Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measuring Software Testability via Automatically Generated Test Cases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.16185 v1 pith:DUAMHIXG submitted 2023-07-30 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords softwaretestabilitytestapproachestimatingmetricscasestraditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Estimating software testability can crucially assist software managers to optimize test budgets and software quality. In this paper, we propose a new approach that radically differs from the traditional approach of pursuing testability measurements based on software metrics, e.g., the size of the code or the complexity of the designs. Our approach exploits automatic test generation and mutation analysis to quantify the evidence about the relative hardness of developing effective test cases. In the paper, we elaborate on the intuitions and the methodological choices that underlie our proposal for estimating testability, introduce a technique and a prototype that allows for concretely estimating testability accordingly, and discuss our findings out of a set of experiments in which we compare the performance of our estimations both against and in combination with traditional software metrics. The results show that our testability estimates capture a complementary dimension of testability that can be synergistically combined with approaches based on software metrics to improve the accuracy of predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools