Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 29 references

On the theoretical prediction of microalgae growth for parallel flow

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives an analytical, dimensionless formula for the growth rate of microalgae in parallel laminar flow, expressed through Reynolds and Schmidt numbers, and reports order-of-magnitude agreement with measured growth rates.

desk verdict A mathematically correct but biologically misapplied boundary-layer analysis: the 'growth rate' is a Sherwood number in disguise, and the paper's central prediction is unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.01472 v2 pith:DPU55CBG submitted 2019-08-05 physics.bio-ph q-bio.OT

C. Y. Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phq-bio.OT
keywords microalgaegrowthdimensionlessanalysisparallelflowReynoldsnumberSchmidtphotobioreactormasstransferboundarylayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that microalgae growth in a photobioreactor can be predicted without fitting biological constants, by applying dimensional analysis from fluid dynamics and heat transfer. Its central proposal is that, for a parallel laminar flow, the growth rate obeys an analytical dimensionless law in which Reynolds number, Schmidt number, and a surface-to-bulk concentration ratio replace empirical parameters. If correct, the same dimensionless expression would apply to any parallel-flow geometry and could unify experimental data taken under different laboratory conditions. The predicted growth rate is shown to agree with measured microalgae growth rates only to an order of magnitude, which the paper frames as a first theoretical foundation rather than a precise predictor.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the boundary-layer analogy between microalgae concentration and a diffusing chemical species. By writing the microalgae concentration $N$ in exactly the same form as the species concentration boundary-layer equation, the paper imports the standard flat-plate boundary-layer solutions: the velocity boundary-layer thickness $\delta = 5x\,Re_x^{-1/2}$, the local concentration Sherwood number $Sh_{x,N} = 0.332\,Re_x^{1/2}Sc_N^{1/3}$, and the corresponding average and turbulent-flow forms via the mass-transfer analogy. These pieces turn the growth balance $\mu\int N\,dV = \int h_N(N_s - N_\infty)\,dS$ into the dimensionless Microalgae growth number $Mg_x = \mu x/D_N$. A radiation submodel using exponential attenuation of photosynthetically active radiation and nutrient-yield inequalities gives separate upper bounds, and equating the nutrient-derived and light-derived bounds produces the light-flow-nutrient relation used for design.

What would settle it

Grow a uniformly suspended microalgae culture in a parallel-plate flow with independently varied diffusivity and velocity; if the measured specific growth rate does not follow the Reynolds-number and Schmidt-number dependence encoded in Eq. (44), or if growth continues when the surface-boundary condition is eliminated, the prediction is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper claims that the growth rate of microalgae in steady, incompressible, laminar parallel flow can be predicted analytically by treating microalgae cells as a species whose concentration satisfies a boundary-layer equation along a surface-attached growth layer. The central result, the paper's Eq. (44), defines a dimensionless 'Microalgae growth number' $Mg_x = \mu x/D_N$ as a product of a Reynolds-number power, a Schmidt-number power $\mathrm{Sc}_N^{2/3}$, and the concentration ratio $(N_s - N_\infty)/N_\infty$. Because the relation is dimensionless, the paper argues it can be used for arbitrary parallel flows without knowing the photobioreactor size or microalgae strain. The predicted growth rate is compared with experimental data for several microalgae species and found to be consistent on the order of magnitude. The paper also derives upper bounds on growth from nutrient supply and light absorption, and an optimal Reynolds number for mixed laminar-turbulent flow.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes microalgae cells grow on a surface-attached thin layer and enter the culture only by diffusion; if cells grow suspended throughout the bulk fluid, the concentration boundary-layer equation that generates the formula has no physical basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The dimensionless solution can be applied to arbitrary parallel flows, so small-laboratory results could be scaled to larger photobioreactors by matching Reynolds and Schmidt numbers.
  • Growth rate increases with the diffusion coefficient and decreases with kinematic viscosity at fixed Reynolds number, giving practical levers: choose a culture medium with stronger mass transfer and lower viscosity.
  • For mixed laminar-turbulent flow the growth rate has a maximum at a specific Reynolds number; Eq. (61) gives $Re_L \approx 7.5\times 10^5$ for the transition constant used, so an optimal operating velocity can be designed.
  • The light-nutrient-flow relation, Eq. (51), implies that more light should be paired with stronger flow and mass transfer; otherwise light or nutrient supply becomes limiting.
  • The predicted growth rates fall within the measured range of 0.0465 to 1.752 d$^{-1}$, so the formula could serve as an order-of-magnitude estimate for photobioreactor design before detailed calibration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the surface-attached growth assumption makes the framework directly testable in biofilm or attached-growth photobioreactors, where the boundary condition is literally true rather than approximate.
  • A clean experimental discriminator would hold Reynolds number fixed while changing only the microalgae diffusion coefficient; if the predicted $Sc_N^{2/3}$ dependence does not appear, the species-diffusion analogy is the weak link.
  • The paper's order-of-magnitude comparison is not a tight test; a quantitative test would need growth-rate data paired with the full flow geometry of the same culture, not the mixed-species table used here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a dimensionless analytical model for the growth rate of microalgae in a parallel laminar (or mixed) flow. The author treats the microalgae concentration field as analogous to a diffusing chemical species in a boundary layer, assuming that cells grow on a surface and enter the culture by diffusion. After reproducing the standard Blasius solution and the Sherwood-number correlation, the model defines a 'microalgae growth number' Mg = μx/D_N and derives Eq. (44) (laminar) and Eq. (58) (mixed boundary layer) expressing Mg as a function of Reynolds and Schmidt numbers times the ratio (N_s−N_∞)/N_∞. The results are plotted for different ratios R and compared loosely with published growth rates of microalgae in photobioreactors; the paper claims order-of-magnitude agreement. The mathematical manipulations are standard, but the biological interpretation of the derived quantity as a growth rate is the central issue.

Significance. The paper takes a classical heat/mass-transfer result and labels it as microalgae growth. If the biological mapping were valid, the dimensionless formula would indeed be simple and potentially useful for preliminary PBR design. The standard boundary-layer derivation itself is correct, and the idea of expressing a growth law in dimensionless form is appealing. However, the central mapping from a surface mass-transfer flux to a specific growth rate is not established; Eq. (8) contains no source term representing cell division, and the model introduces a free concentration ratio R and an unjustified diffusion coefficient. As a result, the claimed predictive capability is not demonstrated. The paper's value is limited to suggesting that mass-transfer analogies might be explored for surface-attached growth, but the current treatment does not constitute a predictive biological growth model.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.4, Eqs. (39)–(44)] Equation (8) is a steady, source-free advection-diffusion equation for cell concentration N; it contains no time derivative and no cell-division source term. The growth rate μ is then introduced in Eq. (39) as the total surface flux h_N (N_s−N_∞)S divided by ∫ N dV. Consequently Eq. (44) is a rearrangement of the standard Sherwood correlation and describes a surface mass-transfer coefficient, not a biological specific growth rate. In a steady source-free boundary layer the total number of cells in the domain is constant, so Eq. (44) cannot predict cell division. The central claim that Eq. (44) predicts microalgae growth is therefore unsupported.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (8)] The premise stated in §3.1 that 'microalgae cells are growth on the surface of the thin layer' and enter the culture by diffusion is not supported by any experimental evidence or reference, and it conflicts with the standard suspended-growth mode in photobioreactors. If cells are not produced at the wall, the boundary condition N(0)=N_s has no biological meaning and the analogy to species mass transfer does not apply. The manuscript must either justify this assumption with data or abandon it; as written, Eq. (44) rests on an unverified physical picture.
  3. [§4.1, Figs. 1–4 and Eq. (44)] The concentration ratio R=N_s/N_∞ is a free input parameter, chosen as 1.001, 1.002, or 1.005 in Figs. 1–4 without any measurement procedure. Since Eq. (44) scales with (R−1), the predicted growth rate is extremely sensitive to R, and no constraint is provided. Thus the model is not parameter-free, and the claim that it can predict growth rates without fitting coefficients is not supported.
  4. [§4.2, Table 1] The validation is qualitative. Only one entry in Table 1 (Scenedesmus sp.) contains both the velocity and length needed to compute a Reynolds number, and the text merely states that the predicted growth rate is 'consistent' on the order of magnitude. No error metric, uncertainty estimate, or parity plot is given, so the agreement does not discriminate the proposed model from a constant plausible growth rate. A more quantitative comparison with controlled experiments is needed before the model can be accepted as predictive.
  5. [§4.1, D_N values] The diffusion coefficient D_N=1.973×10−9 m² s−1 is taken from a fluid-mechanics handbook without justification for microalgae cells. For a 10-μm cell, Brownian diffusion would be orders of magnitude smaller, while swimming and turbulent dispersion are not represented by a constant D_N. Since D_N enters the definition of the growth number and the Schmidt number, the numerical predictions in Figs. 1–4 depend on an unjustified parameter.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and grammatical errors, including 'derivate' (§3.2), 'mciroalgae' (§5), and 'its have a tendency' (§4.1); the language should be carefully revised.
  2. [§2] Equation numbering is confused: Section 2.1 presents Eq. (1) and then jumps to Eq. (7), while Eqs. (2) and (3) appear in Section 2.2; the numbering should be reordered so that equations are introduced sequentially.
  3. [§3.4, Eq. (37)] The notation in Eq. (37) is unclear: the symbol '| c V V ' is not defined, and the equality between ∫ n_{M,s} dS and V d/dt ∫ N dV should be derived explicitly.
  4. [§3.3] The radiative-transfer discussion in Section 3.3 is not connected to the growth-rate derivation; if Eqs. (49) and (50) are intended to depend on it, the linkage should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Fig. 2] The inset in Fig. 2 has unlabeled axes and an unexplained legend; its purpose and parameter values should be given in the caption.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The central growth-rate prediction (Eq. 44) is the standard Sherwood correlation relabeled via definition (39), so the claimed theoretical prediction reduces by construction to a mass-transfer coefficient.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.4, Eqs. (37)-(44)]
    "Combining the Eq. (37) and Eq.(38), it follows that μ = (∫_{S_BL} h_N(N_s-N∞)dS)/(∫_V NdV) (39) ... For an one dimensional parallel flow, the integral can be approximated by ... μ = h_N(N_s-N∞)L/(N∞Lδ) (41) ... Combining the Eq. (30) we obtain, Mg = (0.664/5) Re_x^{1/2} Re_L^{1/2} Sc_N^{2/3}(N_s-N∞)/N∞ (44)."

    The biological growth rate μ is not obtained from any cell-division or population-balance relation; it is defined in Eq. (39) as the diffusive surface flux h_N(N_s−N∞)S divided by the volume-integrated cell number, and Eq. (41) approximates that ratio using a boundary-layer thickness. Substituting the laminar Sherwood correlation Eq. (30) and δ=5xRe^{−1/2} turns Eq. (41) into Eq. (44) by pure algebra. Thus the new 'Microalgae growth number' is the known Sherwood number multiplied by (R−1)/5, with R=N_s/N∞, expressed in new coordinates. The governing equation (8) is steady and source-free, so the quantity called growth rate is a passive concentration-boundary-layer flux per unit cell inventory, not cell proliferation.

full rationale

No significant self-citation circularity is present: the author's own references [18,19] are used only for time-dependent optical cross-sections and are not load-bearing for Eq. (44). The load-bearing reduction is definitional/renaming. In Section 3.4, Eqs. (37)-(41) define the specific growth rate as the surface mass-transfer flux divided by the cell concentration inventory, and Eq. (30) is the standard textbook Sherwood correlation obtained by the mass/microalgae transfer analogy. Combining them yields Eq. (44) algebraically; the 'growth number' is the Sherwood number rescaled by (R−1)/5. Because Eq. (8) has no source/sink term and no time derivative in the boundary-layer form, the derivation cannot describe cell division; it describes passive diffusion to a surface. The comparison with Table 1 is order-of-magnitude only and uses the freely chosen ratio R, so it does not validate a biological growth law. The paper's own caveat that 'the theoretical calculation method given here needs more experimental data to verify and modify' is consistent with this. Score 6 reflects partial circularity: the central prediction reduces by construction to a known mass-transfer result, though the paper does not fit parameters to the growth data and its fluid-mechanical input is externally cited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard boundary layer correlations (Ref [20]), but introduces an ad hoc surface-growth assumption and a concentration ratio R that is not independently measured. The diffusion coefficient for cells is taken from a molecular diffusion reference, which is likely invalid for 10-20 micrometer cells.

free parameters (2)
  • R = N_s/N_infinity (or its inverse), the ratio of surface to bulk microalgae concentration = 1.001, 1.002, 1.005 for R1-R3 in Figs. 1-4 (unphysical if N_s > N_infinity)
    Used to set the concentration difference driving diffusion; not measured, and the values plotted appear to make the driving force negative, suggesting the notation is inconsistent.
  • D_N, diffusion coefficient of microalgae cells in culture = 1.973e-9 m2/s (from Ref [23])
    Likely the molecular diffusivity of a small molecule, not the Brownian diffusivity of a 5-20 micrometer algal cell, which would be orders of magnitude lower; this choice strongly affects the Schmidt number and the predicted growth rate.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Steady, incompressible, laminar boundary layer equations for flow over a flat plate (Eqs. 5-8) are applicable.
    Taken from Ref [20], a standard heat and mass transfer textbook.
  • domain assumption Microalgae concentration obeys the same convection-diffusion equation as a chemical species, with a constant diffusion coefficient D_N.
    The mass transfer analogy in Section 3.2 assumes cells behave as a passive scalar.
  • ad hoc to paper Microalgae cells grow on the reactor surface and enter the bulk by diffusion.
    Stated in Section 3.1; not representative of suspended-cell PBR operations.
  • standard math The radiative transfer equation and the neglect of convection in Eq. (32) due to u << c are valid.
    From Ref [15], Modest's radiative heat transfer text.
invented entities (1)
  • Microalgae growth number Mg = mu x / D_N
    purpose: Dimensionless growth rate used to express the solution independently of reactor size.
    A new dimensionless group defined in Section 3.4; no independent measurement or falsifiable prediction beyond the formula itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the theoretical prediction of microalgae growth for parallel flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPU55CBG

@misc{pith2026190801472,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the theoretical prediction of microalgae growth for parallel flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPU55CBG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.01472}
}
read the original abstract

The established microalgae growth models are semi-empirical or considerable fitting coefficients exist currently. Therefore, the ability of the model prediction is reduced by the numerous fitting coefficients. Furthermore, the predicted results of the established models are dependent on the size of the photobioreactor (PBR), light intensity, flow and concentration field. The growth mechanism of microalgae has not clearly understood in PBR cultivation. It is difficult to predict the microalgae growth by theoretical methods, owing to the aforementioned factors. We developed an exploratory bridging microalgae growth model to predict the microalgae growth rate in PBRs by using the nondimensional method which is effectively in fluid dynamics and heat transfer. The analytical solution of the growth rate was obtained for the parallel flow. The nondimensional growth rate expressed as function of Reynolds number and Schmidt number, which can be used for arbitrary parallel flow due to the solution was expressed as nondimensional quantities. The theoretically predicted growth rate is compared with the experimentally measured microalgae growth rate on the order of magnitude. The nondimensional method successfully applied to the microalgae growth problem for the first time. The general nondimensional solution can unify the numerous experimental data for different laboratory conditions, and give a direction for the disorder of the microalgae growth problem. The nondimensional solution may be useful to explain the growth mechanism of microalgae and design large-scale PBRs for microalgae biofuel production. The significance of the work is to give a theoretical foundation and methodology of biological theory of microalgae growth.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review

    Mata TM, Martins AA and Caetano NS. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 2010; 14: 217-32

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    BioCO2–a multidisciplinary, biological approach using solar energy to capture CO 2 while producing H 2 and high value products

    Skjå nes K, Lindblad P and Muller J. BioCO2–a multidisciplinary, biological approach using solar energy to capture CO 2 while producing H 2 and high value products. Biomolecular engineering 20 07; 24: 405-13

    work page

  3. [3]

    Radiation transfer in photobiological carbon dioxide fixation and fuel production by microalgae

    Pilon L, Berberoğlu H and Kandilian R. Radiation transfer in photobiological carbon dioxide fixation and fuel production by microalgae. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2011; 112: 2639-60

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Assessing the potential of algal biomass opportunities for bioenergy industry: A review

    Ullah K, Ahmad M , Sharma VK, Lu P, Harvey A, Zafar M and Sultana S. Assessing the potential of algal biomass opportunities for bioenergy industry: A review. Fuel 2015; 143: 414-23

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Photobioreactors: Production systems for phototrophic microorganisms

    Pulz O. Photobioreactors: Production systems for phototrophic microorganisms. Applied m icrobiology and biotechnology 2001; 57: 287-93

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Microalgae -based biofuels and bioproducts: From feedstock cultivation to end-products

    Muñ oz R and Gonzalez -Fernandez C. Microalgae -based biofuels and bioproducts: From feedstock cultivation to end-products. New York: Woodhead Publishing; 2017

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Photoacclimation processes in phytoplankton: Mechanisms, consequences, and applications

    Dubinsky Z and Stambler N. Photoacclimation processes in phytoplankton: Mechanisms, consequences, and applications. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 2009; 56: 163-76

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Physiology and xanthophyll cycle activity of nannochloropsis gaditana

    Gentile MP and Blanch HW. Physiology and xanthophyll cycle activity of nannochloropsis gaditana. Biotechnology and bioengineering 2001; 75: 1-12

    work page 2001

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Time-dependent radiation characteristics of nannochloropsis oculata during batch culture

    Heng RL and Pilon L. Time-dependent radiation characteristics of nannochloropsis oculata during batch culture. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2014; 144: 154-63

    2014

  2. [10]

    Utilization of different nitrogen sources by the marine cyanobacteria prochlorococcus and synechococcus

    Moore LR, Post AF, Rocap G and Chisholm SW. Utilization of different nitrogen sources by the marine cyanobacteria prochlorococcus and synechococcus. Limnology and oceanography 2002; 47: 989-96

    2002

  3. [11]

    Industrial photobioreactors and scale -up concepts

    Pruvost J , Le Borgne F, Artu A, Cornet J F and Legrand J. Industrial photobioreactors and scale -up concepts. Advances in Chemical Engineering 2016; 48: 257-310. - 22 -

    2016

  4. [12]

    Predicting microalgae growth

    Blanken W, Postma PR, de Winter L, Wijffels RH and Janssen M. Predicting microalgae growth. Algal research 2016; 14: 28-38

    2016

  5. [13]

    Growth kinetic models for microalgae cultivation: A review

    Lee E, Jalalizadeh M and Zhang Q. Growth kinetic models for microalgae cultivation: A review. Algal Research 2015; 12: 497-512

    2015

  6. [14]

    Growth and neutral lipid synthesis in green microalgae: A mathematical model

    Packer A, Li Y , Andersen T, Hu Q, Kuang Y and Sommerfeld M. Growth and neutral lipid synthesis in green microalgae: A mathematical model. Bioresource technology 2011; 102: 111-7

    2011

  7. [15]

    Radiative heat transfer

    Modest MF. Radiative heat transfer. New York: Academic press; 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Oceanic primary production estimates from measurements of spectral irradiance and pigment concentrations

    Bidigare RR, Smith R, Baker K and Marra J. Oceanic primary production estimates from measurements of spectral irradiance and pigment concentrations. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1987; 1: 171-86. [17]Bidigare RR, Ondrusek ME, Morrow JH and Kiefer DA. In-vivo absorption properti...

    1987

  9. [18]

    Experimental study of the temporal scaling characteristics of growth-dependent radiative properties of S pirulina platensis

    Ma CY , Zhao JM and Liu LH. Experimental study of the temporal scaling characteristics of growth-dependent radiative properties of S pirulina platensis. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2018; 217: 453-8

    2018

  10. [19]

    Temporal scaling of the growth dependent optical properties of microalgae

    Zhao JM, Ma CY and Liu LH. Temporal scaling of the growth dependent optical properties of microalgae. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2018; 214: 61-70

    2018

  11. [20]

    Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer

    Incropera FP, Lavine AS, Bergman TL and DeWitt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. Ne w York: Wiley; 2007

    2007

  12. [21]

    Fluid dynamics: An introduction

    Rieutord M. Fluid dynamics: An introduction. Springer; 2014

    2014

  13. [22]

    Handbook of microalgal culture: Applied phycology and biotechnology

    Richmond A and Hu Q. Handbook of microalgal culture: Applied phycology and biotechnology. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2013

    2013

  14. [23]

    Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics

    Tropea C and Yarin AL. Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007

    2007

  15. [24]

    Productivity correlated to photobiochemical performance of chlorella mass cultures grown outdoors in thin -layer cascades

    Masojí dek J, Kopecký J, Giannelli L and Torzillo G . Productivity correlated to photobiochemical performance of chlorella mass cultures grown outdoors in thin -layer cascades. Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology 2011; 38: 307-17

    2011

  16. [25]

    Novel outdoor thin-layer high density microalgal culture system: Productivity and operational parameters

    Doucha J and Lí vanský K. Novel outdoor thin-layer high density microalgal culture system: Productivity and operational parameters. Algological Studies/Archiv Hydrobiolo gie Supplement V olumes 1995: 129-47

    1995

  17. [26]

    Microalgae culturing in thin-layer photobioreactors

    Torzillo G , Giannelli L, Martí nez-Roldá n A, Verdone N and De Filippis P. Microalgae culturing in thin-layer photobioreactors. Chemical Engineering 2010; 20: 265-70. - 23 -

    2010

  18. [27]

    Kinetic models f or astaxanthin production by high cell density mixotrophic culture of the microalga haematococcus pluvialis

    Zhang X, Gong X and Chen F. Kinetic models f or astaxanthin production by high cell density mixotrophic culture of the microalga haematococcus pluvialis. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 1999; 23: 691-6

    1999

  19. [28]

    Bayesian modelling of algal mass occurrences—using adaptive mcmc methods with a lake water quality model

    Malve O, Laine M, Haario H, Kirkkala T and Sarvala J. Bayesian modelling of algal mass occurrences—using adaptive mcmc methods with a lake water quality model. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007; 22: 966-77

    2007

  20. [29]

    Independent colimitation for carbon dioxide and inorganic phosphorus

    Spijkerman E, De Castro F and Gaedke U. Independent colimitation for carbon dioxide and inorganic phosphorus. PLoS One 2011; 6: e28219

    2011

  21. [30]

    Experimental analysis and model -based optimization of microalgae growth in photo-bioreactors using flue gas

    He L, Subramanian VR and Tang YJ. Experimental analysis and model -based optimization of microalgae growth in photo-bioreactors using flue gas. biomass and bioenergy 2012; 41: 131-8

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.