Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Refractory phosphorus in the HD 100546 protoplanetary disk

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phosphorus in the HD 100546 planet-forming disk is almost entirely carried by refractory dust, with gas-phase P depleted by a factor of at least 129 inside the main dust trap and at least 513 outside it.

desk verdict First empirical P volatile/refractory budget for a planet-forming disk; solid but conditional on HCP modeling and stellar abundance systematics. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14228 v1 pith:DYA7DIQK submitted 2025-04-19 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Mihkel Kama , Oliver Shorttle , Sandipan P. D. Borthakur , Luke Keyte , Jennifer B. Bergner , Luca Fossati , Colin P. Folsom , Heleri Ramler This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords phosphorusprotoplanetarydisksHD100546refractoryreservoirdusttrapHerbigAe/Bestarsgas-phasedepletionchemicalhabitability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to determine where elemental phosphorus sits in a planet-forming disk: in gas, in volatile ices, or in refractory dust. It uses the Herbig Ae/Be star HD 100546, whose slowly mixing radiative envelope means that accreting disk material contaminates the photosphere, so the stellar phosphorus abundance measures the total gas-plus-dust phosphorus in the inner disk. The stellar abundance is $\log(\mathrm{P/H})_\star=-7.50^{+0.23}_{-0.28}$, about eight times below the solar value, while non-detections of the P-bearing molecules PO and PN in the sub-millimetre put the inner-disk gas-phase P/H below $2\times10^{-9}$ and the outer disk below $5\times10^{-10}$. The paper concludes that almost all elemental phosphorus in the disk is locked in a refractory (dusty) reservoir that survives the roughly 180 K temperatures at the inner edge of the 22 au dust trap, with apatite or schreibersite minerals, or possibly ammonium phosphate salts, as plausible carriers. If true, a planet's phosphorus budget is set by its solid-accretion history, with consequences for the formation and habitability of planets around such stars.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the stellar accretion-contamination method: the star's slowly mixing radiative envelope preserves freshly accreted disk material in its photosphere, so the photospheric phosphorus-to-hydrogen ratio measures the total gas-plus-dust inventory of the material that crosses the last major dust trap. The dust trap is the 22-40 au ring where large grains are stopped, which removes the refractory fraction from the accretion stream. Comparing the stellar total with the gas-phase disk abundance isolates the fraction locked in solids. The gas-phase side is carried by a two-dimensional thermo-chemical disk model with a phosphorus chemical network, whose calculated PO and PN line fluxes are compared with the sub-millimetre upper limits, in a two-zone version that lets the inner and outer disk gas-phase P/H vary independently.

What would settle it

A deeper sub-millimetre or mid-infrared search for P-bearing molecules in the HD 100546 disk that detects a line flux above the 3-sigma upper limits used here, or an independent stellar abundance re-analysis that returns a phosphorus-to-hydrogen ratio within 0.1 dex of solar, would contradict the inferred depletion and settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that phosphorus in the HD 100546 disk is strongly depleted from gas into dust. The gas-phase elemental abundance inside the main dust trap is at least a factor of 129 below the solar reference, outside it at least a factor of 513 below, and the total gas-plus-dust inventory crossing into the accretion stream is depleted by a factor of about 8. Because roughly 90 percent of the refractory element mass is held back by the dust trap while volatile carriers like water ice pass through, the phosphorus carrier must remain solid at temperatures up to roughly 180 K rather than being a volatile ice such as PO, PN, or $\mathrm{PH_3}$. The preferred solid reservoir is a mineral such as apatite or schreibersite; ammonium phosphate remains a candidate but would require a special formation mechanism to avoid depleting nitrogen on the star.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the phosphorus-to-hydrogen ratio measured on the star's surface equals the total phosphorus-to-hydrogen ratio of the gas and dust that cross the 22 au dust trap and fall onto the star, which requires a roughly 98 percent mixing fraction for freshly accreted material and no chemical sorting between gas and dust during accretion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Giant planets forming inside and outside the 22 au dust trap will accrete very different phosphorus inventories: the inner planet candidate receives dust-poor, low-phosphorus gas, while the outer planet can gather more of the refractory reservoir.
  • The P/H ratio in a giant planet's envelope becomes a tracer of its refractory-element accretion history, comparable to or better than sulfur, because almost all phosphorus is delivered in solids.
  • Chemical habitability arguments should treat phosphorus as a primarily solid-delivered element in transitional disks, so exoplanet-atmosphere phosphorus detections must be interpreted against a refractory delivery pathway.
  • The same comparison between a stellar photospheric abundance and disk gas-phase upper limits can map the volatile-versus-refractory budget of other elements in other transitional disks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the stellar mixing fraction is close to the assumed 98 percent, a survey of Herbig Ae/Be stars with dust traps should find broadly similar phosphorus behaviour, which would turn this single-object result into a general property of transitional disks.
  • Editorial extension: the current non-detections leave room for a phosphorus carrier that the chemical network does not include; a targeted search for HCP or $\mathrm{PH_3}$ lines at the same sensitivity would distinguish apatite or schreibersite carriers from an unmodelled volatile reservoir.
  • Editorial extension: simultaneous abundance measurements of calcium, iron, and phosphorus in the accreting photosphere could test whether phosphorus rides on the same refractory grains as these metals, and whether the inferred 90 percent grain-trapping efficiency is consistent across elements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper constrains the phosphorus budget of the HD 100546 protoplanetary disk by combining a photospheric P abundance measurement from HST/STIS ultraviolet spectroscopy (log(P/H)_star = -7.50(+0.23/-0.28)) with APEX sub-millimetre non-detections of PO and PN rotational lines, modeled with the DALI thermochemical code to obtain gas-phase upper limits of (P/H)_in < 2e-9 inside the 22 au dust cavity and (P/H)_out < 5e-10 outside. Interpreting the stellar abundance as the total gas-plus-dust P/H of the accretion stream via the stellar mixing fraction f_acc = 98%, they conclude that phosphorus in the disk is predominantly locked in refractory solids, consistent with apatite/schreibersite, and discuss implications for the two protoplanet candidates and for chemical habitability.

Significance. This would be the first empirical determination of the volatile-versus-refractory partitioning of phosphorus in a planet-forming disk, a quantity relevant to planet formation, atmospheric chemistry, and prebiotic potential. The study uses two independent datasets and an established accretion-contamination method, and the stellar depletion factor (~8) is consistent with the depletion of other refractory elements. The paper also makes falsifiable predictions for future JWST/Ariel observations. The principal caveats are the dependence of the conclusions on a single stellar-mixing model and on the completeness of the disk phosphorus chemical network, in particular the unmodeled HCP line.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2 / Table 2] The observed HCP J=6-5 transition is listed in Table 2 with a 3-sigma upper limit of 26.4 mK km/s, but the text states that 'The HCP line was not included in the modelling.' Since Section 1 identifies HCP as one of the three dominant gas-phase P carriers in the interstellar medium, the gas-phase P/H upper limits derived solely from PO and PN (P/H_in < 2e-9, P/H_out < 5e-10) are not total gas-phase phosphorus limits unless HCP is explicitly shown to be negligible. The authors should either incorporate HCP into the DALI network and model its line, or provide a quantitative argument, for example based on photodissociation rates or chemical network predictions for protoplanetary disks, that HCP carries a negligible fraction of gas-phase P. Without this, the central claim in Conclusions (iii) that phosphorus is 'strongly depleted from the gas into a refractory reservoir' is not fully supported.
  2. [§4 (stellar mixing fraction)] The identification of the measured photospheric abundance log(P/H)_star = -7.50 with the total P/H of the inner-disk accretion stream relies on the mixing fraction f_acc = 98% from Jermyn & Kama (2022). This is a model-dependent quantity, and if f_acc were substantially lower, the stellar abundance would not trace the inner-disk P inventory, weakening the inferred factor ~8 total-P depletion and the contrast with the gas-phase limits. The authors should include a sensitivity test or an explicit error budget for f_acc, or cite independent validation of this mixing fraction, to make the central interpretation robust.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§5.1] The text says the gas-phase chemistry was 'probed by our ALMA observations,' but the observations were taken with APEX; please correct the instrument name.
  2. [References] The entries Jenkins 2009a and Jenkins 2009b refer to the same publication (ApJ 700, 1299) and should be merged or distinguished consistently.
  3. [§3.2 / Table 2] The text states that the 234 GHz setting covers PO and HCP lines and the 242 GHz setting covers PN, but the observed PN line is at 234.936 GHz while the PO and HCP lines are near 240 GHz; the assignment of lines to local oscillator settings appears reversed.
  4. [Table A1] Section 4.2 states that the disk extends to R_out = 500 au, while Table A1 lists R_out = 1000 au; please resolve this inconsistency.
  5. [§5.2] The sentence 'The conclusion from above that most, or all, elemental P is locked in refractory solids.' is a sentence fragment and should be rephrased.
  6. [Figure 5 caption] There is a typo, 'phoshporous,' in the caption; it should be 'phosphorus.'
  7. [Abstract / throughout] The word 'phosphorous' is used in several places (e.g., abstract, Figure 5 caption); the correct spelling for the element is 'phosphorus.'
  8. [§4.2] The phrase 'constant volatile P/H ratio' could be misunderstood; consider using 'constant gas-phase elemental P/H ratio' to avoid confusion between volatility and gas phase.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the stellar P/H and disk gas upper limits are forward-modeled measurements; self-cited mixing and disk models are assumptions, not inputs that define the result.

full rationale

The central claim that phosphorus is refractory in HD 100546 rests on two independently derived constraints. The photospheric abundance log(P/H)_star=-7.50 is obtained from chi-square fitting of HST/STIS P II/P I lines with gf values calibrated on Vega; it is not defined in terms of the disk refractory fraction. The inner and outer disk gas limits, (P/H)_in<2e-9 and (P/H)_out<5e-10, are forward-model upper limits from a DALI grid over volatile P/H compared with APEX 3-sigma non-detections of PO and PN; they are not fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The interpretation that P/H_star traces the total gas plus dust P inventory of the inner disk relies on the accretion-mixing fraction f_acc=98% from Jermyn & Kama (2022), a self-cited published stellar mixing calculation. That step is load-bearing and model-dependent, but it is not circular: no equation in this paper reduces the refractory conclusion to that f_acc by construction, and the prior result is an external, parameterized calculation with stated assumptions that do not include the target P reservoir. The paper explicitly notes 'The HCP line was not included in the modelling' (Table 2 note), an acknowledged completeness limitation for the gas-phase tracer, but this is a correctness risk rather than a circular step. The self-citations to Kama et al. (2015, 2016, 2019) and Keyte et al. (2023, 2024) import the disk structure and the accretion-contamination method, but these are prior published results whose assumptions do not include the conclusion about phosphorus. Score 2 reflects moderate reliance on self-cited prior models, with no circular step identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on four main assumptions: the stellar mixing fraction, the disk model fidelity, the volatile binding energy of P species, and the Vega-based oscillator strength calibration. No new entities are postulated. The two calibrated P line log(gf) values are the main fitted parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • log(gf) of P II 1543.133 Å line = -2.224
    Calibrated by chi-square fitting to the HST/STIS Vega spectrum with the Fitzpatrick (2010) P abundance; used for the main stellar P/H estimate. A 0.08 dex (1-sigma) uncertainty is propagated.
  • log(gf) of P II 1535.9225 Å line = -1.470
    Calibrated on Vega for the validation region in Appendix B; yields a P/H value consistent with the main result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The stellar mixing model of Jermyn & Kama (2022) yields f_acc = 98% for HD 100546, so the photospheric composition is nearly entirely accreted disk material.
    Invoked in Section 4 to identify log(P/H)_star with the total P/H of the inner disk accretion stream; if f_acc were much lower, the stellar P/H would not trace disk material.
  • domain assumption The DALI disk physical structure for HD 100546 (Bruderer et al. 2012; Kama et al. 2016; Keyte et al. 2023, 2024) correctly describes the temperature, density, and dust distribution needed to convert non-detections into P/H upper limits.
    Used in Section 4.2; the upper limits on P/H_in and P/H_out are model-dependent.
  • domain assumption All phosphorus-bearing species in the chemical network have binding energy E_B = 5770 K (T_sub ~ 125 K), following Piacentino & Öberg (2022).
    Section 4.2.1; this volatile assumption is conservative for the refractory conclusion, but it shapes the P/H upper limits.
  • domain assumption The Vega-calibrated oscillator strengths for the P lines are transferable to HD 100546.
    Section 4.1 and Appendix B; the stellar P/H measurement rests on log(gf) values estimated from Vega spectra.
  • domain assumption Photospheric abundances are derived under LTE with ATLAS9 model atmospheres and the adopted stellar parameters from Kama et al. (2016).
    Section 4.1; departures from LTE or errors in stellar parameters would shift the inferred P/H.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Refractory phosphorus in the HD 100546 protoplanetary disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DYA7DIQK

@misc{pith2026250414228,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Refractory phosphorus in the HD 100546 protoplanetary disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DYA7DIQK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14228}
}
abstract

The phosphorus budget of planets is intertwined with their formation history and is thought to influence their habitability. The chemical reservoirs and volatile \emph{vs} refractory budget of phosphorus in planet-forming environments have so far eluded empirical characterisation. We employ high-resolution spectra from HST/STIS in the ultraviolet and APEX in the sub-mm to constrain the phosphorus budget in the well-characterized HD\,100546 star and protoplanetary disk system. We measure $\log{(P/H)_{\star}}=-7.50^{+0.23}_{-0.28}$ on the stellar surface, which traces the total inventory of P in accreting gas \emph{and }dust from the inner disk. The inner disk gas, inside of the main dust trap, has $\log{(P/H)_{\rm in}}\lesssim-8.70$, and the outer disk gas $\log{(P/H)_{\rm out}}\lesssim-9.30$. Phosphorus in the disk is carried by a relatively refractory reservoir, consistent with minerals such as apatite or schreibersite, or with ammonium phosphate salts, in terms of sublimation temperature. We discuss the impact this might have on the two protoplanets around HD\,100546. Our results contribute to our understanding of the chemical habitability of planetary systems and lay a foundation for future explorations, especially in the context of JWST and \emph{Ariel} which can study phosphorus in exoplanet atmospheres.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14228 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top panel: The stellar spectrum of HD 100546 is in light grey, the binned spectrum is in dark grey, the red spectrum is the best-fit syn￾thetic spectrum, and the blue spectra are for ±3 𝜎 parameter deviations. The highlighted region is used for estimating log(P/H)★using the chi-square minimisation. Bottom panel: 𝜒 2 as a function of log(P/H)★. The red ver￾tical line indicates the minimum, while the blue lines are ±3… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Volatile elemental P/H in the HD 100546 disk assuming a globally constant abundance. Disk-integrated 3𝜎 line flux upper limits for the PO and PN transitions observed with APEX (black lines), and predicted line fluxes for a DALI model grid covering volatile elemental phosphorus abundances from P/H = 10−12 to 10−6 (colored circles) are shown. 4.2.1 Chemical network The chemical reaction network used in our model is ba… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. PO and PN abundance maps from our DALI model assuming a global volatile phosphorus abundance P/H = 10−9 . The white contours enclose 50 % and 75 % of total line flux for the PN 234.936 GHz transition. ℎ(𝑟) = ℎ𝑐  𝑟 𝑅𝑐 𝜓 (2) where ℎc is the scale height at 𝑅c, and the power law index of the scale height, 𝜓, describes the flaring of the disk. Σgas and Σdust extend from the dust sublimation radius (𝑅sub = 0.25 au) to … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coupled constraints on the gas-phase elemental P/H ratio inside (P/Hin, 𝑥-axis) and outside (P/Hout, 𝑦-axis) the 22 au dust cavity in the HD 100546 disk. Allowed abundance sets (shades of blue) meet the constraint from the PN line disk-integrated 3𝜎 flux upper limit. T…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The dominant phosphorous reservoirs throughout the HD 100546 disk. Left-hand panel: a map of the calculated disk temperature structure, which dictates phosphorous mineral stability. Normalised height above midplane is given by z/r, with height above midplane, z (au), d…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sketch of the HD 100546 system with the star, protoplanetary disk, and two claimed protoplanets. which are coupled to the gas but generally constitute a small fraction of the total dust mass, can traverse the inner cavity. In the HD 100546 disk model from Keyte et al.(…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unraveling the non-equilibrium chemistry of the temperate sub-Neptune K2-18 b

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A grid of non-equilibrium chemical models fit to JWST spectra of K2-18 b favors high metallicity (266x solar) and C/O > 2.1, with methane robustly detected.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    G., McIntosh B

    Adams N. G., McIntosh B. J., Smith D., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A&A...232..443A 232, 443

    1990

  3. [3]

    Ag \'u ndez M., Cernicharo J., Gu \'e lin M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519561 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...662L..91A 662, L91

    doi:10.1086/519561 2007

  4. [4]

    R., Gu \'e lin M., Phillips T

    Ag \'u ndez M., Cernicharo J., Pardo J. R., Gu \'e lin M., Phillips T. G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810193 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...485L..33A 485, L33

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810193 2008

  5. [5]

    Ag \'u ndez M., Cernicharo J., Decin L., Encrenaz P., Teyssier D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/790/2/L27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790L..27A 790, L27

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/790/2/l27 2014

  6. [6]

    Altwegg K., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-019-0991-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4..533A 4, 533

    doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0991-9 2020

  7. [7]

    Altwegg K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2440 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.3900A 516, 3900

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2440 2022

  8. [8]

    Aota T., Aikawa Y., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/74 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761...74A 761, 74

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/1/74 2012

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA&A..47..481A 47, 481

    2009

  2. [10]

    M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    Asplund M., Amarsi A. M., Grevesse N., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653A.141A 653, A141

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Bains W., et al., 2021, Astrobiology, 21, 1277

    2021

  4. [12]

    R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913590 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...511A..75B 511, A75

    Benisty M., Tatulli E., M \'e nard F., Swain M. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913590 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...511A..75B 511, A75

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    B., \"O berg K

    Bergner J. B., \"O berg K. I., Walker S., Guzm \'a n V. V., Rice T. S., Bergin E. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab48f9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884L..36B 884, L36

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    B., Burkhardt A

    Bergner J. B., Burkhardt A. M., \"O berg K. I., Rice T. S., Bergin E. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac47a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927....7B 927, 7

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Koelemay L

    Bernal J. J., Koelemay L. A., Ziurys L. M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc87b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...906...55B 906, 55

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    S., Walsh C., Terwisscha van Scheltinga J., van Dishoeck E

    Booth A. S., Walsh C., Terwisscha van Scheltinga J., van Dishoeck E. F., Ilee J. D., Hogerheijde M. R., Kama M., Nomura H., 2021, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-021-01352-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatAs...5..684B 5, 684

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..164B 167, 164

    Booth A. S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167..164B 167, 164

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Broome M., Kama M., Booth R., Shorttle O., 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 3378

    2023

  11. [19]

    Bruderer S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321171 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...559A..46B 559, A46

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    F., Doty S

    Bruderer S., van Dishoeck E. F., Doty S. D., Herczeg G. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118218 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    L., 2003, in Piskunov N., Weiss W

    Castelli F., Kurucz R. L., 2003, in Piskunov N., Weiss W. W., Gray D. F., eds, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres. p. A20 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0405087 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087

    2003 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    M., Vasyunin A., Redaelli E., Bizzocchi L., Fontani F., Caselli P., 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 633, A54

    Chantzos J., Rivilla V. M., Vasyunin A., Redaelli E., Bizzocchi L., Fontani F., Caselli P., 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 633, A54

    2020

  15. [23]

    Chen K., Kama M., Pinilla P., Keyte L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.2049C 527, 2049

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Young K

    De Beck E., Kami \'n ski T., Patel N. A., Young K. H., Gottlieb C. A., Menten K. M., Decin L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321349 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A.132D 558, A132

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    R., Oudmaijer R

    Fairlamb J. R., Oudmaijer R. D., Mendigut \' a I., Ilee J. D., van den Ancker M. E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453..976F 453, 976

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Lewis J

    Fegley B. J., Lewis J. S., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1016/0019-1035(80)90228-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980Icar...41..439F 41, 439

    1980 doi

  19. [27]

    Fern \'a ndez-Ruz M., Jim \'e nez-Serra I., Aguirre J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acf290 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956...47F 956, 47

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    L., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2401 , 725, 2401

    Fitzpatrick E. L., 2010, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2401 , 725, 2401

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    P., Bagnulo S., Wade G

    Folsom C. P., Bagnulo S., Wade G. A., Alecian E., Landstreet J. D., Marsden S. C., Waite I. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20718.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422.2072F 422, 2072

    2012

  22. [30]

    M., Caselli P., Vasyunin A., Palau A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822L..30F 822, L30

    Fontani F., Rivilla V. M., Caselli P., Vasyunin A., Palau A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822L..30F 822, L30

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Fontani F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348219 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A..74F 682, A74

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Gardner E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.1870G 499, 1870

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    T., Widicus Weaver S

    Garrod R. T., Widicus Weaver S. L., 2013, @doi [Chemical Reviews] 10.1021/cr400147g , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ChRv..113.8939G 113, 8939

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    S., et al., 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 655

    Greaves J. S., et al., 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 655

    2021

  27. [35]

    D., Villaver E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245427 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.140G 671, A140

    Guzm \'a n-D \' az J., Montesinos B., Mendigut \' a I., Kama M., Meeus G., Vioque M., Oudmaijer R. D., Villaver E., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245427 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.140G 671, A140

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    B., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700.1299J 700, 1299

    Jenkins E. B., 2009b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700.1299J 700, 1299

    doi

  29. [37]

    B., 2009a, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 1299

    Jenkins E. B., 2009a, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 1299

  30. [38]

    S., Kama M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.4418J 476, 4418

    Jermyn A. S., Kama M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.4418J 476, 4418

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    S., Kama M., 2022, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ac79b9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022RNAAS...6..131J 6, 131

    Jermyn A. S., Kama M., 2022, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/ac79b9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022RNAAS...6..131J 6, 131

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Jim \'e nez-Serra I., Viti S., Qu \'e nard D., Holdship J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacdf2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862..128J 862, 128

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    P., Pinilla P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527094 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    Kama M., Folsom C. P., Pinilla P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527094 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    Kama M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526991 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  35. [43]

    S., Folsom C

    Kama M., Shorttle O., Jermyn A. S., Folsom C. P., Furuya K., Bergin E. A., Walsh C., Keller L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab45f8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885..114K 885, 114

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Keyte L., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-023-01951-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023NatAs...7..684K 7, 684

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    I., Drozdovskaya M

    Keyte L., Kama M., Chuang K.-J., Cleeves L. I., Drozdovskaya M. N., Furuya K., Rawlings J., Shorttle O., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528..388K 528, 388

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    A., Shorttle O., Walsh K

    Krijt S., Kama M., McClure M., Teske J., Bergin E. A., Shorttle O., Walsh K. J., Raymond S. N., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 534, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference S...

    2023

  39. [47]

    A., Stempels H

    Kupka F., Piskunov N., Ryabchikova T. A., Stempels H. C., Weiss W. W., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1051/aas:1999267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&AS..138..119K 138, 119

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    G., Ryabchikova T

    Kupka F. G., Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., Stempels H. C., Weiss W. W., 2000, @doi [Baltic Astronomy] 10.1515/astro-2000-0420 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000BaltA...9..590K 9, 590

    2000 doi

  41. [49]

    Kurucz CD-ROM No

    Kurucz R., 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993KurCD..13.....K 13

    1993

  42. [50]

    L., 2012, Robert L

    Kurucz R. L., 2012, Robert L. Kurucz on-line database of observed and predicted atomic transitions

    2012

  43. [51]

    L., Peytremann E., 1975, SAO Special Report, http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1975SAOSR.362.....K 362, 1

    Kurucz R. L., Peytremann E., 1975, SAO Special Report, http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1975SAOSR.362.....K 362, 1

    1975

  44. [52]

    D., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...326..967L 326, 967

    Landstreet J. D., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...326..967L 326, 967

    1988 doi

  45. [53]

    D., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A.132L 528, A132

    Landstreet J. D., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...528A.132L 528, A132

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    S., et al., 2024, @doi [Meteoritics and Planetary Science] 10.1111/maps.14227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024M&PS...59.2453L 59, 2453

    Lauretta D. S., et al., 2024, @doi [Meteoritics and Planetary Science] 10.1111/maps.14227 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024M&PS...59.2453L 59, 2453

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Lefloch B., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462.3937L 462, 3937

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    P., et al., 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L44

    Lincowski A. P., et al., 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L44

    2021

  49. [57]

    Lique F., Jim \'e nez-Serra I., Viti S., Marinakis S., 2018, @doi [Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions)] 10.1039/C7CP05605B , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PCCP...20.5407L 20, 5407

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    Lodders K., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/375492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...591.1220L 591, 1220

    2003 doi

  51. [59]

    MacKay D. D. S., Charnley S. B., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04429.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.325..545M 325, 545

    2001

  52. [60]

    N., Halfen D

    Milam S. N., Halfen D. T., Tenenbaum E. D., Apponi A. J., Woolf N. J., Ziurys L. M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684..618M 684, 618

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    J., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...242..241M 242, 241

    Millar T. J., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...242..241M 242, 241

    1991

  54. [62]

    J., Bennett A., Herbst E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/229.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.229P..41M 229, 41P

    Millar T. J., Bennett A., Herbst E., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/229.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.229P..41M 229, 41P

    1987 doi

  55. [63]

    M., Beltr \'a n M

    Mininni C., Fontani F., Rivilla V. M., Beltr \'a n M. T., Caselli P., Vasyunin A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476L..39M 476, L39

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006GeCoA..70.5371M 70, 5371

    Morlok A., Bischoff A., Stephan T., Floss C., Zinner E., Jessberger E. K., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006GeCoA..70.5371M 70, 5371

    2006 doi

  57. [65]

    I., Wordsworth R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab46a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..194O 158, 194

    \"O berg K. I., Wordsworth R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab46a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AJ....158..194O 158, 194

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    Pani \'c O., Min M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1175P 467, 1175

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    F., Hogerheijde M

    Pani \'c O., van Dishoeck E. F., Hogerheijde M. R., Belloche A., G \"u sten R., Boland W., Baryshev A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...519A.110P 519, A110

    2010 doi

  60. [68]

    A., 2019, Icarus, 317, 59

    Pasek M. A., 2019, Icarus, 317, 59

    2019

  61. [69]

    Pasek M., Lauretta D., 2008, @doi [Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere] 10.1007/s11084-007-9110-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008OLEB...38....5P 38, 5

    2008 doi

  62. [70]

    A., Dworkin J

    Pasek M. A., Dworkin J. P., Lauretta D. S., 2007, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 1721

    2007

  63. [71]

    H., Percivalle C., Ritson D

    Patel B. H., Percivalle C., Ritson D. J., Duffy C. D., Sutherland J. D., 2015, Nature chemistry, 7, 301

    2015

  64. [72]

    L., \"O berg K

    Piacentino E. L., \"O berg K. I., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac96e2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939...93P 939, 93

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..863P 110, 863

    Pickles A. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PASP..110..863P 110, 863

    1998 doi

  66. [74]

    Pilorget C., et al., 2024, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-024-02366-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024NatAs...8.1529P 8, 1529

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Pinilla P., Birnstiel T., Walsh C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...580A.105P 580, A105

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    A., Sokolov D

    Pirim C., Pasek M. A., Sokolov D. A., Sidorov A. N., Gann R. D., Orlando T. M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014GeCoA.140..259P 140, 259

    2014 doi

  69. [77]

    E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T

    Piskunov N. E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T. A., Weiss W. W., Jeffery C. S., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..112..525P 112, 525

    1995

  70. [78]

    Poch O., et al., 2020, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aaw7462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Sci...367.7462P 367, aaw7462

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    A., Delage T

    Pyerin M. A., Delage T. N., Kurtovic N. T., G \'a rate M., Henning T., Pinilla P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141998 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A.150P 656, A150

    2021 doi

  72. [80]

    P., Amara A., Meyer M

    Quanz S. P., Amara A., Meyer M. R., Kenworthy M. A., Kasper M., Girard J. H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766L...1Q 766, L1

    2013 doi

  73. [81]

    M., Fontani F., Beltr \'a n M

    Rivilla V. M., Fontani F., Beltr \'a n M. T., Vasyunin A., Caselli P., Mart \' n-Pintado J., Cesaroni R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/161 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826..161R 826, 161

    2016 doi

  74. [82]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475L..30R 475, L30

    Rivilla V. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475L..30R 475, L30

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3336 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.1180R 492, 1180

    Rivilla V. M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3336 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.1180R 492, 1180

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    A., Piskunov N

    Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., Kupka F., Weiss W. W., 1997, @doi [Baltic Astronomy] 10.1515/astro-1997-0216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997BaltA...6..244R 6, 244

    1997 doi

  77. [85]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhyS...90e4005R 90, 054005

    2015 doi

  78. [86]

    L., van der Tak F

    Sch \"o ier F. L., van der Tak F. F. S., van Dishoeck E. F., Black J. H., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...432..369S 432, 369

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    W., 1978, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90002-X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978E&PSL..41..128S 41, 128

    Sears D. W., 1978, @doi [Earth and Planetary Science Letters] 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90002-X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978E&PSL..41..128S 41, 128

    1978 doi

  80. [88]

    Sil M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac09f9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....162..119S 162, 119

    2021 doi

  81. [89]

    J., Zhan Z., Hu R., Bains W., 2020, Astrobiology, 20, 235

    Sousa-Silva C., Seager S., Ranjan S., Petkowski J. J., Zhan Z., Hu R., Bains W., 2020, Astrobiology, 20, 235

    2020

  82. [90]

    Szul \'a gyi J., Binkert F., Surville C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac32d1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...924....1S 924, 1

    2022 doi

  83. [91]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1642-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.574..378T 574, 378

    Teague R., Bae J., Bergin E. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1642-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.574..378T 574, 378

    2019 doi

  84. [92]

    R., Anicich V

    Thorne L. R., Anicich V. G., Prasad S. S., Huntress W. T. J., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161977 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...280..139T 280, 139

    1984 doi

  85. [93]

    H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468.1123T 468, 1123

    Tobo a R., K os J., Lique F., Cha asi \'n ski G., Alexander M. H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...468.1123T 468, 1123

    2007 doi

  86. [94]

    Turcotte S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573L.129T 573, L129

    2002 doi

  87. [95]

    Villanueva G., et al., 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 631

    2021

  88. [96]

    A., Bagnulo, S

    Wade G. A., Bagnulo, S. Kochukhov, O. Landstreet, J. D. Piskunov, N. Stift, M. J. 2001, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010735 , 374, 265

    2001 doi

  89. [97]

    Walsh C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791L...6W 791, L6

    2014 doi

  90. [98]

    H., 1987, Science, 235, 1173

    Westheimer F. H., 1987, Science, 235, 1173

    1987

  91. [99]

    L., Downes D., Bieging J., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....71..275W 71, 275

    Wilson T. L., Downes D., Bieging J., 1979, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A&A....71..275W 71, 275

    1979

  92. [100]

    J., Millar T

    Woodall J., Ag \'u ndez M., Markwick-Kemper A. J., Millar T. J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064981 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...466.1197W 466, 1197

    2007 doi

  93. [101]

    B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c0e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..153W 934, 153

    Wurmser S., Bergner J. B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c0e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934..153W 934, 153

    2022 doi

  94. [102]

    Yamaguchi T., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/63.5.L37 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASJ...63L..37Y 63, L37

    2011 doi

  95. [103]

    M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...321L..81Z 321, L81

    Ziurys L. M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...321L..81Z 321, L81

    1987 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.