REVIEW 2 cited by
DynaServe: Unified and Elastic Execution for Dynamic Disaggregated LLM Serving
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DynaServe: Unified and Elastic Execution for Dynamic Disaggregated LLM Serving
read the original abstract
LLM inference must meet strict latency SLOs (e.g., 100 ms P99 time-between-tokens) while maximizing goodput. Yet, real-world variability in prompt and response lengths skews compute-intensive prefill and memory-bound decode phases, making both colocated (even with chunked prefill) and disaggregated deployments unable to simultaneously deliver low tail latency and high throughput. We introduce DynaServe, a high-performance LLM serving system built atop vLLM that unifies and extends both paradigms for maximizing goodput under SLO constraints, when handling unbalanced and dynamic workloads. It relies on a micro-request abstraction, which arbitrarily splits each request at any token boundary into at most two cooperating segments. A two-level scheduling framework then balances micro-request load across unified GPU instances. The global scheduler rapidly selects per-request split points by considering both the request's prefill/decode time ratio and the current load across GPU instances. The local schedulers on each GPU instance independently form SLO-aware batches, adjusting their composition in response to workload fluctuations, potential latency spikes and per-GPU under/over utilization. On real-world traces, DynaServe boosts the overall serving capacity from 1.15$\times$ to 3.07$\times$, improves goodput by up to 1.91$\times$ and 1.61$\times$, and improves the performance by up to 60\% in a hybrid workload under SLO compared to state-of-the-art colocated and disaggregated baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ViBE: Co-Optimizing Workload Skew and Hardware Variability for MoE Serving
ViBE co-optimizes expert placement with measured GPU performance variability in MoE inference to cut execution-time imbalance, delivering 14% better SLO attainment and up to 45% lower P90 TTFT.
-
SMetric: Rethink LLM Scheduling for Serving Agents with Balanced Session-centric Scheduling
Balancing only first-turn agent requests while keeping follow-ups cache-aware raises LLM cluster TPS 10-16% (colocation) and prefill TPS 2-34% (disaggregation) over SOTA schedulers on production agent traces.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.