Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Simplification of a Real-Time Verification Problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1008.1417 v1 pith:DR5G4SRZ submitted 2010-08-08 cs.LO cs.SE

classification cs.LOcs.SE
keywords statesystemsreal-timemodelverificationfinitemodelsproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We revisit the problem of real-time verification with dense dynamics using timeout and calendar based models and simplify this to a finite state verification problem. To overcome the complexity of verification of real-time systems with dense dynamics, Dutertre and Sorea, proposed timeout and calender based transition systems to model the behavior of real-time systems and verified safety properties using k-induction in association with bounded model checking. In this work, we introduce a specification formalism for these models in terms of Timeout Transition Diagrams and capture their behavior in terms of semantics of Timed Transition Systems. Further, we discuss a technique, which reduces the problem of verification of qualitative temporal properties on infinite state space of (a large fragment of) these timeout and calender based transition systems into that on clockless finite state models through a two-step process comprising of digitization and canonical finitary reduction. This technique enables us to verify safety invariants for real-time systems using finite state model-checking avoiding the complexity of infinite state (bounded) model checking and scale up models without applying techniques from induction based proof methodology. Moreover, we can verify liveness properties for real-time systems, which is not possible by using induction with infinite state model checkers. We present examples of Fischer's Protocol, Train-Gate Controller, and TTA start-up algorithm to illustrate how such an approach can be efficiently used for verifying safety, liveness, and timeliness properties specified in LTL using finite state model checkers like SAL-smc and Spin. We also demonstrate how advanced modeling concepts like inter-process scheduling, priorities, interrupts, urgent and committed location can be specified as extensions of the proposed specification formalism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools