REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Learning for Music
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Our goal is to be able to build a generative model from a deep neural network architecture to try to create music that has both harmony and melody and is passable as music composed by humans. Previous work in music generation has mainly been focused on creating a single melody. More recent work on polyphonic music modeling, centered around time series probability density estimation, has met some partial success. In particular, there has been a lot of work based off of Recurrent Neural Networks combined with Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RNN-RBM) and other similar recurrent energy based models. Our approach, however, is to perform end-to-end learning and generation with deep neural nets alone.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Auto-Regressive vs Flow-Matching: a Comparative Study of Modeling Paradigms for Text-to-Music Generation
Under matched training conditions, auto-regressive models slightly outperform flow-matching on music quality and temporal control, while flow-matching offers faster inference and better inpainting flexibility.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.