pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21204 · v1 · pith:E4POMCIHnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

PIQC: Scalable Distributed Quantum Computing via Photonic Integration of Designed Molecular Quantum Nodes

Anna Aubele , Gregor Bayer , Tim R. Eichhorn , Tobias Hahn , Fedor Jelezko , Paul Mentzel , Philipp Neumann , Matthias Pfender
show 11 more authors
Martin B. Plenio Alex Retzker Simon Roggors Alon Salhov Jochen Scharpf Tobias A. Schaub Nico Striegler Thomas Unden Julia Zolg Sella Brosh Ilai Schwartz
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords molecular qubitsphotonic integrationdistributed quantum computingfault-tolerant quantum computingquantum error correctioncarbene moleculesnuclear spin registers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular quantum nodes integrated into photonic circuits enable a scalable path to distributed fault-tolerant quantum computing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents PIQC as a distributed architecture that connects specially designed carbene molecules serving as quantum nodes through photonic links. These nodes incorporate nuclear spin registers for memory and interface with thin-film lithium niobate circuits, while supporting entanglement protocols that handle high photon loss and error-correction codes adapted for networked hardware. If correct, the approach would allow quantum computers to grow by adding modular photonic connections instead of enlarging single chips. A reader would care because monolithic quantum systems hit fundamental scaling barriers that distributed designs with native photonic interfaces could bypass.

Core claim

PIQC integrates five innovations to scale molecular quantum nodes into a functional quantum computer: carbene molecules in an isosteric host that provide millisecond-coherence electron spins with stable optical interfaces, synthetically placed nuclear labels for fast high-fidelity gates, seamless hybrid integration with thin-film lithium niobate fabrication, heralded entanglement protocols tolerant to 70 percent photon loss, and stairway Floquetification that converts qLDPC codes into Floquet codes using only weight-two measurements.

What carries the argument

The PIQC framework, which unifies designer molecular qubits with hybrid photonic integration and Floquetified error-correction codes to support distributed FTQC.

If this is right

  • Distributed quantum processors can be built by networking molecular nodes rather than scaling monolithic chips.
  • Entanglement distribution remains viable even when up to 70 percent of photons are lost.
  • Syndrome extraction for error correction reduces to simple weight-two Bell-pair measurements.
  • Mature fabrication technologies such as thin-film lithium niobate can be used directly for quantum hardware.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modular nature of photonic links could support incremental expansion of quantum systems similar to classical network growth.
  • Synthetic control over molecular placement might allow custom optimization of nuclear registers for specific algorithms.
  • Validation experiments integrating actual carbene films with lithium niobate devices would test the core integration step.

Load-bearing premise

The rationally designed carbene molecules in an isosteric host can be integrated into hybrid photonic circuits with thin-film lithium niobate while keeping millisecond coherence and high-fidelity gates at scale.

What would settle it

Demonstration that coherence times drop below milliseconds or gate fidelities fall too low for error correction once the molecules are placed in the thin-film lithium niobate photonic environment would falsify the viability claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21204 by Alex Retzker, Alon Salhov, Anna Aubele, Fedor Jelezko, Gregor Bayer, Ilai Schwartz, Jochen Scharpf, Julia Zolg, Martin B. Plenio, Matthias Pfender, Nico Striegler, Paul Mentzel, Philipp Neumann, Sella Brosh, Simon Roggors, Thomas Unden, Tim R. Eichhorn, Tobias A. Schaub, Tobias Hahn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Illustration of a PIQC chip, including the qubit cells, photonic switching layer and BSM stations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The process for generating a unversal two-qubit gate. Heralded entanglement is achieved with the following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

There is a growing consensus that large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) necessitates high-fidelity photonic interconnects to overcome the scaling limits of monolithic architectures. However, most current platforms were not originally designed for native photonic connectivity and require significant engineering overhead. To overcome these fundamental hardware limitations, we recently introduced a rationally designed organic molecule that serves as an ideal quantum node, featuring a robust qubit-photon interface (QPI) and a long-lived nuclear-spin register. In this work, we present PIQC (Photonic Integrated Quantum Circuits), a distributed architecture designed to scale these molecular nodes into a functional quantum computer. The PIQC framework integrates five mutually reinforcing innovations: (i) Designer molecular qubits, i.e. carbene molecules in an isosteric host that provide millisecond-coherence electron spins with high spectral stability and spin-dependent optical emission, (ii) deterministic nuclear registers made of synthetically placed $^{13}$C or $^{14}$N labels that enable fast ($\sim 1~\mu$s), high-fidelity electron-nuclear gates, (iii) hybrid photonic integration, which allows molecular films to seamlessly integrate with existing mature fabrication technologies, e.g. thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN), (iv) heralded entanglement protocols that can tolerate up to 70% photon loss, and (v) stairway Floquetification, i.e. high-rate quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes that are converted into Floquet codes, reducing syndrome extraction to weight-two Bell-pair measurements that match PIQC's networked hardware. PIQC offers a hardware-efficient, commercially viable pathway toward a utility-scale quantum computer based on distributed FTQC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes PIQC, a distributed quantum computing architecture that scales rationally designed carbene molecular qubits (with millisecond electron-spin coherence and spin-dependent optical emission) into a fault-tolerant system. It combines five innovations: designer molecular qubits in isosteric hosts, synthetically placed nuclear-spin registers for ~1 μs high-fidelity gates, hybrid photonic integration with thin-film lithium niobate, heralded entanglement tolerant to 70% loss, and stairway Floquetification that converts high-rate qLDPC codes into Floquet codes using weight-two Bell-pair measurements.

Significance. If the integration assumptions hold, PIQC could provide a hardware-efficient route to utility-scale distributed FTQC by addressing photonic connectivity limits of monolithic platforms. The framework usefully synthesizes recent molecular-node results with established TFLN fabrication and qLDPC/Floquet techniques; credit is given for the parameter-free conceptual structure and the explicit mapping of hardware constraints to code requirements.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hybrid photonic integration (innovation iii)] Hybrid photonic integration section: the assertion that carbene-isosteric-host films can be 'seamlessly' placed on TFLN while retaining millisecond coherence and ~1 μs gates is unsupported by any calculation of strain-induced dephasing, surface electric-field noise, or waveguide scattering loss. This directly affects whether the 70% photon-loss tolerance and overall error budget can close at scale.
  2. [Stairway Floquetification section] Stairway Floquetification description: the reduction of syndrome extraction to weight-two Bell-pair measurements is presented without explicit threshold calculations or resource-overhead comparisons against standard qLDPC decoding under the specific loss and gate-error model of the molecular nodes; this is required to substantiate the claim that the architecture reaches utility-scale FTQC.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'stairway Floquetification' without a one-sentence definition or citation to prior Floquet-code literature, reducing immediate accessibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (where present) would benefit from explicit labels for the five innovations and their interconnections to aid cross-referencing with the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments on the PIQC manuscript. We appreciate the positive assessment of the overall framework and address each major comment below with revisions planned for the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Hybrid photonic integration (innovation iii)] Hybrid photonic integration section: the assertion that carbene-isosteric-host films can be 'seamlessly' placed on TFLN while retaining millisecond coherence and ~1 μs gates is unsupported by any calculation of strain-induced dephasing, surface electric-field noise, or waveguide scattering loss. This directly affects whether the 70% photon-loss tolerance and overall error budget can close at scale.

    Authors: We agree that the hybrid integration claim requires more quantitative support to fully close the error budget. The manuscript presents the integration as a conceptual step based on compatibility between molecular films and mature TFLN processes, without performing explicit calculations of strain dephasing, surface noise, or scattering losses. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph with order-of-magnitude estimates drawn from existing literature on organic-inorganic hybrid spin systems, together with a brief discussion showing how the 70 % loss tolerance of the heralded entanglement protocol supplies margin for these additional error channels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Stairway Floquetification section] Stairway Floquetification description: the reduction of syndrome extraction to weight-two Bell-pair measurements is presented without explicit threshold calculations or resource-overhead comparisons against standard qLDPC decoding under the specific loss and gate-error model of the molecular nodes; this is required to substantiate the claim that the architecture reaches utility-scale FTQC.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the stairway Floquetification section lacks explicit threshold numerics and overhead comparisons under the molecular-node error model. The current text relies on general properties of Floquet codes and high-rate qLDPC constructions without tailoring the analysis to the specific photon-loss and gate-error rates assumed for the carbene nodes. We will revise the section (and add a short supplementary note) to include a basic threshold estimate and a resource-overhead comparison against standard qLDPC decoding using the loss and gate parameters stated in the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to prior molecular design work; PIQC architecture claims remain independent

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "we recently introduced a rationally designed organic molecule that serves as an ideal quantum node, featuring a robust qubit-photon interface (QPI) and a long-lived nuclear-spin register. In this work, we present PIQC ... The PIQC framework integrates five mutually reinforcing innovations: (i) Designer molecular qubits, i.e. carbene molecules in an isosteric host..."

    The PIQC architecture is built directly on the authors' prior introduction of the molecule as the 'ideal quantum node.' While this is a standard background reference and the new claims concern integration and scaling protocols rather than re-deriving the molecule's properties, it constitutes a minor self-citation at the root of the hardware premise.

full rationale

The paper references its own recent introduction of the rationally designed carbene molecule as the foundation for the quantum node. However, the PIQC framework's five innovations—including hybrid photonic integration with TFLN, heralded entanglement protocols, and stairway Floquetification—are presented as new conceptual integrations without any equations or derivations that reduce the scalability claims to self-referential definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains. The central proposal is a hardware architecture outline rather than a closed mathematical derivation that loops back on its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal relies on the prior introduction of the molecular qubit (referenced as recent work) and standard assumptions from quantum optics and error correction; no new free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Molecular films can be integrated with thin-film lithium niobate while preserving qubit properties
    Invoked in the hybrid photonic integration innovation description.
  • domain assumption Heralded entanglement protocols tolerate up to 70% photon loss
    Stated as part of the entanglement protocols innovation.
invented entities (1)
  • Stairway Floquetification of qLDPC codes no independent evidence
    purpose: Convert high-rate qLDPC codes into Floquet codes for weight-two Bell-pair syndrome measurements matching networked hardware
    Introduced as one of the five mutually reinforcing innovations; no independent evidence provided in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5913 in / 1344 out tokens · 29772 ms · 2026-05-21T04:37:13.225448+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The PIQC framework integrates five mutually reinforcing innovations: (i) Designer molecular qubits, i.e. carbene molecules in an isosteric host... (iii) hybrid photonic integration... (iv) heralded entanglement protocols that can tolerate up to 70% photon loss... (v) stairway Floquetification, i.e. high-rate quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes...

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Stairway Floquetification procedure... converts each weight-w stabilizer into a periodic sequence of weight-two measurements

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nature Materials19, 1319–1325 (2020)

    Bourassa, A.et al.Entanglement and control of single nuclear spins in isotopically engineered silicon carbide. Nature Materials19, 1319–1325 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Barral, D.et al.Review of Distributed Quantum Computing: From single QPU to High Performance Quantum Computing.Computer Science Review57, 100747 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic intercon- nects.Physical Review A89(2014)

    Monroe, C. Large-scale modular quantum-computer architecture with atomic memory and photonic intercon- nects.Physical Review A89(2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Development of Quantum Interconnects (QuICs) for Next-Generation Information Technologies

    Awschalom, D. Development of Quantum Interconnects (QuICs) for Next-Generation Information Technologies. PRX Quantum2(2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    M.et al.Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network.Nature629, 573–578 (2024)

    Knaut, C. M.et al.Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network.Nature629, 573–578 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    C.et al.Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network.Nature558, 268–273 (2018)

    Humphreys, P. C.et al.Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network.Nature558, 268–273 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    A Single-Molecule Spin-Photon Interface

    Roggors, S.et al.A Single-Molecule Spin-Photon Interface (2026). ArXiv:2605.10077 [quant-ph], 2605.10077

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    H., Fitzsimons, J

    Nickerson, N. H., Fitzsimons, J. F. & Benjamin, S. C. Freely Scalable Quantum Technologies Using Cells of 5-to-50 Qubits with Very Lossy and Noisy Photonic Links.Physical Review X4, 041041 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Nemoto, K.et al.Photonic Architecture for Scalable Quantum Information Processing in Diamond.Physical Review X4, 031022 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Roggors, S.et al.Optically Detected Magnetic Resonance on Carbene Molecular Qubits.Journal of the American Chemical Society147, 36383–36392 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Waldherr, G.et al.Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register.Nature506, 204–207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond

    Taminiau, T. H., Cramer, J., van der Sar, T., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Hanson, R. Universal control and error correction in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond.Nature Nanotechnology9, 171–176 (2014). 1309.5452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    E.et al.A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute.Physical Review X9, 031045 (2019)

    Bradley, C. E.et al.A Ten-Qubit Solid-State Spin Register with Quantum Memory up to One Minute.Physical Review X9, 031045 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Hu, Y.et al.Integrated electro-optics on thin-film lithium niobate.Nature Reviews Physics7, 237–254 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Barrett, S. D. & Kok, P. Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics. Physical Review A71, 060310 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Nature562, 101–104 (2018)

    Wang, C.et al.Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Nature562, 101–104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Lombardi, P.et al.Triggered emission of indistinguishable photons from an organic dye molecule.Applied Physics Letters118, 204002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Hastings, M. B. & Haah, J. Dynamically Generated Logical Qubits.Quantum5, 564 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    & Broughton, M

    Gidney, C., Newman, M., Fowler, A. & Broughton, M. A Fault-Tolerant Honeycomb Memory.Quantum5, 605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Planar Floquet Codes

    Vuillot, C. Planar Floquet Codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05348v2 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Brown, B. J. A fault-tolerant non-Clifford gate for the surface code in two dimensions.Science Advances6, eaay4929 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    & Pastawski, F

    Jacoby, S., Retzker, A. & Pastawski, F. Stairway Codes: Floquetifying Bivariate Bicycle Codes and Beyond (2026). ArXiv:2603.00228 [quant-ph], 2603.00228

    work page arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits

    Gidney, C. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits (2025). ArXiv:2505.15917 [quant-ph], 2505.15917

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2048

  24. [24]

    & Ekerå, M

    Gidney, C. & Ekerå, M. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits.Quantum 5, 433 (2021)

    work page 2048

  25. [25]

    & Sangouard, N

    Gouzien, É., Ruiz, D., Le Régent, F.-M., Guillaud, J. & Sangouard, N. Performance Analysis of a Repetition Cat Code Architecture: Computing 256-bit Elliptic Curve Logarithm in 9 Hours with 126 133 Cat Qubits.Physical Review Letters131, 040602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Bluvstein, D.et al.A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum computation.Nature649, 39–46 (2026)

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Acharya, R.et al.Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold.Nature638, 920–926 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    W.et al.Demonstration of quantum computation and error correction with a tesseract code

    Reichardt, B. W.et al.Demonstration of quantum computation and error correction with a tesseract code. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04628v2 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Postol, M. S. A Proposed Quantum Low Density Parity Check Code (2001). quant-ph/0108131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Breuckmann, N. P. & Eberhardt, J. N. Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes.PRX Quantum2, 040101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    & Kalachev, G

    Panteleev, P. & Kalachev, G. Degenerate Quantum LDPC Codes With Good Finite Length Performance. Quantum5, 585 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Bravyi, S.et al.High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory.Nature627, 778–782 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits

    Cain, M.et al.Shor’s algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits (2026). ArXiv:2603.28627, 2603.28627. 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Main, D.et al.Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link.Nature638, 383–388 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    V., Guo, X., Breum, C

    Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state.Science366, 369–372 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Zhai, L.et al.Quantum interference of identical photons from remote GaAs quantum dots.Nature Nanotech- nology17, 829–833 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Practical blueprint for low-depth photonic quantum computing with quantum dots

    Chan, M. L., Capatos, A. A., Lodahl, P., Sørensen, A. S. & Paesani, S. Practical blueprint for low-depth photonic quantum computing with quantum dots (2025). ArXiv:2507.16152, 2507.16152

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Riedel, D.et al.Scalable Photonic Quantum Interconnect Platform.Physical Review X16, 011063 (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [39]

    ArXiv:2601.04848 [quant-ph], 2601.04848

    Iuliano, M.et al.Unconditionally teleported quantum gates between remote solid-state qubit registers (2026). ArXiv:2601.04848 [quant-ph], 2601.04848

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    ArXiv:2406.01704, 2406.01704

    Afzal, F.et al.Distributed Quantum Computing in Silicon (2024). ArXiv:2406.01704, 2406.01704

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    T.et al.Developing silicon carbide for quantum spintronics.Applied Physics Letters116, 190501 (2020)

    Son, N. T.et al.Developing silicon carbide for quantum spintronics.Applied Physics Letters116, 190501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Togan, E.et al.Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit.Nature466, 730–734 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    T.et al.Quantum Network Nodes Based on Diamond Qubits with an Efficient Nanophotonic Interface.Physical Review Letters123, 183602 (2019)

    Nguyen, C. T.et al.Quantum Network Nodes Based on Diamond Qubits with an Efficient Nanophotonic Interface.Physical Review Letters123, 183602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    K.et al.Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication.Nature580, 60–64 (2020)

    Bhaskar, M. K.et al.Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication.Nature580, 60–64 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    B.et al.Optical observation of single spins in silicon.Nature607, 266–270 (2022)

    Higginbottom, D. B.et al.Optical observation of single spins in silicon.Nature607, 266–270 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities: Resource Estimates and Mitigations

    Babbush, R.et al.Securing Elliptic Curve Cryptocurrencies against Quantum Vulnerabilities: Resource Esti- mates and Mitigations (2026). ArXiv:2603.28846, 2603.28846

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    R.et al.Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science.Nature Reviews Chemistry4, 490–504 (2020)

    Wasielewski, M. R.et al.Exploiting chemistry and molecular systems for quantum information science.Nature Reviews Chemistry4, 490–504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    L.et al.Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing.Science370, 1309–1312 (2020)

    Bayliss, S. L.et al.Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing.Science370, 1309–1312 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    L.et al.Enhancing Spin Coherence in Optically Addressable Molecular Qubits through Host-Matrix Control.Physical Review X12, 031028 (2022)

    Bayliss, S. L.et al.Enhancing Spin Coherence in Optically Addressable Molecular Qubits through Host-Matrix Control.Physical Review X12, 031028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    C.et al.Universal coherence protection in a solid-state spin qubit.Science369, 1493–1497 (2020)

    Miao, K. C.et al.Universal coherence protection in a solid-state spin qubit.Science369, 1493–1497 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    PIQC: Blueprint for Distributed Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing

    NVision. PIQC: Blueprint for Distributed Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing. Manuscript under preparation

    work page

  52. [52]

    Protecting a nuclear spin from a noisy electron spin in diamond

    Cohen, I., Unden, T., Jelezko, F. & Retzker, A. Protecting a nuclear spin from a noisy electron spin in diamond (2017). ArXiv:1703.01596, 1703.01596

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Nuclear-electron gates for deterministic nuclear spin registers in carbene molecular qubits (2026)

    NVision. Nuclear-electron gates for deterministic nuclear spin registers in carbene molecular qubits (2026). Manuscript under preparation

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet.Nature453, 1023–1030 (2008)

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    & Hanson, R

    Wehner, S., Elkouss, D. & Hanson, R. Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead.Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    E., Taminiau, T

    de Bone, S., Möller, P., Bradley, C. E., Taminiau, T. H. & Elkouss, D. Thresholds for the distributed surface code in the presence of memory decoherence.A VS Quantum Science6, 033801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    & Briegel, H

    Poulsen Nautrup, H., Friis, N. & Briegel, H. J. Fault-tolerant interface between quantum memories and quantum processors.Nature Communications8, 1321 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    C., Paesani, S

    Löbl, M. C., Paesani, S. & Sørensen, A. S. Loss-tolerant architecture for quantum computing with quantum emitters.Quantum8, 1302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    & Lončar, M

    Desiatov, B., Shams-Ansari, A., Zhang, M., Wang, C. & Lončar, M. Ultra-low-loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate.Optica6, 380–384 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    & Lončar, M

    Zhang, M., Wang, C., Cheng, R., Shams-Ansari, A. & Lončar, M. Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate microring resonator.Optica4, 1536–1537 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    13, Issue 2, pp

    Zhu, D.et al.Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate.Advances in Optics and Photonics, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 242-352(2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Boes, A.et al.Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum.Science379, eabj4396 (2023)

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Wang, X.et al.Large-scale quantum dot–lithium niobate hybrid integrated photonic circuits enabling on-chip quantum networking.Nature Materials24, 1898–1905 (2025)

    work page 1905

  64. [64]

    Zhang, M.et al.Electronically programmable photonic molecule.Nature Photonics13, 36–40 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Physical Review Letters104, 123605 (2010)

    Lettow, R.et al.Quantum Interference of Tunably Indistinguishable Photons from Remote Organic Molecules. Physical Review Letters104, 123605 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Alexander, K.et al.A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing.Nature641, 876–883 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    & Plenio, M

    Eisert, J., Jacobs, K., Papadopoulos, P. & Plenio, M. B. Optimal local implementation of nonlocal quantum gates.Physical Review A62, 052317 (2000)

    work page 2000

  68. [68]

    B., Huelga, S

    Plenio, M. B., Huelga, S. F., Beige, A. & Knight, P. L. Cavity-loss-induced generation of entangled atoms. Physical Review A59, 2468–2475 (1999)

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    L., Plenio, M

    Bose, S., Knight, P. L., Plenio, M. B. & Vedral, V. Proposal for Teleportation of an Atomic State via Cavity 13 Decay.Physical Review Letters83, 5158–5161 (1999)

    work page 1999

  70. [70]

    I., García-Fernández, P

    Cabrillo, C., Cirac, J. I., García-Fernández, P. & Zoller, P. Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference.Physical Review A59, 1025–1033 (1999)

    work page 1999

  71. [71]

    Deutsch, D.et al.Quantum Privacy Amplification and the Security of Quantum Cryptography over Noisy Channels.Physical Review Letters77, 2818–2821 (1996)

    work page 1996

  72. [72]

    H.et al.Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels.Physical Review Letters76, 722–725 (1996)

    Bennett, C. H.et al.Purification of Noisy Entanglement and Faithful Teleportation via Noisy Channels.Physical Review Letters76, 722–725 (1996)

    work page 1996

  73. [73]

    Aghaee Rad, H.et al.Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer.Nature638, 912–919 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [74]

    Singh, S.et al.Modular architectures and entanglement schemes for error-corrected distributed quantum com- putation.npj Quantum Information12, 3 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    K., Tipper, D., Nejabati, R., Kaur, E

    Chandra, N. K., Tipper, D., Nejabati, R., Kaur, E. & Seshadreesan, K. P. Distributed Realization of Color Codes for Quantum Error Correction. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), vol. 01, 2482–2492 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Sutcliffe, E., Jonnadula, B., Le Gall, C., Moylett, A. E. & Westoby, C. M. Distributed Quantum Error Correction Based on Hyperbolic Floquet Codes. In2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), vol. 01, 649–657 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant overhead.Quantum Information & Compu- tation14, 1338–1372 (2014)

    Gottesman, D. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant overhead.Quantum Information & Compu- tation14, 1338–1372 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    A., Delfosse, N

    Tremblay, M. A., Delfosse, N. & Beverland, M. E. Constant-Overhead Quantum Error Correction with Thin Planar Connectivity.Physical Review Letters129, 050504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    & Kalachev, G

    Panteleev, P. & Kalachev, G. Asymptotically good Quantum and locally testable classical LDPC codes. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2022, 375–388 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    & Zémor, G

    Leverrier, A. & Zémor, G. Quantum Tanner codes. In2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 872–883 (2022)

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.