REVIEW 9 cited by
Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a benchmark self-evolving framework to dynamically evaluate rapidly advancing Large Language Models (LLMs), aiming for a more accurate assessment of their capabilities and limitations. We utilize a multi-agent system to manipulate the context or question of original instances, reframing new evolving instances with high confidence that dynamically extend existing benchmarks. Towards a more scalable, robust and fine-grained evaluation, we implement six reframing operations to construct evolving instances testing LLMs against diverse queries, data noise and probing their problem-solving sub-abilities. With this framework, we extend benchmark datasets of four tasks. Experimental results show a general performance decline in most LLMs against their original results. This decline under our scalable and robust evaluations, alongside our fine-grained evaluation, more accurately reflect models' capabilities. Besides, our framework widens performance discrepancies both between different models and within the same model across various tasks, facilitating more informed model selection for specific tasks (Code and data are available at https://github.com/NanshineLoong/Self-Evolving-Benchmark).
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
Prompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systems
Prompt injection attacks can self-replicate across LLM agents in multi-agent systems, enabling data theft, misinformation, and system disruption while propagating silently.
-
Does Capability Transfer to Subjective Behavior -- and Would Our Instruments Tell Us? A Self-Evolving, Trust-by-Construction Evaluation Paradigm
Self-evolving rubric with anti-gaming fitness reveals that objective capability scaling fails to transfer to subjective LLM behaviors, with advice-restraint as the universal lowest dimension that can regress.
-
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
The paper maps agent memory research via three forms (token-level, parametric, latent), three functions (factual, experiential, working), and dynamics of formation/evolution/retrieval, plus benchmarks and future directions.
-
Automatically Generating Hard Math Problems from Hypothesis-Driven Error Analysis
A hypothesis-driven pipeline generates targeted hard math problems that drop Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct accuracy from 77% on MATH to as low as 45%.
-
BetaWeb: Towards a Blockchain-enabled Trustworthy Agentic Web
BetaWeb promises a blockchain-enabled trustworthy agentic web, but the submitted manuscript body is a different mining-robot paper, leaving the proposal without supporting evidence.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
-
Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
The survey organizes LLM-based multi-agent collaboration mechanisms into a framework with dimensions of actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols, reviews applications across domains, and ident...
-
Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges
A survey that deconstructs LLM agent systems via a methodology-centered taxonomy linking design principles to emergent behaviors, applications, and challenges.
-
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.