Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Projected Covariance Measure for assumption-lean variable significance testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.02039 v4 pith:E3FLIQ26 submitted 2022-11-03 math.ST stat.MEstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH
keywords testingapproachconditionalpowercontrolcovariancedataerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Testing the significance of a variable or group of variables $X$ for predicting a response $Y$, given additional covariates $Z$, is a ubiquitous task in statistics. A simple but common approach is to specify a linear model, and then test whether the regression coefficient for $X$ is non-zero. However, when the model is misspecified, the test may have poor power, for example when $X$ is involved in complex interactions, or lead to many false rejections. In this work we study the problem of testing the model-free null of conditional mean independence, i.e. that the conditional mean of $Y$ given $X$ and $Z$ does not depend on $X$. We propose a simple and general framework that can leverage flexible nonparametric or machine learning methods, such as additive models or random forests, to yield both robust error control and high power. The procedure involves using these methods to perform regressions, first to estimate a form of projection of $Y$ on $X$ and $Z$ using one half of the data, and then to estimate the expected conditional covariance between this projection and $Y$ on the remaining half of the data. While the approach is general, we show that a version of our procedure using spline regression achieves what we show is the minimax optimal rate in this nonparametric testing problem. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach both in terms of maintaining Type I error control, and power, compared to several existing approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis)

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The thesis introduces the Local Covariance Measure test for conditional local independence, the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estimator for efficient covariate adjustment, and the Aalen Covariance Measure for as...

Pith tools