REVIEW 2 cited by
Resumming the color-octet contribution to e+ e- -> J/psi + X
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent observations of the spectrum of J/psi produced in e+ e- collisions at the Upsilon(4S) resonance are in conflict with fixed-order calculations using the Non-Relativistic QCD (NRQCD) effective field theory. One problem is that leading order color-octet mechanisms predict an enhancement of the cross section for J/psi with maximal energy that is not observed in the data. However, in this region of phase space large perturbative corrections (Sudakov logarithms) as well as enhanced nonperturbative effects are important. In this paper we use the newly developed Soft-Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) to systematically include these effects. We find that these corrections significantly broaden the color-octet contribution to the J/psi spectrum. Our calculation employs a one-stage renormalization group evolution rather than the two-stage evolution used in previous SCET calculations. We give a simple argument for why the two methods yield identical results to lowest order in the SCET power counting.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Semi-analytical results for $e^+e^-\to J/\psi + X_{{\rm non\,}c\bar{c}}$ up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s v^2)$ at B factories
NRQCD calculation of O(α_s), O(v²) and first-time O(α_s v²) corrections to e⁺e⁻ → J/ψ + X_non c c̄, with r = m_c/√s expansions to r⁴⁰, yielding cross section 0.530 pb consistent with Belle but angular parameter deviating >2σ.
-
Factorization for Collider Dataspace Correlators
Derives a factorization theorem and NLL resummation for SEMD-based event correlators, predicting a universal ledge in quark-jet non-Gaussianity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.