Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural network time-series classifiers for gravitational-wave searches in single-detector periods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.09268 v1 pith:DSSOAH6G submitted 2023-07-18 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords classifiersdatanetworkgravitational-waveneuralarchitecturesblackcoincidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The search for gravitational-wave signals is limited by non-Gaussian transient noises that mimic astrophysical signals. Temporal coincidence between two or more detectors is used to mitigate contamination by these instrumental glitches. However, when a single detector is in operation, coincidence is impossible, and other strategies have to be used. We explore the possibility of using neural network classifiers and present the results obtained with three types of architectures: convolutional neural network, temporal convolutional network, and inception time. The last two architectures are specifically designed to process time-series data. The classifiers are trained on a month of data from the LIGO Livingston detector during the first observing run (O1) to identify data segments that include the signature of a binary black hole merger. Their performances are assessed and compared. We then apply trained classifiers to the remaining three months of O1 data, focusing specifically on single-detector times. The most promising candidate from our search is 2016-01-04 12:24:17 UTC. Although we are not able to constrain the significance of this event to the level conventionally followed in gravitational-wave searches, we show that the signal is compatible with the merger of two black holes with masses $m_1 = 50.7^{+10.4}_{-8.9}\,M_{\odot}$ and $m_2 = 24.4^{+20.2}_{-9.3}\,M_{\odot}$ at the luminosity distance of $d_L = 564^{+812}_{-338}\,\mathrm{Mpc}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robustness of Sensitivity Evaluations for Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AresGW model 1's injection detection count at a false-alarm rate of 1/month varies with noise dataset by up to 39% coefficient of variation, while sensitive distance varies by only a few percent.

Pith tools