Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 44 references

The stable motivic homotopy category over a field is, to a large extent, governed by topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the field's absolute Galois group—plus an exotic η/τ periodicity axis that top

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:47 UTC pith:DRUVWQWU

load-bearing objection Useful survey, no new theorems, and the organizing narrative mostly holds up; the one thing to fix is an overstatement in §3.3 about what BBX25 proves. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18165 v1 pith:DRUVWQWU submitted 2026-07-20 math.AT math.AG

Periodic phenomena in stable motivic homotopy theory

classification math.AT math.AG MSC 14F3555T1555Q5155Q45
keywords motivic stable homotopy groups of spheresperiodicityAdams spectral sequenceslice spectral sequencesynthetic spectraη-periodicityw1-periodicityabsolute Galois group
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey argues that the stable motivic homotopy category over a field F is largely governed by three ingredients: ordinary topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the absolute Galois group of F. It assembles the evidence from motivic Adams spectral sequences, slice spectral sequences, and synthetic spectra, showing how topological v1- and v2-periodic families lift into motivic stems and how new periodic families—η-periodic and w1-periodic—appear because the motivic Hopf map η is not nilpotent. The payoff, if the picture is correct, is a reliable map of the periodic part of the motivic stable homotopy groups of spheres and a toolbox for future computations. The survey also records many open problems, including the construction of motivic modular forms over fields other than the complex numbers and the identification of w2-periodic families. Its main structural caveat is stated in the text: the synthetic 'cofiber of τ' deformation that carries the narrative is established only in special cases, not for arbitrary fields.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the stable motivic homotopy category over a field is largely governed by topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the absolute Galois group. Periodic phenomena are the test case: topological v1- and v2-periodic families lift to motivic stems, while the non-nilpotent Hopf map η generates η-periodic and w1-periodic families absent in topology. The survey presents motivic Adams spectral sequences, slice spectral sequences, and synthetic spectra as the lenses for this structure, with the cofiber of τ—inverting it recovers topology, killing it yields the algebraic Adams–Novikov category—as the bridge.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 'cofiber of τ' / synthetic-spectra deformation: in the motivic category there is a class τ of degree (0,−1); inverting τ recovers topological spectra, while killing τ gives the derived category of BP_*BP-comodules, so the whole motivic category is a one-parameter deformation between topology and algebra. Around this pivot the survey organizes the motivic Adams spectral sequence, the slice spectral sequence, and the hermitian K-theory kq-resolution (the analogue of the topological bo-resolution for detecting v1-periodicity). The η-periodic sphere η^{-1}S is the corresponding exotic instrument: it isolates the non-nilpotent Hopf map and, where the Witt ring has t

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 'cofiber of τ' / synthetic-spectra deformation, which the paper states as observed in Section 1 and cites in full only for the complex numbers and for fields of small cohomological dimension in Section 3.3, describes stable motivic homotopy over every field. If it fails for some field, the survey's organizing thesis—motivic periodicity is topological periodicity plus Galois information plus an exotic τ/η axis—is not a general statement.

What would settle it

Choose a field F with large cohomological dimension that is not covered by the cited reconstruction, compute a low 2-completed motivic stable stem in the range where the synthetic model predicts the isomorphism πF_{*,*}(S) ≅ πBP_{*,*}(SBP) ⊗ KMW_*(F), and check whether every class has the predicted tensor-product form. An unexpected stem with extra torsion, or a missing τ-divisible class demanded by the model, would falsify the deformation narrative for general fields.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the synthetic picture is right, motivic v1-periodic elements over any field of characteristic ≠ 2 are organized by a kq-resolution whose only nonzero differential pattern comes from the Adams operation ψ3−1; the v1-torsion-free part is described by a small spectrum jq.
  • The η-periodic sphere has completely describable homotopy: over fields with appropriate Witt rings it is a polynomial ring on η, μ9, ε modulo ε^2, with coefficients in the Witt ring; this makes η-periodic phenomena as tractable as rational topological homotopy.
  • The 'cofiber of τ' method transfers differentials between the motivic Adams spectral sequence and the algebraic Novikov spectral sequence, and has already pushed stable stems computations to dimension 90; the survey implies this transfer remains valid wherever the deformation exists.
  • Topological v2-periodic families lift to motivic stems through the unit map from the sphere to a motivic modular forms spectrum, and the same Hurewicz-image technique should detect all C-motivic v2-periodic classes.
  • The existence of w1-periodic classes, together with the self-map construction on S/η, predicts a w2-periodic family of period (416,224) on the cofiber of w1^4, which would be the first exotic height-2 periodicity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the τ-deformation extends to all fields, motivic stems should be recoverable from topological chromatic data plus the absolute Galois group; this suggests a general Galois-descent formula for stable stems, not just a computational coincidence over C and R.
  • The paper's distinction between η-periodic and non-η-periodic v1-classes implies that any motivic height-1 telescope conjecture must be stated with both KGL and KW localizations, in contrast to the topological equivalence LKO ≃ LKU.
  • The absence so far of w1-periodicity outside C and R, and of any w_n-periodicity for n≥2, suggests that a systematic search over finite and p-adic fields could either confirm a uniform height n(p−1) pattern or reveal base-field-dependent exotic periodicities.
  • Because the Balmer spectrum of compact motivic spectra is governed by how η-, w1-, and p-periodicities interact, the future identification of w2-periodicity could yield new thick subcategories that have no topological analogue.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This survey, intended for a mathematical audience familiar with stable homotopy theory and some motivic homotopy theory, reviews how tools from classical stable homotopy theory—motivic Adams spectral sequences, the slice spectral sequence, and synthetic spectra—are used to organize periodic phenomena in the stable motivic homotopy groups of spheres over a field. The paper is organized into sections covering global structural results (Milnor–Witt stems, slice spectral sequences), motivic Adams spectral sequences (HF2-based and Adams–Novikov), the synthetic-spectra / 'cofiber of τ' framework, classical v1- and v2-periodic phenomena, exotic η- and w1-periodic phenomena, and a list of open problems. The central thesis is that, to a large extent, SH(F) is governed by topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the absolute Galois group of F, with additional exotic periodic phenomena such as η- and w1-periodicity that have no topological analogue.

Significance. If the survey is correct, it serves as a valuable and timely roadmap to a substantial body of recent work: it collects the computational tools, lists the known periodic families, and identifies directions for future research. The author is generally careful to attribute results to the literature, and to flag results that rely on to-appear or in-preparation work, including the author's own. The bibliography is extensive and the organization is good. The main weakness is that the paper's organizing thesis is stated more universally than the cited theorems justify: the deformation/synthetic reconstruction of SH(F) is proved only over specific fields or under cohomological-dimension hypotheses, while the Introduction and parts of §§4–5 speak as though the framework applies over arbitrary fields. This is a fixable scope issue, but it is load-bearing for the paper's narrative.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, BBX25 paragraph] The text says that Bachmann–Burklund–Xu reconstruct SH(F) 'for fields F of small cohomological dimension', and then immediately states: 'As a consequence, they show that for any field F containing all 2nd roots of unity that there is an isomorphism πF_{*,*}(S) ≅ πBP_{*,*}(SBP) ⊗ KMW_*(F).' The cohomological-dimension hypothesis is dropped in the displayed claim. If the reconstruction and the isomorphism require a bound on cd(F) (or on cd_2(F)), the sentence as written is unsupported and the broader claim that SH(F) is 'completely governed' by topology and Galois data is overstated. Please state the precise theorem with its hypotheses, and if the hypothesis is necessary, adjust the Introduction and the framing of §§4–5 accordingly.
  2. [§1, §3.3] The organizing sentence in the Introduction—'to some extent, the stable motivic homotopy category SH(F) is completely governed by topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the absolute Galois group of F'—is cited to [HKO11a; GIKR22; Pst23; BBX25; BHS26]. As the paper itself later explains, the cited reconstruction theorems cover F=C, F=R, and fields of small cohomological dimension; no general-field reconstruction is cited. Since the survey repeatedly presents computational tools as applying 'over any field' (e.g. Theorem 4.2, Theorem 5.5), the reader needs the scope stated explicitly at the outset. A short qualification in the Introduction and at the beginning of §3.3 would prevent the universal narrative from overrunning the cited evidence.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos: 'toological' (§1), 'comparsion' (§2), 'Ananyesvkiy' (§2.2), 'Dugger ans Isaksen' (§3.1.1), 'Liebniz' and 'Lieniz' (§3.1.3, §5.1), 'Stableev' (§3.3), and 'Univerity' in the author affiliation. These should be corrected.
  2. [§2.2] In the definition of the effective covers, the text says 'for any n∈Z' twice; the second occurrence should be 'q∈Z' for the index of f_q.
  3. [Figure 2] The caption reads 'A ■ indicated Zrτs' — 'indicated' should be 'indicates'. Also, the chart would benefit from a statement of the grading axes beyond the labels 0,4,8,...; the reader must infer that these are (s,w) coordinates.
  4. [§4.2.2] The notation 'ksp' is introduced as 'the very effective cover of KQ[4,2]' but is then used in 'kspr4,2s'; please standardize the suspension notation so the reader can see whether the cover is of KQ or of a suspended KQ.
  5. [§5.2] The phrase 'Miller suggests that non-nilpotence of η is evidence for a new family of periodicity operators w_n' is not accompanied by a citation. If this is folklore or from an unpublished source, please add a reference or mark it as such.
  6. [§6, 'Construct resolutions...'] The notation 'SKp2qmot' for the motivic Kp2q-local sphere is used without definition; define it as the Kp2q-mot-localization of the motivic sphere, or spell it out.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the survey's organizing claims are supported by external prior theorems (Dugger–Isaksen, Gheorghe–Wang–Xu, Pstrągowski, Bachmann–Burklund–Xu, etc.), and the author's own cited works are clearly labeled computational inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey with no fitted parameters, no derived prediction, and no quantity defined in terms of its own target. The central organizing thesis (§1) that SH(F) is 'completely governed by topological stable homotopy theory, the Adams–Novikov spectral sequence, and the absolute Galois group of F' is explicitly presented as an observed/imported framework supported by external citations (HKO11a; GIKR22; Pst23; BBX25; BHS26), none of which are authored by Morris. The paper's own works [Mor25], [Mor26], [MPT] appear only as explicitly identified contributions to computing kq-resolution E1-pages/cooperations rings, and those computations are not used to force the survey's broader narrative. The 'cofiber of τ'/synthetic-spectra equivalences in §3.3 are quoted from GWX21, Pst23, BHS26, and BBX25 as theorems, not derived from the survey's claims, and the paper openly records field-specific hypotheses (e.g., F=C, R, small cohomological dimension). Even if the scope of BBX25's reconstruction is narrower than the paper's informal 'any field' phrasing suggests, that is a correctness/fidelity concern about external results, not a circular derivation. No step in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to an input by construction or relies on a self-citation as its load-bearing justification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a survey, so the ledger records imported background rather than new postulates. No free parameters are fitted anywhere in the paper; the conjectures in Section 6 are not derived from fitted constants. No new entities are invented: spectra such as mmf, Siso, and Syn_E are cited from prior work. The axioms listed are the major structural results the survey leans on; they are stated as facts in the text and not proved there.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Existence and Nisnevich/A1-descent properties of the stable motivic homotopy category SH(F) over a field F, with bigraded spheres S^{s,w} (Morel–Voevodsky).
    Section 1; the entire survey operates inside this category.
  • standard math Dual motivic Steenrod algebra presentation A_* ≅ M^F_2[ξ_i, τ_i]/(relations) and the listed M^F_2 values in Table 2 (Voevodsky; Hoyois–Kelly–Østvær).
    Section 3.1; used to set up the motivic Adams spectral sequence.
  • standard math Slice filtration on SH(F) exists, and the slice spectral sequence converges conditionally to the η-completion; slices of the sphere are given by the topological Adams–Novikov E2-page (Levine; Röndigs–Spitzweck–Østvær).
    Section 2.2; the Milnor–Witt stem computations rely on this.
  • standard math The deformation/synthetic-spectra equivalences: Mod_{S/τ}(SH(C)) ≃ Stable_ev(BP_*BP) (Gheorghe–Wang–Xu) and τ^{-1}SH(C) ≃ Sp (Dugger–Isaksen).
    Section 3.3; the 'cofiber of τ' computational method and the synthetic-spectra narrative depend on these equivalences.
  • standard math Bachmann–Hopkins cofiber sequence η^{-1}S → kw → kw[4,2] and the resulting formula for πF_{*,*}(η^{-1}S) for fields of char ≠ 2.
    Section 5.1; the main explicit computation of η-periodic homotopy.
  • standard math Hopkins–Smith thick subcategory theorem and the periodicity theorem in topology, used as the baseline for comparing v_n-periodicity.
    Sections 2 and 5; the topological analogue against which motivic periodicity is measured.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 38855 in / 18320 out tokens · 162263 ms · 2026-08-01T15:47:19.148235+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this survey, we study how tools from stable homotopy theory have manifested and impacted motivic homotopy theory. In particular, we discuss various motivic Adams spectral sequences, periodicity in the motivic stable homotopy groups of spheres, and synthetic spectra. We conclude with many problems for future investigation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18165 by Jackson Morris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Morning Green, Arthur Dove (1941). 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14F35, 55T15; Secondary 55Q51, 55Q45. Key words and phrases. (Motivic/Chromatic/Synthetic) stable homotopy theory, Adams spectral sequence, nilpotence and periodicity. 1 arXiv:2607.18165v1 [math.AT] 20 Jul 2026 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The map ψ 3 ´ 1 : KQ Ñ KQ. A ■ indicated Zrτ s, a ‚ indicates F2rτ s, and a ˝ indicates F2. The blue and black colors indicate which copy of KQ a class belongs to. Red arrows indicate nonzero values for ψ 3 ´ 1. Theorem 4.2 ([BOQ25]). Let F be any field such that charpFq ‰ 2, and let X ∈ SHpFq be any motivic spectrum. There is a cofiber sequence XKGL{2 Ñ pKQ b Xq ^ 2,η ψ 3´1 ÝÝÝÑ pKQ b Xq ^ 2,η. 31 Example… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 18 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A deformation of Borel equivariant homotopy

    [ABBK26] G. Angelini-Knoll, M. Behrens, E. Belmont, and H. J. Kong. “A deformation of Borel equivariant homotopy”. In:Adv. Math.484 (2026), Paper No. 110698, 68 (cit. on p. 15). [ABCSS25] K. Aoki, T. Barthel, A. Chedalavada, T. Schlank, and G. Stevenson.Higher Zariski Geometry

  2. [3]

    On very effective hermitian K-theory

    arXiv:2510.20197 [math.AT](cit. on p. 15). [ARØ20] A. Ananyevskiy, O. R¨ ondigs, and P. A. Østvær. “On very effective hermitian K-theory”. In:Math. Z.294.3-4 (2020), pp. 1021–1034 (cit. on pp. 7, 24). [Bac18] T. Bachmann. “Motivic and real ´ etale stable homotopy theory”. In:Compos. Math. 154.5 (2018), pp. 883–917 (cit. on pp. 16, 25). 49Pulling back alon...

  3. [4]

    Chromatic structures in stable homotopy theory

    arXiv:2505.07297 [math.AT](cit. on p. 15). [BB20] T. Barthel and A. Beaudry. “Chromatic structures in stable homotopy theory”. In: Handbook of homotopy theory. 2020, pp. 163–220 (cit. on p. 3). [BBH25] A. Beaudry, I. Bobkova, and H. -W. Henn. “The duality resolution at n“p“ 2”. In:Math. Z.310.3 (2025), Paper No. 50, 38 (cit. on p. 28). [BBQ26] P. Bhattach...

  4. [5]

    The motivic lambda algebra and motivic Hopf invariant one problem

    arXiv: 2503.12060 [math.AG] (cit. on pp. 3, 15). [BCQ25] W. Balderrama, D. L. Culver, and J. D. Quigley. “The motivic lambda algebra and motivic Hopf invariant one problem”. In:Geom. Topol.29.3 (2025), pp. 1489–1570 (cit. on pp. 10–12). [BE20] P. Bhattacharya and P. Egger. “A class of 2-local finite spectra which admit a v1 2-self-map”. In:Adv. Math.360 (...

  5. [6]

    Topological resolutions in Kp2q-local homotopy theory at the prime 2

    arXiv:2508.09915 [math.KT](cit. on p. 2). [BG18] I. Bobkova and P. G. Goerss. “Topological resolutions in Kp2q-local homotopy theory at the prime 2”. In:J. Topol.11.4 (2018), pp. 918–957 (cit. on p. 28). [BG25] P. Balmer and M. Gallauer. “The spectrum of Artin motives”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.378.3 (2025), pp. 1733–1754 (cit. on p. 32). [BGI21] E. Belm...

  6. [11]

    Singularities and higher torsion in symplectic cobordism

    arXiv: 2402.14274 [math.AT] (cit. on p. 15). [BK94] B. I. Botvinnik and S. O. Kochman. “Singularities and higher torsion in symplectic cobordism”. In:Canad. J. Math.46.3 (1994), pp. 485–516 (cit. on p. 32). REFERENCES 35 [BKWX22] T. Bachmann, H. J. Kong, G. Wang, and Z. Xu. “The Chow t-structure on the ∞-category of motivic spectra”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)1...

  7. [12]

    In:JEMS(2025) (cit. on pp. 19, 28). [BQ26] I. Bobkova and J. D. Quigley.New simple η-torsion families of elements in the stable stems

  8. [13]

    C2-equivariant stable homotopy from real motivic stable homotopy

    arXiv:2410.21181 [math.AT](cit. on p. 21). [BS20] M. Behrens and J. Shah. “ C2-equivariant stable homotopy from real motivic stable homotopy”. In:Ann. K-Theory5.3 (2020), pp. 411–464 (cit. on p. 11). [BSSW25] T. Barthel, T. M. Schlank, N. Stapleton, and J. Weinstein.On the rationalization of theKpnq-local sphere

  9. [14]

    arXiv:2402.00960 [math.AT](cit. on p. 3). [Bur22] R. Burklund.Multiplicative structures on Moore spectra

  10. [15]

    The Adams differentials on the classes h3 j

    arXiv: 2203.14787 [math.AT](cit. on p. 13). [BX25] R. Burklund and Z. Xu. “The Adams differentials on the classes h3 j ”. In:Invent. Math.239.1 (2025), pp. 1–77 (cit. on p. 15). [Car25] C. Carrick.Slice spectral sequences through synthetic spectra

  11. [17]

    Formal ternary laws and Buchstaber’s 2-groups

    arXiv:2506.20507 [math.AT](cit. on pp. 21, 28). [CDFH24] D. Coulette, F. D´ eglise, J. Fasel, and J. Hornbostel. “Formal ternary laws and Buchstaber’s 2-groups”. In:Manuscripta Math.174.1-2 (2024), pp. 453–490 (cit. on p. 33). [CDN25] C. Carrick, J. M. Davies, and S. van Nigtevecht. “Descent spectral sequences through synthetic spectra”. In:Int. Math. Res...

  12. [18]

    kq-resolutions I

    arXiv:2402.15136 [math.KT](cit. on p. 4). [COCTALOS] M. Hopkins.Chromatic Homotopy Theory and the Language of Stacks. https : //ncatlab.org/nlab/files/HopkinsComplexOrientedCohomology.pdf. 1999 (cit. on p. 16). [CQ21] D. L. Culver and J. D. Quigley. “ kq-resolutions I”. In:Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 374.7 (2021), pp. 4655–4710 (cit. on pp. 20, 24). [D´ eg25]...

  13. [20]

    Computations of K-theories of finite fields

    To appear inAlgebraic & Geometric Topology(cit. on p. 21). [Fri76] E. M. Friedlander. “Computations of K-theories of finite fields”. In:Topology15.1 (1976), pp. 87–109 (cit. on p. 27). [Gal19] M. Gallauer. “tt-geometry of Tate motives over algebraically closed fields”. In: Compos. Math.155.10 (2019), pp. 1888–1923 (cit. on p. 32). [Gal25] M. Gallauer.Peri...

  14. [21]

    Reconstructing rational stable motivic homotopy theory

    arXiv: 2511.14325 [math.CT](cit. on p. 32). [Gar19] G. Garkusha. “Reconstructing rational stable motivic homotopy theory”. In:Com- pos. Math.155.7 (2019), pp. 1424–1443 (cit. on p. 18). [Ghe18] B. Gheorghe. “The motivic cofiber of τ ”. In:Doc. Math.23 (2018), pp. 1077–1127 (cit. on p. 13). [GHMR05] P. Goerss, H.-W. Henn, M. Mahowald, and C. Rezk. “A resol...

  15. [24]

    Nilpotence and stable homotopy theory. II

    To appear inAnn. of Math (2)(cit. on pp. 6, 21). [HS98] M. J. Hopkins and J. H. Smith. “Nilpotence and stable homotopy theory. II”. In: Ann. of Math. (2)148.1 (1998), pp. 1–49 (cit. on pp. 3, 23, 26, 29, 31). [Hua26] T. Huang.On η-periodic Formal Ternary Laws

  16. [25]

    The C-motivic Adams- Novikov spectral sequence for topological modular forms

    arXiv: 2607.06795 [math.AT] (cit. on p. 33). [IKLRZ24] D. C. Isaksen, H. J. Kong, G. Li, Y. Ruan, and H. Zhu. “The C-motivic Adams- Novikov spectral sequence for topological modular forms”. In:Adv. Math.458 (2024), Paper No. 109966, 47 (cit. on pp. 21, 28). [IKLRZ26] D. Isaksen, H. J. Kong, G. Li, Y. Ruan, and H. Zhu. “Exotic periodic phenomena in the coh...

  17. [29]

    arXiv:2509.16404 [math.AG](cit. on p. 7). [KW19] J. I. Kylling and G. M. Wilson.Strong convergence in the motivic Adams spectral sequence

  18. [32]

    A survey of elliptic cohomology

    arXiv:2503.17149 [math.AT](cit. on p. 25). [Lur09] J. Lurie. “A survey of elliptic cohomology”. In:Algebraic topology. Vol

  19. [33]

    bo-resolutions

    Abel Symp. Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp. 219–277 (cit. on p. 28). [LurCHT] J. Lurie.Chromatic Homotopy Theory. http : / / people . math . harvard . edu / ~lurie/252x.html. 2010 (cit. on p. 16). [Mah81] M. Mahowald. “bo-resolutions”. In:Pacific J. Math.92.2 (1981), pp. 365–383 (cit. on pp. 3, 18, 26, 29). [Man24] L. Mantovani. “Localizations and completions ...

  20. [34]

    On a nilpotence conjecture of J. P. May

    arXiv: 1901.05713 [math.KT](cit. on p. 29). [MNN15] A. Mathew, N. Naumann, and J. Noel. “On a nilpotence conjecture of J. P. May”. In:J. Topol.8.4 (2015), pp. 917–932 (cit. on p. 32). [Mor04] F. Morel. “On the motivic π0 of the sphere spectrum”. In:Axiomatic, enriched and motivic homotopy theory. Vol

  21. [37]

    Suite spectrale d’Adams et invariants cohomologiques des formes quadra- tiques

    To appear inAnnals of K-theory(cit. on p. 20). [Mor99] F. Morel. “Suite spectrale d’Adams et invariants cohomologiques des formes quadra- tiques”. In:C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.328.11 (1999), pp. 963–968 (cit. on p. 8). REFERENCES 39 [MPT] J. Morris, S. Petersen, and E. Tatum.Rational motivic K-theory cooperations. In preparation (cit. on pp. 12...

  22. [38]

    Periodic phenomena in the Adams- Novikov spectral sequence

    arXiv:2509.19542 [math.AT](cit. on pp. 25, 31). [MR W77] H. R. Miller, D. C. Ravenel, and W. S. Wilson. “Periodic phenomena in the Adams- Novikov spectral sequence”. In:Ann. of Math. (2)106.3 (1977), pp. 469–516 (cit. on p. 3). [MV99] F. Morel and V. Voevodsky. “ A1-homotopy theory of schemes”. In:Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math.90 (1999), pp. 45–143...

  23. [43]

    The homogeneous spectrum of Milnor-Witt K-theory

    arXiv: 2511.22560 [math.AG] (cit. on p. 16). [Tho16] R. Thornton. “The homogeneous spectrum of Milnor-Witt K-theory”. In:J. Algebra 459 (2016), pp. 376–388 (cit. on p. 31). [Vez01] G. Vezzosi. “Brown-Peterson spectra in stable A1-homotopy theory”. In:Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova106 (2001), pp. 47–64 (cit. on p. 12). [Voe00] V. Voevodsky. “Triangulated cat...

  24. [67]

    The homotopy coniveau tower

    Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005, pp. xxii+550 (cit. on pp. 5, 9, 24). [Lev08] M. Levine. “The homotopy coniveau tower”. In:J. Topol.1.1 (2008), pp. 217–267 (cit. on p. 6). [Lev13] M. Levine. “Convergence of Voevodsky’s slice tower”. In:Doc. Math.18 (2013), pp. 907–941 (cit. on p. 6). [Lev14] M. Levine. ...

  25. [121]

    Motives and modules over motivic cohomology

    Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1986, pp. xx+413 (cit. on pp. 9, 16). [RØ06] O. R¨ ondigs and P. A. Østvær. “Motives and modules over motivic cohomology”. In:C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris342.10 (2006), pp. 751–754 (cit. on p. 17). [RØ16] O. R¨ ondigs and P. A. Østvær. “Slices of hermitianK-theory and Milnor’s conjecture on ...

  26. [131]

    NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2004, pp. 219–260 (cit. on p. 4). [Mor12] F. Morel. A1-algebraic topology over a field. Vol

  27. [143]

    Open problems in the motivic stable homotopy theory. I

    Ann. of Math. Stud. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000, pp. 188–238 (cit. on p. 17). [Voe02] V. Voevodsky. “Open problems in the motivic stable homotopy theory. I”. In: Motives, polylogarithms and Hodge theory, Part I (Irvine, CA, 1998). Vol. 3, I. Int. Press Lect. Ser. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2002, pp. 3–34 (cit. on p. 6). [Voe03] V. Voevodsk...

  28. [145]

    Symplectic cobordism and the computation of stable stems

    Graduate Studies in Mathematics. An intro- duction to algebraic K-theory. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013, pp. xii+618 (cit. on pp. 4, 9). 38 REFERENCES [Koc93] S. O. Kochman. “Symplectic cobordism and the computation of stable stems”. In: Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.104.496 (1993), pp. x+88 (cit. on p. 32). [KOØ20] J. I. Kylling, R. Oliver, ...

  29. [177]

    Synthetic spectra and the cellular motivic category

    Cambridge Stud- ies in Advanced Mathematics. With a foreword by Matthew Ando. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019, pp. xiv+405 (cit. on p. 16). [Pst23] P. Pstragowski. “Synthetic spectra and the cellular motivic category”. In:Invent. Math.232.2 (2023), pp. 553–681 (cit. on pp. 3, 14). [PstCHT] P. Pstragowski.Finite Height Chromatic Homotopy Theory...

  30. [201]

    On the rational motivic homotopy category

    Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014, pp. xxxii+318 (cit. on pp. 28, 30). [DFJK21] F. D´ eglise, J. Fasel, F. Jin, and A. A. Khan. “On the rational motivic homotopy category”. In:J. ´Ec. polytech. Math.8 (2021), pp. 533–583 (cit. on p. 18). 36 REFERENCES [DH04] E. S. Devinatz and M. J. Hopkins. “Homotopy...

  31. [309]

    Springer Proc. Math. Stat. Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp. 109–219 (cit. on p. 32). [KBook] C. A. Weibel.The K-book. Vol

  32. [729]

    Hermitian K-theory for stable ∞-categories I: Foundations

    Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., [Providence], RI, 2019, pp. 93–128 (cit. on p. 28). REFERENCES 37 [Hermitian1] B. Calm` es, E. Dotto, Y. Harpaz, F. Hebestreit, M. Land, K. Moi, D. Nardin, T. Niko- laus, and W. Steimle. “Hermitian K-theory for stable ∞-categories I: Foundations”. In:Selecta Math. (N.S.)29.1 (2023), Paper No. 10, 269 (cit. on p. 4). [Hil11...

  33. [745]

    The motivic Hopf map solves the homotopy limit problem for K-theory

    Contemp. Math. Amer. Math. Soc., [Providence], RI, 2020, pp. 199–215 (cit. on p. 13). [RSØ18] O. R¨ ondigs, M. Spitzweck, and P. A. Østvær. “The motivic Hopf map solves the homotopy limit problem for K-theory”. In:Doc. Math.23 (2018), pp. 1405–1424 (cit. on p. 6). [RSØ19] O. R¨ ondigs, M. Spitzweck, and P. A. Østvær. “The first stable homotopy groups of m...

  34. [2008]

    The motivic Mahowald invariant

    arXiv:0802.0996 [math.AT](cit. on p. 16). [Qui19] J. D. Quigley. “The motivic Mahowald invariant”. In:Algebr. Geom. Topol.19.5 (2019), pp. 2485–2534 (cit. on pp. 20, 27). [Qui21a] J. D. Quigley. “Motivic Mahowald invariants over general base fields”. In:Doc. Math.26 (2021), pp. 561–582 (cit. on p. 20). [Qui21b] J. D. Quigley. “Real motivic and C2-equivari...

  35. [2018]

    Stable stems

    arXiv: 1811.07937 [math.AT](cit. on pp. 21, 28). [Isa19] D. C. Isaksen. “Stable stems”. In:Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.262.1269 (2019), pp. viii+159 (cit. on pp. 10, 13). [IWX23] D. C. Isaksen, G. Wang, and Z. Xu. “Stable homotopy groups of spheres: from dimension 0 to 90”. In:Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci.137 (2023), pp. 107–243 (cit. on pp. 14, 21, 28)....

  36. [2019]

    arXiv:1901.03399 [math.AT](cit. on p. 8). [Lam05] T. Y. Lam.Introduction to quadratic forms over fields. Vol

  37. [2021]

    Norms in motivic homotopy theory

    arXiv:2005.06778 [math.KT](cit. on pp. 19, 25, 32). [BH21b] T. Bachmann and M. Hoyois. “Norms in motivic homotopy theory”. In:Ast´ erisque 425 (2021), pp. ix+207 (cit. on p. 32). [BH22] T. Bachmann and J. Hahn.Nilpotence in normed MGL-modules

  38. [2022]

    On the existence of a v32 2 -self map on Mp 1, 4q at the prime 2

    arXiv: 1906.01306 [math.AT](cit. on p. 32). [BHHM08] M. Behrens, M. Hill, M. J. Hopkins, and M. Mahowald. “On the existence of a v32 2 -self map on Mp 1, 4q at the prime 2”. In:Homology Homotopy Appl.10.3 (2008), pp. 45–84 (cit. on pp. 21, 26, 30). [BHLS23] R. Burklund, J. Hahn, I. Levy, and T. M. Schlank. K-theoretic counterexamples to Ravenel’s telescop...

  39. [2023]

    arXiv:2310.17459 [math.AT](cit. on p. 3). [BHS26] R. Burklund, J. Hahn, and A. Senger.Galois reconstruction of Artin-Tate R-motivic spectra

  40. [2024]

    C-motivic modular forms

    To appear in Memoirs of the European Mathematics Society(cit. on p. 11). [GIKR22] B. Gheorghe, D. C. Isaksen, A. Krause, and N. Ricka. “ C-motivic modular forms”. In:J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS)24.10 (2022), pp. 3597–3628 (cit. on pp. 3, 15, 21). [GuiCHT] B. Guillou.Chromatic Homotopy Theory. https://www.ms.uky.edu/ ~guillou/ S24/751Notes.pdf. 2024 (cit. on ...

  41. [2025]

    On the groups JpXq . IV

    arXiv:2508.11621 [math.AG](cit. on p. 31). [Ada66] J. F. Adams. “On the groups JpXq . IV”. In:Topology5 (1966), pp. 21–71 (cit. on pp. 18, 23, 26, 30). [ALP17] A. Ananyevskiy, M. Levine, and I. Panin. “Witt sheaves and the η-inverted sphere spectrum”. In:J. Topol.10.2 (2017), pp. 370–385 (cit. on pp. 17, 25). [AM17] M. Andrews and H. Miller. “Inverting th...

  42. [2026]

    R-motivic stable stems

    To appear inGeometry and Topology(cit. on pp. 3, 15). [BI22] E. Belmont and D. C. Isaksen. “ R-motivic stable stems”. In:J. Topol.15.4 (2022), pp. 1755–1793 (cit. on p. 11). [BIK24] E. Belmont, D. C. Isaksen, and H. J. Kong. “ R-motivic v1-periodic homotopy”. In: Pacific J. Math.330.1 (2024), pp. 43–84 (cit. on pp. 7, 20, 27). [BJM25] J. F. Baer, M. Johns...

  43. [2052]

    Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, pp

    Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. x+259 (cit. on p. 5). [Mor25] J. Morris.Rings of cooperations for Hermitian K-theory over finite fields

  44. [2510]

    19501 [math.AT](cit. on p. 15). [CD19] D.-C. Cisinski and F. D´ eglise.Triangulated categories of mixed motives. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. xlii+406 (cit. on p. 17). [CD25] C. Carrick and J. M. Davies.On periodic families in the stable stems of height two