Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Thermally Drawn Bioelectric Catheters: Enabling Proprioceptive Endovascular Navigation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A thermally drawn 16-electrode catheter can localize itself continuously in a vascular phantom by fusing electric distance estimates with vessel-geometry impedance features, letting a surgeon and a lay person navigate to a target within 3…

desk verdict A genuine engineering advance in bioelectric catheter fabrication and real-time tracking, but the headline accuracy figures rest on fragile distance estimates and in-phantom-only validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.19326 v2 pith:DPRDYWTA submitted 2025-04-27 physics.med-ph

Alex Ranne , Heiko Maier , Jinshi Zhao , Songli Moey , Ayhan Aktas , Manik Chana , Burak Temelkuran , Nassir Navab
show 1 more author
Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-ph
keywords BioelectricnavigationThermaldrawingImpedancesensingCatheterlocalizationDynamictimewarpingEndovascularsurgeryAbdominalaorticaneurysmProprioceptive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that a catheter can navigate inside blood vessels using only the electric impedance of its surroundings, with no X-ray imaging. To that end the authors build a custom 6 Fr catheter with 16 electrodes using 3D printing, thermal drawing, and laser micro-machining, and they design a tracking pipeline called devDTW that fuses two electric signals: vessel-geometry features and distance travelled. In a silicone model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, an endovascular surgeon and a lay person steered the catheter to a simulated stent-graft landing site using only the system's display, reaching an average target accuracy of 3 mm RMS with the anchor-based refinement and 8.3 mm RMS live tracking. If these numbers transfer beyond the phantom, this would be the first demonstration of continuous, real-time, fluoroscopy-free catheter localization from bioelectric sensing alone, reducing radiation and contrast-agent exposure in procedures like stent-graft repair.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the devDTW pipeline: a three-dimensional dynamic time warping algorithm that matches the live impedance signal, resampled to 1 mm steps using electric distance estimates, against a database of simulated reference signals built from a base centerline plus off-centerline deviations. The key addition is the anchor-region refinement: high-variance stretches of the live signal are matched robustly, and the catheter position is computed from the reference index of the most recent anchors plus the estimated distance moved since passing them. This fusion is what turns a scalar impedance trace into a continuous centerline position while allowing pull-backs and re-advances, because the distance estimates strip non-monotonic motion before matching. The other half of the machinery is the manufacturing pipeline of 3D-printed polycarbonate preforms, wire feeding during the draw, thermal drawing, femtosecond laser micromachining for electrode windows, and laser spot welding.

What would settle it

Run the same phantom navigation while deliberately alternating wall-pressed and centred catheter paths through the aneurysm, comparing the anchor-based output against an electromagnetic ground truth. If the 3 mm RMS target accuracy appears only when the wall-pressed renal feature is visible, or if centring the catheter introduces a drift larger than the reported tracking error because the distance estimate underestimates travel in wide vessels, the central claim does not survive outside the phantom.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that bioelectric navigation can be promoted from branch classification to continuous real-time localization by fusing two previously separate electric signals: tetrapolar (four-electrode) impedance features that change with vessel geometry, and electric distance estimates that measure how far the catheter has travelled. On a prototype 6 Fr polycarbonate catheter with 16 electrodes made by thermal drawing, the authors show that the two signals can be resampled onto a common millimetre abscissa and matched against finite-element simulated reference signals using deviation-based dynamic time warping (devDTW), with an anchor-based refinement that locks onto high-variation regions of the signal. In an anatomically realistic phantom, this pipeline tracked the catheter with 8.3 mm RMS error during live navigation and let an endovascular surgeon and a lay user place a simulated stent-graft landing zone within 3 mm RMS of the target using only the system's display. The authors also show that the catheter's mechanical properties are comparable to or better than a commercial 6 Fr catheter in bending and torsion, and that its impedance recordings reproduce the expected inverse relationship between impedance and vessel cross-section.

Load-bearing premise

The navigation result rests on the assumption that the electrically estimated distance the catheter has travelled is accurate enough to reshape the impedance signal and carry the anchor positions forward; the paper reports mean distance errors up to -10.2% and expects systematic underestimation in real tissue, so if that bias is not controlled the 3 mm target accuracy cannot transfer beyond the phantom.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 8.3 mm RMS live tracking and 3 mm RMS target accuracy hold, endovascular navigation can be done in real time with no fluoroscopy, removing radiation exposure and the need for nephrotoxic contrast agents in the phantom context.
  • The back-and-forth handling that surgeons use to reposition devices is supported, because the distance-estimate preprocessing strips non-monotonic motion before matching, removing a key limitation of prior bioelectric branch classification.
  • The 16-electrode layout with a proximal tetrapolar configuration lets one tracking run address two EVAR landmarks at once, such as the renal-artery ostium and the iliac bifurcation, on a single catheter.
  • The manufacturing route of 3D-printed preforms plus thermal drawing can produce 21 m of catheter body in one draw, so electrode distributions could be tuned to a patient's anatomy rather than fixed by extrusion dies.
  • The surgeon's reported workload, with low temporal demand, very low frustration, and lower effort with the anchor-based display, suggests the proprioceptive interface does not add heavy cognitive load.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the anchor-region idea is not specific to bioelectric impedance; any catheter sensor that yields strong local landmarks plus a weak odometry signal could use the same deviation-based matching and anchor propagation to localize itself.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's own distance-error data point to the main transfer risk, so the natural next test is to fuse distance estimates from several electrode configurations and reject inconsistent estimates before resampling, which could remove the systematic underestimation the authors expect in tissue.
  • Editorial inference: because renal-branch features appear only when the catheter touches the wall, a practical system may need to deliberately seek wall contact at known landmarks or use radially arranged electrodes, rather than assuming the feature is always visible.
  • Editorial inference: the spare 250 µm sensor channel could carry a shape sensor, turning the single-point centerline estimate into a curve and resolving the off-centerline position ambiguity that currently creates phantom artifacts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents two contributions. First, it describes a manufacturing pipeline for bespoke 6 Fr electrode catheters using 3D-printed preforms, thermal drawing, femtosecond laser micromachining, and laser spot welding, yielding 16 electrodes, a guidewire channel, and an auxiliary sensor lumen; the catheter is mechanically characterized against a commercial device and electrically validated in simple and anatomically realistic phantoms. Second, it introduces a real-time localization pipeline that fuses tetrapolar impedance-based vascular feature matching via a new deviation-based dynamic time warping (devDTW) algorithm with electric displacement estimates from prior work [22], evaluated in an AAA phantom with an expert endovascular surgeon and a lay person navigating without fluoroscopy. The claimed headline results are 8.3 mm RMS tracking accuracy for the robust-feature approach A2 and an average 3 mm RMS target accuracy for the anchor-based technique. This is framed as the first demonstration of continuous, real-time, fluoroscopy-free, bioelectric-only catheter localization.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this would be a meaningful step for bioelectric navigation: it moves from post-hoc branch classification to real-time continuous centerline localization, and it demonstrates that an experienced surgeon can act on the feedback. The engineering contribution is substantial: the thermally drawn, wire-embedded catheter with bespoke electrode placement is a genuine advance in prototyping capability, and the electrical validation against FEM simulations is a strength. The authors are also transparent about distance-estimation errors, radial-position-dependent feature visibility, and the single-phantom nature of the evaluation, all of which are useful for the community. However, the central accuracy claims rest on favorable evaluation conditions and on an unquantified dependence on the electric distance estimator, so the significance is currently more at the level of a promising feasibility demonstration than an established performance level.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4.3, Figure 8A/B] The headline tracking accuracy of 8.3 mm RMS and the 3 mm RMS target accuracy are computed over the best four of five runs after excluding the worst run, but no outlier criterion is specified and the distribution of the excluded runs is not reported. Since the manuscript explicitly notes that some runs had high target errors, especially with approach A1, the reported numbers may substantially overstate the typical performance. The abstract and discussion state these numbers without qualification, which is misleading. Please report per-run errors, the outlier exclusion rule, all-run statistics, and per-user results, and qualify the headline numbers accordingly.
  2. [Sections 4.11, 2.4.3 (approach A2), and 2.4.2] The tracking pipeline critically depends on electric distance estimates from [22]: Section 4.11 uses them to discard non-monotonous signal segments and resample live impedance signals at 1 mm intervals, and approach A2 propagates anchor positions by adding the estimated distance dS to the matched reference index. Yet Section 2.4.2 reports mean distance errors up to -10.2% of traveled distance, standard deviations up to 4.4 times those in [22], forward/backward differences up to 6.9%, and the strongest underestimation in the large-diameter sections S3-S5. The paper does not quantify how these distance errors propagate into the final position estimates; no ablation replacing the electric distance with EM ground-truth distance in the preprocessing and anchor steps is provided. Without such an analysis, it is unclear whether the reported 8.3 mm and 3 mm accuracies are intrinsic to the fusion method or are absorbing favorable phantom-specific distance estimates. This is the central load-bearing gap in the tracking evaluation.
  3. [Section 2.4.3, Figure 7D-a] The reference database used for devDTW is built from FEM simulations of the same silicon AAA phantom used in the evaluation, with off-centerline trajectories hand-designed from that same phantom. The reported accuracies are therefore in-distribution measures: they demonstrate that the pipeline can localize a catheter inside a phantom whose simulated reference signals were created from the same geometry, conductivity, and catheter trajectory assumptions. No test on a different phantom geometry, a different saline conductivity, or a different catheter configuration is presented. The Discussion acknowledges some related limitations, but the quantitative claims in the abstract and conclusion should be explicitly scoped as single-phantom, in-distribution results, or supported by at least one additional validation condition.
  4. [Section 2.4.3, Figure 8] The real-time navigation evaluation involves one expert endovascular surgeon and one lay person, with no indication of how many repeated runs per user were performed beyond the 'five runs' used for the best-four analysis. With a single expert participant and no statistical model of run-to-run variability, the comparison between approaches A1 and A2 and the reported RMS values have very limited inferential power. This is acceptable for a feasibility demonstration, but the text should avoid presenting the numerical accuracies as stable performance characteristics; per-run trajectories, medians, and confidence intervals should be shown, and the single-participant nature of the usability claims (including the NASA-TLX results) should be stated prominently.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1] There is a typo: 'nozzel temperature' should be 'nozzle temperature', and the superscripts in 'Tg=112 o− 113oC' should be formatted consistently.
  2. [Section 2.4.2] The manufacturer name 'Elastrat S` arl' appears garbled; please correct the company name and add details of the phantom model.
  3. [Section 2.4.3 and Figure 8] Please state explicitly how many runs each user performed in each scenario, and whether 'best four' means best four of five per user/scenario or best four of the pooled runs; the current text is ambiguous.
  4. [Section 4.11] The phrase '17 times per second' is system-specific; clarify that this is the sampling rate of the Eliko system with the chosen multiplexer configuration.
  5. [Throughout] The manuscript uses 'S` arl.', 'Dassult', 'continously', and other small typographical errors; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found: the tracking pipeline is evaluated against external EM ground truth, and the distance-estimation input from prior work is independently measured rather than fitted to the target.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims—8.3 mm RMS tracking error and 3 mm RMS target error—are empirical measurements, not derivations from fitted parameters. The live position estimate is formed by devDTW matching against simulated reference signals and, in approach A2, by adding the electrically estimated displacement dS to an anchor's matched reference index (Section 2.4.3). The output is then compared with an electromagnetic tracker: 'We mounted an EM tracker next to the sensing electrodes to obtain a ground truth catheter location' and 'The distance error is calculated as the difference between ground truth and the electrically estimated distance' (Section 2.4.2). The distance estimator is inherited from self-cited work [22], but the present paper re-evaluates it on its own catheter against EM ground truth, reporting mean errors between +1.1% and -10.2% and standard deviations up to 4.4 times higher than [22], rather than assuming [22]'s numbers. Those error characteristics are correctness and generalization limitations, not circularity: biased distance estimates could propagate into the A2 anchor positions, but the predicted positions are not defined as the distance estimates and are not fitted to the EM target. The anchoring threshold and DTW derivative weighting are tuned heuristically, not to the final target error. The in-distribution reference database, simulated on the same phantom used for testing, weakens external validity but does not make the evaluation circular because the error metric is independent of the reference construction. The authors also explicitly flag transfer limitations, including expected systematic underestimation of traveled distance in real tissue and reduced tracking performance without an aneurysm, which further shows that the reported accuracy is a measured phantom result rather than a circularly constructed prediction. No equation equates an output to an input by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests solely on a self-citation without independent support.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities or conserved quantities are introduced. The paper contributes a manufacturing pipeline and a matching algorithm. The ledger shows that the central claim rests on prior physical models (static conduction FEM, inverse impedance-area relationship, displacement formula from [22]) and on algorithmic parameters tuned for this phantom.

free parameters (4)
  • Anchor region variance threshold = 0.025 (standard deviation)
    Set empirically in Section 4.13 to include most non-plateau regions; affects which indices are selected as anchors and thus the A2 position estimates.
  • Derivative weighting factor = ratio of mean absolute signal to mean absolute derivative of centerline simulation
    Section 4.12: weights signal-value error against derivative error in devDTW. Derived from the centerline reference signal, not from held-out data.
  • Electrode spacings dstim and ddet = 29 mm and 3 mm
    Chosen based on phantom geometry and literature [46,47,48]; a patient- and intervention-specific parameter affecting BN feature sensitivity and distance estimation accuracy.
  • Normalization baseline = mean of first 5 mm of resampled signal
    Section 4.11: used to normalize live and reference signals; a methodological choice that affects matching in low-feature regions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Static current conduction FEM (Elmer) accurately simulates tetrapolar impedance in the saline-filled phantom.
    Used to build the reference signal database (Section 4.7); if inaccurate, devDTW matches against wrong references.
  • domain assumption Local tetrapolar impedance is inversely proportional to vessel cross-sectional area.
    Core BN assumption inherited from [49] and used to interpret signals (Section 2.4.1); stated to hold in tissue by [49,53].
  • domain assumption The displacement estimation formula of Maier et al. [22] remains valid for this catheter and phantom.
    Used for distance estimation, signal resampling, and anchor propagation (Sections 2.4.2, 4.11); the paper reports larger errors than [22], so this is load-bearing.
  • ad hoc to paper The catheter's live impedance signal after resampling by distance estimates is comparable to centerline-based simulation references.
    Preprocessing in Section 4.11 discards non-monotonic segments and resamples at 1 mm using potentially biased distance estimates; if distances are biased, the signal is warped and matching may fail.
  • domain assumption Surrounding tissue does not break the inverse impedance-area relationship.
    Section 3: extrapolation to real tissue relies on [49,53]; not tested here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermally Drawn Bioelectric Catheters: Enabling Proprioceptive Endovascular Navigation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPRDYWTA

@misc{pith2026250419326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermally Drawn Bioelectric Catheters: Enabling Proprioceptive Endovascular Navigation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPRDYWTA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.19326}
}
read the original abstract

To navigate medical instruments safely and accurately inside a patient's vascular tree, combining X-ray fluoroscopy with intermittent contrast injections is the gold standard. However, prolonged exposure to ionizing radiation poses health risks, necessitates the use of cumbersome lead vests for the clinicians, and contrast injections can lead to acute kidney injury in patients. Bioelectric Navigation, a non-fluoroscopic tracking modality, aims to provide an alternative. It uses weak electric currents to detect local anatomical features in the vasculature and localize instruments without x-ray imaging. In this work, we advance Bioelectric Navigation on two frontiers. Firstly, we introduce a new class of bespokely designed electrode catheters. They are fabricated using 3D printing, thermal drawing, and laser micro-machining. Specifically, we manufacture a 6 Fr catheter incorporating 16 electrodes, a guidewire channel and an additional sensor compartment. We thoroughly assess the catheter's mechanical and electrical properties. Secondly, we introduce an algorithm to localize the catheter along the centerline of a vascular phantom, for the first time fusing electric detection of vascular geometry with electric distance estimation. We report both tracking accuracy and usability evaluated by an expert endovascular surgeon, demonstrating the strong potential of this technology for integration into the existing clinical workflow.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.19326 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 16-electrode catheter for Bioelectric Navigation (BN) in endovascular surgery. A) An illustration showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mechanical characterization. A) Photograph of catheters produced in a single draw. B) Time evolution of catheter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detailed schematic for electrode assembly. A) Using femtosecond laser micro-machining to open windows on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of electrode distribution. Sensing electrodes are indicated in green, injection electrodes in purple. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In vitro and in silico evaluation of impedance sensing in a simple phantom. (A) Comparison of recordings from our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In-Vitro and In-Silico characterization of impedance sensing for our prototype in an anatomically realistic phantom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Live tracking setup and pipeline. (A,B) the catheter configurations and target locations of scenario S1 and S2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Tracking results. (A,B) Target RMS errors (final EM location vs. intended target) achieved by the users, either [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Extending bioelectric navigation for displace- ment and direction detection

    Heiko Maier, Heribert Schunkert, and Nassir Navab. Extending bioelectric navigation for displace- ment and direction detection. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery , 18(7):1253–1260, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Kaplan’s cardiac anesthesia: In cardiac and noncardiac surgery

    Joel A Kaplan. Kaplan’s cardiac anesthesia: In cardiac and noncardiac surgery . Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [2]

    Interventional radiology: a survival guide

    David Kessel and Iain Robertson. Interventional radiology: a survival guide . Elsevier Health Sciences, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    Vascular and endovascular surgery E-book: companion to specialist surgical practice

    Jonathan D Beard, Peter A Gaines, and Ian Loftus. Vascular and endovascular surgery E-book: companion to specialist surgical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013. 19 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues

    Mahadevappa Mahesh. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics, 21(4):1033– 1045, 2001

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Radiation risk to the fluoroscopy operator and staff

    Cosette M Stahl, Quinn C Meisinger, Michael P Andre, Thomas B Kinney, and Isabel G Newton. Radiation risk to the fluoroscopy operator and staff. American Journal of Roentgenology, 207(4):737– 744, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    Contrast induced nephropathy in vascular surgery

    GTC Wong, EYP Lee, and MG Irwin. Contrast induced nephropathy in vascular surgery. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia , 117(suppl 2):ii63–ii73, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Ra- diation exposure and contrast agent use during endovascular aortic repair using mobile versus fixed angiography systems

    Amir Arnautovic, Waseem Garabet, Reinhold Thomas Ziegler, Joscha Mulorz, S¨ onke Maximilian Braß, Alexander Oberhuber, Hubert Schelzig, Markus Udo Wagenh¨ auser, and Philip Dueppers. Ra- diation exposure and contrast agent use during endovascular aortic repair using mobile versus fixed angiography systems. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease...

    work page 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Current state of mri-guided endovascular arterial interventions: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

    Han Nijsink, Christiaan G Overduin, Loes H Willems, Michiel C Warl´ e, and Jurgen J F¨ utterer. Current state of mri-guided endovascular arterial interventions: A systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 56(5):1322–1342, 2022

    2022

  2. [9]

    Mri-guided endovascular intervention: current methods and future potential

    Bridget F Kilbride, Kazim H Narsinh, Caroline D Jordan, Kerstin Mueller, Teri Moore, Alastair J Martin, Mark W Wilson, and Steven W Hetts. Mri-guided endovascular intervention: current methods and future potential. Expert review of medical devices , 19(10):763–778, 2022

    2022

  3. [10]

    State of the art and future opportunities in mri-guided robot-assisted surgery and interventions

    Hao Su, Ka-Wai Kwok, Kevin Cleary, Iulian Iordachita, M Cenk Cavusoglu, Jaydev P Desai, and Gregory S Fischer. State of the art and future opportunities in mri-guided robot-assisted surgery and interventions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 110(7):968–992, 2022

    2022

  4. [11]

    Thermally drawn polymeric catheters for mr-guided cardiovascular intervention.Advanced Science, page 2407704, 2024

    Mohamed EMK Abdelaziz, Libaihe Tian, Thomas Lottner, Simon Reiss, Timo Heidt, Alexander Maier, Klaus D¨ uring, Constantin von zur M¨ uhlen, Michael Bock, Eric Yeatman, et al. Thermally drawn polymeric catheters for mr-guided cardiovascular intervention.Advanced Science, page 2...

    2024

  5. [12]

    PA Sandhya, RS Mohil, and R Sricharan. Randomised controlled study to compare radiofrequency ablation with minimally invasive ultrasound-guided non-flush ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins. The Annals of The Royal College of Surge...

    2020

  6. [13]

    Comparison of ultrasound- guided endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency for the varicose veins treatment: An updated meta-analysis

    Guangzhi He, Chenhong Zheng, Ming-An Yu, and Hongpeng Zhang. Comparison of ultrasound- guided endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency for the varicose veins treatment: An updated meta-analysis. International journal of surgery , 39:267–275, 2017

    2017

  7. [14]

    First experience using intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal aortic aneurysms

    Reinhard Kopp, Werner Z¨ urn, Rolf Weidenhagen, Georgios Meimarakis, and Dirk A Clevert. First experience using intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound during endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery , 51(5):1103–1110, 2010

    2010

  8. [15]

    Ultrasound- guided endovascular treatment for vascular access malfunction: results in 4896 cases

    Masanori Wakabayashi, Sayaka Hanada, Hiroyuki Nakano, and Tsunemichi Wakabayashi. Ultrasound- guided endovascular treatment for vascular access malfunction: results in 4896 cases. The Journal of Vascular Access, 14(3):225–230, 2013

    2013

  9. [16]

    Ultrasound physics and technology: how, why and when

    Vivien Gibbs, David Cole, and Antonio Sassano. Ultrasound physics and technology: how, why and when. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011

    2011

  10. [17]

    Shape accuracy of fiber optic sensing for medical devices characterized in bench experiments

    Mischa Megens, Merel D Leistikow, Anneke van Dusschoten, Martin B van der Mark, Jeroen JL Horikx, Elbert G van Putten, and Gert W’t Hooft. Shape accuracy of fiber optic sensing for medical devices characterized in bench experiments. Medical Physics, 48(7):3936–3947, 2021

    2021

  11. [18]

    3d visualisation of navigation catheters for endovascular procedures using a 3d hub and fiber optic 20 REFERENCES REFERENCES realshape technology: phantom study results

    Torre M Bydlon, Alyssa Torjesen, Steven Fokkenrood, Alessandra Di Tullio, and Molly L Flexman. 3d visualisation of navigation catheters for endovascular procedures using a 3d hub and fiber optic 20 REFERENCES REFERENCES realshape technology: phantom study results. In EJVES Vas...

    2023

  12. [19]

    First in human clinical feasibility study of endovascular navigation with fiber optic realshape (fors) technology

    Joost A van Herwaarden, Marloes M Jansen, Evert-jan PA Vonken, Trijntje Bloemert-Tuin, Roland WM Bullens, Gert J de Borst, and Constantijn EVB Hazenberg. First in human clinical feasibility study of endovascular navigation with fiber optic realshape (fors) technology. European...

    2021

  13. [20]

    Biologically inspired catheter for endovascular sensing and navigation

    Erin E Sutton, Bernhard Fuerst, Reza Ghotbi, Noah J Cowan, and Nassir Navab. Biologically inspired catheter for endovascular sensing and navigation. Scientific reports, 10(1):5643, 2020

    2020

  14. [21]

    Feature-based electromagnetic tracking registration using bioelectric sensing.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(6):3286–3293, 2023

    Ardit Ramadani, Heiko Maier, Felix Bourier, Christian Meierhofer, Peter Ewert, Heribert Schunkert, and Nassir Navab. Feature-based electromagnetic tracking registration using bioelectric sensing.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 8(6):3286–3293, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Intravascular catheters — sterile and single-use catheters — part 1: General requirements

    International Organization for Standardization. Intravascular catheters — sterile and single-use catheters — part 1: General requirements. Standard ISO 10555-1:2023, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    McDaniel

    Benjamin D. McDaniel. Medical devices having an atraumatic distal tip segment, Apr 2007

    2007

  17. [25]

    Stehr, Martin M

    Richard E. Stehr, Martin M. Grasse, and Allan M. Fuentes. Medical devices having an atraumatic distal tip segment, Mar 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Design and experiments of extrusion die for polypropylene five-lumen micro tube

    Guo-Bao Jin, Min-Jie Wang, Dan-Yang Zhao, Hui-Qing Tian, and Yi-Fei Jin. Design and experiments of extrusion die for polypropylene five-lumen micro tube. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214(1):50–59, 2014

    2014

  19. [27]

    Extrudate swelling: Physics, models, and computations

    Roger I Tanner. Extrudate swelling: Physics, models, and computations. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 48(10):689–708, 1995

    1995

  20. [28]

    Vishav M. S. Aujla. Catheter with split electrode sleeve and related methods, Apr 2007

    2007

  21. [29]

    Catheter with improved loop contraction and greater contraction displacement, Mar 2017

    Ricardo Padilla, Homero Padilla, Julie Bui, Mario Solis, Thomas Selkee, Jose Jimenez, Keshava Datta, and Fernando Salazar. Catheter with improved loop contraction and greater contraction displacement, Mar 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Hjelle, Katharina Musiol, and Christiane Leitold

    Mark A. Hjelle, Katharina Musiol, and Christiane Leitold. Catheter with segmented electrodes and methods of making same, Jul 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Mechanical performance of 3d-printed biocompatible polycarbonate for biomechanical applications

    Giovanni G´ omez-Gras, Manuel D Abad, and Marco A P´ erez. Mechanical performance of 3d-printed biocompatible polycarbonate for biomechanical applications. Polymers, 13(21):3669, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    Fiberbots: Robotic fibers for high-precision minimally invasive surgery

    Mohamed EMK Abdelaziz, Jinshi Zhao, Bruno Gil Rosa, Hyun-Taek Lee, Daniel Simon, Khushi Vyas, Bing Li, Hanifa Koguna, Yue Li, Ali Anil Demircali, et al. Fiberbots: Robotic fibers for high-precision minimally invasive surgery. Science advances, 10(3):eadj1984, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Fabrication of fibers with complex features using thermal drawing of 3d-printed preforms

    Ali Anil Demircali, Jinshi Zhao, Ayhan Aktas, Mohamed EMK Abdelaziz, and Burak Temelkuran. Fabrication of fibers with complex features using thermal drawing of 3d-printed preforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00741, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Frank H. Jr. Boehm and Janice L. Stone. Endovascular catheter with multiple capabilities, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Complications of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms: management and prevention

    Yon Kwon Ihn, Shang Hun Shin, Seung Kug Baik, and In Sup Choi. Complications of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms: management and prevention. Interventional Neuroradiology, 24(3):237–245, 2018. 21 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2018

  28. [36]

    Vascular perforation during coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm: the incidence, mechanism, and clinical outcome

    Chang-Woo Ryu, Chul-Young Lee, Jun Seok Koh, Seok Keun Choi, and Eui Jong Kim. Vascular perforation during coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm: the incidence, mechanism, and clinical outcome. Neurointervention, 6(1):17–22, 2011

    2011

  29. [37]

    Unraveling the influence of thermal drawing parameters on the microstructure and thermo–mechanical properties of multimaterial fibers

    In` es Richard, Anjani K Maurya, Shahrzad Shadman, Elo¨ ıse Masquelier, Lison S Marthey, Antonia Neels, and Fabien Sorin. Unraveling the influence of thermal drawing parameters on the microstructure and thermo–mechanical properties of multimaterial fibers. Small, 18(4):2101392, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Cardiac catheterisation: avoiding common pitfalls with transradial vascular access

    Matthew Sadler and Clive Lawson. Cardiac catheterisation: avoiding common pitfalls with transradial vascular access. The British Journal of Cardiology , 30(3):21, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    What knot to do: retrieval of a kinked and trapped coronary catheter

    Shahbaz A Malik, Ganesh Gajanan, Yiannis S Chatzizisis, and Edward L O’Leary. What knot to do: retrieval of a kinked and trapped coronary catheter. Case Reports, 2(11):1657–1661, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Molecular dynamics simulation of entangled melts at high rates: identifying entanglement lockup mechanism leading to true strain hardening

    Yexin Zheng, Mesfin Tsige, and Shi-Qing Wang. Molecular dynamics simulation of entangled melts at high rates: identifying entanglement lockup mechanism leading to true strain hardening. Macro- molecular Rapid Communications, 44(1):2200159, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Entangle- ment density-dependent energy absorption of polycarbonate films via supersonic fracture

    Edwin P Chan, Wanting Xie, Sara V Orski, Jae-Hwang Lee, and Christopher L Soles. Entangle- ment density-dependent energy absorption of polycarbonate films via supersonic fracture. ACS macro letters, 8(7):806–811, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Objective assessment of endovascular navigation skills with force sensing

    Hedyeh Rafii-Tari, Christopher J Payne, Colin Bicknell, Ka-Wai Kwok, Nicholas JW Cheshire, Celia Riga, and Guang-Zhong Yang. Objective assessment of endovascular navigation skills with force sensing. Annals of biomedical engineering, 45:1315–1327, 2017

    2017

  35. [43]

    Therapeutic ultrasound angioplasty: the risk of arterial perforation

    Mark P Wylie, Garrett B McGuinness, and Graham P Gavin. Therapeutic ultrasound angioplasty: the risk of arterial perforation. an in vitro study. In 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society , pages 282–285. IEEE, 2009

    2009

  36. [44]

    A comparison of permanent electrical connections

    GW Mills. A comparison of permanent electrical connections. Bell System Technical Journal , 43(3):1067–1102, 1964

    1964

  37. [45]

    Laser spot micro- welding of ultra-thin steel sheet

    Quanhong Li, Zhongyan Mu, Manlelan Luo, Anguo Huang, and Shengyong Pang. Laser spot micro- welding of ultra-thin steel sheet. Micromachines, 12(3):342, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Measurement of coronary lumen area using an impedance catheter: finite element model and in vitro validation

    Ghassan S Kassab, Eugen R Lontis, and Hans Gregersen. Measurement of coronary lumen area using an impedance catheter: finite element model and in vitro validation. Annals of biomedical engineering, 32:1642–1653, 2004

    2004

  39. [47]

    Novel method for measure- ment of medium size arterial lumen area with an impedance catheter: in vivo validation

    Ghassan S Kassab, Eugen R Lontis, Arne Hørlyck, and Hans Gregersen. Novel method for measure- ment of medium size arterial lumen area with an impedance catheter: in vivo validation. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology , 288(4):H2014–H2020, 2005

    2005

  40. [48]

    Effect of radial position on volume measurements using the conductance catheter

    JC Woodard, CD Bertram, and BS Gow. Effect of radial position on volume measurements using the conductance catheter. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing , 27:25–32, 1989

    1989

  41. [49]

    Accurate nonfluoroscopic guidance and tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters using a conductance guidewire system

    Mark C Svendsen, David Birrer, Benjamin Jansen, Shawn D Teague, Bill Combs, Gregory J Schears, and Ghassan S Kassab. Accurate nonfluoroscopic guidance and tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters using a conductance guidewire system. Journal of Vascular Surgery:...

    2013

  42. [50]

    Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recog- nition

    Hiroaki Sakoe and Seibi Chiba. Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recog- nition. IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing , 26(1):43–49, 1978

    1978

  43. [51]

    Using derivatives in time series classification

    Tomasz G´ orecki and Maciej Luczak. Using derivatives in time series classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 26:310–331, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    Matching incomplete time series with dynamic time warping: an algorithm and an application to post-stroke rehabilitation

    Paolo Tormene, Toni Giorgino, Silvana Quaglini, and Mario Stefanelli. Matching incomplete time series with dynamic time warping: an algorithm and an application to post-stroke rehabilitation. Artificial intelligence in medicine , 45(1):11–34, 2009. 22 REFERENCES REFERENCES

    2009

  45. [53]

    A novel system for the reconstruction of a coronary artery lumen profile in real time: a preclinical validation

    Ghassan S Kassab, Jenny S Choy, Mark Svendsen, Anjan K Sinha, Mouhamad Alloosh, Mike Sturek, Yunlong Huo, George E Sandusky, and James Hermiller. A novel system for the reconstruction of a coronary artery lumen profile in real time: a preclinical validation. American Journal o...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.