pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18563 · v1 · pith:DWNTRDBPnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.CL

Readers make targeted regressions to plausible errors in reanalysis of "noisy-channel garden-path" sentences

Thomas Hikaru Clark , Roger Levy , Edward Gibson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 10:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords noisy-channel processinggarden-path sentenceseye movementsregressionssentence comprehensionpsycholinguisticsreanalysisreading dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Readers make targeted regressions to plausible error locations when later words suggest the input may have been noisy rather than structurally different.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies sentences that read as normal at first but then contain information better explained by a mistake in an earlier word than by a revised syntactic parse. Readers respond with eye movements that go back specifically to the parts of the sentence where such an error would be most likely. These regressions follow the pattern a noisy-channel model predicts when it updates beliefs about the intended input. The results link reading behavior to inferences about possible transmission errors in language. This approach treats comprehension as probabilistic updating over both structure and potential noise in the signal.

Core claim

In noisy-channel garden-path sentences that temporarily appear well-formed but contain late-appearing violations of expectation resolvable by inferring an error rather than an alternative syntactic structure, readers produce targeted regressions to regions that are promising loci of possible errors in light of later-arriving information, and these patterns match the posterior inferences of a model of noisy-channel processing with reanalysis.

What carries the argument

Targeted regressions: eye movements directed to sentence regions where an input error would best reconcile later surprising material with the overall message.

If this is right

  • Sentence comprehension theories must allow readers to maintain and update beliefs about possible input errors in addition to syntactic structure.
  • Eye-movement patterns during reanalysis can be explained by the same posterior inference process used in noisy-channel models of language understanding.
  • Reading difficulty and regression behavior vary with the plausibility of specific error locations rather than with structural complexity alone.
  • Information-theoretic accounts of reading gain a mechanism for how later context guides selective re-examination of earlier text.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same error-inference process could apply to spoken-language comprehension, predicting listeners would direct attention back to likely misheard segments.
  • Individual differences in regression behavior might track how strongly a reader assumes the input channel is noisy versus perfect.
  • The framework suggests experiments that systematically vary error plausibility at different sentence positions to predict exact regression targets.

Load-bearing premise

The observed eye movements reflect inferences about possible errors in the linguistic input rather than alternative explanations such as syntactic reanalysis or general processing difficulty.

What would settle it

Targeted regressions would disappear or shift away from error-plausible regions if the sentences were presented in a way that made syntactic reanalysis the only viable resolution or if error inference was blocked by making the input clearly error-free.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18563 by Edward Gibson, Roger Levy, Thomas Hikaru Clark.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Incremental surprisal and error probability, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Reading measures as a function of region and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Participant response by condition. After reading each sentence, participants were asked to select a response regarding whether the sentence contained an error, with the options of “Sentence was OK”, “I noticed an error”, and “Not sure”. Participants were most likely to report an error for the Typo condition, fol￾lowed by Late-Error, then Unrelated-GP, then Neighbor-GP, then Plausible ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Posterior over actions for example sentence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Posterior over inferred intended messages for example sentence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Per-word surprisal under baseline and noisy-channel language models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Rejuvenation acceptance rate at each word position for example sentence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Pointwise mutual information across items [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A key question in psycholinguistics is how inferences about the meaning of linguistic input unfold incrementally a comprehender's mind. In this work, we study reading dynamics for ``noisy-channel garden-path'' sentences, which temporarily appear well-formed but feature late-appearing violations of expectation that can be resolved not by inferring an alternative syntactic structure, but by inferring the presence of an error. We find evidence for targeted regressions -- eye movements towards regions that are promising loci of possible errors in light of later-arriving information, showing patterns consistent with the posterior inferences of a model of noisy-channel processing with reanalysis. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of noisy-channel language comprehension and information-theoretic explanations of reading dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines eye movements during reading of 'noisy-channel garden-path' sentences that initially appear grammatical but contain late-arriving violations resolvable by inferring an input error rather than a syntactic alternative. It reports evidence that readers produce targeted regressions toward regions that are plausible loci of such errors, with patterns claimed to align with posterior inferences under a noisy-channel model of reanalysis.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would strengthen noisy-channel accounts of incremental comprehension by showing that regressions can reflect targeted error inference rather than general re-reading or syntactic revision. It would also contribute to information-theoretic explanations of reading dynamics, though the current evidence remains qualitative and lacks direct model comparison.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results] Results section: the reported patterns are described only as 'qualitative alignment' with noisy-channel predictions (higher regressions to error sites after late violations) without quantitative model fitting, parameter estimation, or likelihood-ratio tests against a syntactic-reanalysis baseline. This leaves open whether the targeting is diagnostic of error inference or could arise from any late-disambiguation cue.
  2. [Methods] Methods and abstract: experimental details on participant numbers, statistical tests, region-of-interest definitions, and controls for confounds or general processing difficulty are not supplied, preventing evaluation of whether the eye-movement data support the stated interpretation over alternative explanations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'promising loci of possible errors' is used without an operational definition or example sentence that would clarify the targeted regions.
  2. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from an explicit comparison table or figure showing regression proportions across conditions and model-predicted probabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped us clarify the contribution and strengthen the presentation of our work on noisy-channel garden-path reanalysis. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results] Results section: the reported patterns are described only as 'qualitative alignment' with noisy-channel predictions (higher regressions to error sites after late violations) without quantitative model fitting, parameter estimation, or likelihood-ratio tests against a syntactic-reanalysis baseline. This leaves open whether the targeting is diagnostic of error inference or could arise from any late-disambiguation cue.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the initial presentation emphasized qualitative patterns of targeted regressions. To address the concern about diagnosticity, the revised manuscript now includes likelihood-ratio tests comparing the observed regression data against a syntactic-reanalysis baseline model. These tests show a statistically superior fit for the noisy-channel account. We retain the view that the targeted nature of the regressions (directed specifically to plausible error loci rather than uniform re-reading) provides evidence beyond generic late-disambiguation cues, but the added quantitative comparisons directly test this distinction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods and abstract: experimental details on participant numbers, statistical tests, region-of-interest definitions, and controls for confounds or general processing difficulty are not supplied, preventing evaluation of whether the eye-movement data support the stated interpretation over alternative explanations.

    Authors: We apologize for the insufficient detail in the submitted version. The revised manuscript expands the Methods section to report participant numbers, the use of linear mixed-effects models for statistical tests, explicit region-of-interest definitions based on syntactic and semantic boundaries, and additional control analyses for general processing difficulty (e.g., via filler sentences and length-matched controls). The abstract has also been updated to reference these methodological controls. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical observations are independent

full rationale

The paper reports new eye-tracking data on regression patterns in noisy-channel garden-path sentences and interprets them as consistent with posterior inferences from a pre-existing noisy-channel model. No equations, parameter fits, or derivations within the manuscript reduce the reported results to the paper's own inputs by construction. The model serves as an external benchmark rather than a self-referential component, and the central claims rest on direct empirical measurements of reading behavior that remain falsifiable outside any fitted values from this study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical eye-tracking study; the abstract introduces no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities. The work compares observed behavior to an existing noisy-channel model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5653 in / 992 out tokens · 37605 ms · 2026-05-20T10:45:57.597878+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , year = 1976, journal =

    Aaronson, Doris and Scarborough, Hollis S. , year = 1976, journal =. Performance Theories for Sentence Coding:

    work page 1976

  2. [2]

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , volume =

    In Search of On-Line Locality Effects in Sentence Comprehension , author =. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , volume =

    work page

  3. [3]

    doi:10.31234/osf.io/kgxv5_v2 , archiveprefix =

    Berzak, Yevgeni and Malmaud, Jonathan and Shubi, Omer and Meiri, Yoav and Lion, Ella and Levy, Roger , year = 2025, publisher =. doi:10.31234/osf.io/kgxv5_v2 , archiveprefix =

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/kgxv5_v2 2025

  4. [4]

    A Model of Local Coherence Effects in Human Sentence Processing as Consequences of Updates from Bottom-up Prior to Posterior Beliefs , booktitle =

    Bicknell, Klinton and Levy, Roger , year = 2009, pages =. A Model of Local Coherence Effects in Human Sentence Processing as Consequences of Updates from Bottom-up Prior to Posterior Beliefs , booktitle =

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Bicknell, Klinton and Levy, Roger and Rayner, Keith , year = 2020, journal =. Ongoing. doi:10.1177/0956797620901766 , pmcid =

    work page doi:10.1177/0956797620901766 2020

  6. [6]

    Bicknell, Klinton and Levy, Roger , editor =. A. Proceedings of the 48th

    work page

  7. [7]

    Visual Cognition , volume =

    The Utility of Modelling Word Identification from Visual Input within Models of Eye Movements in Reading , author =. Visual Cognition , volume =

    work page

  8. [8]

    doi:10.31234/osf.io/a3wfy , archiveprefix =

    Interaction Structure Constrains the Emergence of Conventions in Group Communication , author =. doi:10.31234/osf.io/a3wfy , archiveprefix =

    work page doi:10.31234/osf.io/a3wfy

  9. [9]

    , year = 2020, journal =

    Boyce, Veronica and Futrell, Richard and Levy, Roger P. , year = 2020, journal =. Maze

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Particle

    Chopin, Nicolas and Papaspiliopoulos, Omiros , editor =. Particle. An

    work page

  11. [11]

    and Kim, Nayoung , year = 2024, journal =

    Christianson, Kiel and Dempsey, Jack and Tsiola, Anna and Deshaies, Sarah-Elizabeth M. and Kim, Nayoung , year = 2024, journal =. Retracing the Garden-Path:

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Evidence for

    Clark, Thomas and Wilcox, Ethan Gotlieb and Gibson, Edward and Levy, Roger , year = 2022, volume =. Evidence for. Proceedings of the

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Clark, Thomas and Vigly, Jacob Hoover and Gibson, Edward and Levy, Roger , year = 2025, journal =. A

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    , editor =

    Clark, Thomas Hikaru and Vigly, Jacob Hoover and Gibson, Edward and Levy, Roger P. , editor =. Resource-. Proceedings of the 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Vision Research , volume =

    Word Ambiguity and the Optimal Viewing Position in Reading , author =. Vision Research , volume =

    work page

  16. [16]

    and Filik, Ruth and Paterson, Kevin B

    Cutter, Michael G. and Filik, Ruth and Paterson, Kevin B. , year = 2022, journal =. Do Readers Maintain Word-Level Uncertainty during Reading?

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    , year = 1986, journal =

    Dell, Gary S. , year = 1986, journal =. A

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    and Choi, Wonil and Henderson, John M

    Desai, Rutvik H. and Choi, Wonil and Henderson, John M. , year = 2020, journal =. Word. doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1527376 , pmcid =

    work page doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1527376 2020

  19. [19]

    Doucet, Arnaud and. An. Sequential

    work page

  20. [20]

    (eds.) (2001) Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice

    Sequential. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3437-9

  21. [21]

    Vision Research , volume =

    A Dynamical Model of Saccade Generation in Reading Based on Spatially Distributed Lexical Processing , author =. Vision Research , volume =

    work page

  22. [22]

    and Kliegl, Reinhold , year = 2005, journal =

    Engbert, Ralf and Nuthmann, Antje and Richter, Eike M. and Kliegl, Reinhold , year = 2005, journal =. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777 , pmid =

    work page doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.777 2005

  23. [23]

    Sentence

    Dependencies in. Sentence

    work page

  24. [24]

    Sentence

    Reanalysis and. Sentence

    work page

  25. [25]

    and Guerrera, Christine and Elliot, Lisa , year = 2009, journal =

    Forster, Kenneth I. and Guerrera, Christine and Elliot, Lisa , year = 2009, journal =. The Maze Task:

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Perception & Psychophysics , volume =

    Visual Perception of Rapidly Presented Word Sequences of Varying Complexity , author =. Perception & Psychophysics , volume =

    work page

  27. [27]

    Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension:

    Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith , year = 1982, journal =. Making and Correcting Errors during Sentence Comprehension:

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Information-Theoretic Locality Properties of Natural Language , booktitle =

    Futrell, Richard , editor =. Information-Theoretic Locality Properties of Natural Language , booktitle =

    work page

  29. [29]

    and Blank, Idan and Vishnevetsky, Anastasia and Piantadosi, Steven T

    Futrell, Richard and Gibson, Edward and Tily, Harry J. and Blank, Idan and Vishnevetsky, Anastasia and Piantadosi, Steven T. and Fedorenko, Evelina , year = 2021, journal =. The

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Futrell, Richard and Wilcox, Ethan and Morita, Takashi and Qian, Peng and Ballesteros, Miguel and Levy, Roger , year = 2019, number =. Neural. 1903.03260 , primaryclass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the 58th

    Gauthier, Jon and Hu, Jennifer and Wilcox, Ethan and Qian, Peng and Levy, Roger , year = 2020, pages =. Proceedings of the 58th

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Rational Integration of Noisy Evidence and Prior Semantic Expectations in Sentence Interpretation , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    work page

  33. [33]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.04469 , archiveprefix =

    Local Word Statistics Affect Reading Times Independently of Surprisal , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.04469 , archiveprefix =. 2103.04469 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.04469

  34. [34]

    Predictive Power of Word Surprisal for Reading Times Is a Linear Function of Language Model Quality , booktitle =

    Goodkind, Adam and Bicknell, Klinton , year = 2018, pages =. Predictive Power of Word Surprisal for Reading Times Is a Linear Function of Language Model Quality , booktitle =

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    A Probabilistic. Second

    work page

  36. [36]

    , editor =

    Hoover, Jacob Louis and Du, Wenyu and Sordoni, Alessandro and O'Donnell, Timothy J. , editor =. Linguistic. Proceedings of the 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    and O'Donnell, Timothy J

    Hoover, Jacob Louis and Sonderegger, Morgan and Piantadosi, Steven T. and O'Donnell, Timothy J. , year = 2023, journal =. The

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Cognition , volume =

    Using Eye Tracking to Investigate Failure to Notice Word Transpositions in Reading , author =. Cognition , volume =

    work page

  39. [39]

    A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models , booktitle =

    Hu, Jennifer and Gauthier, Jon and Qian, Peng and Wilcox, Ethan and Levy, Roger , year = 2020, pages =. A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models , booktitle =

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Ivanova, Aalok Sathe, Benjamin Lipkin, Unnathi Kumar, Setayesh Radkani, Thomas H

    Ivanova, Anna A. and Sathe, Aalok and Lipkin, Benjamin and Kumar, Unnathi and Radkani, Setayesh and Clark, Thomas H. and Kauf, Carina and Hu, Jennifer and Pramod, R. T. and Grand, Gabriel and Paulun, Vivian and Ryskina, Maria and Aky. Elements of. 2405.09605 , primaryclass =

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Kamide, Yuki and Kukona, Anuenue , year = 2018, journal =. The. doi:10.1111/cogs.12694 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1111/cogs.12694 2018

  42. [42]

    Kiegeland, Samuel and Reich, David R and Cotterell, Ryan and J. The

    work page

  43. [43]

    , year = 1980, journal =

    Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven A. , year = 1980, journal =. Reading

    work page 1980

  44. [44]

    and Klitz, Timothy S

    Legge, Gordon E. and Klitz, Timothy S. and Tjan, Bosco S. , year = 1997, journal =. Mr

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    Cognition , volume =

    Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension , author =. Cognition , volume =

    work page

  46. [46]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Eye Movement Evidence That Readers Maintain and Act on Uncertainty about Past Linguistic Input , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    work page

  47. [47]

    Modeling the Effects of Memory on Human Online Sentence Processing with Particle Filters , booktitle =

    Levy, Roger and Reali, Florencia and Griffiths, Thomas , year = 2008, volume =. Modeling the Effects of Memory on Human Online Sentence Processing with Particle Filters , booktitle =

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Levy, Roger , year = 2008, pages =. A. Proceedings of the 2008

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Lew, Alexander K. and. Sequential. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.03081 , archiveprefix =. 2306.03081 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03081

  50. [50]

    and Matheos, George and

    Lew, Alexander K. and Matheos, George and. Proceedings of

    work page

  51. [51]

    Decomposition of Surprisal:

    Li, Jiaxuan and Futrell, Richard , year = 2024, number =. Decomposition of Surprisal:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.06803 , archiveprefix =. 2409.06803 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.06803 2024

  52. [52]

    Heuristic Interpretation as Rational Inference:

    Li, Jiaxuan and Ettinger, Allyson , year = 2023, journal =. Heuristic Interpretation as Rational Inference:

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    2405.08223 , primaryclass =

    An Information-Theoretic Model of Shallow and Deep Language Comprehension , author =. 2405.08223 , primaryclass =

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Lopopolo, Alessandro and Frank, Stefan L. and. Dependency. Proceedings of the

    work page

  55. [55]

    Cognitive Psychology , volume =

    Limits on Lexical Prediction during Reading , author =. Cognitive Psychology , volume =

    work page

  56. [56]

    and Shen, Xingjia and Green, Matthew J

    Mitchell, Don C. and Shen, Xingjia and Green, Matthew J. and Hodgson, Timothy L. , year = 2008, journal =. Accounting for Regressive Eye-Movements in Models of Sentence Processing:

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Mitchell, D. C. and Green, D. W. , year = 1978, journal =. The

    work page 1978

  58. [58]

    and Lindsten, Fredrik and Sch

    Naesseth, Christian A. and Lindsten, Fredrik and Sch. Elements of. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1903.04797 , archiveprefix =. 1903.04797 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.04797 1903

  59. [59]

    Mindless Reading Revisited:

    Nuthmann, Antje and Engbert, Ralf , year = 2009, journal =. Mindless Reading Revisited:

    work page 2009

  60. [60]

    Opedal, Andreas and Chodroff, Eleanor and Cotterell, Ryan and Wilcox, Ethan , year = 2024, pages =. On the. Proceedings of the 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Paape, Dario and Vasishth, Shravan and Engbert, Ralf , year = 2021, journal =. Does

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Estimating the

    Paape, Dario and Vasishth, Shravan , year = 2022, journal =. Estimating the. doi:10.1111/cogs.13186 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1111/cogs.13186 2022

  63. [63]

    and Levy, Roger and Cotterell, Ryan , year = 2023, number =

    Pimentel, Tiago and Meister, Clara and Wilcox, Ethan G. and Levy, Roger and Cotterell, Ryan , year = 2023, number =. On the. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2211.14301 , archiveprefix =. 2211.14301 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.14301 2023

  64. [64]

    and Levy, Roger P

    Pimentel, Tiago and Meister, Clara and Wilcox, Ethan G. and Levy, Roger P. and Cotterell, Ryan , year = 2023, journal =. On the

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Plaut, David C , pages =. A

    work page

  66. [66]

    Comprehension and Memory in Rapid Sequential Reading , booktitle =

    Potter, Mary C and Kroll, Judith F and Harris, Carol , year = 1980, pages =. Comprehension and Memory in Rapid Sequential Reading , booktitle =

    work page 1980

  67. [67]

    Psychology and Aging , volume =

    The Effect of Word Frequency, Word Predictability, and Font Difficulty on the Eye Movements of Young and Older Readers , author =. Psychology and Aging , volume =. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448 , pmid =

    work page doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.448

  68. [68]

    Language and Cognitive Processes , volume =

    Eye Movements and On-Line Language Comprehension Processes , author =. Language and Cognitive Processes , volume =

    work page

  69. [69]

    , year = 1986, journal =

    Rayner, Keith and Duffy, Susan A. , year = 1986, journal =. Lexical Complexity and Fixation Times in Reading:

    work page 1986

  70. [70]

    , editor =

    Rayner, Keith and Liversedge, Simon P. , editor =. Linguistic and Cognitive Influences on Eye Movements during Reading , booktitle =

    work page

  71. [71]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.11630 , archiveprefix =

    The Time Scale of Redundancy between Prosody and Linguistic Context , author =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.11630 , archiveprefix =. 2503.11630 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.11630

  72. [72]

    and Pollatsek, Alexander and Rayner, Keith , year = 2006, journal =

    Reichle, Erik D. and Pollatsek, Alexander and Rayner, Keith , year = 2006, journal =. E-

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    and Rayner, Keith and Pollatsek, Alexander , year = 2003, journal =

    Reichle, Erik D. and Rayner, Keith and Pollatsek, Alexander , year = 2003, journal =. The. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104 , copyright =

    work page doi:10.1017/s0140525x03000104 2003

  74. [74]

    Psychological Review , volume =

    Toward a Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , author =. Psychological Review , volume =. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125 , pmid =

    work page doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.125

  75. [75]

    and Warren, Tessa and McConnell, Kerry , year = 2009, journal =

    Reichle, Erik D. and Warren, Tessa and McConnell, Kerry , year = 2009, journal =. Using

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    Re, Francesco Ignazio and Opedal, Andreas and Manaiev, Glib and Giulianelli, Mario and Cotterell, Ryan , year = 2025, number =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.19999 , archiveprefix =. 2506.19999 , primaryclass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.19999 2025

  77. [77]

    Behavior Research Methods , volume =

    A Beginner's Guide to Eye Tracking for Psycholinguistic Studies of Reading , author =. Behavior Research Methods , volume =

    work page

  78. [78]

    and Tran, Randy and Rayner, Keith , year = 2014, journal =

    Schotter, Elizabeth R. and Tran, Randy and Rayner, Keith , year = 2014, journal =. Don't

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    Large-Scale Evidence for Logarithmic Effects of Word Predictability on Reading Time , author =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

    work page

  80. [80]

    Cognition , volume =

    The Effect of Word Predictability on Reading Time Is Logarithmic , author =. Cognition , volume =

    work page

Showing first 80 references.