Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Compensation of Nonlinear Torsion in Flexible Joint Robots: Comparison of Two Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.07067 v2 pith:DPS26WED submitted 2015-07-25 cs.SY cs.SY

Compensation of Nonlinear Torsion in Flexible Joint Robots: Comparison of Two Approaches

classification cs.SY cs.SY
keywords jointhysteresisinversemotortorsionapproachapproachesdrives
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Flexible joint robots, in particularly those which are equipped with harmonic-drive gears, can feature elasticities with hysteresis. Under heavy loads and large joint torques the hysteresis lost motion can lead to significant errors of tracking and positioning of the robotic links. In this paper, two approaches for compensating the nonlinear joint torsion with hysteresis are described and compared with each other. Both methods assume the measured signals available only on the motor side of joint transmissions. The first approach assumes a rigid-link manipulator model and transforms the desired link trajectory into that of the motor drives by using the inverse dynamics and inverse hysteresis map. The second approach relies on the modeling of motor drives and inverse hysteresis and uses the generalized momenta when predicting the joint torsion. Both methods are discussed in details along with a numerical example of two-link planar manipulator under gravity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.