Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hyperparameter Optimization for Effort Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1805.00336 v4 pith:DWBPTRG3 submitted 2018-04-28 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords softwareeffortestimationhyperparameteranalyticsbeendataoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Software analytics has been widely used in software engineering for many tasks such as generating effort estimates for software projects. One of the "black arts" of software analytics is tuning the parameters controlling a data mining algorithm. Such hyperparameter optimization has been widely studied in other software analytics domains (e.g. defect prediction and text mining) but, so far, has not been extensively explored for effort estimation. Accordingly, this paper seeks simple, automatic, effective and fast methods for finding good tunings for automatic software effort estimation. We introduce a hyperparameter optimization architecture called OIL (Optimized Inductive Learning). We test OIL on a wide range of hyperparameter optimizers using data from 945 software projects. After tuning, large improvements in effort estimation accuracy were observed (measured in terms of standardized accuracy). From those results, we recommend using regression trees (CART) tuned by different evolution combine with default analogy-based estimator. This particular combination of learner and optimizers often achieves in a few hours what other optimizers need days to weeks of CPU time to accomplish. An important part of this analysis is its reproducibility and refutability. All our scripts and data are on-line. It is hoped that this paper will prompt and enable much more research on better methods to tune software effort estimators.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accuracy Can Lie: On the Impact of Surrogate Model in Configuration Tuning

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 29 systems, 10 models and 17 tuners, higher surrogate-model accuracy frequently fails to improve, and sometimes degrades, configuration tuning quality.

  2. Whence Is A Model Fair? Fixing Fairness Bugs via Propensity Score Matching

    cs.LG 2025-04 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper claims fairness metrics are strongly affected by test-set sampling and proposes FairMatch, a matching plus threshold-shift method to locate and fix fairness bugs, but the matching is not true propensity scor...

Pith tools