared excess and Ca II emission discs on a nightly cadence would show whether correlated flares are common or specific to WDJ2100+2122.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a multi-epoch monitoring campaign of the polluted white dwarf WDJ2100+2122, combining VLT/X-shooter optical spectroscopy and VLT/HAWK-I near-infrared JHKs photometry obtained between 2019 and 2023. The calcium infrared triplet and the Mg I 8806 Å line show two strong flare-like episodes (at MJD 59699 and MJD 60161) with rises and decays on week-to-month timescales, while Fe II and O I lines remain comparatively stable. The near-infrared data show Ks-band brightenings of up to 0.2 mag at the same two epochs. The paper claims a positive correlation between the gas and dust emission (Pearson R = 0.8), interprets this as the first demonstration of near-simultaneous dust and gas production in a white dwarf debris disc, and argues that collisional production is more likely than steady sublimation of inflowing dust.

Significance. If the correlation claim holds, this is a genuinely new observational constraint on the debated origin of gas in white dwarf debris discs: it would show that gas and dust are generated in brief, linked events rather than by a steady sublimation flow, with implications for the collisional cascade scenario. The dataset itself is valuable: the X-shooter line fluxes and HAWK-I differential photometry are tabulated in full, the photometric errors are small (0.006–0.011 mag), and the paper is transparent about key limitations, including the statistically insignificant blackbody temperature changes and the two-week observing cadence. The central novelty, however, rests on a single correlation statistic that is not fully characterised, and the data contain epochs that complicate the simple simultaneous-burst picture.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Fig. 3, Tables A1/A2] The Pearson R = 0.8 between Ca line flux and Ks-band flux is reported without the number of paired epochs, a p-value, or a definition of which epochs enter the calculation. With roughly two dozen points and two dominant flare epochs, a rank or permutation test is needed to show the correlation is not driven solely by the two peak points. Moreover, the decline from the first event is inconsistent with a single linked burst: at MJD 59725 the Ca 8542 Å flux is still elevated (≈16 × 10−13 erg s−1 cm−2) while Ks = 15.308 mag, fainter than the median, and at MJD 59730 the Ca flux has returned to near-quiescence (≈8.5) while Ks has rebrightened to 15.212 mag. The paper should either quantify the correlation on all paired epochs with a significance test, or explicitly restrict the claim to the two peak epochs and justify that restriction.
  2. [Section 3.2 and 3.3] The paper notes that 'gas emission lines can occur in the near-infrared and may be contributing to a portion of the variability' (citing Owens et al. 2023), but it does not estimate the magnitude of this contamination in the J, H, and Ks bands. Because the central claim is that the near-infrared variability traces dust emission, the possibility that some of the Ks-band brightening arises from the same gaseous lines that are seen in the optical needs to be quantified or explicitly argued to be negligible using the line fluxes measured in the same campaign.
  3. [Section 4 (Discussion)] The text acknowledges that the two-week cadence leaves room for a delay of less than two weeks between dust and gas brightening, and that the PR-drag timescale for 0.1 μm dust is ≈15 days. Given that the dataset contains only two flare epochs and no high-cadence coverage of either event, the conclusion that the production is 'near-simultaneous' and that a common collisional origin is required goes beyond what the current data can establish. A delay of days, or even two independent but temporally close events, cannot be excluded; the paper should soften this claim or present a quantitative argument (e.g., a cross-correlation or a model of the decay light curve) that distinguishes simultaneity from coincidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract uses 'near-simultaneous observations' to describe the spectroscopic and photometric data, while Section 4 defines 'simultaneous' as observations taken within a few hours. The two-week cadence of the campaign means that most paired epochs are separated by days, so the wording in the abstract should be clarified to distinguish the few same-night observations from the general sampling cadence.
  2. [Section 3.3] The statistic should be reported as 'Pearson r' rather than 'Pearson's R', and the sentence giving R = 0.8 should include the number of data points and the associated p-value or confidence interval.
  3. [Figures 2 and 3] The y-axis label 'Fx/Median(Fx)' is not defined in the text or caption; the reader must infer that Fx is the line flux or band flux. Please define the symbol in the caption.
  4. [Tables A1 and A2] Table A1 gives HAWK-I observation dates in calendar format while Table A2 uses MJD, making it unnecessarily difficult to match the photometry to the spectroscopy. Adding MJD columns to Table A1 (or dates to Table A2) would improve reproducibility.
  5. [References] The in-text citations 'Rogers et al. 2023' and 'Rogers et al. 2024' appear in the reference list as 'Rogers L. K., et al., 2023, MNRAS,' and 'Rogers L. K., et al., 2024, MNRAS,' without volume, page, or article identifier; these entries need to be completed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dust–gas correlation is an empirical observational claim supported by independent photometry and spectroscopy, not a fitted or self-citational construction.

full rationale

This paper reports an observational variability study, not a derivation in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction. The central claim—that the strongest dust and gas emission epochs are correlated—rests on independent HAWK-I near-infrared photometry and X-shooter optical spectroscopy, with the two data sets obtained on the same night during the peak epochs. No parameter is fitted to the correlation and then renamed a prediction; the blackbody temperatures fitted to the JHKs excesses are explicitly not used to support the conclusion, since the paper states that 'the median error on the temperature fits is 166K so a temperature increase in the emission peaks is not statistically significant.' The Pearson R value is a descriptive statistic computed from independent measurements, and any concern about its statistical robustness or the influence of the two bright epochs is a correctness or evidentiary issue, not a circularity issue. Citations to prior work by the authors supply stellar parameters, disc properties, and context, but the simultaneity claim is established from the new observations presented in this paper rather than by a load-bearing self-citation or an imported uniqueness theorem. Thus no step in the paper's argument reduces to its own inputs by definition or by citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard observational assumptions: the photospheric model subtraction isolates line emission, the NIR variability is dominated by dust, and the two flaring epochs are real and linked. The only fitted numbers are blackbody parameters that the paper itself does not treat as significant. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Blackbody dust temperature and radius of the near-infrared excess = T ~ 1190 K median, 1340/1280 K at the two peak epochs; radius ~23.5 R_WD
    Fitted to the JHKs excess after subtracting the white dwarf model (Section 3.2). The paper states the temperature increase at the peaks is not statistically significant, so these values do not support the central correlation claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The model spectrum of WDJ2100+2122 from Rogers et al. (2023) is an accurate representation of the white dwarf photosphere, so subtracting it yields only circumstellar line flux.
    Used in Section 2.1 before integrating line fluxes; an incorrect model would shift all line fluxes and the derived variability.
  • domain assumption Near-infrared JHKs variability is dominated by thermal dust emission, not by gas emission lines that fall in these bands.
    Stated in Section 3.2 with the caveat that NIR gas lines may contribute to a portion of the variability; if that contribution is large, the dust-gas correlation weakens.
  • domain assumption The two bright epochs at MJD 59699 and 60161 are real astrophysical events whose alignment is not coincidence.
    The Pearson R=0.8 is given with no significance test in Section 3.3; with only two flaring epochs, chance alignment is not quantitatively excluded.
  • domain assumption Keplerian rotation and the inclination from Owens et al. (2023) are adopted to convert FWZI measurements to orbital radii.
    Used in Section 3.1 and Table 2; these radii are contextual and not load-bearing for the correlation claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simultaneous emission from dust and gas in the planetary debris orbiting a white dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DO6UJEIT

@misc{pith2026241207647,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simultaneous emission from dust and gas in the planetary debris orbiting a white dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DO6UJEIT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07647}
}
read the original abstract

There is increasing evidence for the presence and variability of circumstellar dust and gas around white dwarfs that are polluted with exoplanetary material, although the origin of this dust and gas remains debated. This paper presents the first near-simultaneous observations of both circumstellar dust (via broadband emission) and gas (via emission lines) around a polluted white dwarf. From the optical spectra the gaseous emission lines, notably the calcium infrared triplet and magnesium lines, show significant increases and decreases in their strength over timescales of weeks, while the oxygen and iron lines remain relatively stable. Near-infrared JHKs photometry reveals dust emission changes of up to 0.2 magnitudes in the Ks band over similar timescales, marking the shortest variability timescales observed to date. The two epochs with the strongest emission were correlated between the dust (Ks band brightening) and gas (strengthened calcium and magnesium lines), showing for the first time that the dust and gas must be produced near-simultaneously with a common origin, likely in collisions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07647 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The evolution of the Fe ii 5316 Å and Ca ii 8542 Å lines over time, with each spectrum being offset vertically such that time evolves upwards and the data are labelled with their MJD. As line fluxes are used, the emission strength for each line can be compared directly. There are two regions in time in which the calcium line increases in strength, yet no increase in strength is seen in the iron line. The top panels … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The line flux of the gas emission lines normalised to their median flux over time. The strong emission behaviour of the calcium lines is reflected in all 3 components of the infrared triplet and in the magnesium line, and the two strongest epochs are marked with vertical dashed lines at 59699 and 60161 MJDs. The oxygen and iron lines do not appear to vary in the same way as the calcium lines, but low level variabili… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top: The HAWKI J, H and Ks magnitudes plotted relative to their median magnitude and offset by 0.15 mags for clarity (horizontal lines show the median magnitude per band). Bottom: the gas emission line fluxes of one of the lines from the calcium infrared triplet (8542 Å), and one of the iron lines (5316 Å) normalised to their median flux over time (with the horizontal dotted line showing the new median flux, which a… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Effects of Magnetic Accretion on the Spatial Extent of White Dwarf Pollution

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetic channeling concentrates white dwarf pollution into small patches, makes metal lines vary as the star spins, and biases inferred accretion rates low.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    E., Farihi J., Jura M., Song I., Weinberger A

    Becklin E. E., Farihi J., Jura M., Song I., Weinberger A. J., Zuckerman B., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/497826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...632L.119B 632, L119

    doi:10.1086/497826 2005

  3. [3]

    W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-03869-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Natur.598..272B 598, 272

    Blackman J. W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-03869-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021Natur.598..272B 598, 272

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03869-6 2021

  4. [4]

    S., G \"a nsicke B

    Brinkworth C. S., G \"a nsicke B. T., Girven J. M., Hoard D. W., Marsh T. R., Parsons S. G., Koester D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/86 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...750...86B 750, 86

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/86 2012

  5. [5]

    G., Bonsor A., Malamud U., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.2404B 509, 2404

    Brouwers M. G., Bonsor A., Malamud U., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.2404B 509, 2404

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3009 2022

  6. [6]

    S., Iye M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

    Casali M., et al., 2006, in McLean I. S., Iye M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 6269, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy. p. 62690W, @doi 10.1117/12.670150

    work page doi:10.1117/12.670150 2006

  7. [7]

    J., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B

    Cunningham T., Wheatley P. J., Tremblay P.-E., G \"a nsicke B. T., King G. W., Toloza O., Veras D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-04300-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Natur.602..219C 602, 219

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04300-w 2022

  8. [8]

    H., Sigurdsson S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..556D 572, 556

    Debes J. H., Sigurdsson S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..556D 572, 556

    doi:10.1086/340291 2002

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    H., Kilic M., Faedi F., Shkolnik E

    Debes J. H., Kilic M., Faedi F., Shkolnik E. L., Lopez-Morales M., Weinberger A. J., Slesnick C., West R. G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...754...59D 754, 59

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    C., Debes J

    Dennihy E., Clemens J. C., Debes J. H., Dunlap B. H., Kilkenny D., O'Brien P. C., Fuchs J. T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ef2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...849...77D 849, 77

    2017 doi

  3. [11]

    C., Dunlap B

    Dennihy E., Clemens J. C., Dunlap B. H., Fanale S. M., Fuchs J. T., Hermes J. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa89b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854...40D 854, 40

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Dennihy E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905....5D 905, 5

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Dominik C., Decin G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...598..626D 598, 626

    2003 doi

  6. [15]

    Farihi J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2331 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2601F 481, 2601

    2018 doi

  7. [16]

    Farihi J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.1647F 511, 1647

    2022 doi

  8. [17]

    M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C

    Freudling W., Romaniello M., Bramich D. M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C. E., Moehler S., Neeser M. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...559A..96F 559, A96

    2013 doi

  9. [18]

    T., Marsh T

    G \"a nsicke B. T., Marsh T. R., Southworth J., Rebassa-Mansergas A., 2006, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1135033 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Sci...314.1908G 314, 1908

    2006 doi

  10. [19]

    T., Marsh T

    G \"a nsicke B. T., Marsh T. R., Southworth J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00343.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.380L..35G 380, L35

    2007

  11. [20]

    T., Koester D., Marsh T

    G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Marsh T. R., Rebassa-Mansergas A., Southworth J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00565.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.391L.103G 391, L103

    2008

  12. [21]

    T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L...7G 818, L7

    G \"a nsicke B. T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818L...7G 818, L7

    2016 doi

  13. [22]

    T., Schreiber M

    G \"a nsicke B. T., Schreiber M. R., Toloza O., Gentile Fusillo N. P., Koester D., Manser C. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1789-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.576...61G 576, 61

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.4570G 482, 4570

    Gentile Fusillo N. P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.4570G 482, 4570

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2707G 504, 2707

    Gentile Fusillo N. P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504.2707G 504, 2707

    2021 doi

  16. [25]

    A., Kutra T., Wu Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..236G 167, 236

    Goksu O. A., Kutra T., Wu Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..236G 167, 236

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    A., Hermes J

    Guidry J. A., Hermes J. J., De K., Ould Rouis L. B., Ewing B. B., Kaiser B. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5be7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...972..126G 972, 126

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    Hartmann S., Nagel T., Rauch T., Werner K., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116625 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...530A...7H 530, A7

    2011 doi

  19. [28]

    Hartmann S., Nagel T., Rauch T., Werner K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..44H 571, A44

    2014 doi

  20. [29]

    Jura M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/374036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...584L..91J 584, L91

    2003 doi

  21. [30]

    Jura M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/5/1785 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.1785J 135, 1785

    2008 doi

  22. [31]

    D., 2014, @doi [Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences] 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AREPS..42...45J 42, 45

    Jura M., Young E. D., 2014, @doi [Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences] 10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-054740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AREPS..42...45J 42, 45

    2014 doi

  23. [32]

    Jura M., Farihi J., Zuckerman B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518767 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663.1285J 663, 1285

    2007 doi

  24. [33]

    J., Bromley B

    Kenyon S. J., Bromley B. C., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7b85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844..116K 844, 116

    doi

  25. [34]

    J., Bromley B

    Kenyon S. J., Bromley B. C., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9570 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...50K 850, 50

    doi

  26. [35]

    K., Winget D

    Kilic M., von Hippel T., Leggett S. K., Winget D. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/504682 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...646..474K 646, 474

    2006 doi

  27. [36]

    Kissler-Patig M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...491..941K 491, 941

    2008 doi

  28. [37]

    T., Farihi J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..34K 566, A34

    Koester D., G \"a nsicke B. T., Farihi J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423691 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...566A..34K 566, A34

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    Lai S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920..156L 920, 156

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    A., Vanderburg A., Stevenson K

    Limbach M. A., Vanderburg A., Stevenson K. B., Blouin S., Morley C., Lustig-Yaeger J., Soares-Furtado M., Janson M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2823 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.2622L 517, 2622

    2022 doi

  31. [40]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad74ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973L..11L 973, L11

    Limbach M. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad74ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973L..11L 973, L11

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    Malamud U., Grishin E., Brouwers M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.3806M 501, 3806

    2021 doi

  33. [42]

    J., et al., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.4467M 455, 4467

    Manser C. J., et al., 2016a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2603 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.4467M 455, 4467

    doi

  34. [43]

    J., G \"a nsicke B

    Manser C. J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Marsh T. R., Southworth J., 2016b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1760 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.1461M 462, 1461

    doi

  35. [44]

    J., et al., 2019, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aat5330 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...364...66M 364, 66

    Manser C. J., et al., 2019, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aat5330 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Sci...364...66M 364, 66

    2019 doi

  36. [45]

    J., G \"a nsicke B

    Manser C. J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Gentile Fusillo N. P., Ashley R., Breedt E., Hollands M., Izquierdo P., Pelisoli I., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa359 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.2127M 493, 2127

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    Melis C., Jura M., Albert L., Klein B., Zuckerman B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1078M 722, 1078

    2010 doi

  38. [47]

    Melis C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/751/1/L4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751L...4M 751, L4

    2012 doi

  39. [48]

    E., Weinberger A., Zuckerman B., Dufour P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdfa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905...56M 905, 56

    Melis C., Klein B., Doyle A. E., Weinberger A., Zuckerman B., Dufour P., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdfa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...905...56M 905, 56

    2020 doi

  40. [49]

    Meng H. Y. A., et al., 2014, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1255153 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Sci...345.1032M 345, 1032

    2014 doi

  41. [50]

    D., Rafikov R

    Metzger B. D., Rafikov R. R., Bochkarev K. V., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20895.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.423..505M 423, 505

    2012

  42. [51]

    E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962L..32M 962, L32

    Mullally S. E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962L..32M 962, L32

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    Owens D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/accc25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166....5O 166, 5

    2023 doi

  44. [53]

    Pirard J.-F., et al., 2004, in Moorwood A. F. M., Iye M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy. pp 1763--1772, @doi 10.1117/12.578293

    2004 doi

  45. [54]

    Poulsen S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad374c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..257P 167, 257

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01096.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416L..55R 416, L55

    Rafikov R. R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01096.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416L..55R 416, L55

    2011

  47. [56]

    M., Torres S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.3990R 489, 3990

    Rebassa-Mansergas A., Solano E., Xu S., Rodrigo C., Jim \'e nez-Esteban F. M., Torres S., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2423 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.3990R 489, 3990

    2019 doi

  48. [57]

    K., Xu S., Bonsor A., Hodgkin S., Su K

    Rogers L. K., Xu S., Bonsor A., Hodgkin S., Su K. Y. L., von Hippel T., Jura M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa873 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2861R 494, 2861

    2020 doi

  49. [58]

    K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.tmp.3437R

    Rogers L. K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.tmp.3437R

    2023 doi

  50. [59]

    K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1530R

    Rogers L. K., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1520 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.tmp.1530R

    2024 doi

  51. [60]

    Siebenmorgen R., Carraro G., Valenti E., Petr-Gotzens M., Brammer G., Garcia E., Casali M., 2011, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Msngr.144....9S 144, 9

    2011

  52. [61]

    Steele A., Debes J., Xu S., Yeh S., Dufour P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...911...25S 911, 25

    2021 doi

  53. [62]

    G., 2019, MNRAS:L, 484, L109

    Swan A., Farihi J., Wilson T. G., 2019, MNRAS:L, 484, L109

    2019

  54. [63]

    G., Parsons S

    Swan A., Farihi J., Wilson T. G., Parsons S. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.5233S 496, 5233

    2020 doi

  55. [64]

    J., Farihi J., Dennihy E., G \"a nsicke B

    Swan A., Kenyon S. J., Farihi J., Dennihy E., G \"a nsicke B. T., Hermes J. J., Melis C., von Hippel T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1738 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506..432S 506, 432

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    Swan A., Farihi J., Su K. Y. L., Desch S. J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529L..41S 529, L41

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...41V 917, 41

    Vanderbosch Z. P., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...41V 917, 41

    2021 doi

  58. [67]

    A., Rappaport S., Bieryla A., Irwin J., et al., 2015, Nature, 526, 546

    Vanderburg A., Johnson J. A., Rappaport S., Bieryla A., Irwin J., et al., 2015, Nature, 526, 546

    2015

  59. [68]

    Vanderburg A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-020-2713-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Natur.585..363V 585, 363

    2020 doi

  60. [69]

    Vernet J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117752 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...536A.105V 536, A105

    2011 doi

  61. [70]

    Wang T.-g., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab53ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886L...5W 886, L5

    2019 doi

  62. [71]

    J., G \"a nsicke B

    Wilson D. J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Raddi R., Breedt E., Southworth J., Parsons S. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1878W 445, 1878

    2014 doi

  63. [72]

    J., G \"a nsicke B

    Wilson D. J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Koester D., Toloza O., Pala A. F., Breedt E., Parsons S. G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1201 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.3237W 451, 3237

    2015 doi

  64. [73]

    G., Farihi J., G \"a nsicke B

    Wilson T. G., Farihi J., G \"a nsicke B. T., Swan A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487..133W 487, 133

    2019 doi

  65. [74]

    Xu S., Jura M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/792/2/L39 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792L..39X 792, L39

    2014 doi

  66. [75]

    Xu S., Jura M., Dufour P., Zuckerman B., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/816/2/L22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...816L..22X 816, L22

    2016 doi

  67. [76]

    Xu S., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadcfe , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..108X 866, 108

    2018 doi

  68. [77]

    Xu S., Lai S., Dennihy E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902..127X 902, 127

    2020 doi

  69. [78]

    Xu S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad3737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..248X 167, 248

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    N., H \"u nsch M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..477Z 596, 477

    Zuckerman B., Koester D., Reid I. N., H \"u nsch M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..477Z 596, 477

    2003 doi

  71. [80]

    Zuckerman B., Melis C., Klein B., Koester D., Jura M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/1/725 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722..725Z 722, 725

    2010 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.