Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.00232 v3 pith:E4SCIX7G submitted 2020-10-31 physics.optics

Fundamental limitations of Huygens metasurfaces for optical beam shaping

classification physics.optics
keywords limitationsmetasurfacesfirstfundamentalhuygensopticalsecondspatial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optical dielectric metasurfaces composed of arrayed nanostructures are expected to enable arbitrary spatial control of incident wavefronts with subwavelength spatial resolution. For phase modulation, one often resorts to two physical effects to implement a 2\pi-phase excursion. The first effect relies on guidance by tall nanoscale pillars and the second one exploits resonant confinement by nanoresonators with two degenerate Mie-resonances. The first approach requires high aspect ratios, while the second one, known as Huygens metasurfaces, is much flatter, and thus easier to manufacture. We compare the two approaches, more focusing on conceptual rather than technological issues, and identify fundamental limitations with the latter. We explain the origin of the limitations based on general arguments, such as reciprocity, multimode/monomode operation and symmetry breaking.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.