REVIEW 1 cited by
Training Users Against Human and GPT-4 Generated Social Engineering Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Training Users Against Human and GPT-4 Generated Social Engineering Attacks
read the original abstract
In real-world decision making, outcomes are often delayed, meaning individuals must make multiple decisions before receiving any feedback. Moreover, feedback can be presented in different ways: it may summarize the overall results of multiple decisions (aggregated feedback) or report the outcome of individual decisions after some delay (clustered feedback). Despite its importance, the timing and presentation of delayed feedback has received little attention in cognitive modeling of decision-making, which typically focuses on immediate feedback. To address this, we conducted an experiment to compare the effect of delayed vs. immediate feedback and aggregated vs. clustered feedback. We also propose a Hierarchical Instance-Based Learning (HIBL) model that captures how people make decisions in delayed feedback settings. HIBL uses a super-model that chooses between sub-models to perform the decision-making task until an outcome is observed. Simulations show that HIBL best predicts human behavior and specific patterns, demonstrating the flexibility of IBL models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SoK: Exposing the Generation and Detection Gaps in LLM-Generated Phishing
This SoK paper introduces a nine-stage taxonomy for LLM guardrail breaches in phishing, characterizes evasion and manipulation tactics, and identifies a dynamic-offense versus static-defense asymmetry.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.