REVIEW 2 cited by
Benchmarking of quantum processors with random circuits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Quantum processors with sizes in the 10-100 qubit range are now increasingly common. However, with increased size comes increased complexity for benchmarking. The effectiveness of a given device may vary greatly between different tasks, and will not always be easy to predict from single and two qubit gate fidelities. For this reason, it is important to assess processor quality for a range of important tasks. In this work we propose and implement tests based on random quantum circuits. These are used to evaluate multiple different superconducting qubit devices, with sizes from 5 to 19 qubits, from two hardware manufacturers: IBM Research and Rigetti. The data is analyzed to give a quantitive description of how the devices perform. We also describe how it can be used for a qualititive description accessible to the layperson, by being played as a game.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
QPU-scale randomized benchmarking via Bell-pair injection
MQA adds structured entangling layers to MRB circuits to measure correlation dynamics via mutual information and locate critical depths where error mitigation fails on large QPUs.
-
Citizen Science Games on the Timeline of Quantum Games
A review of citizen science quantum games that attributes the field's development to serious game use, quantum computer evolution, and Quantum Game Jams.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.